[00:00:10]
GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON.
GOOD AFTERNOON TO EVERYONE HERE.
[ 12:45 p.m. - City Council convenes in City Council Chambers in Work Session regarding items for presentation and discussion on such issues that may require in-depth consideration by the City Council. No action will be taken by the City Council in Work Session. ]
IT IS 12:45 ON THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, AND WE ARE HERE TO CONVENE IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR WORK SESSION REGARDING PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING AND A PROPOSED CITY OF LUBBOCK LOGO AND BRANDING PROGRAM.[1. Communications and Marketing - Proposed City of Lubbock Logo and Branding Program]
SO LACEY, YOU HAVE THE DISTINCT PRIVILEGE OF KICKING US OFF TODAY.YES, I'M SORRY, BUT I'VE GOT TO SAY, WELL, I WAS ABOUT TO SAY, I LOVE THAT TANGERINE, BABY.
THANK YOU. WHAT ABOUT MY TIE? THE REST OF YOU ALL LOOK NICE TOO.
MR. MASSENGALE HAS A NEW TIE ON.
WORKING THAT TIE MR. MASSENGALE. [LAUGHTER] LACEY.
WELL, GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
WE'RE HERE FOR SOMETHING FUN THAT THE COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN WORKING ON.
A NEW LOOK FOR THE ORGANIZATION THAT WILL TAKE US INTO THE FUTURE.
A BOLD, STRONG BRAND THAT IS 100% THE CITY OF LUBBOCK'S.
SO A BRAND IS MORE THAN A LOGO LIKE WE KNOW IT IS ABOUT OUR CULTURE, OUR LOCAL PRIDE, AND BESIDES OUR STAFF, IT'S OFTEN THE FIRST THING PEOPLE SEE ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION.
AND OUR BRAND IDEA IS WHAT THE ORGANIZATION SHOULD REPRESENT.
THE CITY OF LUBBOCK IS A SERVICE FOCUSED ORGANIZATION STAFFED BY UNIQUE AND TALENTED INDIVIDUALS WHO CARE ABOUT THE COMMUNITY OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL GROUNDBREAKERS WHOM THEY SERVE.
SO HERE IS WHERE WE ARE TODAY, AND WE'VE HAD AN ITERATION OF THIS SINCE 2008.
THIS ISN'T IT. THIS ISN'T THE NEW ONE.
THIS IS JUST THE. THIS IS TO CLEANSE OUR PALATE.
OKAY, HERE IS THE NEW CITY OF LUBBOCK LOGO.
THIS WILL BE OUR PRIMARY LOGO.
THE ONE THAT WILL BE ON NEW WATER TOWERS AND WHAT PUBLICATIONS AND MEDIA OUTLETS WILL USE.
OKAY, HERE IS THE SECONDARY DEPARTMENTAL LOGO AND THE NEW COLOR PALETTE.
THESE WILL BE USED WITH DEPARTMENTAL NAMES ON VEHICLES AND EMAIL SIGNATURES WITH THE SECONDARY LOGO.
SO HERE IS OUR PRIMARY LOGO IN A LOCKUP WITH THE CHAMBER'S COMMUNITY LOGO.
THIS CAN BE USED FOR COLLABORATIONS WITH COMMUNITY PARTNERS, AND HERE'S HOW IT WILL LOOK IN THE WILD ON VEHICLES APPAREL. DIFFERENT MARKETING SWAG.
NEW ONES OR ELEVATED STORAGE TANKS.
LAUREN IS GOING TO HAND YOU OUT SOME PERSONALIZED EXAMPLES SO YOU CAN SEE HOW IT WILL LOOK CLOSER.
LACEY, MISS JOY IS GOING TO ASK A QUESTION.
OKAY. THE LOGO IS GOING TO BE THAT LARGE ON THE PICKUP TRUCK.
NO, THEY CAN BE SCALABLE. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU COULD BE ABLE TO SEE THEM.
DON'T KNOW IF HE'LL BE THAT BOLD.
JUST MAKE SURE YOU COULD SEE IT IN THE PRESENTATION.
OKAY. AND THAT IS OUR PRESENTATION.
THIS LOGO WAS CREATED BY OUR PREVIOUS GRAPHIC DESIGNER, ALICIA RODRIGUEZ, IN COLLABORATION WITH LAUREN ADAMS AND MYSELF, AND ALONG WITH OUR NEW GRAPHIC DESIGNER, ANNA BROOKS, WHO IS HERE TODAY.
THIS WAS 100% CREATED IN-HOUSE.
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS OURS AND WE ALREADY HAVE PRELIMINARY TRADEMARKING PERMISSIONS.
[00:05:02]
SO IT IS TRULY JUST THE CITY OF LUBBOCK'S.SO I'M HERE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY.
ANY QUESTIONS OF LACEY? MR. ATKINSON, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU FOR A MINUTE.
CITY COUNCIL. HOPE YOU ALL ENJOYED THAT.
AND AGAIN, SPECIAL THANKS TO LACEY AND TO HER TEAM.
COLLECTIVELY, THEY ALL DID GOOD.
COUNCIL, WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU IS THIS WE DON'T HAVE IT UP FOR ACTION TODAY.
WE WANTED TO GET THIS IN FRONT OF YOU AND HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT IT.
WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER PUTTING IT ON YOUR AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER THE 12TH TO POSSIBLY MOVE TO ADOPT IT AND YOU WOULD HAVE A NEW AND ORIGINAL CITY LOGO THAT IS ALREADY PROTECTED, BUT ALSO ALLOWING YOU TIME IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, SUGGESTIONS TO GET WITH LACEY AND HER TEAM THERE.
THEY'RE THE PROS AT THIS, NOT ME.
A QUESTION THAT WILL INEVITABLY COME UP WHEN YOU LOOK AT DOING A NEW LOGO OR CHANGING A LOGO.
OH, MY GOODNESS. WHAT DID THIS COST? WHAT WILL IT COST YOU TO USE IT? AND I THINK ALL OF THOSE ARE GOOD AND FAIR QUESTIONS.
IT'S NOT GOING TO HAVE SOMETHING COME AT US AFTER THE FACT.
AND NUMBER TWO, NOW THAT WE'VE SHOWED IT PUBLICLY TO PROTECT IT SO THAT IT DOESN'T RUN AWAY FROM US AS WE MOVE FORWARD, WE'RE LOOKING RIGHT NOW AT APPROXIMATELY $4,000 THAT'S BEEN SPENT AND THAT'S IT ON THIS DEAL.
ASSUMING THE COUNCIL ULTIMATELY WILL ADOPT THIS, HOW DO WE PUT IT INTO PLAY? HOW DO WE USE IT? AND WHAT ARE THOSE COSTS? AND WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU THAT FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF ITEMS. USING THE NEW LOGO IS THE SAME EXACT COST AS AN OLD LOGO.
WE WILL HAVE LOGOS AND MARKINGS ON OUR PICKUPS AND OUR CARS AND ALL OF THESE THINGS.
NEW ONES GET THE NEW ONE AS THE DECALS ON THE OLD ONES BEGIN TO WEAR OUT.
WE'LL OF COURSE, REPLACE THEM.
YOU DID SEE THE EXAMPLE OF THE WATER TOWER AND I REALLY LIKED THAT.
BUT YOUR WATER TOWERS TODAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN PAINTED, THE ONES YOU HAVE.
SO WE STILL HAVE ONE MORE TO COME.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO GO UP AND TAKE THE LOGOS OFF OF THE ONES THAT WE HAVE.
THOSE WILL STAY UNTIL IT'S TIME TO DO THE TANK REPAINTING AND WE'LL CONVERT IT OVER THEN.
BUSINESS CARDS, STATIONERY, LETTERHEAD.
THOSE ARE ALL PRODUCED IN-HOUSE IN OUR PRINT SHOP.
AND YOU JUST QUIT PRODUCING WITH YOUR OLD LOGO AND YOU START PRODUCING WITH YOUR NEW ONE.
SO I WOULD LEAVE YOU WITH THAT.
TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. IF NOT, ENCOURAGE YOU TO GET WITH LACEY AND HER TEAM.
AND IDEALLY YOU'LL SEE THIS BACK ON THE 12TH OF SEPTEMBER.
ALL RIGHT. WE'LL START WITH MISS JOY.
I THINK THERE'S A FEW QUESTIONS.
YES. WHEN WE STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD, THE AIRPORT WAS WORKING ON A LOGO BECAUSE WE JUST REMODELED IT AND IT LOOKS REALLY NICE.
AND THEN EVERYBODY FOUND OUT THAT WE WEREN'T THE ONLY PEOPLE LOOKING FOR A LOGO.
THE CHAMBER DIDN'T KNOW YOU WERE LOOKING FOR A LOGO.
SO ARE WE GOING TO DO ANYTHING DIFFERENT FOR THE AIRPORT? AND I'M NOT SAYING CHANGE THIS BASIC, BUT ARE WE GOING TO DO ANYTHING DIFFERENT ON THE SIGNS AT THE AIRPORT, THINGS LIKE THAT? I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.
SO WE'LL HAVE TO TIE ALL THOSE BACK TOGETHER AND I'LL JUST HAVE TO GET YOU MORE INFORMATION.
MR. MCBRAYER? YES. WHAT WAS THAT YOU MENTIONED 2008.
ARE YOU SAYING THAT'S WHEN WE ADOPTED THE LOGO WE'VE GOT NOW? IS THAT 2008? AND WHAT WAS THE GENESIS OF THE DISCUSSION TO CHANGE IT? I MEAN, WHAT PROMPTED YOU ALL TO SAY, OKAY, WE NEED TO CHANGE FROM THIS ONE TO A NEW ONE? A, IT'S NOT ACTUALLY OURS.
I MEAN, JUST IT WAS THE CHAMBER STARTED THEIR TALKS ABOUT DOING THE COMMUNITY BRANDING AND I'D ACTUALLY BEEN WANTING TO CHANGE IT SINCE I GOT HERE TO START THAT CONVERSATION FIVE YEARS AGO.
AND IT'S JUST BEEN A QUIET RUMBLING AND SO WE JUST DECIDED TO.
IT'S AN EXCITING TIME IN LUBBOCK WITH THE GROWTH AND EVERYTHING'S JUST NICE WAY TO MOVE FORWARD.
GENERAL DISSATISFACTION WE ALL YEAH. YES, SIR.
MS. PATTERSON HARRIS. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. I HAVE A, MS. LACEY, I HAVE SEVERAL THINGS.
[00:10:01]
SOME COMMENTS AND SOME QUESTIONS ON THE PRESENTATION.YEAH. WAS THIS JUST THESE JUST OPTIONS OR WAYS TO DO THINGS? YES. SO THIS IS OUR SECONDARY LOGO.
OKAY. BUT THE MAIN LOGO WILL STAY IN THE COLORS OF NAVY AND RED.
OKAY, COOL. WHAT I WANT TO SAY IS THAT MR. MCBRAYER, THANK YOU FOR ASKING, BECAUSE I WAS LIKE, WELL, HOW LONG HAVE WE HAD THE OTHER ONE? AND I GUESS I COME TO NOTICE THEM BEING CONNECTED WITH THE CITY.
I KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND I'M NOT SURE IF OUR CITIZENS REALLY KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN THEY SEE THAT LOGO ON OUR VEHICLES AND WHAT HAVE YOU, BECAUSE IT'S REALLY NOT REAL NOTICEABLE.
THOSE COLORS ARE NOT RIGHT, ESPECIALLY ON A WHITE VEHICLE.
BUT I THINK THIS WOULD REALLY GIVE IT A MORE OF A POP, IF YOU WILL, AND A FLAIR AND MAKE IT NOTICEABLE TO OUR CITIZENS, BECAUSE FRANKLY, I'M KIND OF WITH YOU.
I HAVE NEVER REALLY BEEN A FAN OF THE OTHER, BUT NOBODY ASKED ME.
[LAUGHTER] SO AND MY OTHER THING, I GUESS MR. JARRETT WOULD BE TO YOU.
I'M NOT SURE HOW MUCH WE HAVE PRINTED OR WITH THE OLD LOGO.
WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, TAKING A BIG BARREL AROUND AND HAVING EVERYBODY DUMP THE OLD LOGO.
YOU KNOW HOW LONG THAT IS. WOULD THAT BE ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS AND SOME CHANGE.
WHAT WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT IS AT THE VERY END OF 2024, A LITTLE PAST THAT, THE END OF 2024 BEING THE GRACE PERIOD OF GETTING EVERYTHING CHANGED OVER.
ALL RIGHTY. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
MISS PATTERSON HARRIS. I THINK THERE WAS SOME SPECIFICITY TO THAT 8 MONTHS AND SOME CHANGE.
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO LACEY AND HER TEAM.
AND I THINK THAT BRANDING IS IMPORTANT TO OUR CITY.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO ANY ORGANIZATION.
AND SO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HARD WORK.
ALL RIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MR. ATKINSON? IF YOU DO HAVE QUESTIONS, YOU'RE WELCOME TO GET WITH LACEY AND THE STAFF AND MAKE SUGGESTIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS.
AND WE MAY BE HEARING FROM OTHERS AS WELL.
SO. WITH THAT, WE WILL NEXT MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM 1.2.
[2. Presentation and discussion of the Proposed FY 2023-24 Operating Budget and Capital Program, and discuss all funds of the City, including but not limited to General Fund, Debt Service Fund, Internal Services, Enterprise Funds, Special Revenue Funds, Component Units, Related Entities, Debt and Debt Obligations, Capital Improvement Program, current and proposed American Rescue Plan Act Funds and uses, and related and associated items; and take action to direct the City Manager to make changes to said Budget.]
THANK YOU, MAYOR. WE CAN GO QUICKLY ON THIS.THIS, OF COURSE, IS YOUR BUDGET LANGUAGE.
HAVE TWO ITEMS JUST TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION TODAY.
WANT TO FOLLOW UP ONE A BIT OF A CHANGE.
AT OUR PRIOR COUNCIL MEETING, STAFF WAS INSTRUCTED TO GO BACK AND SEE IF WE COULD COME UP WITH A QUARTER POINT THAT WOULD ALLOW YOUR PUBLIC SAFETY AND NON PUBLIC SAFETY RAISES TO ALL BE 4% FLAT THANKS TO BLUE AND HIS TEAM.
I WILL TELL YOU WHERE THE DOLLARS CAME FROM.
THAT'S BASICALLY WHERE WE FUND LUBBOCK 101.
THOSE DOLLARS HAD BEEN UPPED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO, THINKING WE MIGHT TRY TO DO IT TWO TIMES A YEAR.
THE FIRST FEW YEARS THAT WE DID IT.
THE SECOND IS $37,000 FROM A CREDIT CARD CHARGES LINE ITEM AND BUILDING SAFETY.
I DON'T THINK WE DISCUSSED IT DIRECTLY WHEN WE WERE PRESENTING THE BUDGET, BUT COUNCIL HAD INSTRUCTED STAFF WAY BACK TO FIND A WAY TO START TRYING TO RECOVER SOME OF THOSE CREDIT CARD JANUARY WITH OUR NEW MERCHANT SERVICE AGREEMENT.
SO COMES OUT OF THOSE TWO OPERATING ACCOUNTS.
QUESTIONS ON THAT ONE AND I'LL JUMP TO THE SECOND.
[00:15:04]
OKAY. MISS JOY.YEAH, IT'S JUST A HAIR UNDER 120.
THAT'S WHERE IT'S GOING TO COME OUT.
AND THERE'S KIND OF TWO STEPS TO THIS.
COUNCIL IS AWARE THAT FIRE STATION 20, OF COURSE, IS THE NEXT FIRE STATION.
AND THAT STATION WAS RECENTLY BID.
NOT A SURPRISE BASED ON EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT.
THAT STATION CAME IN HIGHER THAN IT WAS ESTIMATED TO COME IN AT.
WHAT WE NOW SUGGEST WE DO IS CANCEL THOSE TWO FIRE TRUCKS FOR NEXT YEAR.
PER THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THIS IS NOT GOING TO CAUSE US AN ISSUE.
THESE WERE KIND OF GET AHEAD TRUCKS.
SO IT WILL NOT CAUSE US AN ISSUE WITH HAVING TRUCKS IN THE FLEET TOO LONG AND IT WILL NOT LEAD US TO WHAT I WOULD CALL A DOUBLE UP YEAR THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COVER IN THE FUTURE. SO PULL THOSE TWO OUT.
YOU'VE GOT 4 MILLION IN EXPENSE BUDGETED THROUGH THAT TAX NOTE, PUT 3 MILLION BACK INTO THE CAPITAL PROJECT TO GET FIRE STATION 20 COMPLETED, WHICH WILL INCLUDE WHAT I WOULD CALL LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL OF GETTING THAT GOING.
THE ONLY EXCEPTION TO THAT IS GOING TO BE OUR SELF ACTIVATED STOPLIGHT THAT WILL GO ON THE STREET AND THAT WILL ACTUALLY GO INTO THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING BUDGET FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR'S 400 DAY CONSTRUCTION CYCLE.
THE SECOND PHASE OF THAT, JUST BASED ON WE NEED THINGS TO GET DONE AND GET DONE AS QUICK AS WE CAN.
COUNCIL, WE'D LIKE TO COME TO YOU IN SEPTEMBER AND BASICALLY DO A BUDGET AMENDMENT BACKWARDS INTO THAT CURRENT CAPITAL PROJECTS SO WE CAN GO AHEAD AND GET THAT THAT BID AWARDED AND GET IT STARTED.
SO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT.
JARRETT THAT IS, THOSE MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES.
AND THEN YOU SAID 4 MILLION TOTAL.
THERE'S A 4 MILLION EXPENSE IN NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET.
RIGHT. FUNDED THROUGH TAX NOTES.
WE'RE GOING TO TAKE 3 MILLION OF THAT AND AMEND IT INTO THE CURRENT PROJECT TO AWARD STATION 20.
SO IT'S A NET REDUCTION OF A MILLION.
AND THAT PUTS US EVEN AS WHAT YOUR PROPOSED BUDGET IS TODAY AT THE 0.48002.
YES. IT WILL NOT NOT IMPACT THAT.
YEAH, I THINK YOU SAID THE FIRST ONE IT WOULDN'T IMPACT.
OKAY. IF IT DID ANYTHING, IT WOULD MOVE IT SLIGHTLY DOWNWARD.
SO, MR. ATKINSON, THAT BID IS $1 MILLION DOLLARS MORE THAN WE ANTICIPATED.
IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? A LITTLE OVER TWO.
SO WHERE'S THE OTHER MILLION? YOU'RE GOING, OH, WHY THE 3 MILLION AMENDMENT INSTEAD OF THE 2 MILLION AMENDMENT? YES. GOOD QUESTION. AND I HOPE I BROUGHT THAT PRINT OUT WITH ME.
SO WE HAVE TO HAVE A COUPLE OF SPECIALIZED CONSULTANTS.
YOUR NEW PUBLIC BUILDINGS HAVE TO BE CERTIFIED AS A STORM SHELTER.
YOU HAVE SOME OF YOUR AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT, YOUR SECURITY EQUIPMENT, THINGS LIKE THAT THAT GO IN IT, AND THEN A BUNCH OF THE FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES AND THAT KIND OF STUFF. THAT'S THE PHRASE LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL.
THAT IS THE PHRASE LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL.
THAT'S THE ADDITIONAL MILLION.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON AGENDA ITEM 1.2.
YES. IT WILL NOT TAKE THE RATES UP IN ANY FASHION, BUT WE'LL CHECK TO SEE IF IT'LL GO DOWN.
[00:20:01]
SO WE DON'T GET OFF CYCLE TOO MUCH FOR EQUIPMENT AND THE APPARATUS.THEY WILL COME BACK IN ON THE 25 BUDGET.
SO WE'RE WORKING TOWARDS THE 24 TODAY AND WE'LL PICK IT UP THIS TIME NEXT YEAR.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THOSE PRESENTATIONS AT THIS TIME.
[2. Executive Session]
IT IS 1:05 CITY COUNCIL WILL HOLD AN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSULTING WITH CITY STAFF REGARDING THE FOLLOWING PENDING OR CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND TO HOLD CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY UNDER SECTION 551.071 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.THE PURCHASE EXCHANGE LEASE OR VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY UNDER SECTION 551.072 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE AND PERSONNEL MATTERS UNDER SECTION 551.074 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.
WE WILL BE IN RECESS IN EXECUTIVE SESSION AND WE ANTICIPATE BEGINNING PROMPTLY AT 2 P.M.
YES, MA'AM. IS THAT THE ONE NO, I AM. I'M JUST WAITING FOR CHRISTY.
[ 2:00 p.m. - City Council reconvenes in Open Session in City Council Chambers.]
GOOD AFTERNOON.THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. MASSENGALE. MS. PATTERSON HARRIS.
IT IS 2:02, AND THIS IS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST OF 2023 AND WE ARE GLAD TO BE HERE THIS AFTERNOON FOR OUR REGULAR CITY COUNCIL. WE STARTED AT 12:45 WITH THE EXEC SESSION EXCUSE ME WITH THE WORK SESSION, AND THEN WE JUST FINISHED UP AN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
SO NOW WE WILL BEGIN OUR REGULAR AGENDA.
[1. Invocation]
AND TODAY WE ARE HONORED AND PRIVILEGED TO HAVE REVEREND PAUL CARPENTER WITH THE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH HERE TODAY.REVEREND CARPENTER, IF YOU WILL STEP FORWARD, IF EVERYONE WOULD PLEASE REMOVE YOUR CAPS AND STAND.
AND SO IF YOU WILL REMAIN STANDING AFTER THAT, REVEREND.
GRACIOUS AND HOLY FATHER, WE BOW BEFORE YOU TODAY AND WE THANK YOU THAT YOU ARE STILL ON YOUR THRONE AND THAT YOU LOVE TO RULE IN PROCESSES THAT SEEM LIKE THEY'RE RANDOM.
YOU CLOAK YOUR SOVEREIGN POWER AND YOUR WILL FORWARD THROUGH DIALOG, THROUGH VOTING, THROUGH TIME.
AND TODAY, LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR THE IMPORTANT WORK THAT'S GOING TO BE DONE HERE TODAY.
WE ASK A BLESSING OVER EVERYONE HERE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS HOW LOVED THEY ARE BY YOU, THAT YOUR SPIRIT WOULD BLESS AND TOUCH EACH OF OUR MINDS AND HEARTS, THAT WE WOULD SHOW EACH OTHER RESPECT AND THAT ULTIMATELY THE DECISIONS THAT ARE MADE GLORIFY YOU AND ARE IN LINE WITH YOUR WILL FOR OUR GREAT CITY.
AND WE THANK YOU, LORD, THAT WE GET TO BE PART OF THIS GREAT COMMUNITY.
WE PRAY THIS IN THE NAME OF JESUS, YOUR SON.
IF YOU WILL REMAIN STANDING AND JOIN US AS WE
[2. Pledges of Allegiance]
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG; I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE, TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE.
[4. Citizen Comments - According to Lubbock City Council Rules, any citizen wishing to appear in-person before a regular meeting of the City Council, regarding any matter posted on the City Council Agenda below, shall complete the sign-up form provided at the meeting, no later than 2:00 p.m. on August 22, 2023. Citizen Comments provide an opportunity for citizens to make comments and express a position on agenda items. ]
ALL RIGHT. FIRST, WE HAVE OUR AGENDA ITEM 4.[00:25:03]
AGENDA ITEM FOUR IS CITIZEN COMMENTS.THIS IS A TIME FOR ANYONE TO DISCUSS OR HAS A DISCUSSION OR MAKE A COMMENT ON AN AGENDA ITEM.
THEY ARE ALLOWED TO COME FORWARD AND HAVE THREE MINUTES TO MAKE SAID AGENDA ITEM.
I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT IF SOMEONE IS INTENDING TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM THAT IS NOT RELATED TO THE AGENDA ITEM, I WILL IMMEDIATELY CUT YOU OFF AND ASK YOU TO COME FORWARD AT SOME OTHER TIME.
PARTICULARLY WHEN IT COMES TO AGENDA ITEM 6.26 AND 6.27.
WHEN YOU STEP FORWARD, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS.
THE AGENDA ITEM YOU WISH TO SPEAK ABOUT, AND YOU WILL HAVE 2.5 MINUTES BEFORE MR. JIMMY OVER HERE RINGS A BELL AND THAT WILL GIVE YOU YOUR 30S.
MY NAME IS DIANE TAYLOR AND I'M ONE OF THE RN'S AT LUBBOCK ADULT DAY CENTER.
AND I DO WANT TO TALK ABOUT PUBLIC TRANSIT.
HOWEVER, IT IS JUST CONCERNING THE CITY ACCESS PORTION OF THAT, JUST SO YOU KNOW.
SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, I DO WANT YOU TO REALIZE IT TOOK A LOT.
WE BROUGHT SOME OF OUR CLIENTS HERE AND IT TOOK A LOT FOR THESE PEOPLE TO SHOW UP AT THIS MEETING.
WHEN YOU'RE DISABLED OR YOU TAKE CARE OF A PERSON THAT IS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS AND YOU CHOOSE TO ADVOCATE FOR THEM, THE THREAT OF RETALIATION IS ALWAYS A CONSIDERATION. AND I MENTION THIS TO BRING IT OUT IN THE OPEN BECAUSE I'VE LET THEM KNOW THE CITY OF LUBBOCK WOULD NEVER DO SUCH A THING.
AND I EXPECT THE SAME FOR MY BUSINESS.
AT LUBBOCK ADULT DAY CENTER WE HAVE A VARIETY OF PATIENTS THAT YOU ASSIST US WITH.
I'M AWARE OF THE DISCUSSION AND AGAIN, I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO KEEP THIS ON POINT FOR ITEM 626 AND 627 AND NOT DEVIATE FROM THOSE AGENDA ITEMS, NOT WHAT ? NOT A DEVIATE FROM THOSE AGENDA ITEMS THAT YOU WISH TO.
I DON'T FEEL I AM DEVIATING FROM THOSE AGENDA ITEMS. THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE WITH THEM IS WE ARE RELYING ON THEM FOR OUR CLIENTS.
WE'RE TRYING TO ADVOCATE FOR PEOPLE THAT CAN'T SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
WE ARE TRYING TO ADVOCATE THAT THEY GET PICKED UP ON TIME, THEY GET TAKEN HOME ON TIME.
THEY'RE NOT TRANSPORTED ON BUSSES THAT ARE OVER 100 DEGREES INSIDE THE BUS.
MANY, MANY OF YOU WOULD SUFFER IF IT WAS 100 DEGREES.
SO I DO BELIEVE, MR. PAYNE, THAT I AM SPEAKING TO THE TRANSPORTATION ISSUE BECAUSE AS I READ IT, YOU'RE CONSIDERING TURNING OVER THE ENTIRE MANAGEMENT TO THE TEAM. IT'S IN FORT WORTH, BUT I BELIEVE IT'S BASED IN ANOTHER COUNTRY.
DO YOU AGREE WITH ME? SO LET ME CLEAR LET ME CLARIFY.
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE DOING THAT AND I WILL LET YOU PROCEED.
SO I JUST WOULD LIKE YOU TO KNOW A LITTLE HISTORY.
I'VE DEALT WITH CITIBUS FOR 23 YEARS AND UNTIL THREE YEARS AGO THE SERVICE COULD NOT BE BEAT.
I DO UNDERSTAND THE CITY HAS GROWN AND I KNOW THERE'S GROWING PAINS.
CITIBUS HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED THIS.
I NOR MY STAFF WORK FOR CITIBUS.
SOMEHOW WE'VE BECOME YOUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT.
WE ARE APPROXIMATELY 20% OF YOUR CITY ACCESS RIDES DAILY, 20%.
SO WE'RE FIELDING A LOT OF CALLS FOR CITIBUS BECAUSE THEY CALL US TO COMPLAIN BECAUSE THEY'RE AFRAID TO CALL CITY ACCESS BECAUSE THEY DON'T GET A RESPONSE OR THEY HAVE BEEN HUNG UP ON.
SO WE'RE NOW YOUR CITY, YOUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT, SO WE'RE FIELDING MANY CALLS FOR YOU.
WE TAKE CALLS ON A DAILY BASIS.
THEY RANGE FROM COMPLAINTS THAT THE AIR CONDITIONERS DO NOT WORK ON THE BUS.
AND SOMETIMES WE HAVE TO ASSIST WITH OUR PATIENTS.
WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE DOWN SYNDROME POST RESIDUAL EFFECTS FROM STROKE.
WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE PARALYZED, BLIND AND DEAF.
WE RUN THE GAMUT OF DIAGNOSES.
I DON'T JUST TAKE CARE OF PEOPLE THAT CAN TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES.
SO HAVING SAID THAT, THE CALLS RANGE FROM THE AIR CONDITIONERS NOT WORKING.
LAST NIGHT IT WAS LIKE THREE HOURS LATE BEFORE SOMEONE GOT HOME.
OUR PEOPLE ARE ON HIGH, POTENT MEDICATIONS.
THEY NEED TO BE DEALT WITH ON A TIMELY BASIS.
WE HAVE PEOPLE THAT ALL THREE PEOPLE COME TO THE CENTER.
THEY ALL THREE LIVE AT THE SAME HOUSE.
THEY DON'T GET PICKED UP AT THE SAME TIME, HOURS IN BETWEEN.
[00:30:03]
SO THESE DON'T THESE ISSUES DON'T AFFECT MY BOTTOM LINE.SO HOW THEY AFFECT ME IS THAT MY PATIENTS ARE NOT BEING CARED FOR.
I OWN LUBBOCK ADULT DAY CENTER.
WHEN SOMEONE COMES IN WITH BRUISES, BANGS AND CUTS, I CALL APS.
SO NOW I'M TRYING TO TALK TO YOU.
I ATTEMPTED TO CALL BILL HOWERTON.
I ATTEMPTED TO CALL HIM, NEVER GOT A CALL BACK.
AND DAVID HAS SPOKEN WITH JARRETT ATKINSON.
SO THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE YOU TO KNOW.
I CHALLENGE EACH OF YOU, TAKE A RIDE ON CITIBUS AT 2 TO 2:30 IN THE AFTERNOON AND GET ON ONE OF THE ONES THAT STARTS WITH NUMBER 16 BECAUSE THEY'RE THE OLD ONES AND THE AC'S DON'T WORK. THANK YOU, MISS TAYLOR.
I'M A REGISTERED NURSE AT LUBBOCK ADULT DAY CENTER AS WELL.
22 OF THEM WERE PAST THEIR 30 MINUTE WINDOW OF BEING LATE, SO THAT'S 45% OVER 30 MINUTES LATE.
AT THAT POINT THEY SAY YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY FOR THE RIDE.
I CONTINUE TO PAY FOR THE RIDES BECAUSE I DON'T WANT ANYTHING BAD TO BECOME FOR THE CLIENTS.
THAT BEING SAID, WE LIKE DIANE SAID, WE'VE REACHED OUT TO THEM.
WE CAN NEVER GET A CALL BACK FROM ANYONE.
MR. ATKINSON WAS GOING TO LOOK INTO THINGS FOR ME.
I HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM HIM, BUT I DON'T KNOW.
I JUST. I WANT COMMUNICATION IS ALL I WANT FROM THE CITY AND FROM CITIBUS MAINLY.
BUT I THINK THAT'S PRETTY MUCH ALL I'VE HAD.
I WANTED TO TOUCH ON. BUT, YOU KNOW, I HAVE SIGNED STATEMENTS FROM INDIVIDUALS THAT TAKE CARE OF PEOPLE SAYING THEY BROUGHT THEIR 77 YEAR OLD CLIENT HOME ON A BUS IN 107 DEGREE WEATHER.
AND THE BUS DRIVER TOLD THEM, MY AC DOESN'T WORK.
SO I JUST WANT TO BRING THIS TO THE ATTENTION.
I DON'T KNOW WHO TO REACH OUT TO.
WE'RE LOOKING FOR GUIDANCE. WE'RE LOOKING FOR HELP FOR THE CLIENTS THAT CAN'T SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. TAYLER. EDDIE KIRKPATRICK.
MR. MAYOR, MAYOR PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
THANK YOU ALL FOR LISTENING TO US.
THANK YOU FOR MAYOR, FOR TRYING TO BE FAIR TO LISTEN TO THE PROBLEMS. I HAVE NO DOG IN THIS RACE EXCEPT I LIVE WITH THE LADY THAT JUST TALKED TO YOU.
AND SHE'S THE LOVE OF MY LIFE.
AND I HATE TO SEE I'VE SEEN THE PROBLEMS THAT THEY'VE DEALT WITH.
MY NAME IS EDDIE KIRKPATRICK, BY THE WAY.
I'VE SEEN THE PROBLEMS THEY'VE DEALT WITH.
WHEN DIANE AND I FIRST STARTED DATING, SHE COULDN'T.
AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT'S HAPPENED WITH CITIBUS.
I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE TRANSIT OR THE CITIBUS.
CITY ACCESS PARATRANSIT TRANSPORTATION ON DEMAND.
TEXAS TECH SUBSYSTEM SPECIAL SERVICES FOR CHARTERS AND SPORTING EVENTS.
AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S PLACES THAT CITIBUS MAKING MONEY OTHER THAN THIS.
I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THE FOLKS THAT CAN'T SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES UNTIL I MET DIANE.
AND YOU GUYS ARE THE ONES THAT CAN TAKE CARE OF THAT.
WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR SHE'S NOT ASKING FOR MORE MONEY.
THEY WANT Y'ALL TO HOLD CITIBUS ACCOUNTABLE.
IF YOU'RE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE 1964 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, TITLE SIX.
[00:35:06]
LET ME READ IT TO YOU.DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN ANY PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY THAT RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDS OR OTHER FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS THAT RECEIVE FEDERAL FUNDS CANNOT DISTINGUISH AMONG INDIVIDUALS ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN.
AND I WOULD SUBMIT TO YOU, LET'S ADD SPECIAL NEEDS.
IN THE TOP QUALITY, QUANTITY AND TIMELESSNESS OF PROGRAM SERVICES.
AIDS OR BENEFITS THAT PROVIDE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY PROVIDE THEM.
THIS PROHIBITION APPLIES TO INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION AS WELL AS TO PROCEDURES, CRITERIA, OR METHODS OF ADMINISTRATION THAT APPEAR NEUTRAL BUT HAVE A DISCRIMINATORY EFFECT ON INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN OR SPECIAL NEEDS.
OF COURSE. THANK YOU, MR. KIRKPATRICK. MICHELLE EDWARDS.
GOOD EVENING. I MAINLY JUST WANT TO ELABORATE ON WHAT THE ONES BEFORE ME HAVE SAID.
I'M ONE OF THE FOSTER PARENTS THAT HAVE THREE INDIVIDUALS.
THEY ARE ALL IDD, THEY'RE ALL SEIZURE PRONE.
AND LIKE DIANE SAID, WE HAVE BEEN TO CITIBUS AND WE HAVE TALKED TO THE ONES AHEAD OF EVERYTHING AND WE'VE ASKED FOR THEM TO CONSIDER CHANGING MY SCHEDULE BACK LIKE IT WAS.
THEY'RE PICKING UP THREE PEOPLE FROM THE SAME HOUSE, GOING TO THE SAME PLACE, BUT IT'S LIKE ONE GETS PICKED UP FOR ONE HOUR AND THE OTHER 2ND MAY GET PICKED UP WITHIN ABOUT TWO HOURS.
WE HAVE APPOINTMENTS, AND A LOT OF TIMES I'VE HAD TO CALL AND CANCEL THE APPOINTMENTS BECAUSE I CAN'T MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR MYSELF OR FOR MY INDIVIDUALS IF THE BUS IS NOT PICKING THEM UP.
SO ALL I'VE BEEN ASKING FOR MY SITUATION IS THAT CITIBUS PUT IT BACK ON THE SCHEDULE THAT WE HAD THAT'S WORKED FOR THE PAST 10 OR 12 YEARS.
AND LIKE I SAID, I JUST WANTED TO REITERATE WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE HAS SAID.
MY NAME IS CINDY DAVIS AND I'VE BEEN A PROVIDER IN THE FIELD FOR ALMOST 50 YEARS.
FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS, I HAVE SERVED TWO INDIVIDUALS IN MY HOME.
ONE IS IN A WHEELCHAIR AND HAS AUTISM.
CEREBRAL PALSY CAN'T TALK OR SPEAK FOR HIMSELF.
THE OTHER GENTLEMAN IS 69 YEARS OLD.
HE CAN'T SEE OR HEAR, BUT HE'S AMBULATORY.
BUT HE JUST CAN'T COMMUNICATE.
AND HE COMMUNICATES IN HIS OWN WAY.
AND THEY HAVE BEEN REALLY A GREAT BLESSING TO ME UNTIL RECENTLY.
AND THEY'RE WANTING TO SEND TWO BUSSES.
I WALK THE WAY I FOUND OUT THAT THEY WERE CHANGING THIS.
I WENT OUT TO TAKE THEM WHEN THE BUS SHOWED UP, SAID, I CAN ONLY TAKE VINNY.
AND I SAID, WELL, WHAT ABOUT BRANDON? HE SAID, OH, ANOTHER BUS IS COMING FOR HIM.
AND I WAS LIKE, WHY? AND THEY SAID THEY HAD BEEN TOLD THAT IT WAS GOING TO SAVE MONEY.
BUT I CALLED CITY ACCESS AND I WAS TOLD, YES, THAT WAS A DECISION THAT HAD BEEN MADE FROM THE TOP AND THAT HE HAD ASKED FOR US TO HAVE TIME AND WE'D SEE HOW IT SAVED MONEY.
WELL, THE BUSSES ARE LIKE YOU'VE HEARD, NOT ALL OF THEM ARE IN GREAT SHAPE.
THE BIG THE PRETTY TROLLEY ANYWAY.
[00:40:04]
BUT ANYWAY, I JUST I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW, WHAT KIND OF DECISIONS ARE BEING MADE.AND IT IS SOMETHING TO ME THAT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD COST MORE MONEY AND NOT SAVING MONEY.
AND I REALLY NEED THE CITY ACCESS SERVICE.
THANK YOU, MA'AM. MISS TAYLOR.
I THINK THERE'S LIKE THREE TAYLORS.
YES. I HAD SOME INFORMATION THAT SOME PEOPLE KNOW YOU'RE OKAY.
I HAD SOME INFORMATION THAT PEOPLE MAY BE SPEAKING AGAINST YOUR GROUP HOME AND THAT THEY WERE GOING TO TRY TO DISCUSS THESE TWO TOPICS AS A WAY TO CIRCUMVENT AND MAKE A CITIZEN COMMENT. A GROUP HOME THAT'S IN TOWN.
USUALLY THERE'S SIX PEOPLE IN HERE THAT I WOULD BE APOLOGIZING IN FRONT OF.
I WANTED YOU TO HAVE YOUR TIME.
I RESPECT YOUR TIME. AND EVERYONE THAT SPOKE.
I DID HAVE. SO IT'S ALL MY FAULT IF THAT CAME ACROSS SHORT.
SO THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY.
I DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU KNOW HOW ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL CITIBUS DRIVERS ARE.
THEY'RE TOP NOTCH. EVERY ONE OF THEM.
WELL, THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME.
[5. Minutes]
ALL RIGHT. SO NOW AFTER THAT FUN TIDBIT THERE, WE WILL MOVE TO 5, WHICH IS THE JULY 25TH OF 2023 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES? THANK YOU, MISS MARTINEZ-GARCIA, SECONDED BY MISS JOY.ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 5.1.
ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES 5.1.
IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES.
WE HAVE A LARGE GROUP HERE TODAY.
ENSURE THAT CELL PHONES ARE SILENCED AND TURNED OFF.
ALL RIGHT. WE NEXT MOVE TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
WE HAVE SEVERAL ITEMS TO BE PULLED AND BEGINNING.
[5. Resolution - Finance: Consider a resolution releasing the lien on 2701 121st Street, Unit #15, Vintage Township Lot 235, in the Vintage Township Public Improvement District (Vintage PID).]
LET'S FIRST OF ALL, COUNCIL LET'S START WITH 6.5.AND 6.5 IS A FINANCE RESOLUTION.
ANY OBJECTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALL RIGHT. WE WILL MOVE THAT TO DATE CERTAIN 9-12 OF 2023.
NEXT, WE WILL MOVE TO 6.17 AND I WILL TURN THAT ONE OVER TO YOU, MR.
[17. Resolution - Public Works Streets: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Contract 17407, with Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc., for concrete repair, replacement, and construction, in the Manhattan Heights Subdivision area.]
ATKINSON. THANK YOU, MAYOR.CITY COUNCIL ITEM 617 IS A CONTINUATION OF OUR EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT THE 2022 STREET BOND.
SPECIFICALLY, THIS IS A CONCRETE THAT WILL.
THE CONTRACT IN FRONT OF YOU IS $2.29 MILLION DOLLARS.
IT IS WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUDGET OF THIS.
THIS IS STEP TWO OF THE REBUILD FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
STEP TWO IS WHAT YOU SEE HERE WITH THE CONCRETE REPAIR.
STEP THREE WILL BE TO COME BACK AND ACTUALLY RESURFACE THE STREETS.
AND WE'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON THAT.
MISS PATTERSON HARRIS, I DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD THAT SET IT APART SO CITIZENS WHO ARE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD WILL KNOW THAT AS AS VOTED BY THE CITIZENS OF THIS CITY THAT WE ARE HOLDING TRUE AND HAVE BEGUN THE PROCESS OF DOING THE STREET WORK AND THE SURROUNDING, THE CURBS AND ALL OF THAT GOOD STUFF THAT GO ALONG WITH IT.
SO I JUST WANTED TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THAT ACTUAL ITEM.
THANK YOU. MISS PATTERSON HARRIS.
[20. Resolution - Public Health Services: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Cost Reimbursement Subaward Agreement UTAUS-SUB00001039, and all related documents, by and between the City of Lubbock and the University of Texas at Austin, under the Health and Human Services Commission Substance Abuse Innovative Healing Centered Projects (IHCP) Grant Program.]
ALL RIGHT. NOW MOVING TO AGENDA ITEM 6.20 AND 6.21 AS WELL.MR. ATKINSON, WE'RE GOING TO TURN THAT OVER TO MR. HOWERTON. MR. MAYOR, IF I COULD, I'D LIKE TO TURN 6.20 OVER TO MISS KATHERINE WELLS, AND WE'LL ASK MISS KAREN MURFEE TO DO 6.21.
ALL RIGHT, KATHERINE, THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
IT'S A GRANT FOR WITH PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES LOOKING AT.
[00:45:06]
THIS IS A THREE YEAR DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS IN AUSTIN.IT WILL ALLOW THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO OFFER A NEW PROGRAM CALLED STRENGTHENING FAMILIES AND THE STRENGTHENING FAMILIES PROGRAM IS AN EVIDENCE BASED CURRICULUM THAT BRINGS FAMILIES IN FOR EIGHT WEEKS WEEKLY SESSIONS TO WORK WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE AT RISK OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER AND THEIR PARENTS TO HELP HOPEFULLY MOVE THOSE CHILDREN INTO RECOVERY AND THEN IMPROVE PARENTING TECHNIQUES TO WORK WITH THOSE AT RISK INDIVIDUALS.
WE'RE VERY EXCITED TO BE OFFERING THIS OUR NEW LOCATION AND THE WAY THAT NEW BUILDING IS SET UP WILL ALLOW US TO HAVE THE PUBLIC SPACES TO OFFER THIS PROGRAM WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY ANY RENTAL COSTS.
THANK YOU, KATHERINE. ANY QUESTIONS OF KATHERINE? MISS JOY. ONE QUESTION.
WE NEED TO START TELLING PEOPLE WHERE THE NEW BUILDING IS.
WHAT'S THE ADDRESS? I DON'T KNOW. IT'S.
IT'S OVER THERE. I'M VERY EXCITED ABOUT IT.
MY STAFF CAN'T WAIT UNTIL WE MOVE.
AND EXPECTED MOVE IN? THEY'RE SAYING FEBRUARY OF 2024 AND WE'LL BE ABLE TO EXPAND SOME OF OUR CLINICAL SERVICES, HAVE A LOT MORE SPACE FOR MEETINGS, EDUCATIONAL EVENTS AND STAFF WILL ACTUALLY HAVE PROPER WORKSPACES NOW.
I'M SORRY. YOU'RE OKAY? I JUST WANTED TO BASICALLY SAY THANKS FOR THIS PROGRAM.
A FEW YEARS AGO WHEN THE BANISHMENT OF MANAGED CARE HAPPENED THERE, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS NO PLACE REALLY TO CONNECT SPECIFICALLY YOUNG PEOPLE, JUVENILES, YOU KNOW, WHO HAD THESE PARTICULAR ISSUES.
BUT I'M EXCITED WITH ALL THE THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN FOR YOUNG PEOPLE, FOR FAMILIES.
AND I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT YOU ALL DO.
AND FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, THAT'S 2015 50TH STREET.
[21. Resolution - Community Development: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 3 to Community Development Funding Contract 16001, and all related documents, with YWCA of Lubbock, to provide Childcare Assistance to qualified low-to-moderate income persons and families who have been affected by COVID-19, through the Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus Relief and Economic Security Act CARES (CDBG / CARES) administered by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD).]
COUNCIL THIS IS AGENDA ITEM 6.21.GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS IS A YWCA GRANT THAT WE ARE EXTENDING.
WE'RE ACTUALLY ADDING MORE FUNDING TO THIS.
THIS STARTED IN OCTOBER 1ST OF 2021.
SO OVER THE THREE YEAR PERIOD, THIS IS FINISHING IT OUT AND SEPTEMBER 30TH IS THE FINAL DAY OF THIS.
OVER THIS THREE, ALMOST THREE YEAR PERIOD, WE'VE ASSISTED OVER 34 THROUGH THE VOUCHER PROGRAM YWCA HAS WORKED WITH OVER 34 LICENSED DAYCARE AGENCIES THAT CAN APPLY FOR THESE VOUCHERS.
540 HOUSEHOLDS HAVE BEEN ASSISTED.
AND OF THOSE 540, 720 CHILDREN AND WILL PROBABLY ASSIST WITH THIS 300,000 THAT WE'RE GIVING ADDITIONAL THIS TIME, THAT WILL PROBABLY WILL GO WAY OVER BECAUSE IT GOES VERY FAST.
CHILD CARE IS STILL VERY HIGH AND THE FEES THAT THEY'VE ADDED ONTO IS STILL THERE.
THEY'VE NOT REDUCED THOSE FEES FOR CLEANING SERVICES AND SUPPLIES.
JUST IT'S A GOOD SAFE PRACTICE FOR DAYCARES.
AND THEY'RE GOING TO CONTINUE WITH THAT.
THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. I JUST WANTED TO SAY.
WOW, SOME MORE MONEY IN THE BUCKET IS WHAT? AND TO BE ABLE TO HELP, YOU KNOW, SOME FAMILIES, YOUNG PEOPLE AGAIN, YET AGAIN TO GET THE CARE THAT THEY NEED.
SO IS THERE A PARTICULAR PROCESS OR ARE WE STILL ON THE SAME TYPE PROCESS OR IS JUST IS THAT STRICTLY UP TO YWCA? THIS THEY'RE STILL DOING THE VOUCHER PROGRAM? WE'RE NOT. THIS IS THAT'S THE PROGRAM THAT WAS SET UP TWO YEARS AGO OR THREE YEARS AGO NOW ALMOST.
AND SO THEY'LL JUST, THIS IS JUST THE FINISH OUT OF THAT FUNDING.
[00:50:03]
OKAY. OKAY.I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE FOLKS KNEW AND ALL THOSE MOMS AND DADS WHO HAVE SOME YOUNG PEOPLE THAT THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THEM RECEIVING SOME CARE BECAUSE THEY CAN'T AFFORD IT OR WHAT HAVE YOU.
SO AND THE TIMING OF IT WITH SCHOOL GOING BACK.
YES, MA'AM. THAT'S WHY WE SAW THAT THIS WAS A NEED, BECAUSE YWCA SAID THEY STILL HAVING PEOPLE ASK.
THANKS FOR THE HELP AND WHAT YOU DO.
THANK YOU. MISS MARTINEZ-GARCIA.
AND I DITTO WHAT MISS PATTERSON SAID, BUT ALSO WHAT PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE.
AND SO THIS IS SUCH A NECESSARY PROGRAM.
THIS IS GOING TO HELP TO BRING PEOPLE BACK INTO THE WORKFORCE.
YES, MA'AM. THAT'S WHY THE PROGRAM WAS DEVELOPED.
YES, MA'AM. APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO.
[33. Resolution - City Manager: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 replacing Article II-Scope of Services, to the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funding Agreement, by and between the City of Lubbock and StarCare Spcialty Health System, for the Construction of Infrastructure to serve as a Center for Behavioral Health Crisis. ]
ATKINSON. 6.33.ITEM 6.33 IS AN EXCITING OPPORTUNITY HERE.
AS I BEGAN, I'D LIKE TO MAKE TWO INTRODUCTIONS TO COUNCIL.
FIRST IS YOUR VERY OWN COUNCIL MEMBER, LATRELLE JOY.
SHE REPRESENTS THE CITY COUNCIL IN THIS PROJECT.
AND I'LL COVER WHERE HERE IN JUST A MOMENT.
THIS IS A PROJECT YOU'VE LIKELY HEARD OF, REFERRED TO AS THE DIVERSION CENTER.
IT IS A JOINT CITY COUNTY FUNDED FACILITY THAT DOES NOT EXIST TODAY.
SO IT IS A NEW FACILITY OFFERING GREAT SERVICES TO OUR COMMUNITY.
WHY WE ARE HERE IS WHEN THESE CONTRACTS WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED.
THIS IS ARPA FUNDED IN THE AMOUNT OF $3.5 MILLION DOLLARS FROM EACH OF THE TWO ENTITIES.
YOUR AMENDMENT SAYS YOU'VE DONE THIS.
YOU HAVE NOW CREATED AND POPULATED THE STEERING COMMITTEE.
AGAIN. COUNCILMEMBER JOY REPRESENTS THE CITY OF LUBBOCK ON THAT.
EARLY. WE SAID THAT THE TIMELINE WAS GOING TO BE SEPTEMBER.
YOU NOW HAVE, AS PART OF YOUR ATTACHMENTS IN THE BACKUP.
AND MAYOR, IF YOU WANTED TO SWITCH INPUTS, I COULD EVEN PUT IT ON THE SCREEN.
IT IS PROJECTED TO OPEN BY APRIL OF 2025.
FURTHER WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE DESCRIBES A NOW AGREED UPON SITE PLAN.
YOU SEE THAT ON YOUR ON YOUR SCREEN, THE RED BOX.
THAT IS THE HOPE CENTER THAT IS EAST 19TH RUNNING EAST AND WEST TO THE NORTH.
ONCE YOU CROSS THAT PARKING LOT AND KEEP MOVING TO THE WEST, THAT'S WHERE OUR BALL FIELDS ARE.
SO IF THAT KIND OF HELPS YOU FRAME WHERE THAT IS.
STEERING COMMITTEE WORKING WITH STARCARE HAS ALSO COME UP WITH A CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN.
THIS IS A PLUS OR -10,000 SQUARE FOOT FACILITIES.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE IS WHAT WILL BE DONE IN THIS FACILITY HAS NOT CHANGED.
ALL THE PARTIES ARE STILL IN LINE WITH WHAT THIS IS TO DO FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
AND IN A SHORT WAY TO SAY THAT IS THIS TAKES PEOPLE THAT ARE IN A BEHAVIORAL OR A MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS AND GIVES AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A PLACE TO TAKE THEM THAT IS MOST APPROPRIATE FOR THEM TO GET THE HELP THEY NEED MORE APPROPRIATE THAN THE OPTIONS WE HAVE TODAY, WHICH ARE VERY LIMITED.
GENERALLY, THAT MEANS GOING TO AN EMERGENCY ROOM OR GOING TO A JAIL.
NEITHER OF WHICH IS THE BEST WAY TO HELP THESE INDIVIDUALS.
THIS FACILITY IS THE BEST WAY TO HELP THOSE INDIVIDUALS.
SOME OF THOSE BOXES MAY MOVE OVER TIME, BUT AGAIN, YOU HAVE YOUR STEERING COMMITTEE AND YOUR DELEGATE TO THAT THAT ARE OVERSEEING ALL THAT PLUS OR -10,000FTĀ² AVAILABLE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT, AVAILABLE TO EMS AND AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.
THIS DOES NOT PRODUCE ANY CHANGE TO THE DOLLAR.
THE CITY'S FUNDING IS STILL AT THE 3.5 MILLION AND REMINDER THAT IS OUT OF THE ARPA DOLLARS.
SO WITH THAT MAYOR, I'LL STOP AND TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR TURN IT OVER TO THE OTHERS.
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR FURTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WE HAD SOME QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS ON 6.26 AND 6.27 WITH COUNCIL.
[26. Resolution - Public Transit Services: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Transit System Management Contract, and all related documents, by and between the City of Lubbock and RATP Dev USA, Inc., to manage and operate the public transportation system owned by the City of Lubbock.]
[00:55:06]
I BELIEVE MY UNDERSTANDING IS MR. ATKINSON, THAT CONTRACT IS NOT DUE UNTIL OCTOBER 1ST.WOULD ANYBODY BE OPPOSED TO US PUTTING THAT OFF TO A DATE CERTAIN OF SEPTEMBER 12TH FOR US TO GATHER SOME MORE INFORMATION ON SOME OF THOSE ISSUES? THANK YOU, MISS JOY. 6.26 AND 6.27.
THANK YOU, MISS JOY. THANK YOU. I HAVE A SECOND FROM MISS MARTINEZ-GARCIA.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF 6.26 AND 6.27 TO DATE CERTAIN OF SEPTEMBER 12TH OF 2023.
ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT, MR. ATKINSON. THAT CARRIES SEVEN ZERO.
WE WILL GATHER MORE INFORMATION AND BRING THAT BACK UP ON THE 12TH.
[6. Consent Agenda - Items considered to be routine are enacted by one motion without separate discussion. If the City Council desires to discuss an item, the item is removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.]
OKAY, SO AT THIS TIME COUNCIL WE WILL BE MOVING AGENDA ITEM 6.1 THROUGH 6.33 EXCLUSIVE OF 6.5, 6.26 AND 6.27.IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? THANK YOU, MISS JOY. THANK YOU, MR. MASSENGALE. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 6.1 THROUGH 6.33.
ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES.
ALL RIGHT. THAT CONCLUDES OUR CONSENT AGENDA.
WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE REGULAR AGENDA COUNCIL.
[1. Board Appointments - City Secretary: Consider and take action on the appointments of the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for the Lubbock Water Advisory Commission.]
WE HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU BOARD APPOINTMENTS UNDER 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 AND 7.4.THERE'S NO OBJECTION I WOULD ASK THAT WE PULL THOSE FOUR ITEMS INTO ONE VOTE.
7.2 WOULD BE TO APPOINT VINNY GUERRERO AS CHAIR OF THE VETERANS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? THANK YOU MS. MARTINEZ-GARCIA AND A SECOND BY MR. MCBRAYER. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.1 THROUGH 7.3.
7.1, 7.2, 7.3 AND 7.4 CARRIES SEVEN ZERO.
ALL RIGHT. WE WILL NOW HAVE AGENDA ITEMS 7.5 THROUGH 7.12 INCLUSIVE.
[5. Public Hearing - Finance: Hold a public hearing on the proposed 2023 Assessment Rate for the Bell Farms Public Improvement District (PID), and consider an ordinance reviewing classifications for the methods of assessing special benefits for the services and improvements of property in the Bell Farms PID; approving, adopting, and filing with the City Secretary the assessment roll; levying 2023 assessments for the cost of certain services and improvements to be provided in the district during FY 2023-24; fixing charges and liens against the property in the district and against the owners thereof; and providing for the collection of the assessment.]
THESE ARE PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING FINANCE.MR. ATKINSON, IF YOU DON'T MIND GIVING US A BRIEF RUNDOWN OF ANY CHANGES.
I DON'T BELIEVE THERE ARE ANY CHANGES.
SEVEN FIVE THROUGH 7 12 FROM YEAR OVER YEAR.
CERTAINLY, MAYOR. GLAD TO DO THAT.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'M SURE YOU RECALL THIS IS AN ITEM THAT YOU SEE GENERALLY EVERY AUGUST.
CITY COUNCIL IS REQUIRED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING, ULTIMATELY TO APPROVE THE ASSESSMENTS, THE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT THAT YOU HAVE INSIDE THESE ITEMS. THE MAYOR MENTIONED DISCUSSED THE CHANGE, IF THERE IS ANY.
AT THE SAME ASSESSMENT RATE AS THE PRIOR YEAR.
SO THEN THERE IS NO CHANGE TO THAT ASSESSMENT RATE.
AND WITH THAT, EITHER MYSELF OR MRS. BROWN WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
ALL RIGHT. WE'LL HAVE TIME FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE COUNCIL.
BUT AT THIS TIME, WE WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO LEVY THE 2023 ASSESSMENT FOR THE BELLE FARMS PID, THE NORTH OVERTON PID, THE NORTH POINTE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE PID, THE QUINCY PARK PID, THE UPLAND CROSSING PID.
THE VALENCIA PID, AND THE WILLOW BEND VILLAS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.
SO WE WILL NOW HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AGENDA ITEM 7.5 THROUGH 7.12 CONCERNING THESE ASSESSMENTS.
AND SOME OF YOU MAY PAY ATTENTION AS WE WILL BE DOING OTHER PUBLIC HEARINGS HERE SHORTLY.
BUT I WILL FIRST CALL OUT ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.
IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, YOU MAY STEP FORWARD.
PLEASE STATE YOUR ADDRESS AND THEN YOU MAY STATE YOUR POSITION IN OPPOSITION.
SO NOW AGENDA ITEM 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
[01:00:03]
MR. MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT UP AND CROSSING PID 7.10.
WE ARE. SO MY OPPOSITION IS THAT THERE'S NOT A CREDIBLE BUDGET TO BASE THE TAXES ON.
AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE A LOT OF YOUR TIME, BUT I'VE SIMPLY OPPOSED THE BUDGET AS PROPOSED.
AND IF I COULD JUST BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION A COUPLE OF LINE ITEMS ON THE BUDGET.
ACCORDING TO THE BUDGET PROPOSED APPROXIMATELY $100,000 FOR FENCING.
ON THE BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET, THERE'S APPROXIMATELY JUST UNDER $100,000 PER 5 FOR THE ENTRY SIGNS.
I COULDN'T QUITE BELIEVE THE NUMBERS.
I SAID, WHAT? AM I MISSING SOMETHING? I DROVE TO THE PARK.
AND YET THERE'S 100, NEARLY $100,000.
AND MY WIFE AND I LIVE JUST A BLOCK OR TWO FROM THE PARK AND ACROSS UPLAND CROSSING PUD.
THE DESIGN OF THE PARK IS A TOTAL SUCCESS.
YOUNG FAMILIES WALK THEIR INFANT CHILDREN AND INFANTS DOWN TO THE PARK, TO THE PLAYGROUND.
ALL THE HOMEOWNERS, ALL THE NEIGHBORS THAT WE'VE TALKED TO, THEY LOVE THAT PARK.
THEY WANT TO PAY TO MAINTAIN THAT PARK.
BUT MY OPPOSITION SIMPLY IS WE TO HAVE A CREDIBLE BUDGET TO DO THE JOB.
A CREDIBLE BUDGET TO MAINTAIN.
SO I ASK THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT APPROVE THE BUDGET UNTIL THERE'S A CREDIBLE EXPLANATION OF WHAT EXACTLY THE MONEY IS GOING TO AND FROM.
FROM THE NUMBERS ON THE PROPOSED BUDGET.
I DIDN'T QUITE I COULDN'T FOLLOW IT WHATSOEVER.
SO I JUST WANT TO ALERT YOU TO THAT.
IT'S A BEAUTIFUL AREA. IT'S A BIG SUCCESS, BUT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT WAS PROPOSED IN THE BUDGET.
THANK YOU. SIR, WOULD YOU MIND, PLEASE, GIVING ME YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS ONE MORE TIME? EXCUSE ME. ED MCDONALD, 2718 VIOLA AVENUE.
ANYONE ELSE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.5 THROUGH 7.12, YOU MAY APPROACH.
IN CASE YOU ALL DON'T REMEMBER ME, MY NAME'S WES EVERETT.
I CURRENTLY WORK FOR BETENBOUGH HOMES.
I'M HERE REPRESENTING SEVERAL OF THESE PIDS TODAY, INCLUDING UPLAND CROSSING.
AND IF YOU HAVE A SECOND, SIR, I'D LIKE TO TALK TO YOU AFTER THIS MEETING.
AND I LOVE TO HEAR WHAT HE SAID ABOUT THE PARK.
BUT THAT PIDS, WHEN IT IS, IT'S TO ENCOMPASS AND TO HELP THINGS IN THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY.
SO THERE'S FENCES IN THOSE AREAS.
AND I'M HERE FOR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS THAT YOU ALL HAVE.
ALL RIGHT. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED AS A 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
SORRY. IS THAT DR. WILSON? DR. WILSON. THANK YOU, MR. MASSENGALE, FOR THE SECOND.
ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? BRIANNA? I DO THINK, LOOKING AT THIS LINE ITEM MR. MASSENGALE HAS, AND MAYBE WES CAN HELP ANSWER THIS AS WELL, THAT FENCING THAT'S A PROJECT THROUGH 2028, IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR. SO I'M NOT LOOKING AT THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN RIGHT NOW, BUT FROM WHAT I RECALL, I DO THINK THAT $100,000 THAT WAS REFERENCED IS A TOTAL, NOT AN ANNUAL EXPENSE.
AND THE PURPOSE OF THAT FUNDING IS TO MAINTAIN THE FENCE.
AND WE DO TYPICALLY OVERESTIMATE OUR EXPENSES ON OUR SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLANS AND UNDERESTIMATE OUR REVENUES, JUST TO BE SURE THAT THE PID IS CONSISTENTLY OPERATING IN THE BLACK YEAR OVER YEAR, WE HAVE NOT TAKEN OVER THE ENTRY SIGN THAT IS ON UPLAND OR THE FENCING THAT IS ON ONE OF THE BACK SIDES OF THE
[01:05:09]
DISTRICT. SO THAT'S AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT THE COST WILL BE TO MAINTAIN THOSE AREAS BASED ON WHAT WE'VE DONE IN SOME OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS.THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS TO MR. WEST, WHOSE NAME WE KNOW, WHO WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH, WITH BETENBOUGH HOMES, BUT I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO AS TO WHEN THE PID MEETS AND ALL OF THAT GOOD STUFF.
AND I'M SURE WHEN THEY MEET OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
BUT WHEN I HEAR FOLKS SAYING, HEY, THEY'RE DOING THIS AND I'VE NOT BEEN A PART OF I DON'T KNOW HOW TO BE A PART OF WHATEVER, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT THAT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE TO THEM AND THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONVEY.
WE'VE TRIED TO DO THOSE AS CLOSE TO THE ACTUAL DISTRICTS AS WE CAN.
AND SO ANY PROPERTY OWNER OR ANY CITIZEN IS WELCOME TO JOIN US.
SO WE WOULD WELCOME ANY PROPERTY OWNERS IN ANY OF OUR DISTRICTS TO JOIN.
WE MEET ABOUT FOUR TIMES A YEAR TYPICALLY.
YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU, MR. PATTERSON HARRIS. MISS JOY.
THIS QUESTION IS FOR MR. MCDONALD. WHERE DID YOU GO? THERE HE IS. ALL THE WAY TO THE BACK.
YES, MA'AM. THANKS FOR BEING HERE.
DID YOU GET A NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING? YES. AND DID YOU GO? I WAS HOPING THAT THE BUDGET WOULD MORE CLARIFY BUDGET WOULD COME OUT OF THOSE MEETINGS.
BUT IT'S GREAT TO SEE THAT MEETING WAS SCHEDULED AND PUBLISHED AND WE RECEIVED THAT LETTER.
MY ONLY CONCERN WAS THAT THE PROPOSED BUDGET IS NOT CREDIBLE.
AND SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A PERMANENT TAX WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THE REAL COST WOULD BE.
SO SOMETIMES IN THE BUDGETING PROCESS, IT COULD BE UNDERSTATED OR OVERSTATED.
SO WE DON'T WANT TO DO EITHER.
I'M CONFIDENT THAT THE HOMEOWNERS WANT TO MAINTAIN THAT PARK.
BY THE WAY, IF NO ONE'S EVER BEEN THERE, THE TRACK AND THE TRACK HOMES ARE BUILT ABOVE GRADE.
THE PARK, THE POND AND THE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE PARK ARE BUILT BELOW STREET GRADE.
THAT MEANS THAT THE RAINWATER AND FLOODWATER DRAIN TO THE POND IN THE PARK.
IT'S WONDERFUL BECAUSE THE PARK PROTECTS THE HOMES.
AND SO FROM THE ORIGINAL DESIGN, FROM THE BUILDER, IT'S ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL.
AND THE PARK IS A BIG SUCCESS.
PEOPLE WALK THERE ALL THE TIME.
IT'S JUST IT'S JUST REALLY GREAT.
AND SO THE IDEA IS TO WHAT IS IT GOING TO COST TO MAINTAIN THAT? AND WE WANT TO I'M CONFIDENT EVERY HOMEOWNER WANTS TO PAY THEIR SHARE.
MS. JOY. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, I JUST. FIRST OF ALL, IT'S A PROPOSED BUDGET.
AND YOU LOOK AT ALL THE ROUND NUMBERS, WHICH TELLS ME IT'S NOT EXACT.
BUT I THINK THE CONCERN HE'S SAYING IS WE'RE GOING TO BE ASSESSED BASED UPON THIS PROPOSED BUDGET.
NOW IT'S THE SAME AS IT WAS LAST YEAR.
IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IT DOESN'T GO UP UNDER THIS SCENARIO.
BUT. THESE PIDS ARE IMPORTANT.
YOU DIDN'T LEAVE, DID YOU? NO, MA'AM, I DID NOT. YOU KNOW, WHY DON'T YOU TWO SIT DOWN AND KIND OF TALK ABOUT THIS? ABSOLUTELY. YOUR ASSESSMENT WON'T GO UP THIS YEAR, BUT THEY CAN.
THESE ARE JUST PROPOSED BUDGETS.
THEY MAY NOT GET ANY OF THIS DONE.
THEY MAY NOT, BUT WES KIND OF EXPLAINED THE PROCESS TO YOU.
GOOD. BUT WE APPRECIATE YOUR BEING HERE.
THANK YOU. THANKS. THANK YOU, MR. MCDONALD. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? DISCUSSION ON 753712.
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM DR.
WILSON AND A SECOND FROM MR. MASSENGALE. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.5 THROUGH 7.12.
[01:10:03]
PLEASE SAY AYE. AYE.[13. Resolution - Business Development: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute City Tax Abatement Agreement No. 17471, with Dura-Line, LLC, for real property improvements and the acquisition of new machinery and equipment. ]
WE WILL NOW MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM 7.13.BRIANNA BEFORE YOU GET STARTED.
JUST FOR EVERYONE'S INFORMATION.
I INTEND TO MOVE COUNCIL'S APPROVAL, OF COURSE.
SOUND GOOD? SO IF YOU NEED A BREAK AND YOU WANT TO TAKE ONE NOW, I'LL GIVE YOU A LITTLE MOMENT.
ALL RIGHT, BRIANNA, I'M SO IT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE TAKING A BREAK NOW.
SO IF IT'S OKAY WITH YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'LL KEEP US ON TRACK AND KEEP GOING.
JUST FOR COUNCIL'S PURPOSES, WE HAD THIS PREVIOUSLY ON AN AGENDA AND THEN WE MOVED IT.
YES, SIR. AND DO YOU ALL HAVE IT IN FRONT OF YOU? PRESENTATION. WE DO. IT'S IN OUR BACK UP AS WELL.
OKAY, PERFECT. OKAY, SO ITEM 7.13 IS THE FINAL STEP IN THE TAX ABATEMENT APPLICATION PROCESS FOR DURA-LINE LLC.
AND IF YOU'LL RECALL, THIS WAS A PROJECT ANNOUNCED BY LEDA SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.
THEY ARE TAKING OWNERSHIP OR LEASING THE SPECULATIVE BUILDING IN THE LUBBOCK BUSINESS PARK TO PRODUCE HDPE PIPE. AND WE THE BUSINESS PARK IS NOT LOCATED IN A WAS NOT LOCATED IN AN ENTERPRISE ZONE.
A COUPLE OF DETAILS ABOUT DURA-LINE'S INVESTMENT.
THE BUILDING IS JUST A SHELL SPACE.
AND SO THEY WILL FINISH OUT THE SPACE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THEIR MANUFACTURING FACILITY.
THIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS YOU AN OUTLINE OF THE ABATEMENT ITSELF.
SO THE ESTIMATED TOTAL ABATEMENT AMOUNT IS 600 AND ROUGHLY $668,000.
AND THAT DOES BEGIN ON JANUARY 1ST OF THE YEAR AFTER THEY'RE 90% COMPLETE ON THE PROJECT.
WE DO HAVE REPRESENTATION FROM THE COMPANY HERE TODAY.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SPECIFICS OF THE ABATEMENT OR THE PROJECT ITSELF.
OTHERWISE, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
APOLOGIZE FOR THE DELAYED PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU, MISS BROWN. ALL RIGHT.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE 7.13.
THANK YOU, MISS MARTINEZ-GARCIA.
ALL RIGHT. HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MR. ATKINSON OR MISS BROWN? OR FURTHER DISCUSSION ON 7.13.
IS THIS A DECLINING ABATEMENT? YES, MA'AM. IT STARTS AT 100% AND DECLINES 20% YEAR OVER YEAR FOR THE FIVE YEARS OF THE ABATEMENT.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS BROWN.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.13.
ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. 7.13 CARRIES.
[15. Public Hearing - Planning (District 2): Consider a request for Zone Case 3486, a request of Core States Group for Ramona Prater and Estate of Charles Prater, for a zone change from Transition District (T) to Commercial District (C-4), at 11213 University Avenue, located north of 114th Street and east of University Avenue, on 2.852 acres of unplatted land out of Block E, Section 10, and consider an ordinance.]
ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL ON 7.15 IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PROPONENT MAY HAVE HAD A SOME TRAVEL CHANGES OR SOME CONFUSION ON TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS.IF ANYBODY SEES ANY NEED, WE CAN PUSH THAT ONE OFF TO A DATE CERTAIN IF WE DON'T SEE A NEED.
AND WE CAN GO AHEAD. I THINK THIS IS MISS PATTERSON HARRIS DISTRICT.
IF WE DON'T SEE ANY NECESSITY, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT.
EVERYBODY GOOD WITH THAT? MISS PATTERSON HARRIS? I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT. I HAVE NOT BEEN CONTACTED BY ANY OF THE CITIZENS IN OPPOSITION OF IT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS PATTERSON HARRIS.
[01:15:09]
ALL RIGHT, COUNCIL, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 7.15.AND IF WE FEEL THERE'S A NECESSITY TO MOVE ON THAT ONE, WE WILL, MISS SAGER.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM TRANSITION DISTRICT TO COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C4.
WE SENT OUT FIVE NOTIFICATIONS AND DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSE.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 114TH STREET AND UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY A VACANT LAND WITH SOME APARTMENTS TO THE WEST.
THERE IS ADDITIONAL A2 AND A1 ZONING WITH ADDITIONAL C3 ZONING IN THE AREA.
FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.
AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.
THE REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
THE LOCATION IS NORTH OF 114TH STREET AND EAST OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. SAGER.
THANK YOU. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND KEEP YOU CLOSE FOR THE NEXT ONE.
BUT AT THIS TIME, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING FOR 7.15.
ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO 7.15.
ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.15.
ALL RIGHT. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED, AS TO 7.15.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ITEM? THANK YOU, MISS PATTERSON HARRIS.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.15.
[16. Public Hearing - Planning (District 4): Consider a request for Zone Case 3257-P, a request of Hugo Reed and Associates, Inc. for 1585 Development, LLC and Rocket Partners I, LLC, for a zone change from Single-Family District (R-1) Specific Use for Reduced Setbacks to Single-Family District (R-1) Specific Use for Townhouse/Garden Home, generally located west of Elgin Avenue and south of 137th Street, on 3 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 1, and consider an ordinance.]
ALL RIGHT. WE WILL NOW MOVE TO 7.16.MISS SAGER. ITEM 7.16 IS ZONED CASE 3257P.
WE SENT OUT 15 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVED NO RESPONSE.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF 138TH STREET, WEST OF ELGIN.
HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THIS IS PART OF A DEVELOPING NEIGHBORHOOD.
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.
AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.
HERE'S THE GRAPHIC PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING HOW THE PROPERTY WILL BE DIVIDED INTO LOTS.
THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUEST.
YOU'LL BE ALONG ELGIN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 137TH STREET.
ELGIN AVENUE IS A COLLECTOR AND 137TH IS A LOCAL STREET.
THANK YOU, MISS SAGER. MIGHT KEEP YOU CLOSE FOR QUESTIONS.
ALL RIGHT. WE WILL NOW CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AGENDA ITEM 7.16.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO 7.16? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL ASK ANYONE THAT'S HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.16.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
I'M TERRY HOLMAN WITH HUGO REED AND ASSOCIATES.
WE'RE AT 1601 AVENUE N AND I'M HOPING I'M GOING THE RIGHT DIRECTION IF I CAN SEE THE SLIDES AGAIN.
PERFECT. THIS HELPS EXPLAIN WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.
HOLD ON JUST A MINUTE, TERRY. LET'S MAKE SURE ONCE AGAIN THAT ALL CELL PHONES ARE TURNED OFF.
AND I'LL BE BRIEF. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF OUR VIRIDIAN DEVELOPMENT.
THIS IS JUST SOUTH OF LOOP 88 BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND INDIANA AVENUE, NOT TOO FAR AWAY HERE FROM THE NEW COOPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED SOME TIME BACK. THIS ENTIRE BLOCK WE ORIGINALLY ENVISIONED AS SORT OF A PARK SITE AND A PLACE FOR A FUTURE HOA
[01:20:02]
COMMUNITY CENTER, THOSE TYPES OF THINGS.AND WE REALIZED THAT WE PROBABLY WERE A BIT AMBITIOUS ON THAT.
WE STILL HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
WE JUST OVERSIZE IT TO BEGIN WITH.
IT'S A STRAIGHT UP TOWNHOME REQUEST.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ALL RIGHT. ANYONE ELSE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.16? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AS TO 7.16.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? 7.16.
ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF TERRY? OF MISS SAGER? MISS JOY, MR. HOLMAN, THIS PARCEL THAT ON THE CORNER, IS THAT WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A PARK OR A COMMUNITY CENTER? WHAT'S GOING IN THAT? ALL OF THE ABOVE.
WE'VE ALREADY BEEN TO ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO GET THE APPROVAL THAT WE NEED TO DO THAT.
THAT SPACE IS DESIGNATED AS COMMON SPACE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.
THERE ARE NO SPECIFIC PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION AT THIS POINT.
JUST TRYING TO LET THE MATURE DEVELOPMENT MATURE A LITTLE BIT THROUGH THE PROCESS WITH ZBA.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION.
ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.16.
ANY OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0.
ALL RIGHT. WE ARE NOW MOVING TO 7.17.
[17. Resolution - Planning: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Municipal Services Agreement, with the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance, Inc., for the requested annexation of an area of land generally described as 105.867 acres north of East 4th Street and east of East Loop 289, into Lubbock's corporate limits, along with the adjacent right-of-way.]
KRISTIN, I BELIEVE YOU ALSO HAVE THIS ONE JUST FOR COUNCIL'S INFORMATION, THIS IS JUST STEP ONE.IN THIS PROCESS. WE'RE MAKING NO ANNEXATION VOTE TODAY.
THIS WOULD JUST BE THE AGREEMENT.
IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF EAST FOURTH STREET, EAST OF EAST LOOP 289 IS FOR 105.867 ACRES.
BUT ANY QUESTIONS OF MISS SAGER OR ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. ATKINSON? ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE 7.17? THANK YOU, MR. MCBRAYER.
IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR FURTHER DISCUSSION ON 7.17? MISS JOY. I NOTICE ON 7.17 IT DOES INDICATE IN THE AGREEMENT THERE ARE SOME SERVICES THAT ARE NEEDED, THAT ARE NOT PROVIDED THERE NOW.
AND I KNOW WE GO ON TO TALK ABOUT THAT, BUT THAT'S ALWAYS A CONCERN ON AN ANNEXATION IS WHAT ADDITIONAL EXPENSE WILL THAT BRING TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK? AND THERE'S JUST A LOT OF THOSE IN THIS.
I'M MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE CITY.
JUST READING IT, IT JUST SAYS WE DON'T HAVE ANY OUT THERE NOW, WHICH MEANS WE WILL HAVE TO ADD THAT TO THE SCHEDULES AND THE LOAD WE WOULD CARRY.
SO EVERYBODY NEEDS TO KNOW THAT.
I GUESS FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, ONE OF THE POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT THIS IS TO BEGIN GETTING DEVELOPMENT IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF OUR CITY, TO MOVE THE DEVELOPMENT IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS. SO THAT DOES SPEAK TO BE A POSITIVE TO ME ANYWAY.
THANK YOU, MR. MCBRAYER. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF MS. SAGER? ALL RIGHT.
I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON 7.17.
ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL OF 7.17.
ALL RIGHT. THEN THAT WILL LEAVE US WITH AGENDA ITEM 7.14.
COUNCIL LET'S TAKE ABOUT A 15 MINUTE BREAK AND WE WILL BEGIN PROMPTLY BACK HERE AT 3:20.
[01:25:03]
WE ARE IN RECESS.ALL RIGHT. WE'RE WE'RE BACK FROM RECESS.
[14. Public Hearing - Planning (District 1): Consider a request for Zone Case 2016-D, a request of Parkhill for Thomas Kenneth Abraham, for a zone change from Family Apartment District (A-1) to High-Rise Apartment District (A-3) with a Planned Development, at 2401 through 2413 14th Street and 2402 through 2416 15th Street, located south of 14th Street and east of University Avenue, Overton Addition, Block 102, Lots 1 through 7 and 17 through 24 and the portion of alley between Lots 1 through 7 and 18 through 24 (to be closed), and consider an ordinance.]
I THINK MANY OF YOU ARE AWARE THAT WE HAVE A BACKUP PACKET.WE'VE HEARD A LOT OF INFORMATION ON THIS.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR EVERYONE THAT'S INVOLVED.
I THINK WE'LL SAY THAT BEFORE THE END OF THIS PRESENTATION.
BUT WE WOULD ASK YOU IF YOU DO GET UP TO PRESENT, PLEASE DON'T BE REPETITIVE.
PLEASE RESPECT EVERYONE IN HIS TIME.
WE HAVE A LOT OF INFORMATION THAT WE WILL SORT THROUGH.
WE DON'T WANT TO LIMIT YOU, BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE WOULD ASK YOU TO BE RESPECTFUL OF THE PROCESS.
SO GIVE YOUR INFORMATION, PRESENT THE INFORMATION, AND THEN ALLOW THE NEXT PERSON TO STEP FORWARD.
AGAIN, WE'LL START WITH MISS SAGER.
SHE'S GOING TO GIVE US A BRIEF PRESENTATION.
ALL RIGHT, MISS SAGER, THANK YOU.
ITEM 7.14 IS ZONING CASE 2016 D.
WE HAVE RECEIVED 102 IN FAVOR, 76 OF WHICH ARE OUTSIDE THE 200 FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY, 64 IN OPPOSITION, 60 OF WHICH ARE OUTSIDE THE 200 FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF 15TH EAST OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
SOME OF THOSE RESPONSE LETTERS WERE PRINTED AND PROVIDED AT THE DAIS TODAY.
THOSE ARE ONES THAT WERE RECEIVED AFTER 5:00 FRIDAY THROUGH 5:00 YESTERDAY.
HERE'S AN AERIAL PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.
THE CURRENT ZONING IS FAMILY APARTMENT DISTRICT A-1.
THERE IS ADDITIONAL A-1 ZONING TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH WITH A1 AND C3 TO THE WEST AND R2 TO THE EAST.
HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA ON 15TH STREET.
THIS IS A GRAPHIC THAT CAME FROM CASE 2243 B, THIS WAS IN 2011 WHEN THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A PORTION OF THE NATIONAL RESIDENTIAL SOUTH OVERTON HISTORIC DISTRICT.
THIS IS THAT SAME BOUNDARY LAID OVER ON AN AERIAL.
THIS IS A LETTER FROM APRIL 7TH, 2011, ADDRESSED TO RANDY HENSON, THE FORMER DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, WRITTEN BY RM BRODKIN WITH THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOUTH OVERTON RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ASSOCIATION.
THIS IS WHEN THE CITY WAS IN THE PROCESS OF ADOPTING THOSE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND IT STATES MR. KENNETH ABRAHAM AND MR. TED RUSHING HAVE HAD A VERY LONG STANDING PLAN IN EXISTENCE FOR PERHAPS TEN YEARS OR MORE TO BUILD STUDENT HOUSING ON LAND THEY OWN IN THE 2400 BLOCK OF 13TH AND 14TH STREETS.
IN THE MAP SKETCH I ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED WITH THE ZONING REQUEST BY THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, I HAD INADVERTENTLY INCLUDED THESE LOTS IN THE PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE. I AM HEREBY SUBMITTING A REVISED MAP WITH A DOTTED LINE RUNNING NORTH SOUTH ALONG THE CENTER OF AVENUE X, WHICH WILL CORRECT THIS ERROR ON MY PART.
THIS IS THE MAP SUBMITTED WITH THE LETTER.
THESE PROPERTIES ARE INCLUDED IN THAT.
THESE 11 ADDRESSES ARE PART OF THAT NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
TWO OF THE HOMES ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING.
HOWEVER, KEEP IN MIND, THIS DESIGNATION DOES NOT OFFER ANY PROTECTIONS FOR THESE PROPERTIES, SO IT DOES NOT PROHIBIT THE APPLICANT FROM DEVELOPING THE PROPERTIES.
THIS IS THE BOUNDARY OF THAT NATIONAL RESIDENTIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT.
THIS IS A MAP THAT WAS CREATED BY STAFF AT THE REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE OUTLINED IN RED.
RESIDENTIAL AND VACANT PROPERTIES ARE OUTLINED IN PURPLE.
[01:30:02]
RENTAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ARE OUTLINED IN YELLOW.THIS IS A GRAPHIC PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY TODAY.
SO THIS WAS THE ORIGINAL CIVIL PLAN AND THIS IS THE NEW REVISED CIVIL PLAN.
THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED.
THIS IS A NEW GRAPHIC SHOWING A SITE PLAN.
THEY ARE SHOWING TWO ADDITIONAL SURFACE PARKING LOTS.
BUT THE APPLICANT WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING THEM.
THE FORMER TYPICAL LEVEL AND THE NEW LEVEL TWO AND A NEW TYPICAL LEVEL DRAWING.
THIS IS THE AMENITY DECK LEVEL.
THIS IS THE FORMER NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION.
THIS IS THE NEW NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION.
THE FORMER EAST AND WEST AND THE NEW EAST AND WEST.
SO THIS IS THE FORMER LOOK AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER AS WELL AS FROM STREET LEVEL AND A NEW VIEW STREET LEVEL OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER. AND VIEW FROM THE WEST, SOUTH EAST.
THE FORMER NORTHEAST CORNER AND THE NEW NORTHEAST CORNER.
FORMER TOWNHOME WALK UPS AND THE NEW VIEW ALONG AVENUE X.
THIS WAS THEIR FORMER BREAKDOWN OF THE GARAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE LEASING AN AMENITY SPACE WHERE THEY HAD A TOTAL OF 12,000FTĀ² FOR LEASING AN AMENITY SPACE, PROPOSING UP TO 330 UNITS, 720 BEDS.
THE LEASING AND AMENITY SPACE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO 7,845.
THIS WAS THE FORMER PARKING INFORMATION WHERE THEY WERE PROVIDING 544 SPACES.
THEIR NEW CALCULATIONS, THEY WILL BE PROVIDING 597 SPACES WITH THE ADDITIONAL TWO SURFACE LOTS.
THEY WOULD BE PROVIDING A TOTAL OF 639.
THEIR FORMER DEVIATIONS WERE SETBACKS, BUT ALONG ALL FOUR STREETS, 14TH AVENUE, 15TH AND THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS ADJACENT TO ANOTHER PROPERTY.
THEIR NEW PROPOSAL FOR THEIR DEVIATIONS IS A SETBACK OF 13FT FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE ALONG 14TH STREET, A DEVIATION OF 12FT SETBACK OF 20FT FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE AVENUE, A DEVIATION OF FIVE FEET, SETBACK OF 11.5FT FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE 15TH STREET, A DEVIATION OF 13.5FT AND A SETBACK OF EIGHT FEET FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, A DEVIATION OF 17FT TO REINFORCE THE NEIGHBORHOOD WALK UP UNITS HAVE BEEN LOCATED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING.
FORMER DEVIATIONS IN REGARDS TO PARKING, MIXED USE AND LOT COVERAGE.
THEY ARE REQUESTING TO ALLOW FOR RESTAURANTS, RETAIL PERSONAL SERVICE USES IN ADDITION TO THE PERMITTED THREE USES, WHICH WILL BE FOR MIXED USE AND ALLOW FOR A 70.7% LOT COVERAGE IN LIEU OF THE MAXIMUM 40%.
IMPROVE THE OVERALL AESTHETIC OF THE OVERTON AREA, MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, SPUR CONTINUING DEVELOPMENT IN THIS CURRENTLY UNDERSERVED AREA, ALLOW FOR FULL AND EFFICIENT USE OF THE PROPERTY AND ACCOMMODATE THE FULL SCOPE OF THE PROJECT.
AND THIS IS AN ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT.
[01:35:04]
THIS IS FROM A TRAFFIC STUDY CONDUCTED BY KIMLEY-HORN.IT STATES THAT IN THIS CASE, THE PROPOSED SITE IS CONSIDERABLY CLOSE TO TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY CAMPUS AND WILL BE LESS THAN A FIVE MINUTE WALK FOR STUDENTS TO REACH THE CAMPUS. FOR THIS REASON, A VAST MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS ARE EXPECTED TO BIKE OR WALK TO CAMPUS.
IN ADDITION, CITIBUS ALSO HAS TWO MAIN BUS ROUTES ALONG UNIVERSITY AVENUE, ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, INCREASING THE LIKELIHOOD FOR RESIDENTS TO USE A NON-MOTORIZED MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AS SHOWN BELOW.
THE MAJORITY OF TRAFFIC IS EXPECTED TO UTILIZE UNIVERSITY AVENUE TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE.
THIS IS AN HOURLY VARIATION FOR OFF CAMPUS STUDENT APARTMENTS, AND IT SHOWS THE NUMBER OF GENERATED TRIPS AT THE PEAK AM HOUR AND PEAK PM HOUR. AFTER ANALYZING AN AVERAGE OF THE PEAK TRAFFIC VOLUMES, THE PROPOSED SITE IS EXPECTED TO CONTRIBUTE 2.7% OF THE TOTAL TRAFFIC ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND 1.8% OF THE TOTAL TRAFFIC ON AVENUE X DURING PEAK HOURS.
IN SUMMARY, THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED OFF CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WILL PLAY A LARGE ROLE IN LIMITING THE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT TO THE SURROUNDINGS, WITH THE SITE BEING LOCATED ONE BLOCK FROM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY CAMPUS OR LESS THAN A FIVE MINUTE WALK.
IT IS EASILY WALKABLE AND BIKEABLE FOR RESIDENTS, AND THIS WAS A HISTORICAL LINK.
VOLUMES AND GROWTH RATES FOR THE AREA FROM 2012 TO 2022, WITH AN OVERALL AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH IN TRAFFIC OF -2.8%. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS AREA FOR RESIDENTIAL DENSITY.
ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE TO A3 IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THIS DESIGNATION, THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL HELP ESTABLISH A DESIGN THAT WILL PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS.
THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE NEXT TO OTHER APARTMENT ZONING DISTRICTS AND THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL ALONG UNIVERSITY IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.
15TH STREET IS THE COLLECTOR AND UNIVERSITY IS THE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL.
STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.
I'M SURE THERE PROBABLY WILL BE QUESTIONS.
ALL RIGHT. THE COUNCIL WILL NOW CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR AGENDA ITEM 7.14.
PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN FOR AGENDA ITEM 7.14.
AS YOU STEP TO THE MIC, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS.
AND AGAIN, REMEMBER, REMEMBER THE RULES OF CONSISTENCY AND NON REPETITION OF MORE QUESTIONS.
THIS LADY THAT WAS THERE RIGHT NOW I LIVE IN THAT AREA.
OKAY, MA'AM, IF YOU'LL TAKE JUST A MINUTE, I'LL EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT'S HAPPENING.
OKAY. WE ARE OPENING A PUBLIC HEARING.
YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK.
OKAY. IF YOU'RE SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION TO THE.
OKAY, MA'AM, IF YOU'LL PLEASE HOLD.
HOLD ON. IF YOU'RE SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION, YOU'LL HAVE A CHANCE TO COME FORWARD TO THE MICROPHONE.
YOU WILL STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, AND YOU'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO STATE YOUR OPPOSITION.
SO NOW, ONCE AGAIN, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.
IS ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS CASE? YOU MAY STEP FORWARD NOW.
MY NAME IS [INAUDIBLE] COUNCIL MEMBERS.
I LIVE AT CARILLON AT 4002 16TH STREET, AND I HAD ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO SPEAK AT THE CITIZENS COMMENTS TIME, BUT WAS TOLD I COULD NOT SPEAK THERE UNLESS I WAS SPEAKING TO ONE OF THE ISSUES.
AND WHAT I'M GOING TO SAY IS MORE IN GENERAL ABOUT ZONING IN PARTICULAR, BUT SINCE I AM A MEMBER OF SAINT JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AND HAVE BEEN FOR 47, 57 YEARS AND STARTED MY LIFE IN LUBBOCK ASIDE FROM HAVING BEEN BORN THERE A LONG, LONG TIME AGO, I CAME AS A NEWLYWED IN 1957.
SO I HAVE A LONG HISTORY OF LIVING ON 14TH 15TH STREET, AND MY VEHICLE IS NOW PARKED ON 15TH
[01:40:08]
STREET AT CARILLON.SO I'VE COME A LONG, LONG, LONG DISTANCE, BUT MY HEART IS STILL WITH SOUTH OVERTON.
I THANK YOU IN PERSON, NOT IN PERSON, BUT IN MESSAGES THIS PAST WEEK.
BUT I WANTED TO SAY ALOUD HOW MUCH I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT YOU DO AS REPRESENTATIVES FOR ALL OF US AND CARRYING THE RESPONSIBILITIES THAT YOU HAVE. AND AS YOU ARE GIVING THAT SERVICE AND MAKING IMPORTANT DECISIONS, THAT BECOMES EASIER IF THERE'S A CLEAR PURPOSE OR A MISSION FOR MAKING ONE CHOICE ABOVE ANOTHER.
AND I HOPE THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU THIS STATEMENT.
I ASK THAT THEY BE PUT AT ON THE DAIS IN FRONT OF YOU.
WE ARE FORTUNATE IN LUBBOCK THAT UNDER PURPOSE IN THE ORDINANCE SECTION 40 AND THEN AS MISSION FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT IN ANOTHER PORTION ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE, OUR CITY HAS THESE LISTED WITH A SET OF VALUES, A LIST OF IMPORTANT THINGS THAT ARE TO BE OBSERVED WHEN LAND IS BEING ZONED OR REZONED.
YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU A COPY OF THESE EXACTLY AS THEY APPEAR ON THE WEBSITE.
IT'S MY HOPE THAT AS YOU HEAR THE ZONING CASES THAT ARE BEFORE YOU TODAY, YOU'LL PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION TO ALL THE RATIONALES THAT ARE GIVEN BY THOSE FAR AND THOSE AGAINST ZONE CHANGES, WHETHER THEY ARE STAFF SPEAKERS FOR OR AGAINST OR FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS. AS YOU LISTEN TO THESE CASES, PLEASE CHECK THE ZONING PROPOSAL AGAINST THE MISSION VALUES THAT YOU SEE ON THOSE STATEMENTS.
I HOPE THAT BECAUSE THIS STATEMENT OF PURPOSE HAS BEEN ON THE CITY A PART OF THE CITY'S GOVERNANCE FOR FIVE DECADES, WAY, WAY BACK TO 1975, AND HAS HELD UP SINCE THEN THAT YOU TOGETHER CAN LOOK AT IT AND CAN HELP MAKE YOUR DECISIONS.
SEEING IT AS A LIGHTHOUSE THAT HAS IMPORTANT THINGS FOR YOU TO CONSIDER AS YOU MAKE YOUR DECISIONS.
AGAIN, I WANT TO SAY THANKS AND I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU ARE DOING FOR ALL OF US AND HOPE THAT YOU WILL GIVE ATTENTION TO THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR LUBBOCK COMMUNITY.
AND I SINCERELY HOPE THAT THE DECISION IS MADE TO OPPOSE THIS ZONE CASE.
YOU LOOK VERY LOVELY TODAY, BY THE WAY.
ALL RIGHT. IF YOU'RE IN OPPOSITION, YOU MAY STEP FORWARD, MA'AM.
BORN AND RAISED LUBBOCK, TEXAS.
MISS REYNA WAS THAT 307 AVENUE V AS IN VICTOR? YES, SIR. SORRY, MR. MAYOR. I'M SEEING.
I'M SEEING. I'M SEEING THE CITY OF LUBBOCK.
MR. REYNA, I'M GOING TO ASK YOU NOT TO TURN AROUND AND POINT TO SPECIFIC PEOPLE.
ALL RIGHT. IT'S INAPPROPRIATE.
AND MISS SAGER, JUST GIVE THE NAME EITHER.
MISS SAGER WORKS FOR THE CITY.
SHE JUST PRESENTS THE FACTS TO US.
YOU'RE KILLING THE HISTORY OF LUBBOCK.
YOU'RE SENDING A HOMELESS, MEAN HOME OWNERS.
YOU'RE MAKING THEM DEFENSELESS, DEFENSELESS, AGAINST THE HIGHER EDUCATION.
EVERYTHING'S CATERED TO TEXAS TECH AND THE PEOPLE.
THEY PAY THEIR TAXES HERE IN LUBBOCK.
THEY LIVED HERE ALL THEIR LIFE.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MISS REYNA.
[01:45:05]
GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS.MY NAME IS TANYA HEGGIE VALDINI.
I'M AN OWNER OCCUPANT AT 1704 AVENUE X.
MAYOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO OUR CITY.
WE KNOW IT'S NOT EASY SOMETIMES AND THANK YOU FOR OFFERING THIS FORUM FOR ENGAGED, CONCERNED CITIZENS TO HAVE A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE EFFECTS OF OUR DAY TO DAY LIVES.
BLESS HER HEART, FOR HER UNWAVERING SUPPORT THROUGH THIS ENTIRE PROCESS.
HER INVALUABLE INPUT HAS BEEN SO APPRECIATED.
MAY I ASK EVERYONE WHO'S HERE IN OPPOSITION TO STAND UP WITH ME? THANK YOU. PLEASE BE SEATED.
SITUATIONS LIKE THIS DO ONE OF TWO THINGS FOR A COMMUNITY.
THEY DRIVE US APART OR THEY PULL US TOGETHER.
I HAVE NEVER IN MY LIFE STOOD SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH A MORE SCRAPPY, MORE DETERMINED, MORE COHESIVE GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS THAT I AM PROUD TO CALL NEIGHBORS. AND I STAND WITH THEM IN STRONG OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONE CHANGE.
IT IS A LETTER ABOUT ANOTHER ZONE CASE.
IT IS IN NO WAY A BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE RESIDENTS OF SOUTH OVERTON PLANNING AND ZONING AND MR. ABRAHAM. NEITHER IN 2011 OR TODAY IN 2023, AND IT WAS MOST CERTAINLY AND IS MOST CERTAINLY NOT AN AGREEMENT BY OUR RESIDENTS TO A SEVEN STORY, 700 BED HIGH RISE.
IN FACT, WE WOULD WELCOME REASONABLE, THOUGHTFUL DEVELOPMENT THAT ACTS AS A BUFFER BETWEEN THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HIGH TRAFFIC COMMERCIAL ENTITIES THAT BORDER US ON ALL FOUR SIDES.
THIS PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE WOULD ACTUALLY REMOVE THE BUFFERS SET IN PLACE BY THE 20/40 PLAN BETWEEN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
AND WE WOULD MOST CERTAINLY WELCOME THOUGHTFUL DEVELOPMENT THAT GETS RID OF THE EYESORE THAT MR. ABRAHAMS PROPERTIES HAVE BECOME.
WE WELCOME DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE DON'T WELCOME THIS DEVELOPMENT IN ITS CURRENT STATE.
IN THIS CASE, THE DEVELOPER IS USING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO CIRCUMVENT A JUMP FROM A1 TO A3.
PD SPECIFICALLY DISALLOWS ITS USE FOR THIS PURPOSE.
ADDITIONALLY, THIS ZONING REQUEST ASKS FOR VARIANCES FOR JUST ABOUT EVERY ASPECT OF A PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED PD, INCLUDING SETBACKS ON ALL THREE STREET FACING SIDES, ALONG WITH MUCH HIGHER LOT COVERAGE THAT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ALLOWED IN A3 BUT WHICH IS ALLOWING FOR SUCH DENSITY OF 700 BEDS ON SUCH A SMALL AREA OF LAND.
THOSE PARKING LOTS ARE NOT SET IN STONE AT THIS POINT.
THINK ABOUT THE DOTTED LINE THAT GOES DOWN AVENUE X 15FT IS NOT A BUFFER BETWEEN US AND A HIGH RISE.
THANKS TO THE EFFORTS OF THE CHURCH LEADERS AT SAINT JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST, THEY FACILITATED NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH DAVID PIERCE AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM PARALLEL.
WE ALSO REACHED OUT AND MET WITH MR. ABRAHAM IN HOPES THAT WE COULD SOMEWAY COME TO AN AGREEMENT OR A COMPROMISE THAT WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ALL THE PARTIES
[01:50:07]
CONCERNED. NEITHER WERE WILLING TO WORK WITH US IN ANY MEANINGFUL FASHION TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL MOST CERTAINLY HAVE ON OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.IN THE PRESENTATIONS TO FOLLOW, OUR RESIDENTS WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THE VERY VALID OBJECTIONS WE HAVE TO THIS ZONE CASE THAT WOULD ALLOW A STUDENT HIGHRISE TO BE BUILT IN THE INTERIOR OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
KEEP IN MIND, THIS ISN'T EVEN ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.
AND WOULD YOU PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR ADDRESS ONE MORE TIME? YES. 1704 AVENUE X, A BLOCK AND A HALF FROM THE CORNER OF WHERE THIS HIGH RISE WOULD START.
THANK YOU. HELLO, MY NAME IS JENNA LAFRANIERE.
I'M AT 1712 AVENUE X, I'M A PROFESSOR AND A TEXAS TECH HOMEOWNER ON AVENUE X, AND AS I JUST STATED, I'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH SOME OF YOU AND WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN BY SAYING THANK YOU AND THE WORK THAT YOU DO AND THE DIFFERENT SIDES THAT YOU MUST CONTEND WITH IN YOUR ROLES ON THIS COUNCIL I AM NOT ENVIOUS OF.
MY HUSBAND AND I HAVE SPENT THE PAST MONTH MEETING WITH ALL OF THE STAKEHOLDERS THAT WE COULD ON THIS PROJECT, CULMINATING WITH A MEETING WITH MR. ABRAHAM, WHICH I WILL SPEAK TO MOMENTARILY.
THIS PROPOSAL IN ITS CURRENT FORM IS JUST NOT IT.
AND I'D LIKE TO SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO TRAFFIC AS A REASON.
AND I CAN SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO AVENUE X.
MY HUSBAND AND I RECENTLY WENT TO SPEAK WITH MR. ABRAHAM, AND WHILE WE DID APPRECIATE THE TIME THAT HE TOOK TO MEET WITH US AND SPEAK WITH US, HE WAS NOT ONLY UNWILLING TO LISTEN TO OUR CONCERNS, BUT VEHEMENTLY DENIED ANY PRESENT DANGERS ON AVENUE X AND INSISTED THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ROADS WOULD ACTUALLY BECOME SAFER WITH THIS APARTMENT COMPLEX AS PRESENTED.
IT'S JUST MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
THOUGH STUDENTS MAY CHOOSE TO WALK TO CAMPUS, THOSE STUDENTS CANNOT WALK TO A GROCERY STORE.
THEY CANNOT WALK TO GO SHOPPING.
AVENUE X IS ALREADY A MAIN THOROUGHFARE THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND PARALLEL, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, HAS NOT PROVIDED A TRAFFIC STUDY ON AVENUE X WHILE SCHOOL IS IN SESSION. AND I MEAN TEXAS TECH AND LUBBOCK HIGH SCHOOL.
I CANNOT EMPHASIZE ENOUGH THE DANGER THAT AVENUE X CURRENTLY PRESENTS TO OUR RESIDENTS AND THEIR PROPERTY, AND THAT AGAIN, ADDING THAT 700 PLUS VEHICLES WILL ONLY LEAD TO MORE INCIDENTS AND INEVITABLY MORE DANGEROUS ONES.
YOU ARE ALL LOGICAL PEOPLE AND CAN REASON JUST AS WELL AS I CAN THAT MORE CARS CORRELATE TO MORE ACCIDENTS AND REPLACING THE 40 TO 50 PEOPLE FROM MR. ABRAHAM'S CURRENT LOTS TODAY WITH THE 700 CANNOT REDUCE THE TRAFFIC.
I BELIEVE I'VE GOT ENOUGH COPIES FOR EVERYONE, SO.
HOST TRAFFIC, NOT LOCAL ROADS, AS I BELIEVE MS. SAGER SAID. AVENUE X IS CURRENTLY A LOCAL ROAD.
[01:55:04]
IT INCLUDES BOSTON BETWEEN 19TH AND 34TH AND IT INCLUDES FLINT BETWEEN 19TH AND 34TH.AND EVEN THOUGH THOSE ARE CURRENTLY DESIGNATED AS COLLECTOR ROADS, AVENUE X HAS MORE ACCIDENTS.
THIS DATA THAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU IS FROM 2013 TO 2023.
RESIDENCES THAT DESERVE TO BE PROTECTED.
IF YOU DO APPROVE THIS PROJECT, I WOULD ASK YOU THAT IF YOU DO VOTE IN FAVOR TODAY OF THIS PROJECT THAT YOU ENCOURAGE PARALLEL AND THE BUILDING TEAM TO CONSIDER WORKING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO LIMIT STUDENTS ACCESS INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE APARTMENT DIRECTLY ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ON TRAFFIC ON OUR ROADS.
SOME SORT OF STRUCTURE THAT WOULD REWORK THE TRAFFIC FLOW TO LIMIT THE IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AVENUE X IS GOING TO BE USED BY STUDENTS TO GET WHERE THEY'RE GOING.
THEY WILL CIRCUMVENT UNIVERSITY AVENUE BECAUSE IT WILL GET OVERPOPULATED, IT WILL GET TRAFFICKY, AND IT'S GOING TO BECOME EVEN MORE TAXED WHEN TEXAS TECH BUILDS THE 1500 CAR PARKING GARAGE THAT IS PROPOSED AT THE VERY SAME INTERSECTION OF 15TH AND UNIVERSITY.
NEXT. HI, MY NAME IS MATTHEW CAVAZOS.
WE HAVE DECAYING ABANDONED PROPERTIES IN NEIGHBORHOODS BEGGING FOR DEVELOPMENT, BUT THESE DEVELOPERS, WHO I BELIEVE ARE FROM LUBBOCK THEMSELVES IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE CAN ONLY THINK OF MAXIMIZING THEIR OWN PROFITS AND FURTHERING THEIR OWN PERSONAL WILL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE ALREADY BURDENED PEOPLE THAT LIVE HERE. BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THAT'S THE REAL REASON THESE OWNERS HAVE BEEN SEEKING OUT THESE KIND OF KIND OF DEVELOPMENTS LATELY.
I'M SAYING IT'S TIME FOR LUBBOCK RESIDENTS TO PUT THEIR FOOT DOWN AND SAY NO TO THESE LUXURY DEVELOPMENTS AND INDULGENT CITY SPRAWL UNTIL WE FIX WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE.
WE NEED TO TELL DEVELOPERS AND CITY PLANNERS TO QUIT LEAVING US BEHIND.
AND WE SHOULD REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENS HERE WHEN VOTING ON THE NEXT ROAD BOND THAT COMES UP THAT OVER SERVES SIMILAR BIG MONEY INTERESTS.
THANK YOU. HELLO, COUNCIL MAYOR.
MY NAME IS ANTONIO LOPEZ, 5415 JARVIS STREET.
WHENEVER THERE IS A LARGE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY THAT IS VOICING AN ISSUE.
AND THERE IS CLEARLY A GROUP OF OVERTON RESIDENTS THAT ARE WELL EDUCATED ON THIS ISSUE, AND THEY ARE OPENLY SAYING THAT THEY ARE NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT, JUST THE RIGHT TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT.
SO WHEN YOU SEE A SEVEN STORY HIGH RISE AND THEN A COUPLE BLOCKS OVER, I SEE AN UNHOUSED PERSON, IT'S LIKE, WHAT ARE WE TRULY AFTER HERE? WHAT DOES LUBBOCK WANT TO BE AND WHAT IS LUBBOCK RIGHT NOW MATERIALISTICALLY.
WE HAVE A GREAT TOWN AND YES, WE DO HAVE A GREAT UNIVERSITY.
NO ONE'S ARGUING THAT, BUT WE MUST WATCH OUT FOR OUR POPULACE FIRST.
AND TO BOUNCE OFF THE MOMENTUM OF THE PREVIOUS STATEMENT, WE WILL.
[02:00:01]
LEVIES MIGHT BE NECESSARY.HELLO, MY NAME IS JOSH STOOVĆ.
I AM THE PASTOR AT SAINT JOHN'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AT 1501 UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
WE ARE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET, RIGHT ACROSS 15TH STREET FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
SINCE HEARING ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL, THE CHURCH HAS SPENT A LOT OF TIME LISTENING TO CONGREGATION MEMBERS LIKE MARY VINES, LISTENING TO OUR SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORS, LISTENING TO THE NEEDS OF THE CAMPUS COMMUNITY AT TECH.
WE ALSO HAD A CHANCE TO MEET WITH THE PARALLEL REPRESENTATIVES FOLLOWING THE MEETING.
WE HAVE DECIDED TO REMAIN OPPOSED TO THE SIZE AND SCOPE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.
SIMPLY PUT, THERE ARE FEWER PARKING SPACES THAN THERE ARE BEDS AVAILABLE.
IN ADDITION TO RESIDENT PARKING, WE HAVE TO THINK ABOUT VISITOR PARKING.
SO WE ARE, OF COURSE, CONCERNED THAT DRIVERS WILL ENCROACH UPON THE CHURCH PARKING LOT UPON OUR ALREADY VERY NARROW AND CROWDED SOUTH OVERTON STREETS.
PARALLELS ARGUMENT IS THAT NOT EVERY RESIDENT WILL BRING A CAR.
THEY ARGUE THAT OTHER PROPERTIES THEY HAVE IN OTHER CITIES, THE NUMBERS WORK OUT.
WE WANT TO POINT OUT THAT LUBBOCK IS DIFFERENT.
STUDENTS DO AND WILL BRING CARS, ESPECIALLY STUDENTS WHO CAN AFFORD TO LIVE IN HIGH END STUDENT HOUSING. I DO ACKNOWLEDGE IN RESPONSE TO OUR CONCERNS THAT THE DEVELOPER APPARENTLY HAS DONE WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO INCREASE PARKING.
BUT AS TANYA SAID, NOTHING IS SET IN STONE.
THERE IS ALREADY A LACK OF PARKING IN THE AREA.
NEIGHBORING ORGANIZATIONS LIKE OURS DON'T HAVE PARKING TO SPARE AND SOLUTIONS LIKE PERMITTED PARKING ONLY WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ONLY WORK IN LIMITED AREAS.
WE DON'T THINK THIS IS GOOD FOR THE POTENTIAL RESIDENTS OR FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THE ONLY WAY TO MITIGATE THESE HARMFUL IMPACTS IS TO DECREASE THE SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
TO START THIS, I SAW PEOPLE STANDING STARTING TO MOVE LEFT OR RIGHT, BRIDE, SIDE, GROOM SIDE.
IT IS A GOOD WAY TO TAKE A BREATH AND COME BEFORE YOU.
I LIVE AT 3118 20TH STREET AND I THOUGHT I WAS DONE.
BUT I AM HERE TODAY TO REPRESENT A NEIGHBORHOOD NOT REPRESENTING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT A NEIGHBOR IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT JUST RECENTLY WENT THROUGH SIMILAR SITUATION.
WHAT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK WITH YOU TODAY IS A YOU'RE ALREADY PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH.
ON MAY 22ND OF 2017, IT WAS THE KICKOFF FOR PLAN LUBBOCK 20/40 PROJECT.
THE CONSULTANT TEAM OF FREESE AND NICHOLS CITY STAFF HAD THEIR FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH THE 32 PERSON COUNCIL APPOINTED ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH WAS CHAIRED BY JOHN [INAUDIBLE].
THE CPAC SHARED THEIR HIGH LEVEL VISION FOR THE FUTURE OF LUBBOCK.
WHOEVER'S RESPONSIBLE FOR SETTING THAT ADVISORY COMMITTEE UP.
THEY HAD SOME REALLY BIG THINKERS THERE.
[02:05:08]
THE COMMUNITY THROUGHOUT THE PLANNING PROCESS.THEN ON OCTOBER 15TH OF 2018, A PUBLIC MEETING, AN OPEN HOUSE, WAS HELD TO PRESENT THE DRAFT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO THE PUBLIC FOR COMMENT. I THINK THIS MAY HAVE BEEN HELD AT THE CIVIC CENTER.
THEY WERE EXPECTING A QUITE A BIT.
IT WAS DESIGNED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC ABOUT PLAN CONTENTS AND ALLOW COMMENTS AND INTERACTION.
FOLLOWING MORE THAN 18 MONTHS OF COLLABORATION AMONGST RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES, CONSULTANTS AND BOARD MEMBERS, CITY STAFF, DECISION MAKERS AND CITIZENS WILL UTILIZE THE DOCUMENT BY IMPLEMENTING THE OBJECTIVES AND TASKS IDENTIFIED AS BEING CRUCIAL TO THE COMMUNITY IN ACHIEVING THEIR VISION. THE LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL IS EXCITED TO ANNOUNCE.
I DON'T REMEMBER IT. I DON'T THINK I WAS FOLLOWING POLITICS VERY MUCH AT THAT TIME.
BUT IT HAPPENED DECEMBER 17TH.
AFTER 18 MONTHS, COUNTLESS HOURS DONATED BY MORE THAN 30 VOLUNTEERS AND AN OUTLAY IN EXCESS OF $474,000 IN CONSULTING FEES.
THERE MAY HAVE BEEN MORE. THAT'S THE ONLY THREE THAT I COULD THINK OF THAT BEEN AROUND THIS LONG.
I DO OFFER THIS BACKGROUND FOR A REASON.
I THINK THESE EFFORTS WOULD CARRY A GREAT AMOUNT OF WEIGHT WITH ME IF I WERE PROVIDED WITH SUCH AN INCREDIBLE PLAN TO USE AS A GUIDELINE TO MAKE BIG DECISIONS LIKE THIS.
ONE QUESTION THAT WAS POSED FOR THE PROJECT WAS HOW CAN WE ENSURE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS CONTINUE TO THRIVE? THERE'S AN ENTIRE CHAPTER DEDICATED TO COMMUNITY LIVABILITY.
IT IDENTIFIES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMMUNITY, CHARACTER AND DESIGN, SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCY, BEST PRACTICES AND NEIGHBORHOOD STRATEGIES AND INCENTIVES.
THIS POSITION WAS CREATED, FILLED AND FULLY FUNDED WITH GRANT MONEY.
THERE ARE 225 OCCURRENCES OF THE WORD NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH INDICATES TO ME THAT'S AN EMPHASIS THAT WAS PLACED IN THIS CONCEPT. THERE'S A SECTION TITLED NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION, AND IT STATES THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS IN LUBBOCK ARE A VITAL PART OF THE COMMUNITY.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THESE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS ARE PROTECTED AS THE CITY GROWS.
THE HOUSING STOCK IN LUBBOCK IS IN GOOD CONDITION OVERALL, AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS IN OR NEAR EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE PRODUCTS BUILT FIT IN WITH THE FABRIC OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS TO PROTECT THEIR IDENTITY AND CHARACTER.
AND THAT IS A QUOTE STRAIGHT FROM PLAN LUBBOCK 20/40.
WHEN CITY COUNCIL VOTED IN FEBRUARY AGAINST THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST.
CASE NUMBER 3471 C, WHICH WAS CONCERNING THE GODBOLD PROPERTY ON 19TH STREET.
THESE IDEAS WERE CONSIDERED HIGH DENSITY, HIGH TRAFFIC VOLUME AND THEIR IMPACT SEEMED TO BE OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE AT THE TIME.
I'VE NOTICED THAT GEORGE HARDBERGER AND THOMAS PAYNE ARE HERE.
THERE'S CONCERN OVER THE POTENTIAL PASSAGE OF THIS CURRENT CASE, AND I'VE RECEIVED MANY CALLS AND EMAILS FROM [INAUDIBLE] UNIT NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORS ASKING IF WE CAN COUNT ON CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD VITALITY, LIVABILITY AND PRESERVATION.
[02:10:09]
SHOULD BE MADE.PERHAPS THE EMPHASIS ON NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED.
OTHERWISE, WHY DO THESE WORDS EXIST? WHY WAS CLOSE TO HALF A MILLION SPENT AND SO VERY MANY VOLUNTEER HOURS COMMITTED TO THIS PROJECT? I DO THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS.
I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU LOOK AT THESE GUIDELINES WHEN YOU'RE MAKING A DECISION FOR THE FUTURE OF SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD, AS WELL AS ANY OF OUR OTHER EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.
MY NAME IS MARY CRITES AND I LIVE AT 4617 EIGHTH STREET IN COUNCIL MEMBER LATRELLE JOYCE DISTRICT.
THIS IS A CITYWIDE ISSUE AND NOT JUST A SOUTH OVERTON ISSUE.
I'M HERE TODAY TO VOICE MY STRONG OPPOSITION IN THIS CASE.
AS A PRACTICING ARCHITECT, I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT ITS IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND REAL RESERVATIONS ABOUT THE MISUSE OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE.
THE ELEVATION YOU SEE REPRESENTS THE SEVEN STORY, 80 FOOT TALL BUILDING, WHICH IS VISUALLY OVERWHELMING THE ADJACENT ONE AND TWO STORY HOUSES.
IT'S EVEN MORE EGREGIOUS GIVEN THAT SOUTH OVERTON IS A RECOGNIZED, HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES A MINIMUM YARD SETBACK OF 30FT ALONG THE STREETS, WHICH IS NOT MET ON ANY OF THE STREETS THIS DEVELOPMENT FACES.
IN FACT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRE A LARGER SETBACK THAN A3 DOES.
BUT BEING SO CLOSE TO THE STREET REINFORCES THE MASSIVE SCALE OF THIS HALF MILLION SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON NOT NEAR ENOUGH LAND.
WHILE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS SILENT ON LOT COVERAGE, A3 LIMITS DEVELOPMENT TO 40% OF THE LOT AREA.
THIS DEVELOPMENT IS AT 70 PLUS PERCENTAGE LOT COVERAGE.
MORE OPEN SPACE IS IMPERATIVE FOR DOGS, FOR PEOPLE, AND TO SOFTEN THE SCALE BETWEEN THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD, THE ADJACENT AREA.
THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, IT APPEARS TO BE USED HERE SOLELY TO ACHIEVE A LARGER SCALE PROJECT.
DON'T REWARD THIS MISUSE OF THIS ORDINANCE.
I AM NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPING THIS TRACT OF LAND FOR STUDENT HOUSING, BUT JUST NOT AT THIS SCALE.
I WOULD SUGGEST THE OWNER EXPLORE A PROJECT MEETING A2 ZONING REQUIREMENTS.
STILL, AN INCREASE TO WHAT IT HAS NOW IS NOW.
BUT TO PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE SCALE FOR LUBBOCK AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
INSUFFICIENT LAND FOR THE DESIRED NUMBER OF BEDS IS NOT A ZONING PROBLEM.
IT'S A LAND ACQUISITION PROBLEM.
[02:15:10]
IT WILL BE EASY FOR THOSE DEVELOPERS TO POINT TO THIS PROJECT AND SAY, WHY CAN'T MY PROJECT HAVE 11 FOOT YARD SETBACKS INSTEAD OF THE 30FT REQUIRED? AND GOSH, WHY CAN'T MY DEVELOPMENT HAVE 78% LOT COVERAGE RATIO INSTEAD OF THE 40% AND INSUFFICIENT PARKING? WHY CAN'T MY BUILDING BE 80 FOOT TALL NEXT TO RESIDENCES? PLEASE VOTE NO ON THIS ZONE CASE.KELLY [INAUDIBLE] 4625, 94TH STREET, AND PREVIOUSLY DURING THREE PERIODS OF OUR HISTORY IN LUBBOCK, WE'VE LIVED ON 14TH STREET AND HOMES.
THAT WE STILL OWN WITHIN A HALF BLOCK OF THIS PROPOSED REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS NO ZONING BUFFER SPACE BETWEEN THIS REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE TO A3 ZONING AND THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES JUST ACROSS AVENUE X, AND THERE IS THIS ABRUPT ZONE CHANGE TRANSITION TO SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS ACROSS AVENUE X, ACROSS OUR ENTIRE CITY. EVEN U LOFT, WHICH WAS MENTIONED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AS THE ONLY OTHER EXAMPLE OF A3 HIGH RISE ZONING LOCATION IN NORTH OVERTON HAS SUBSTANTIAL ZONING BUFFERS SURROUNDING IT, AND THOSE ZONING BUFFERS ARE BETWEEN A THREE RETAIL AND OTHER APARTMENT COMPLEXES, NOT OR 1 OR 2 ZONED RESIDENCES. FURTHERMORE, AVENUE X IS ONLY 30FT WIDE, NARROWER EVEN THAN MOST RESIDENTIAL STREETS.
THIS IS SIMPLY A NARROW INTERIOR RESIDENTIAL CROSS STREET.
THIS JUST MAKES NO SENSE TO PLACE A HIGH RISE APARTMENT COMPLEX EXTENDING BLOCK TO BLOCK ON AVENUE X IN THIS RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR AND IN SUPPORT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
OUR COMPANY WAS THE FIRST TO COME INTO DOWNTOWN LUBBOCK AND BUILD OUR NEW WEST TEXAS EASTERN NEW MEXICO CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS AT 1602 10TH STREET, AND IN HOPES OF LEADING AND CONTRIBUTING TO REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN AND AFTER THE DEVASTATING TORNADO OF MAY 11TH, 1970.
BUT THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT SIZE, SCOPE OR POPULATION DENSITY FOR THESE 15 LOTS IN SOUTH OVERTON.
ALTHOUGH IT OCCURRED IN STEPS OVER TIME ZONING CHANGE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY GRANTED ON THESE ORIGINAL OR 1 OR 2 CONSTRUCTION ZONING IN THIS EXISTING ZONING CASE.
NOW THEY ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE A1 ZONING AND SO THEY COME BACK AND INSIST THAT THEY MUST BE GRANTED MORE EXTREME A3 ZONING AND EVEN MORE DEVIATIONS.
MY GREAT CONTRAST OUR HOMES, WHICH WE'VE OWNED UP TO 49 YEARS, BUILT IN THE SAME TIME PERIOD AND SAME ZONING JUST HALF A BLOCK ACROSS AVENUE X REMAIN AS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED, ZONED R1 AND R2.
AFTER 90 YEARS, THESE THREE OF OUR FOUR HOMES OR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SIMILAR TO THE REMAINING HOMES IN THIS ZONING CASE, I WOULD SUBMIT THAT OUR HOMES ARE JUST AS IMPORTANT TO ME, MY WIFE AND FAMILY, AS THE HOMES IN THIS ZONING CASE ARE TO KEN, HIS WIFE AND DAUGHTER.
[02:20:09]
ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION.AS A FINAL CONTRIBUTING TO FINAL CONTRASTING EXAMPLE, A FAMILY I KNOW OWNS THE SECOND HOME ACROSS AVENUE X FROM THIS REQUESTED ZONE CHANGE ON 15TH STREET.
THIS HOME IS OWNER OCCUPIED BY THEIR SON AND DAUGHTER NOW ATTENDING TEXAS TECH ARE YOU NOW TELLING THEM BY YOUR VOTE TODAY AND ALL OTHER FAMILIES LIKE THEM NOT TO PURCHASE AND RENOVATE HOMES FOR THEIR STUDENTS IS JUST A BLOCK FROM CAMPUS IN SOUTH OVERTON BECAUSE WE DON'T ENFORCE OUR EXISTING ZONING TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIVING CONDITIONS IN THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
WHAT MESSAGE DOES THIS SEND TO OTHERS IN THE DFW METROPLEX WHERE THEY LIVE? TECH'S LARGEST STUDENT ALUMNI BASE? THIS PROJECT APPEARS TO BE EVEN MORE INTRUSIVE AND DETRIMENTAL TO THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD THAN THE GODBOLD CAFE J REPLACEMENT PROJECT APPEARED TO BE TO THEIR SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
DEMOLITION OF STANDING SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL HOMES TO BUILD THIS, A3 HIGH RISE APARTMENT COMPLEX IN SOUTH OVERTON SEEMS LIKE AN EVEN MORE RADICAL, GIGANTIC LEAP FROM REPLACING A RESTAURANT RETAIL COMMERCIAL COMPLEX WITH A SIMILAR A3 PROJECT ON 19TH STREET.
CONSEQUENTLY, IT BECOMES VERY DIFFICULT TO IMAGINE HOW THIS LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL COULD POSSIBLY APPROVE ZONING CHANGES WITH SUBSTANTIAL MEANINGFUL DEVIATIONS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THIS HIGH RISE SEVEN STORY 700 BED APARTMENT COMPLEX ON AVENUE X 14TH AND 15TH STREETS WHEN A SIMILAR PROJECT ON 19TH STREET, A MAJOR SIX LANE LUBBOCK THOROUGHFARE AND STATE HIGHWAY WAS JUST RECENTLY REJECTED BY THIS CITY COUNCIL.
IF YOU WOULD KEEP THAT IN MIND WHEN PRESENTING, I KNOW YOU WANT TO GET UP THERE AND READ WHAT YOU HAVE, BUT IF YOU'LL JUST KEEP IN MIND THAT IF IT'S A SIMILAR ARGUMENT OR IF IT'S CONSISTENT WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S ARGUMENT, KEEP THAT IN MIND, PLEASE.
MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR PAYNE.
ZIP CODE 79410 IN THE TECH TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD.
BUT I USED TO LIVE IN THE SEVEN STORY MONOLITH NOW CALLED U LOFTS.
FIRST OF ALL, I'M VOICING MY OBJECTION TO THIS BUILDING PRIMARILY BECAUSE IT IS NOT NEEDED.
I SENT FORWARD AN EMAIL NOTE YESTERDAY THAT SUPPLIED THE URLS FOR WHERE THIS DATA IS FROM, AND IT'S SIMPLY THAT TEXAS TECH ALREADY HAS ON ITS PLANNING BOARDS FUTURE RESIDENCES ON CAMPUS.
AND ACCORDING TO THE POPULATION PROJECTIONS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS, TEXAS TECH IS ONLY DUE TO HAVE MAYBE 4000 MORE STUDENTS BETWEEN NOW AND THE YEAR 2035.
AND THOSE 4000 STUDENTS WILL BE READILY ACCOMMODATED BY NOT ONLY WHAT'S CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN LUBBOCK THAT NOW STANDS VACANT, BUT BY THOSE RESIDENCES TEXAS TECH PLANS TO BUILD.
SO THIS BUILDING IS SUPERFLUOUS IN TERMS OF SERVING THE NEEDS OF TECH.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, IF IT IS THE PLANNING MISSION OF LUBBOCK TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE AREAS OF SCENIC AND HISTORICAL VALUE AND PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR, THIS BUILDING IS THE ANTITHESIS OF WHAT NASA HAS IDENTIFIED AS AN URBAN HEAT ISLAND.
THIS BUILDING WILL EXACERBATE THE CREATION OF AN URBAN HEAT ISLAND IN THE MIDDLE OF A HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD DUE TO ITS FOOTPRINT AND THE ABSENCE OF GREEN SPACE ALL AROUND IT.
[02:25:06]
BY STEEL, BY ROOFTOPS, AND IS DEEMED TO BE DISPROPORTIONATELY NEGATIVE IN ITS EFFECT ON THE HEALTH OF NEARBY RESIDENTS.NOW, AS TO MY EXPERIENCE LIVING IN A SEVEN STORY MONOLITH, YOU ALL MAY BE FAMILIAR THAT YOU U LOFTS IS BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY UNIVERSITY AVENUE, THE NORTH BY 10TH STREET, THE SOUTH BY MAIN STREET, AND TO THE EAST IS AVENUE X.
I LIVED ON THE SEVENTH FLOOR OF B WING, THE SECOND FLOOR OF A WING DOWN IN THE APARTMENTS.
AND I WAS A RESIDENTIAL ADVISOR.
AND I WILL TELL YOU THAT THIS KIND OF HUGE BUILDING EDIFICE THAT HOUSES STUDENTS IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO THEIR HEALTH, WELFARE OR WELL-BEING.
WE HAD IN THAT BUILDING ONE SUICIDE OF A MEDICAL STUDENT THAT JUMPED OUT OF THE SEVENTH STORY WINDOW, STUDENTS WHO DROVE THEIR VEHICLES OFF THE PARKING GARAGE INTO THE SWIMMING POOL.
WE HAD FOUR MURDERS RIGHT AROUND THAT BUILDING WHILE I LIVED THERE.
WHY DOES THIS HAPPEN? THERE'S NOBODY SITTING ON A FRONT PORCH TALKING TO THE NEIGHBOR NEXT TO THEM.
THERE'S NOBODY LIKE US OVER IN TECH TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO MENTOR OUR STUDENT RENTERS NEXT DOOR.
JUMPED THEIR CARS WHEN THEIR BATTERIES ARE DEAD.
THESE KINDS OF BUILDINGS CREATE AN ANONYMOUS TYPE OF SITUATION FOR OUR STUDENTS, AND WE WOULD RATHER HAVE OUR TEXAS TECH STUDENTS LIVING IN LOWER, MORE HUMAN SCALE TYPES OF BUILDINGS.
I WOULD THINK WHERE THE LIVING IS MORE CONDUCIVE TO BUILDING A RELATIONSHIP WITH A NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR TO YOU OR MAYBE A NEIGHBOR, ONE STORY ABOVE YOU, BUT SEVEN STORIES. NOBODY EVEN KNEW WHO ELSE WAS IN THE BUILDING.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
IT'S COVERED. THIS IS THE ONE I HAVE.
THE ONE THAT THEY SUBMITTED YESTERDAY.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE IN THE PRESENTATION.
OH, OKAY. MY NAME IS CINDY MARTIN.
I LIVE AT 3701 97TH STREET, AND I'M IN DISTRICT FOUR.
I'M A MEMBER OF THE LUBBOCK HERITAGE SOCIETY AND SERVE ON THE LUBBOCK COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION.
AND I'M ALSO WOULD AND IT'LL BE AFFECTED BY THE DEVELOPMENT.
SO FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS, I'M INTERESTED IN WHAT HAPPENS HERE WITH THIS ZONING CASE TODAY.
AND I WANT TO SPEAK OBVIOUSLY IN OPPOSITION, BUT I SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER AT BEING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT.
WE HAD ANOTHER MAP, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO SHOW.
SO I'M NOT I'M NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO TO SEE ON THIS PARTICULAR MAP HERE.
BUT JUST SUFFICE IT TO SAY THAT THIS THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE DESIGNATIONS.
I APOLOGIZE TO INTERRUPT. MISS CRITES TOLD ME WHERE IT'S LOCATED.
IT'S ONE SHE SENT. YEAH, SHE'S SENT IT.
THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD IS LUBBOCK'S OLDEST NEIGHBORHOOD PLATTED.
IN 1907, AS PART OF THE OVERTON EDITION, DEVELOPED BY DR.
MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENCES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD DATE TO THE 1920S AND 30S.
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY TIED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TEXAS TECH IN THE 1980S, LUBBOCK BEGAN TO UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF THESE HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THERE ARE A NUMBER HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS LOCAL LANDMARKS.
[02:30:04]
IF ANY OF YOU BEEN TO SAN ANTONIO AND SEEN THE KING WILLIAM DISTRICT, THAT'S A NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT THERE.WILLIAMSBURG. ANOTHER NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT AUTHORIZED IN 1966.
THE NATIONAL REGISTER IS PART OF THE NATIONAL PROGRAM TO COORDINATE AND SUPPORT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY, EVALUATE AND PROTECT AMERICA'S HISTORIC RESOURCES. IT'S AN IMPORTANT DESIGNATION, AND IT'S NOT EASY TO OBTAIN.
THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND YOU'VE HEARD ALL THE VERY REAL CONCERNS RAISED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS.
SO I'M NOT GOING TO REPEAT ANY OF THOSE, BUT THEY'RE REAL AND RATIONAL CONCERNS.
CURRENT ZONING ALLOWS DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED SITE AND ALLOWS FOR THE BUILDING OF APARTMENTS, BUT AT A SCALE THAT WOULD BE MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. ALLOWING SUCH A LARGE SCALE, HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THIS TYPE OF NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT IS, WELL, JUST WRONG. IT'S NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND IT WILL CHANGE, WILL CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA.
IT'S DRAMATICALLY OUT OF SCALE, WILL ADVERSELY IMPACT THE HISTORICAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND GOES AGAINST THE CITY'S OWN PAST COMMITMENT TO ITS OWN HISTORY AND TO THIS PARTICULAR NEIGHBORHOOD.
IN CONVERSATIONS WITH RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS, THE DEVELOPER HAS INDICATED THE VALUE OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO TEXAS TECH AND DEVELOPING A MORE COHESIVE STUDENT EXPERIENCE ALONG UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
AND THIS DEVELOPER WILL LIKELY NOT HOLD THIS PROPERTY FOR MORE THAN FIVE YEARS.
SO WHATEVER GUARANTEES OR COMMITMENTS MADE TODAY ARE NOT GOING TO BE SUPPORTED LONG TERM.
AND SUPPORTING THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE ONE OF THOSE.
AND I ASK YOU TO TAKE A DIFFERENT VIEW.
IT'S THE NEIGHBORHOOD CLOSEST TO TEXAS TECH, AND IT'S A REAL OPPORTUNITY FOR INVESTMENT.
I MENTIONED KING WILLIAM DISTRICT IN SAN ANTONIO BEFORE.
IT WAS PRETTY DERELICT WHEN THAT WHEN THAT DISTRICT BEGAN AND WHEN THEY BEGAN THE DEVELOPMENT OF IT.
STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT PRESERVATION IS OF ECONOMIC BENEFIT TO CITIES, AND CITIES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY ARE BEGINNING TO REALIZE THAT OUR OWN DOWNTOWN IS SEEING INVESTMENT DOLLARS.
SOUTH OVERTON HAS 397 OF THE STRUCTURES THERE WERE OF CONTRIBUTING NATURE WHEN THAT DISTRICT WAS WAS ESTABLISHED.
BUT THE OPPORTUNITY IS NOT IN A HIGH DENSITY, HIGH RISE APARTMENTS THAT TRADITIONALLY LOSE PRESTIGE AND VALUE OVER TIME AS THEY'RE SOLD OFF EVERY FEW YEARS. BUT IN SUPPORTING AND PRESERVING THIS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD AND HELPING IT DEVELOP INTO INTO SOMETHING A LITTLE BETTER.
ALL LUBBOCK NEIGHBORHOODS ARE IMPORTANT.
AND SOMEONE MENTIONED THE 20/40 PLAN THAT FOCUSED ON THAT.
IT'S BEEN RECOGNIZED BOTH LOCALLY AND NATIONALLY AND LUBBOCK HAS THE CITY OF LUBBOCK HAS MADE COMMITMENTS IN THE PAST TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT DESERVES YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT.
[02:35:03]
I LOOKED ONLINE AT JUST IN, YOU KNOW, DOING SOME RESEARCH FOR THIS THAT KIND OF PLATFORMS AND WHAT EACH OF YOU LOOKED AT WHEN YOU WERE RUNNING FOR OFFICE.AND JUST A COUPLE OF QUOTES, ONE FROM WAS WE MUST BE RESPONSIVE, TO OUR CITIZENS NEEDS.
ANOTHER, IT WAS IMPORTANT FOR THE PEOPLE OF LUBBOCK TO FEEL LIKE THEIR COUNCIL LISTENS TO THEM.
AND SOME OF YOU EVEN MENTIONED SPECIFICALLY THE NEED TO SUPPORT NEIGHBORHOODS.
COUNCILWOMAN WILSON SAID MAINTAINING IT WAS IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN LUBBOCK'S SMALL TOWN VALUES.
AND, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WANT TO BE AUSTIN, WHO IS OVERDEVELOPED IN THE WRONG PLACES.
AND COUNCILWOMAN PATTERSON HARRISON HAD HAD A GOOD QUOTE.
AND IF ONE PART IS NOT WELL, THAT MEANS WE'RE ALL NOT WELL.
SO I URGE YOU TO LISTEN TO THESE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS OF SOUTH OVERTON AND UPHOLD YOUR COMMITMENT TO SUPPORTING NEIGHBORHOODS AND THIS PARTICULAR NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT AND DENY THE ZONING CHANGE.
I AM IN STEVE MASSENGALE'S DISTRICT AT 4012 69TH STREET.
I WANT TO EXPRESS MY EXTREME OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONING CHANGE ON SEVERAL DIFFERENT LEVELS, WHICH YOU HAVE CLEARLY HAD A GOOD CHANCE TO HEAR, SEE AND TALK ABOUT.
AND AS MANY OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SAID, I'M NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT.
IN FACT, MY COMPANY, WILLIAM R.
SCOTT COMPANY, WAS A SUBCONTRACTOR IN DEVELOPMENT.
I JUST AM OPPOSED TO THIS DEVELOPMENT.
SO I THINK THERE'S JUST KIND OF TWO THINGS THAT AS COUNCILMEMBERS, YOU ALL NEED TO CONSIDER.
YOUR JOB IS TO REPRESENT THE CITIZENS OF LUBBOCK.
AND NUMBER TWO, I THINK YOU SHOULD HONESTLY ASK YOURSELF, WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE THIS SEVEN STORY STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT NEXT DOOR TO YOU? I FEEL LIKE IF YOU AND I'M ON THE LUBBOCK COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION, I'M ON THE LUBBOCK HERITAGE SOCIETY BOARD.
SO YES, I AM A PRESERVATIONIST, BUT I'M A REALIST, TOO.
AND I THINK IF YOU WILL ANSWER THOSE TWO QUESTIONS HONESTLY, WHO ARE YOU HERE TO REPRESENT? AND WOULD YOU LIKE THIS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? I THINK YOUR VOTE WILL BE CLEAR.
HONORABLE MAYOR, MAYOR PRO TEM, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
I AM ROGER SETTLER, A LIFELONG RESIDENT OF THE HISTORIC BROADWAY CORRIDOR.
I SUBMIT FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION PETITIONS WHICH CONTAIN DOZENS OF SIGNATURES NOT JUST FROM OVERTON, BUT FROM THE VARIOUS ENDANGERED NEIGHBORHOODS WHICH THE CONGRESS REPRESENTS TECH TERRACE.
HEART OF LUBBOCK NORTH LUBBOCK, WHICH REPRESENTS BENSON AT JACKSON MAHON, GUADALUPE PARKWAY, CHERRY POINT AND DUNBAR MANHATTAN.
AND THESE NEIGHBORHOODS STAND IN SOLIDARITY AND HAVE SIGNED OUR PETITIONS IN SOLIDARITY WITH THE RESIDENTS OF OVERTON AGAINST THIS HORRIBLY INAPPROPRIATE PROJECT.
YOU KNOW, IT'S SAID OUT OF ADVERSITY OFTENTIMES IS BORN OPPORTUNITY.
PEOPLE SAY, WELL, THERE'S THE SPECTER OF PARANOIA.
IT IS NOT PARANOIA WHEN YOU REALIZE A LEGITIMATE THREAT AND THESE NEIGHBORHOODS FEEL THREATENED.
THEY FEEL THREATENED BY GENTRIFICATION, THEY FEEL THREATENED BY URBAN SPRAWL.
AND WE SEE EVIDENCES OF THAT IN ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS I'VE MENTIONED.
DEVELOPERS COVET SOME OF THE PROPERTIES.
SUSAN TOMLINSON VERY ELOQUENTLY SPOKE TO THE FACT THAT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WHO WERE DISPLACED BY THE TRAVESTY CALLED OVERTON NORTH ARE FORGOTTEN TODAY.
[02:40:02]
I KNEW A LOT OF THOSE PEOPLE.WELL, I SUBMIT TO YOU A CATHEDRAL IN LONDON, ONE OF THE GRANDEST STRUCTURES IN EUROPE.
THERE IS A PLAQUE TO SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN, THE ARCHITECT OF THAT CATHEDRAL.
AND ON IT, THE PLAQUE READS IF YOU SEEK HIS MONUMENT, LOOK AROUND YOU.
SO WHAT DO WE WANT OUR MONUMENT TO BE? MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
DO WE WANT OUR MONUMENT TO BE A BIG UGLY EDIFICE, A MONOLITH THAT PAINS THE EYE AND STABS THE HEART? OR DO WE WANT THAT MONUMENT TO BE A LEGITIMATE VISION LIKE THE ONE IN GRAPES OF WRATH, OF PEOPLE LIVING IN COMMUNITY LOVING AND HELPING EACH OTHER, LIVING IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS THEY WANT, LIVING AND THRIVING, RAISING THEIR CHILDREN.
THAT IS THE DREAM OF THE PEOPLE IN OUR HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOODS OF LUBBOCK WHO STAND IN UNITY.
FINALLY, AFTER ALL THESE YEARS TO SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR HEART, YOU KNOW WHAT'S RIGHT, JUST SAY NO TO THIS HORRIBLY INAPPROPRIATE PROJECT WE SEND TO YOU AN SOS, SAVE OVERTON SOUTH AND SAVE THE OTHER HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOODS.
JUST SAY NO TO THIS HORRIBLY INAPPROPRIATE PROJECT.
ROGER, I KNOW YOU PRACTICED THAT THIS MORNING IN YOUR BATHROOM, IN THE MIRROR.
[LAUGHTER] I KNOW YOU PRACTICED THAT.
[APPLAUSE] GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M JANE HENRY.
I LIVE AT 5233 20TH STREET, 79407.
WE COULD WALK TO SAINT PAUL'S CHURCH AT THE END OF THE BLOCK.
WE LIVED ON 16TH THREE HOUSES OFF OF AVENUE X.
IT WAS A WONDERFUL PLACE TO BE AND IT STILL IS.
WHEN WE GO TO CHURCH THERE ON SUNDAYS, WE SIT UNDER A WINDOW THAT SHOWS A BIBLE VERSE ON THE TOP AND SOMETHING THAT APPLIES TO THAT VERSE UNDERNEATH THE ONE OF OUR FAVORITES IS THE COMMUNION.
THE COMMUNION SERVICE THAT REPRESENTS THE BIBLE VERSE.
AND THEN BELOW IT THE CITIZENS BEING GIVEN COMMUNION OUT OF A CHUCK WAGON.
THIS IS KIND OF THE HEART OF THE ESSENCE OF SOUTH OVERTON.
AND TO PUT A SEVEN STORY BUILDING THAT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM MILWAUKEE TO PHOENIX NEXT DOOR IS A VERY SAD IDEA TO ME. I THINK THAT A BETTER USE OF WE HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE THERE, WE HAVE STREETS, WE HAVE FIREHOUSES, WE HAVE SCHOOLS.
A BETTER USE OF SOME OF THE CITY'S MONEY AND ENGINEERING AND EXPERTISE WOULD BE TO HELP GROW THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, PROVIDE SOME FUNDS AND SOME EXPERTS WHO COULD HELP PEOPLE TAKE SOME OF THESE HOUSES AND RESTORE THEM.
LET'S LET THAT NEIGHBORHOOD GROW AND NOT BLIGHT IT BY SOMETHING THAT'S TOO BIG AND TOO OUT OF SCALE.
THANK YOU MR. MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL.
I'M A PRACTICING ARCHITECT, GRADUATED FROM TEXAS TECH A BAZILLION YEARS AGO IN 1971.
SO I'M OLDER THAN DIRT, BUT I CAME BACK TO LUBBOCK 31 YEARS AGO AND HAVE BEEN PRACTICING EVER SINCE.
I'VE BEEN HONORED TO DO A WHOLE BUNCH OF WONDERFUL PROJECTS.
YOU'VE HEARD SOME OF THIS ALREADY, BUT I'M GOING TO REPEAT ONE THING, MR. MAYOR. I APOLOGIZE.
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MUST BY STATUTE.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT, I'M NOT AN ATTORNEY.
MUST MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA.
[02:45:04]
ALREADY BE PERMITTED IN THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT.TWO AND I'M NOT READING THEM ALL LAND USE PATTERNS ESTABLISHED BY THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING AND PLANNED USES ON AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE MUST COMPLY.
WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT IN A MINUTE.
EVERYBODY'S LOOKING BACK THERE.
AM I IN TROUBLE? OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED AS A MEANS OF INCREASING THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT. MUST COMPLY WITH THOSE, ANY ONE OF THEM.
THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CANNOT MOVE FORWARD BY STATUTE.
NOW. I JUST READ THE THINGS THAT ARE NEEDED FOR A CONCEPT PLAN.
NOW, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT Y'ALL, BUT IN MY WORLD OF BEING AN ARCHITECT, CONCEPT MEANS IT'S VERY YOUNG.
WE CAN TWEAK IT LATER ON, AND THAT IS, IT COULD GROW.
DOUBT THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD WANT TO REDUCE IT.
PLEASE REMEMBER THAT IN YOUR THOUGHTS.
IF WE WERE TALKING IN ONE MONTH, IN ABOUT TWO WEEKS, THE UDC WOULD BE IN FORCE AND HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT FOR HOUSING WOULD BE 45FT TALL MAX, PLEASE KEEP THAT IN MIND AS YOU THINK THROUGH AND DISCUSS WHERE THIS PROJECT IS GOING.
NOW, I SAID, I'M AN ARCHITECT AND I AM ONE OF THOSE.
I DRAW PICTURES, BUT I DO HAVE DREAMS. ONE OF MY GRADUATE DEGREES.
AND I KNOW THERE'S A BOOK THAT SAYS I'M NOT SUPPOSED TO PAT MYSELF ON THE BACK IS IN URBAN DESIGN.
URBAN DESIGN IS WHEN YOU START LOOKING AT HOW A PROJECT FITS IN WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
HOW DOES IT WEAVE ITS PIECE TO THE FABRIC OF A NEIGHBORHOOD? I KNOW THAT THE U LOFTS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED A NUMBER OF TIMES IS THE INSPIRATION FOR THIS PROJECT.
WELL, THAT PROJECT CAME BEFORE OUR CURRENT ZONING WAS INSTITUTED IN THE EARLY 70S.
BUT LET'S THINK ABOUT THE U LOFTS.
YOU'RE STANDING ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE.
THERE IS A SCALED DOWN PART OF THAT BUILDING.
IT'S I'M GOING TO GUESS 30FT TALL SETS BACK PROBABLY 30 OR MORE FEET.
THAT'S WHAT'S ON THE STREET THAT THE PEDESTRIAN AND THE NEIGHBORS EXPERIENCE.
THEN YOU AS YOU GO FURTHER TO THE EAST, THERE'S A PARKING STRUCTURE.
BUT IT EVEN STEPS DOWN TO THREE STORY APARTMENT PROJECTS THAT HAVE RECENTLY BEEN DEVELOPED THERE.
LET'S TALK ABOUT URBAN DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT.
YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD THAT IT'S TOO MUCH ON A TOO SMALL SITE.
I WANT YOU TO THINK ABOUT TWO BUILDINGS RIGHT NOW, THIS BUILDING BEING ONE OF THEM WE'RE IN TODAY.
YOU CAN DO IT TO ME. THAT'S OKAY.
60% OF THIS BUILDING CUT THE TOP FOUR STORIES OFF.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BUILDING THE OFFICE BUILDING THAT TEXAS TECH OWNS AT 19TH AND UNIVERSITY.
THAT'S JUST A LITTLE SHORTER THAN THIS PROJECT.
THINK ABOUT THAT BUILDING IN WHERE THIS PROJECT IS PROPOSED.
IT'S GOING TO REFLECT WHAT'S AROUND IT.
THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS NOT GLASS.
NOW, I'M PRETTY SURE I COULD BE WRONG.
THAT IS A CEMENT VERSUS CEMENT BOARD SCAN, NOT BRICK.
THE NORTH THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD IS BRICK.
[02:50:09]
THIS IS NOT TAN.THIS IS DARK AND IT'S ALSO A WALL.
I WANT TO THINK ABOUT WHERE YOU ARE RIGHT NOW AND WHERE I AM.
WE'RE ABOUT TEN FEET APART AT THIS SPOT.
IT'S 84FT TALL BECAUSE THERE'S A PARAPET UP THERE.
THE CODE OF MEASURES AT THE TOP OF THE ROOF, 84FT STRAIGHT UP.
NOW, THERE'S SOME ARTICULATION, BUT IT'S 84FT STRAIGHT UP ON ALL FOUR SIDES.
THAT IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SOUTH OVERTON NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT IS AN ENORMOUS BUILDING THAT IS WAY TOO BIG.
THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT URBAN.
IT IS TOO MUCH ON TOO LITTLE OF A SITE.
IT'S TOO TALL FROM AN URBAN DESIGN STANDPOINT.
WE'VE TALKED ABOUT PARKING ON THE STREET BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN.
I'VE HAD THE PLEASURE OF SENDING THREE DAUGHTERS TO SCHOOL.
THE FIRST THING I HEARD WHEN THEY GOT THAT THING SAYS DRIVER'S LICENSE IS I WANT A CAR.
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT GIVE ME A SECOND, OKAY? THERE'S GOING TO BE PEOPLE PARKING ON THAT STREET.
IF YOU PARK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREETS THAT SURROUND THIS SITE, FIRE APPARATUS ARE GOING TO HAVE A HELL OF A TIME, EXCUSE MY LANGUAGE, TO GET IN THERE AND GET THEIR LADDERS UP TO THIS BUILDING TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND THE SAFETY AND THE WELFARE OF THOSE OCCUPANTS.
AND IT IS A HIGH RISE BUILDING BECAUSE THE TOP FLOOR IS MORE THAN 65FT IN THE AIR.
IT IS A FAR MORE COMPLICATED PROJECT.
EMERGENCY EGRESS AND ACCESS IS REALLY CHALLENGED AND FROM AN URBAN DESIGN STANDPOINT DOES NOT FIT.
I ENCOURAGE YOU TO EITHER DENY THIS OR SUGGEST TO THE DEVELOPER, TO THE OWNER TO GO BACK AND SIT DOWN, ROLL THEIR SLEEVES UP, SHARPEN THEIR PENCILS AND COME UP WITH A PROPOSAL THAT FITS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD FABRIC, THAT HELPS THE NEIGHBORS EMBRACE THE PROJECT AND COME BACK TO YOU AT A FUTURE DATE.
THANK YOU. BUY A RAISED IN A SHOW OF HANDS, HOW MANY MORE PEOPLE DO I ANTICIPATE WILL BE IN OPPOSITION THAT WILL BE SPEAKING ONE, TWO.
AND THEN TED. TED IS THREE OVER HERE.
ALL RIGHT. IN OTHER WORDS, WHERE'S ANOTHER ONE? OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU, SIR. SURE. HELLO, MR. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL.
I LIVE AT 3308 59TH STREET, AND I HAVE MULTIPLE PROPERTIES ON 14TH, 15TH, 16TH STREET AND AVENUE W, AND I WOULDN'T BE HERE TODAY IF THIS WAS A 2 OR 3 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING.
I WANT TO JUST THROW THAT OUT.
GLAD TO HEAR THAT THEY HAVE INCREASED THE PARKING SPACES FOR RESIDENTS, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE GUESTS? 700 BEDS.
IF 10% OF THE PEOPLE HAVE A GUEST, THAT'S 70 CARS.
WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO PARK? TWO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.
PARKING LOTS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BUILDING.
I DID A LITTLE GOOGLE WHILE WE WERE LOOKING.
THOSE WILL HOLD APPROXIMATELY 20 SPACES, 20 CARS.
BUT THOSE ARE FOR THE RESIDENTS.
IF THEY'RE NOT SECURED, THEY'LL JUST BE FOR ANYBODY, INCLUDING THE PEOPLE THAT DON'T BUY A SPACE.
AND THAT'S REALLY MY POINT IS AND I DON'T WANT TO REHASH EVERYTHING BUT GUEST PARKING.
[02:55:09]
I HAD TO MAKE A THIRD SLOT.MR. MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
I DON'T LIVE IN SOUTH OVERTON, BUT I'M HERE TO SUPPORT THE PEOPLE WHO DO LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALL THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN NEIGHBORHOODS IN LUBBOCK.
I LOVE THE CLEAN AIR AND I LOVE THE SCALE OF OUR CITY.
I AM A REFUGEE FROM AUSTIN, TEXAS.
I DO NOT WANT TO LIVE THERE ANYMORE AND I CERTAINLY DON'T WANT LUBBOCK TO BECOME ANOTHER AUSTIN.
AND SO I URGE YOU TO BE CAREFUL IN YOUR PLANNING AND MINDFUL OF THE GRACIOUS PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOODS.
ALL RIGHT, TED, CLOSING ARGUMENTS HERE.
THANK YOU ALL. I THINK I'M THE LAST ONE, SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO PUNCH IT UP.
KEEP IT QUICK. GIVE ME JUST ONE MINUTE.
YEAH, I JUST TOGGLE BACK AND FORTH A COUPLE ABOUT.
THAT'S THE ONE FROM YOURS FROM P&Z.
YEAH. DO I JUST TOGGLE BACK AND FORTH? YEAH, YOU CAN JUST USE THE ARROWS.
I CAN TELL BY THE LOOKS ON YOUR FACES, YOU'VE HAD ENOUGH.
SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO KEEP THIS VERY QUICK AND TO THE POINT AND HOPEFULLY INTERESTING.
SO I APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE.
I APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE AND EVERYTHING Y'ALL HAVE DONE.
IF YOU CAN JUST HANG IN THERE WITH ME FOR JUST A LITTLE BIT LONGER, WE'LL GET THIS MOVING.
WE CAN HAVE INTELLIGENT PEOPLE CAN HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION.
AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON HERE.
BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW TO RUN YOUR SLIDE.
OH, I WAS PUNCHING THE WRONG ARROWS.
OKAY, SO GIVE ME JUST A SECOND TO FIND THE FIRST POINT I WANT TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT. I'M LOOKING FOR THE ZONING MAP KRISTEN.
I TOLD YOU I WASN'T GOING TO WASTE YOUR TIME.
WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A BREAK AFTER TED IS DONE, JUST SO YOU ALL KNOW.
THE PRESSURE'S ON FOR EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM.
ALL RIGHT, HERE WE GO. SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THE ZONING IN THIS AREA.
AND CHRISTIE DID A VERY GOOD JOB OF GIVING YOU THE HISTORY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PROGRAM.
HOWEVER, THIS ZONING SIGNIFICANTLY PREDATED THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE.
THIS SCHEME WAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN 1975 AS A RESULT OF A GREAT MANY MEETINGS AND A GREAT DEAL OF WORK. AND I HATE TO TELL YOU, BUT THAT COUNCIL GOT STUCK IN THAT ROOM UNTIL PAST MIDNIGHT.
I REMEMBER I WAS AT THE MEETING.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT TO YOU TODAY.
BUT THIS ZONING WAS A COMPROMISE.
IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE RESIDENTS AND IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE COMMERCIAL INTERESTS ON UNIVERSITY.
THIS SCHEME, THIS PROPOSAL, THIS DEVIATION FROM THE ZONING RAISES A NUMBER OF PROBLEMS BECAUSE THIS WAS THE PLAN FOR THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA.
[03:00:01]
AND OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS, PEOPLE HAVE PURCHASED IN THIS AREA VARIOUS PARTIES, NUMEROUS PARTIES, MANY OF WHOM ARE HERE TODAY, HAVE INVESTED LITERALLY CUMULATIVELY TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THIS AREA IN AN ATTEMPT TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES, PROVIDE HOMES FOR THEIR FAMILIES, PROVIDE INCOMES FOR THEIR FAMILIES, AND BUILD THE TAX BASE FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK.THIS PROPOSAL RISES TO THE LEVEL ALMOST OF TAKING.
IT'S NOT QUITE THERE, BUT THIS PROPOSAL BENEFITS ONLY TWO PARTIES THE LANDOWNER AND THE DEVELOPER.
AND ONE OF THOSE IS GOING TO LEAVE TOWN.
THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD IT. THEY'RE GOING TO FILL IT, THEY'RE GOING TO FLIP IT AND THEY'RE GONE.
SO I WOULD URGE YOU FOR THAT ALONE.
WE NEED THAT BUFFER PRESERVED TO PROTECT THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE PURPOSE.
YOU HAVE EXISTING RESIDENTS WHO HAVE BEEN HERE FOR DECADES, DIDN'T NEED PROTECTION, AND I WOULD URGE YOU TO STICK TO THE PLAN BECAUSE IF YOU START CHANGING THE PLAN, THE PLAN IS MEANINGLESS.
WE NEED CONSISTENCY IN ZONING, NOT JUST IN THIS AREA, BUT CITYWIDE.
LUBBOCK CAN GROW, BUT IT'S ABOUT PUTTING THE RIGHT USES IN THE RIGHT PLACES.
OKAY. KRISTEN'S HISTORIC TRAFFIC STUDY IS AT THE END.
IT'S TOWARD THE END OF THE RIGHT.
I THINK THIS IS AN IMPORTANT SLIDE.
NOW, MISS SAGER STANDS UP HERE AND TELLS YOU THAT THE TRAFFIC GROWTH IS ACTUALLY NEGATIVE IN THE AREA, THAT THERE IS LESS TRAFFIC HISTORICALLY IN THE AREA THAN THERE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY.
NUMBER ONE, TRAFFIC IN THE AREA IS SEASONAL.
IN THE SUMMERTIME, THERE'S NOBODY THERE AND IT IS AWESOME.
[LAUGHTER] AUGUST ROLLS AROUND WE ARE HERE RIGHT NOW.
THE TECH STUDENTS COME BACK AND WE'RE GLAD TO HAVE THEM BACK.
THEY'RE INTEGRAL TO THE VITALITY OF THE AREA.
BUT FROM AUGUST THROUGH MAY, I WOULD BEG TO DIFFER.
AND SO I DON'T KNOW THAT THE DATA IS NECESSARILY DISPOSITIVE.
OKAY. NOW TO THE PREPARED REMARKS, AND I'M GOING TO KEEP THESE VERY SHORT.
WHAT WE HAVE TRIED TO DO TODAY IS TO PRESENT TO YOU THAT WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO APPROPRIATE REDEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA. AND IN THIS BLOCK IN PARTICULAR, WE ARE REASONABLE.
WE REALIZE THE NECESSITY THAT THIS BLOCK NEEDS IMPROVEMENT, BUT WE CAN'T DO SOMETHING IN THE HOPES OF MAKING THINGS BETTER AND TO GET IN A RUSH AND END UP MAKING THE WRONG THING, MAKING A RESULT.
AND FOLKS, IN OUR MINDS, I THINK IT IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR AFTER THE SPEAKERS HAVE HELD THAT THIS IS THE WRONG PROJECT, WE WOULD WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER AND THE LANDOWNER ON AN INTELLIGENT, SUSTAINABLE, FORWARD THINKING PROJECT THAT IS GOOD FOR THE ALL THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALL THE CITIZENS OF LUBBOCK BECAUSE AS YOU'VE HEARD.
THE EFFECTS OF THIS REACH FAR BEYOND OVERTON SOUTH.
IT'S GOING TO SPILL INTO UNIVERSITY.
IT'S GOING TO AFFECT TEXAS TECH, IT'S GOING TO AFFECT LUBBOCK HIGH.
THE TRAFFIC PATTERNS ARE GOING TO BLEED OFF INTO 19TH STREET.
SO YOU HAVE TO THINK HOLISTICALLY HERE, FOLKS.
YOU CANNOT JUST LIMIT IT TO THIS ONE BLOCK.
AND WE HAVE TRIED WE HAVE HAD THOSE MEETINGS.
I'VE NOT PERSONALLY MET WITH THE DEVELOPER, BUT OTHER REPRESENTATIVES HAVE.
AND I WILL REPRESENT TO YOU THAT THOSE DISCUSSIONS HAVE GONE NOWHERE.
AND THE REASON THOSE THOSE DECISIONS HAVE TO DO WITH THE ECONOMICS THAT WE CURRENTLY FACE.
NOW, IT'S NOT YOUR PROVINCE, IT'S NOT YOUR JOB TO JUDGE THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF A PROJECT
[03:05:03]
THAT IS SOLELY UP TO THE DEVELOPER WHO IS REACHING LOOKING FOR RETURNS.HOWEVER, I WOULD SUBMIT TO YOU THAT WHEN THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS ARE SUCH AS THEY ARE RIGHT NOW, IT IS INCUMBENT UPON YOU ALL TO LOOK AT HOW THE ECONOMICS OF THE PROJECT AFFECT LAND USE DECISIONS.
AND IN THIS CASE, THAT'S WHY WE CAN'T GET A DEAL DONE, BECAUSE IN THE CURRENT ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT, WITH HIGH INTEREST RATES, WITH HIGH CONSTRUCTION COSTS AND LUBBOCK HAVING LOWER RENTS, IT'S GOING TO COST THEM MORE TO BUILD IT.
IT'S GOING TO COST THEM MORE TO FINANCE IT.
AND IN THE SECONDARY RESALE MARKET, BECAUSE INVESTORS IN A HIGH INTEREST RATE MARKET ARE LOOKING FOR A CERTAIN RETURN, THEY'VE GOT TO MAXIMIZE THEIR GROSS RENTAL INCOME IN ORDER TO HIT THOSE TARGETS AND BE ABLE TO RESELL.
THAT'S WHY THEY WON'T COME UNDER 700.
IF THEY CAN GET DOWN TO A REASONABLE NUMBER, WE'LL LISTEN.
OTHER SPEAKERS HAVE TOLD YOU A2 IS MORE THAN APPROPRIATE AND WE'RE WILLING TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AT 700 IT'S NOT SUSTAINABLE IN THIS LOCATION BECAUSE THIS DEVELOPER IS BY SUBMITTING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH ALL SORTS OF VARIANCES.
THEY ARE ASKING YOU TO CRAM A VERY LARGE SQUARE PEG INTO AN INSUFFICIENT ROUND HOLE AND IT SIMPLY DOESN'T WORK. AND BECAUSE OF THE OVERLAP ON NOT ONLY OVERTON BUT ON UNIVERSITY AND TEXAS TECH AS WELL, IF THEY WANT TO BUILD IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS, THERE ARE NUMEROUS PROJECTS WHICH THEY CAN LOOK AT.
ANY INVESTOR IS FREE TO GO FIND AN APPROPRIATE PLACE.
BUT WHEN THE ECONOMICS AFFECT THE LAND USE DECISION, IT BECOMES YOUR ISSUE.
WE HEAR THE SENTIMENT WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS AREA.
WE'VE GOT TO CLEAN THIS AREA UP.
I AGREE. WE DO NEED TO MAKE THIS AREA BETTER.
THIS PROJECT DOES NOTHING TO SERVE THAT PURPOSE.
IT FIXES ONE BLOCK, ONE BLOCK ONLY, AND IT DOES NOT SPUR FURTHER APPROPRIATE INFILL DEVELOPMENT.
IT INSTEAD CAUSES ILL EFFECTS THAT WILL GO FOR BLOCKS AND BLOCKS AND BLOCKS SOUTH OVERTON HAS ROUGHLY 2025 BLOCKS OR SO.
AND BECAUSE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT, IT'S GOING TO MAKE IT HARDER TO FIX THE OTHERS BECAUSE OF THE HISTORIC DESIGN DISTRICT, BECAUSE OF THE CONFIGURATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BECAUSE OF ALL SORTS OF THINGS.
THIS IS NOT GOING TO HAVE THE SPILLOVER EFFECT THAT THE DEVELOPER WANTS YOU TO HAVE.
THIS AFFECTS TWO PEOPLE, THE LANDOWNER AND THE DEVELOPER.
THAT'S IT. OKAY, I'M GOING TO LET YOU GO.
AND I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND PATIENCE.
THANK YOU, TED. IN DOING SO, LET ME LEAVE YOU WITH ONE PARTING THOUGHT.
WE'RE NOT IN TRIAL. [LAUGHTER] GUILTY. WE'RE NOT IN TRIAL.
LET'S NOT GET IN A RUSH TO DO SOMETHING.
ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE LET ME ASK MR. MCBRAYER 20 MINUTE BREAK.
ALL RIGHT. WE'VE GOT A QUORUM.
SO THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN TO THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AGENDA ITEM 7.14.
AGAIN, IF YOU WILL, PLEASE APPROACH AND STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, AND THEN WE WILL BEGIN.
YOU GUYS READY? OKAY. MY NAME IS DAVID PIERCE.
[03:10:06]
I'D LIKE TO START BY THANKING MAYOR PAYNE, MAYOR PRO TEM PATTERSON, COUNCIL MEMBERS, CITY STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY FOR ATTENDING TODAY TO HEAR OUR PROPOSAL.MY TEAM AND I HAVE BEEN MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD LEADERSHIP IN RECENT DAYS AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS TO BRING A PROPOSAL TODAY THAT REFLECTS A GREAT DEAL OF LEARNING, LISTENING AND COLLABORATION WITH THE COMMUNITY AND WE ARE EXCITED TO SHARE IT WITH YOU.
TODAY WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT WHO WE ARE, WHAT WE DO.
WE'RE A PASSIONATE TEXAS BASED COMPANY WITH OFFICES IN DALLAS, AUSTIN AND TEMPE, ARIZONA.
THE MEMBERS ON THIS SLIDE ARE THE PRIMARY PARALLEL TEAM ASSIGNED TO THIS DEVELOPMENT.
HERE'S A MAP OF OUR PAST AND PRESENT PROPERTIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, I PERSONALLY HAVE A LONG STANDING LOVE AND RESPECT FOR LUBBOCK, BEGINNING WITH MY TIME IN ARCHITECTURE SCHOOL HERE AT TEXAS TECH.
I'M A REGISTERED ARCHITECT WITH OVER 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
I'VE BEEN A VOLUNTEER WITH THE EAST DALLAS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION TO HELP BRING NEW AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES TO OLD EAST DALLAS, WHERE I WAS AWARDED THE HERO OF EAST DALLAS AWARD BY PRESERVATION DALLAS FOR MY WORK WITH COMMUNITY THERE.
[INAUDIBLE]. I'M THE OUTGOING PRESIDENT OF THE HUCKABEE COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE DESIGN LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE, A MEMBER OF THE DEAN'S ADVISORY CIRCLE AND AN ALUMNI ADVISOR ON THE NEW COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE.
RENOVATIONS THAT WE'RE ALL GOING TO SEE HAPPEN OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS.
SINCE ITS INCEPTION, PARALLEL'S WON NUMEROUS AWARDS, AND BECAUSE WE ARE SELECTED AND PRECISE IN OUR EXECUTION PLANS, OUR PROJECTS ARE REPEATEDLY RECOGNIZED AS SOME OF THE TOP DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COUNTRY BY OUR PEERS.
HERE ARE SOME IMAGES OF OUR RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TEXAS AND NATIONALLY.
DAVID, I NOTICED YOU SKIPPED OVER THE A&M AND UT AUSTIN PROJECTS VERY QUICKLY.
[CHUCKLING] MAYOR PAYNE I WAS NOT GOING TO SAY TEXAS A&M OUT LOUD.
I KNOW, THANK YOU FOR BEING [INAUDIBLE] [CHUCKLING] BUT THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT.
ON THIS PAGE ARE SYMBOLS OF THE DIFFERENT GROUPS THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH ON OUR PAST DEVELOPMENTS.
WE INTEND TO DO THAT HERE IN LUBBOCK AS WELL.
OF PARTICULAR NOTE IS A LETTER THAT YOU RECEIVED OF THE 100 PLUS LETTERS THAT CAME IN SUPPORT FROM REVEREND MICHAEL NEWMAN, WHO IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE TEXAS DISTRICT OF THE MISSOURI SYNOD OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH.
HE EMPHASIZES THE POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP THAT WE HAVE AND HOW WE ACHIEVE OUR GOALS WITH INTEGRITY AND A CARING AND COLLABORATIVE MANNER AND HE ENDS HIS MESSAGE WITH OUR PRAYER IS THAT THE TEXAS TECH COMMUNITY AND THE CITY OF LUBBOCK CAN THRIVE AND FLOURISH, AND I BELIEVE PARALLEL CAN HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN.
THEY'VE ALSO BEEN A STRONG SUPPORTER OF THE TEXAS TECH COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE DESIGN LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE, WHICH I'VE PARTNERED WITH SEVERAL OF THEIR PRINCIPALS ON THAT IN THE PAST. OUR ARCHITECTURE FIRM IS BOKA POWELL.
BOKA POWELL HAS A HISTORY OF WORKING ON CAMPUS AT TEXAS TECH.
THEY ALSO HAVE A LONG HISTORY WITH PARALLEL IN HELPING US WITH OUR PROJECTS.
[03:15:04]
WE ALSO PARTNER WITH LEVY DYKEMA.IT'S A TEXAS TECH LED INTERIOR DESIGN FIRM THAT SPECIALIZES IN STUDENT HOUSING ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
I REALLY APPRECIATE THE TIME BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S BEEN A REALLY LONG DAY, SO THANK YOU.
THE OPTIONS FOR NEW PRIVATE OFF CAMPUS HOUSING PEDESTRIAN TO CAMPUS HAVE SLOWED.
ALL THE EXISTING OFF CAMPUS STUDENT PROPERTIES WITHIN TWO MILES ARE NEARLY FULL, AND OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS, THE TEXAS TECH ENROLLMENT HAS GROWN 9.5%, WHICH BY HAPPENSTANCE, EQUATES TO 700 STUDENTS PER YEAR, JUST ABOUT HOW MANY WE'RE BUILDING.
WITH THIS ENROLLMENT GROWTH PATTERN IN TEN YEARS, TEXAS TECH WILL BE NEARING 50,000 STUDENTS, RESULTING IN EVEN GREATER NUMBERS WITHOUT PEDESTRIAN OPTIONS TO LIVE.
I WANT TO QUICKLY HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE FEATURES THAT WE WILL INCLUDE IN THIS PROPERTY.
FIRST THING WE BROUGHT UP IS ADJACENCY TO CAMPUS.
STUDENTS TODAY SEEK WALKABLE LOCATIONS CLOSE TO CAMPUS, AND WITH TEXAS TECH'S ENROLLMENT GROWTH PATTERN, THIS SITE IS PERFECTLY SITUATED TO TRANSITION FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE UNIVERSITY.
ONE OF THE AMENITIES WE ALSO FOCUS ON IS STUDY SPACES.
THAT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO US.
WE PUT A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT INTO OUR STUDY SPACES.
WE ALL KNOW WE GET AMAZON PACKAGES, AT LEAST I DO FIVE TIMES A DAY.
AS THE POPULARITY OF ONLINE ORDERING INCREASES, ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE DONE IS HAVE A VERY SOPHISTICATED PACKAGE LOCKER SYSTEM, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES REFRIGERATION FOR ALL THE GROCERY DELIVERIES.
ANOTHER THING TO NOTE IS OUR APARTMENTS ARE FULLY FURNISHED.
SO WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT WHEN THEY MOVE OUT, THERE'S MINIMAL MOVE OUT NEEDED FOR THESE STUDENTS.
ADDITIONALLY, WE HOST A PROFESSIONALLY MANAGED WHAT WE CALL WHITE GLOVE CRUISE SHIP MOVE IN, WHICH WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT WE MOVE ALL THEIR BELONGINGS IN FOR THEM AND WE DISPOSE OF ALL OF THE TRASH FOR THEM.
A FEW OTHER THINGS I WANTED TO BRING UP THAT HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP IN PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS.
PETS ARE ALWAYS A QUESTION AND WE WANT TO AT LEAST TALK ABOUT THAT FOR A SECOND.
WE FOUND IT'S BETTER TO OFFER PETS AT OUR PROPERTY THAN DENY THEM, AND BY ALLOWING PETS, IT ACTUALLY REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF PETS WE HAVE, AND WE WILL ALSO BE PROVIDING PET STATIONS AROUND THE PROPERTY.
SECURITY IS SOMETHING THAT'S EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO US.
WE HAVE 24/7 PROFESSIONAL STAFF WITH NIGHTLY SECURITY, AND OUR TRASH IS INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING.
PARKING THAT'S COME UP A FEW DIFFERENT TIMES TODAY.
SO I WANT TO TOUCH ON IT FOR A SECOND.
WE DO EXTENSIVE MARKET RESEARCH.
I'VE BEEN DOING STUDENT HOUSING FOR OVER 20 YEARS.
[03:20:01]
AS YOU PUT STUDENTS CLOSER TO CAMPUS, YOUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS GO DOWN, THEY DON'T GO UP , AND I CAN SHOW YOU ALL THE DATA THAT SHOWS THAT WE ARE AT A RATIO RIGHT NOW OF 84%.OUR REQUIREMENT ALSO INCLUDES GUEST PARKING.
YOU CAN SEE BASED ON OUR PORTFOLIO AND THE FOUR LARGEST NATIONAL STUDENT HOUSING MANAGERS IN OUR INDUSTRY THAT WE ARE ABOVE ANY OF THE OTHER MARKETS THAT WE HAVE PARKING.
WE'VE ALSO SET ASIDE THE ENTIRE STREET PERIMETER AND 25 SPACES IN THE GARAGE FOR OUR GUESTS.
I'M GOING TO TURN IT OVER TO RYAN TO TALK ABOUT THE COMMUNITY.
I THINK I GOT IT. GOOD AFTERNOON.
THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME.
AS SHE MENTIONED, IT'S GETTING LATE AND WE'LL BE BRIEF.
FIRST, I'D LIKE TO PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT AS TO WHY WE BELIEVE THIS PROPOSAL IS A POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE STAKEHOLDERS AND CITIZENS OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, AS WELL AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE HISTORICAL GROWTH IN LUBBOCK HAS BEEN OUTWARDS AND PRIMARILY TO THE SOUTHWEST.
THE INNER LUBBOCK DISTRICTS FACE DAILY CHALLENGES THAT DON'T NECESSARILY OCCUR ON THE PERIMETER OF THIS TOWN, WHERE DEVELOPMENT CAN SOMETIMES MORE EASILY OCCUR WITH MORE OF A CLEAN SLATE.
THESE INNER AREAS HAVE, AS YOU'VE SEEN, THEY HAVE AGING INFRASTRUCTURE BECAUSE THEY WERE BUILT WHEN THE POPULATION WAS MUCH SMALLER AND WHEN CITY PLANNING NEEDS MUCH DIFFERENT THAN TODAY.
A VARIETY OF PEOPLE LIVE IN SOUTH OVERTON.
THEY ARE HOMEOWNERS AND THEY ARE RENTERS.
THEY ARE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED HERE, AS YOU'VE HEARD.
THEY'VE GROWN UP HERE AND SOME OF THEIR PARENTS STILL LIVE THERE TODAY.
THERE ARE ALSO NEWCOMERS WHO WANT TO PLANT ROOTS OF THEIR OWN HERE.
MANY OF THE HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE BEEN HAVE BEAUTIFUL CHARACTER.
THEY'VE DONE A TREMENDOUS JOB.
HAVING SAID THAT, THIS IS NOT A ZERO SUM GAME.
THIS DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T HINDER OUR NEIGHBORS' ABILITY TO RENOVATE THEIR HOMES, LIVE FULFILLING LIVES, OR LIVE NEAR THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS BY ALLOWING A HIGHER DENSITY ON THE EDGE CLOSER TO CAMPUS AND UNIVERSITY AVENUE, WE'RE ACTUALLY HELPING PROTECT THE EXISTING FABRIC OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD CORE AND THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST. WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED DURING THIS PROCESS IS THAT THE RESIDENTS AND INSTITUTIONS OF SOUTH OVERTON ARE PASSIONATE ABOUT THEIR COMMUNITY. YOU'VE HEARD THEM SPEAKING TONIGHT.
THAT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU FIND EVERYWHERE.
OUR PROPERTY IS IN A TRANSITION BLOCK, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS MAP.
ON ONE SIDE WE HAVE A TIER ONE UNIVERSITY.
ON THE OTHER, WE HAVE A NATIONAL HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD.
BETWEEN THESE, WE HAVE THE UNIVERSITY AVENUE RETAIL CORRIDOR.
RETAIL ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE IS IN DECLINE.
WITH OUR INVESTMENT NEAR CAMPUS.
WE WILL HELP ENCOURAGE NEW RETAIL AND CONTRIBUTE TO THE REVITALIZATION OF THIS RETAIL CORRIDOR.
WHERE ARE THEY LIVING? THEY'RE LIVING IN MULTIFAMILY ON THE PERIMETER OF THE CITY OR IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
IT'S THE ONE BEHIND THE HOTEL.
IT'S NICELY BUILT PROPERTY WITH GREAT AMENITIES AND FANTASTIC APARTMENTS.
BECAUSE THE PROPERTY ISN'T WALKABLE, THE STUDENTS ARE FORCED TO DRIVE THEIR CARS TO SCHOOL.
[03:25:05]
YES, YOU ARE ACROSS FROM CAMPUS HERE, BUT THERE'S NO SAFE WAY TO WALK THERE.THERE ISN'T EVEN A GREAT WAY TO GET TO THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE THAT YOU SEE KIND OF AT THE NORTH PART BY THE STADIUM DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS IS WHAT INCREASES TRAFFIC AND A CROSSING LIKE THIS. IT'S JUST NOT SAFE FOR ANYBODY.
THANKS, RYAN. WE'VE CONTINUED TO EVOLVE OUR DESIGN.
WE DID HAVE MEETINGS WITH THE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WE DID AND WE DID LISTEN.
THE GROUND LEVEL TOWNHOMES ALONG AVENUE X, WHICH ACTUALLY WE HAVE GROUND LEVEL TOWNHOMES AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER, ARE TWO STORIES IN HEIGHT TO BE MORE RELATABLE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE'VE INTENTIONALLY ASKED FOR THE BUILDING HEIGHT AND THE DENSITY NECESSARY TO FUND THIS INVESTMENT.
WE DIDN'T COME IN HERE ASKING FOR A 20 STORY BUILDING, ONLY TO COME BACK AND SETTLE FOR A SEVEN AND TRY TO LOOK LIKE GOOD GUYS, AND WE ARE NOT UNIVERSITY LOFTS.
SO SORRY UNIVERSITY LOFTS COMPARISON TO OUR PREVIOUS SUBMISSION.
I DON'T LIKE TO THROW ROCKS AT OUR OWN PROJECTS, BUT WE LISTENED AND WE'VE COME BACK WITH SOMETHING THAT WE BELIEVE IS MORE PALATABLE AND A BETTER TRANSITION PIECE OF ARCHITECTURE BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND TEXAS TECH.
WE ARE ADMITTEDLY A MODERN FIRM, AND WE BUILD MODERN BUILDINGS, BUT WE HAVE COMPROMISED AND WE'VE COME BACK WITH A WITH A PROJECT THAT HAS A A A GREAT DEAL OF FENESTRATION AND FACADE ARTICULATION THAT HELPS TO MITIGATE THAT.
WE'VE ALSO FURTHER LOWERED THE FACADE ALONG AVENUE X.
ALSO, AT THE REQUEST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WE PREVIOUSLY HAD ABOUT AN 11 FOOT SETBACK ALONG X.
THAT WAS THAT WAS A MISTAKE AND IT WAS WRONG, AND WE READILY ADMITTED IT.
WE HAVE MOVED THE BUILDING BACK 20FT ON THAT PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS ABOUT 30FT FROM THE EDGE OF THE CURB, WHICH IS A SPECIFIC REQUEST TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE COMPLIED WITH. WE'VE ALSO WORKED WITH THE WESLEY FOUNDATION TO THE EAST, AND WE HAVE A NEW COMMONALITY BETWEEN US, AND WE'VE WORKED ON SOME OF THOSE DESIGN FEATURES TO ALLOW US TO FURTHER COMPRESS OUR BUILDING.
WE WERE DISAPPOINTED TO HEAR THAT WE WERE UNCOMPROMISING.
WE WILL HELP MONITOR TO MAKE SURE OUR KIDS ARE NOT PARKING THERE UNLESS THEY'VE PAID TO DO SO.
WE GOT SOME MIXED SIGNALS ON THAT, BUT WE'VE AGREED TO DO THAT.
IF THAT, IN FACT, IS WHAT IS WANTED.
WE'VE AGREED TO HELP WITH RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITTING.
WE'VE AGREED TO LEAVE THE PARKING FOR FREE AROUND OUR SITE AND USE OUR RESOURCES AND OUR MANPOWER TO HELP THE NEIGHBORHOOD COME UP WITH A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITTING SYSTEM THAT THE CITY OF LUBBOCK OFFERS.
IT REQUIRES SOME ORGANIZATION AND SOME BOOTS ON THE GROUND, AND WE'RE WILLING TO HELP WITH THAT.
WE'RE STREET LANDSCAPING AROUND OUR ENTIRE PROPERTY, AND WE'VE ALSO AGREED TO STREET LANDSCAPE ACROSS 14TH ON SOME OF THE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT MR. ABRAHAM OWNS WITHIN THE CITY.
WITHIN THE CITY, RIGHT OF WAY.
WE'RE PUTTING PET BAG DISPOSALS AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY.
WE'VE MENTIONED THE TRASH SERVICES INTERNAL.
EVERYBODY WAS WORRIED ABOUT OUR DUMPSTERS.
[03:30:05]
THERE'S A AMENITY WALL BETWEEN IT.WE DON'T LOOK BACK INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
YOU SAW THE LIST OF PEOPLE THAT WE'VE PARTNERED WITH.
IT'S ONLY GOOD FOR US TO PARTNER WITH OUR NEIGHBORS.
FINALLY, THIS PROJECT WILL CREATE JOBS FOR LUBBOCK.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, WE WILL ALSO CREATE A NEW TAX REVENUE FOR THE CITY.
100% OF OUR SCHOOL TAXES WILL GO TO LUBBOCK ISD AND WE WON'T SEND A SINGLE STUDENT THERE.
SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THERE'S ONLY TWO TWO GROUPS THAT BENEFIT, THAT'S NOT TRUE.
THE CITY OF LUBBOCK WILL GREATLY BENEFIT FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT.
FINALLY, THIS DEVELOPMENT IS GOOD FOR LUBBOCK.
IT'S GOOD FOR TEXAS TECH AND IT'S GOOD FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUED COLLABORATION WITH OUR NEIGHBORS.
WE WILL BE GREAT NEIGHBORS TO THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED TO US, AND WHILE WE WON'T AGREE ON EVERYTHING, WE CAN BE ALLIES ON THOSE THINGS THAT CAN MAKE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE DO THAT IN OUR CURRENT PROPERTIES.
WE LOVE WHAT WE DO AND WE TAKE IMMENSE PRIDE IN OUR PROPERTIES.
THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME TODAY AND YOUR CONSIDERATION OF OUR PROPOSAL, AND WE HAVE WE HAVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF HERE TO ANSWER TRAFFIC, ARCHITECTURE, ANYTHING THAT YOU NEED.
WE DO HAVE SOME NEIGHBORHOOD, SOME COMMUNITY SUPPORT THAT WILL NOW COME UP AND SPEAK AS WELL.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN FOR ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF 7.14.
MY NAME IS DAN WILLIAMS. 918 AVENUE, J.
I'M HERE AS A CITIZEN THAT'S HEAVILY INVOLVED IN DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, HEAVILY INVOLVED IN THE ASPECT OF WHAT WE DO AS WHAT WE CALL A CITYWIDE ISSUE FROM A DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE, AND I TOTALLY AGREE WITH THE OPPOSITION THAT THIS IS A CITYWIDE ISSUE.
WE HAVE A LACK OF WALKABLE HOUSING, ESPECIALLY FROM A STUDENT PERSPECTIVE, AND I THINK THAT A PROJECT LIKE THIS, A PROJECT LIKE THE ONE THAT WAS DISCUSSED ON 19TH STREET, THESE PROJECTS, WE NEED TO FIND WAYS TO MAKE THESE HAPPEN.
I GET IT THAT IT'S AN OUTSIDE DEVELOPER.
THERE'S NOT PEOPLE IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS, THAT HAVE THE MONEY AND HAVE THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP THINGS LIKE THIS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S ALWAYS AN OUTSIDE DEVELOPER, AND SO I WE NEED TO CREATE WALKABLE COMMUNITIES.
THAT'S PART OF THE UDC TO CREATE MIXED USE THE REASON WHY WE'RE REDUCING PARKING RESTRICTIONS ACROSS THE ENTIRE CITY, THE REASON WHY IN DOWNTOWN, WE'RE REMOVING THEM COMPLETELY.
SO THAT WE CAN CREATE PLACES LIKE IN OTHER CITIES WHERE YOU GO TO KNOX-HENDERSON IN DALLAS AND I PARK MY CAR, I SHOP, I EAT, I CAN STAY THERE AT A HOTEL.
EVERYTHING IS IN ONE LOCATION, AND SO WHEN WE CREATE THIS FOR OUR STUDENT POPULATION AND WE TAKE THEM OUT OF THEIR CARS, IT'S A GREAT THING FOR THEM TOO, BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO GO AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THEIR GOOD TIMES AND THEN THEY CAN WALK BACK TO WHERE THEY STAY OR THEY CAN TAKE AN UBER.
THE MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION HAVE CHANGED AND LUBBOCK, WE'RE A COLLEGE COMMUNITY, AND SO I THINK WE'VE YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME DEFINITE POINTS AND I DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, REITERATE EVERYTHING THAT THEY'VE THEY'VE POINTED OUT, BUT I THINK IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT WE'VE REALLY GOT TO CONSIDER IF WE CONTINUE TO TURN THESE DOWN.
AT SOME POINT, THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY IS GOING TO SAY, WE DON'T WANT TO BE IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS, BECAUSE IT'S JUST A PLACE WHERE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO SEE WHAT SOME OF THESE OTHER CITIES WE ARE NEXT IN LINE FOR EVERYTHING BEHIND DALLAS, HOUSTON, SAN ANTONIO.
LUBBOCK IS A PLACE THAT PEOPLE WANT TO INVEST INTO.
WE SEE IT ALL THE TIME IN MY PROFESSION OF REAL ESTATE.
IT'LL HELP THE VALUES OF THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE AROUND IT.
[03:35:02]
THEIR THEIR SIDES, AND I THINK IT'S JUST ONE OF THOSE THINGS WE NEED TO CONSIDER AND I REALLY WANT US TO CONSIDER WHAT THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE HAS LOOKED LIKE.IF WE DO WHAT WE'VE ALWAYS DONE, WE'LL GET WHAT WE'VE ALWAYS GOT, AND SO EVERYTHING FROM 19TH STREET BESIDES IHOP, I THINK HAS BEEN DOZENS AND DOZENS OF BUSINESSES OVER THE YEARS AND WE DON'T HAVE THE DENSITY THAT WE NEED RIGHT THERE TO CREATE REALLY GREAT COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES, AND I THINK THAT THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE GOT TO CONSIDER.
WE HAVE TO HAVE C-3 RIGHT HERE.
I LOVE THE FACT THAT I'M IN RUSH AND I CAN WALK TO ROSE'S.
IT'S NOT IN DESIGNED THAT WAY.
IT'S DESIGNED LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IS.
SO I HAVE TO WALK THROUGH A COUPLE ALLEYWAYS TO GET THERE, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE DO WITH OUR KIDS, AND SO I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE JUST REALLY NEED TO CONSIDER, AND I WOULD URGE YOU ALL TO FIND A WAY TO MAKE PROJECTS LIKE THIS HAPPEN.
MAKE PROJECTS LIKE 19TH STREET HAPPEN BECAUSE LUBBOCK IS A GREAT PLACE.
IT'S A GOOD PLACE. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AUSTIN.
IT'S JUST NOT, AND WE'VE GOT TO FIND WAYS TO HAVE MIXED USE AND BE EXCITED ABOUT IT.
WE WALK FROM NINTH STREET TO 19TH STREET TO GET SMOOTHIES.
LIKE THAT'S WHAT WE DO, AND THAT'S WHERE MY GENERATION, UNFORTUNATELY, THEY DON'T GET UP HERE AND THEY DON'T COME AND SPEAK AT THESE LIKE THEY NEED TO SAY, HERE'S WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE HAPPEN, AND SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO CONVEY, AND I THINK THINGS LIKE LOOKING FROM AN ARCHITECTURAL STANDPOINT, I WOULD SAY LIKE MIXING OLD AND NEW IS GREAT.
THE COTTON COURT CAME OUT BEAUTIFUL AND IT'S RIGHT NEXT TO HISTORIC BUILDINGS, AND I DON'T THINK THOSE COTTON GIN LOOKING SIDES OF IT HAVE HURT THOSE PEOPLE.
I THINK THEY'VE HELPED EVERYTHING OVER THERE, AND SO LET'S LOOK AT THINGS FROM A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT LENS, AND I HOPE THAT WE CAN IMPROVE THIS AND FIND WAYS TO MAKE THINGS LIKE THIS HAPPEN AROUND TOWN.
THANK YOU ALL FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO.
I'M THE PRESIDENT OF TYNER CONSTRUCTION.
OUR COMPANY'S BEEN IN BUSINESS HERE FOR 40 YEARS.
WE ALL WANT WHAT'S BEST FOR THE CITY.
I'LL START BY SAYING WHAT'S PRETTY TRANSPARENT.
MY COMPANY STANDS TO BENEFIT IF THIS PROJECT GOES FORWARD.
AMONG THOSE 40 TO 50 SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE ANYWHERE FROM 5 TO 10 OTHER VENDORS, SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS THAT ARE GOING TO BENEFIT FROM THIS MOSTLY LOCAL.
YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE WE NEED TO BUILD IT.
YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE WE'RE GOING TO USE WITH A PROJECT THIS BIG? WE DON'T SEE MANY PROJECTS THIS BIG.
COME TO LUBBOCK. WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO? WE'RE GOING TO GO TO OUR HIGH SCHOOL VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND WE'RE GOING TO RECRUIT THOSE KIDS.
WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH GROUPS LIKE [INAUDIBLE], EAST LUBBOCK RESIDENT OWNED BUSINESS INITIATIVE.
WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH THOSE GUYS TO GET THOSE KIDS INTERESTED IN THIS AND PUT THEM TO WORK.
ACTUALLY, I THINK IT LIFTS THEM UP.
IT PAINED ME A LITTLE BIT, BUT I'LL TELL YOU, WE VISITED A LOT OF SCHOOLS AND HERE'S SOMETHING I SAW IN FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, POPULATION 95,000, BY THE WAY, SMALLER THAN LUBBOCK. I SAW A HISTORIC HOUSES.
I SAW BUILDINGS AS TALL AS 15 STORIES RIGHT NEXT TO THEM.
I SAW A THRIVING COMMUNITY HIGH RISE AND RESIDENTIAL RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER.
I DIDN'T SEE IT BLIGHT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I WITNESSED IT IN FAYETTEVILLE AND NOW MY DAUGHTER IS A RAZORBACK OR AS I CALL HER, A PIGGY.
[03:40:03]
YOU KNOW, LUBBOCK NEEDS THIS.ONE OTHER THING I WANT TO SAY, I WANT TO ASSURE YOU THAT AS A PROUD LUBBOCK BUSINESS, IF THIS GOES FORWARD, WE WILL BE EXTREMELY SENSITIVE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN WE DID CARLTON HOUSE AT THIRD AND DETROIT, WE REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE ANY ANY ENEMIES OF THE NEIGHBOR NEIGHBORS.
I'M PROUD TO SAY I'VE GOT A LETTER IN MY POCKET FROM JESSE AND FRANCIS GARCIA JUST BRAGGING ABOUT HOW GOOD MY GUYS TOOK CARE OF HIM, AND WE'RE GOING TO HONOR THAT SAME COMMITMENT HERE IF THIS MOVES FORWARD.
I'M PUTTING THE SAME TEAM THAT DID THAT PROJECT ON THIS TEAM.
WE WILL BE GOOD NEIGHBORS TO THE PEOPLE OF SOUTH OVERTON WHILE WE'RE THERE, AND, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THAT WE'RE ONLY GOING TO BE THERE FOR A FEW YEARS, BUT I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT TO THE LEGITIMACY OF PARALLEL.
WE'RE CAREFUL TO WHO WE GET INTO BUSINESS WITH.
I HAVEN'T COME ACROSS A MORE PROFESSIONAL GROUP OF FOLKS HIRING GREAT FIRMS LIKE PARKHILL AND BOKA POWELL AND WHAT DAVID SAID ABOUT WANTING TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT'S WHAT I WITNESSED.
THEY'RE NOT GOING TO AGREE ON EVERYTHING.
THAT'S JUST THE FACT OF IT, BUT THE REALITY OF IT IS, IS WE'VE SHOT DOWN A 700 BED STUDENT HOUSING FACILITY HERE ALREADY. THERE'S A CERTAIN NUMBER WHERE THIS WORKS AND A CERTAIN NUMBER WHERE IT DOESN'T.
IF THIS GETS SHOT DOWN, THEY WON'T BE THE LAST ONES THAT WANT TO COME DEVELOP THIS AREA.
YOU'VE HEARD A LOT AND I KNOW IT'S LATE.
I HAVE A CLIENT WHO I REALLY LOOK UP TO HERE IN LUBBOCK, AND WE WERE TALKING ONE DAY ABOUT OUR BUSINESSES AND I SAID, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES I JUST KIND OF WANT TO PLATEAU A LITTLE BIT AND SLOW THINGS DOWN, AND HE SAID SOMETHING TO ME THAT REALLY CONVICTED ME.
HE SAID, YOU KNOW, IN NATURE, THERE'S NOT A LOT OF STASIS.
SO THANKS FOR LISTENING TO ME.
I APPRECIATE IT, AND I REALLY THINK THIS WILL BE A BENEFIT FOR LUBBOCK, TEXAS.
GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
I LIVE AT 3302 42ND AND AN ARCHITECT HERE PRACTICING IN LUBBOCK.
I'VE BEEN HERE 46 YEARS AND SO I'VE WATCHED LUBBOCK CHANGE OVER THE YEARS AND I THINK IT'S BEEN GOOD CHANGE, AND THERE'S NEIGHBORHOODS, AS WE'VE MENTIONED, WE'VE HEARD ABOUT ALL DIFFERENT KINDS OF NEIGHBORHOODS IN OUR CITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS, COMMUNITIES WITHIN COMMUNITIES, AND HAVING BEEN EXPOSED TO PLANNING AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVELS AND CITY LEVELS, THERE'S A DYNAMICS BETWEEN A UNIVERSITY AND A CITY AND THAT COMMUNITY AND THE PLANNING THAT GOES ON, AND ONE OF THOSE THINGS AND IT'S BEEN TOUCHED ON BUT IS VERY CRITICAL FOR A UNIVERSITY TO GROW AND A COMMUNITY TO GROW IS THAT RELATIONSHIP, AND THERE HAS TO BE THAT WALKABILITY, THAT PHYSICAL CONNECTION WITH BOTH ON CAMPUS HOUSING AS WELL AS OFF CAMPUS HOUSING, AND IT TAKES A MIXTURE.
TEXAS TECH WILL CONTINUE TO GROW, AND TO MEET THAT DEMAND FOR STUDENT HOUSING IS GOING TO BE MORE THAN WHAT TEXAS TECH CAN DO THEMSELVES AND SO THAT MEANS THE COMMUNITY, THE PRIVATE SECTOR HAS TO STEP IN AND HELP, AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SEEING HERE, AND WHILE THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS BEING CREATED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT IS DIFFERENT THAN THE NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET, WE SEE THAT THROUGHOUT LUBBOCK IN ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS.
THERE'S NO TWO NEIGHBORHOODS ALIKE.
THEY'RE ALL DIFFERENT AND THEY'RE ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER, AND THEY HAVE DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS.
THEY EXIST THROUGHOUT OUR COMMUNITY, AND THAT'S AN IMPORTANT ASPECT, AND SO WHAT'S GOOD FOR TEXAS TECH IS GOOD FOR OUR COMMUNITY IN LUBBOCK, AND WHAT'S GOOD FOR LUBBOCK IS GOOD FOR TEXAS TECH, AND IT'S REALLY A PARTNERSHIP, AND IT'S NOT, AGAIN, UNIQUE TO TEXAS TECH AND THE CITY OF LUBBOCK. IT'S EVERY COMMUNITY THAT YOU GO TO THAT HAS A MAJOR INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
IT HAS TO WORK WITH THAT CITY, THAT COMMUNITY THAT IT'S LOCATED IN, AND TO BE THAT PROXIMITY IS SO CRITICAL BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT GENERATES THE THE ATMOSPHERE, IF YOU WILL, BETWEEN THE STUDENTS, THE RETAIL AND THE CITY, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO HAVE A MASS TO DO THAT, AND SO BEING ABLE TO HAVE THOSE IN A
[03:45:10]
WALKABLE FASHION WITH THE MIXTURE, WE HEARD ABOUT MIXED USE WITH RETAIL AS WELL AS LIVING AND OTHER TYPES OF COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN ONE BUILDING AND IN CLOSE PROXIMITY, JUST GIVES VITALITY TO THOSE LIVING COMMUNITIES AND AGAIN, EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD IS DIFFERENT.WE COEXIST ACROSS THE STREET FROM EACH OTHER ACROSS TOWN, BUT IT'S THAT COMBINATION THAT MAKES LUBBOCK UNIQUE, AND SO I THINK THIS JUST CONTINUES TO BUILD THAT UNIQUENESS AND GIVES EVERYBODY DIFFERENT OPPORTUNITIES TO STAY IN LUBBOCK FOR DIFFERENT REASONS.
YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN THANKED A LOT TONIGHT.
NOT NEARLY ENOUGH FOR WHAT YOU DO.
IT WON'T BE ENOUGH. SO I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU AS WELL.
I'M A PRACTICING ARCHITECT HERE IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS.
I GOT INVOLVED IN THIS ISSUE BECAUSE I READ ABOUT TOO LATE.
THE OTHER APARTMENT BUILDING BEING SHOT DOWN.
WHEN I SAW THAT PROJECT, I WAS EXCITED ABOUT IT.
I THOUGHT, THAT IS SUCH A COOL THING TO COME TO LUBBOCK.
THEY'RE INVESTING THEIR MONEY.
I DID NOT GET INVOLVED IN THAT.
I DON'T KNOW THE ISSUES WITH THAT.
I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO VIEW IT THAT WAY, THAT THERE'S A DISASTER ON THE HORIZON, BUT POTENTIAL FOR OPPORTUNITY AND FOR GROWTH. SOUTH OVERTON IS A NEIGHBORHOOD FULL OF POTENTIAL.
YOU CAN TELL THERE'S A BOND THERE AND THERE'S A LOVE FOR THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
I EMPLOY A LOT OF INTERNS FROM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.
I WANT TO KEEP THEM HERE IN LUBBOCK.
THEY ARE SEEKING THAT WALKABLE CITY.
I THINK THIS CONCERN THAT THESE STUDENTS ARE DRUNK DRIVING MANIACS IS MAYBE A LITTLE OVER THE TOP.
SO THAT'S THE TYPE OF YOUNG PERSON THAT I BELIEVE WILL BE ATTRACTED TO THIS TYPE OF STUDENT HOUSING, AND I WOULD LOVE FOR THEM TO LOOK AROUND THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND THINK, I COULD JUST MOVE RIGHT HERE AND HAVE THAT SAME WALKABLE EXPERIENCE.
THAT'S THE KIND OF POTENTIAL THAT I SEE IN THIS PROJECT.
I SEE POTENTIAL FOR THE RESURRECTION OF VARSITY BOOKSTORE.
WE LOST A STAPLE ON THAT AVENUE.
WHY CAN'T THAT BE THE VARSITY GROCERY STORE THAT CAN SERVE THESE YOUNG PEOPLE AND THAT NEIGHBORHOOD? AND THEN I SEE THAT REVITALIZATION EXTENDING EAST TO DOWNTOWN, JUST LIKE DAN'S TALKING ABOUT.
I'VE PROBABLY DONE A STUDY ON EVERY BUILDING ON BROADWAY, BUT WHEN IT GETS DOWN TO IT, THE DENSITY IS NOT THERE TO SUPPORT THOSE PROJECTS. SO I LOVE THE IDEA OF THIS DENSITY AND IT STARTS SOMEWHERE.
WHY NOT HERE? AND THEN I THINK, HOW CAN WE AFFORD NOT TO APPROVE THIS? THE BENEFITS TO OUR TAXES ARE TREMENDOUS.
SOMEBODY MENTIONED THAT THERE'S NO NEED THAT TEXAS TECH IS PLANNING HOUSING.
DOES TEXAS TECH PAY TAXES? THESE GUYS WILL DO THAT.
I RECENTLY DID A PROJECT FOR A SCHOOL SCHOOL IN EAST LUBBOCK, AND IT WASN'T A HUGE PROJECT.
WE DID SECURITY ENTRANCES WHEN THEY SAW THEIR MILL WORK, THEIR NEW RECEPTION DESK, THERE WERE TEARS SHED BECAUSE NOTHING HAD BEEN DONE TO THAT BUILDING.
[03:50:04]
I ALSO, A FEW WEEKS LATER, GOT TO TOUR COOPER'S NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND THE DIFFERENCE WAS SO STARK.WE'VE GOT TO RESTORE THAT TAX BASE TO OUR CENTER CITY, AND WHEN WE TALK.
SOMEBODY TALKED ABOUT EXCLUDING PEOPLE.
HOW ARE WE NOT EXCLUDING PEOPLE BY DENYING THIS PROJECT AND THE POTENTIAL THAT IT BRINGS TO THE CITY? I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS.
I WOULD LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IF IT HAD THAT BUILDING RIGHT NEXT TO IT.
I THINK IN THE END, THE BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE OF THIS PROJECT FAR OUTWEIGH THE FEARS OF POTENTIAL DISASTER.
I THINK THE HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD IS PROTECTED.
THEY HAVE A STRONG COMMUNITY AND I DON'T THINK THIS IS AN EITHER OR PROPOSITION.
BOTH CAN EXIST AT THE SAME TIME, AND I URGE YOU TO VOTE YES FOR THIS PROJECT.
THANK YOU. HELLO, MY NAME IS JONATHAN KREBS AND I'M FROM DALLAS. I BUT I AM UNIQUELY IN A POSITION TO SPEAK ON THIS BECAUSE I OWN THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET AT 2410 14TH STREET.
I'VE OWNED THAT ONE SINCE 2011, AND THEN AND DOWN THE STREET IN THE 2100 BLOCK OF 14TH IN 2005, IT WAS ACTUALLY THE SAME SEMESTER.
MR. MAYOR, I HAD YOUR BUSINESS LAW CLASS AT TECH.
I DID. SO, YOU KNOW, I GOT FASCINATED WITH THE NORTH OVERTON PROJECT WHEN I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL AND STARTED, YOU KNOW, CUTTING MY TEETH IN REAL ESTATE DOWN THERE BACK IN 2005, AND I WANT TO TRY TO ADDRESS A FEW OF THE CONCERNS FROM THE OPPOSITION BECAUSE I LIVED THERE.
I DID FIVE YEARS IN THE 2100 BLOCK AND THEN ANOTHER TWO YEARS IN THE 2400 BLOCK.
SO TO START WITH, YOU KNOW, I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT TRAFFIC.
YOU KNOW, AND I LIVED THERE ON AT 24, TEN, 14TH IN 2013 AND 14, AND WHEN YOU LIVE THERE, YOU DON'T GO UP AVENUE X.
AVENUE X HAS A STOP SIGN ON 15TH, THEN ANOTHER STOP SIGN ON 16TH.
THEN YOU'RE FORCED TO GO RIGHT ON 19TH.
MY PARENTS, I GREW UP ON 20TH AND FLINT.
IF I'M GOING TO TINSELTOWN, I DO THE SAME THING.
IF I'M GOING TO THE MALL, I GO TO THE MARSHA SHARP OR ANYWHERE IN SOUTHWEST LUBBOCK, THE WEST END.
YOU KNOW, THE ONLY WAY I SEE PEOPLE COMING DOWN AVENUE X IS IF THEY'RE COMING FROM THE EAST TO TURN AND GET DOWN THERE, YOU KNOW, IF THEY'RE HEADED WEST , BUT THEY'RE NOT COMING FROM THE AIRPORT BECAUSE IF YOU'RE COMING FROM THE AIRPORT, YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE MARSHA SHARP.
THEY'RE NOT COMING FROM THE FIRST FRIDAY ART TRAIL OR THE DEPOT DISTRICT BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE BROADWAY, YOU KNOW, AND BECAUSE IT'S CLOSER TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, AND, YOU KNOW, SPEAKING OF BROADWAY, I REMEMBER WHEN THEY LOWERED IT, YOU KNOW, TO IT USED TO BE TWO LANES EACH WAY, AND NOW IT'S JUST ONE BECAUSE WE WANTED A BIKE LANE.
SO THAT WAS KIND OF THE FIRST THING THAT STUCK OUT TO ME.
THE SECOND ONE WAS SAINT JOHN'S.
MY PARENTS WERE MARRIED AT SAINT JOHN'S.
I GREW UP GOING TO SAINT JOHN'S AND WE HAD A LOT OF TECH KIDS THERE WHEN I WAS THERE.
SO THE GUY THAT WAS THE ORGAN DIRECTOR, HE WENT TO TECH, HE GAVE ME PIANO LESSONS.
HE LED THE CHOIR, THE YOUTH CHOIR.
THAT'S ONE OF THE WAYS THEY GENERATE REVENUE, I WOULD THINK.
YOU KNOW, LET'S PUT A BUNCH OF KIDS NEXT TO THEM AND SEE IF WE CAN'T GET SOME NEW MEMBERS AT SAINT JOHN'S, YOU KNOW, AND THE PARKING ENFORCEMENT, IT'S HAD TO BE ENFORCED FOR THE LAST 60 YEARS.
SO, YOU KNOW, THAT'S KIND OF, YOU KNOW, MY TAKE ON ON THOSE.
OKAY. KEN ABRAHAM ACQUIRED THESE PROPERTIES OVER ABOUT 30 YEARS AND WAITED UNTIL WHAT CAN BE BUILT IS SOMETHING THAT IS NOT LIKE WHAT THEY BUILT IN THE 50S AND 60S IN NORTH OVERTON.
[03:55:01]
TODAY, BUT WE REMEMBER WHAT THAT WAS LIKE WITH ALL THOSE LITTLE APARTMENT BUILDINGS THAT AREN'T VERY DENSE.SO, YOU KNOW, THIS BUILDING BEING CONCRETE AND STEEL IS GOING TO BE A 100 YEAR BUILDING WITH 100 YEAR MATERIALS AND YOU NEED THAT DENSITY TO HAVE THIS KIND OF AMENITIES TO HAVE THE ECONOMIES OF SCALE.
SO HE'S BEEN WAITING THIS LONG FOR THIS PROJECT TO HAPPEN, AND THEN, YOU KNOW, JUST THE LAST THING I WANT TO SAY IS, YOU KNOW, AS YOU GUYS THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO VOTE ON FOR THE CITY YOU REPRESENT, ALL THE THE CITIZENS OF LUBBOCK AND PEOPLE WITH AN INTEREST LIKE ME THAT OWN PROPERTY HERE.
YOU KNOW THINK ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT WAS JUST SAID, AND I KNOW WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO REPEAT, BUT WE CAN HAVE TECH PROVIDE THIS HOUSING AND CONTINUE TO RECEIVE NO TAX DOLLARS FROM IT OR YOU CAN GET $85,000 A MONTH, $1 MILLION A YEAR FOR LUBBOCK ISD, THE HOSPITAL DISTRICT AND THE WATER DISTRICT.
I SAW A LOT OF ITEMS ON THE AGENDA THAT DEALT WITH FINANCE.
CAN YOU ALL BELIEVE THAT NOW? MY NAME IS TODD SONS.
I CURRENTLY SERVE AS ON THE EXECUTIVE TEAM AND ALSO IS THE BOARD ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS THE CHAIRMAN OF BUILDING AND GROUNDS FOR THE TEXAS TECH WESLEY FOUNDATION, LOCATED AT 2420 15TH STREET.
TODAY, I WENT TO A GREAT EVENT THERE.
WE SERVED OVER 600 STUDENTS TODAY, INCOMING FRESHMEN.
WE GAVE THEM HOT DOGS, AND MY FLIP FLOPS ARE STICKY RIGHT NOW BECAUSE OF ALL THE SIRUP.
YOU KNOW, FROM THE SNOW CONES, BUT A WONDERFUL EVENT FOR THOSE FRESHMEN AND WHAT WESLEY FOUNDATION AT TEXAS TECH HAS BEEN DEDICATED TO FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS RAISING UP A GENERATION OF CHRISTIANS WHO LEAD, AND THAT'S AN AMAZING NUMBER FOR US TO HAVE BEEN DOING THAT FOR THIS LONG. EVERY ENCOUNTER TO US IS A FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE, IS A DIVINE ENCOUNTER.
EVEN THIS ENCOUNTER IN CHAMBERS TODAY AS WE MEET DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT VIEWS AND OPINIONS, IS A DIVINE ENCOUNTER, AND SO WE SUPPORT THE NEW APARTMENT PROPOSAL THAT HAS BEEN OFFERED BEFORE US, AND IT'S WITH OUR HOPE AND OUR HEARTS AND ALL THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO WELCOME THESE STUDENTS JUST AS YOU WOULD WANT.
YOUR KIDS AND GRANDCHILDREN WELCOMED AT A NEW UNIVERSITY TO PROVIDE FOR THEM SUCH GREAT OPPORTUNITY AND GROWTH, BUT BEYOND THAT, TRUE COMMUNITY TO BE WELCOMED INTO.
I JUST WONDER TODAY, THIS EVENING, AS WE TALK AND DELIBERATE THIS WHAT GOD IS UP TO ON PLANTING 700 STUDENTS RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO US AS OUR NEIGHBORS, EVERY ENCOUNTER IS A DIVINE ENCOUNTER.
MINE IS LESS THAN TWO MINUTES, I PROMISE, AND I HAVE MORE GOOD NEWS.
PROUD OF TEXAS TECH, AND I'M GOING TO READ A LITTLE BIT, BUT I HAD TO TELL YOU MY ENTHUSIASM FOR THIS PROJECT AND FOR OUR OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS TOO, BECAUSE I LIVED IN RUSH 25 YEARS, JUST DOWN THE STREET FROM GREEK LIFE, ONE BLOCK, IN FACT, AND I PAID A LOT OF TAX MONEY FOR LIVING THERE TO THE CITY AND TO THE SCHOOL AND EVERYONE , BUT ANYWAY, A LOT OF MY FAMILY WENT TO A&M AND THIS COLLEGE STATION, I HAD A SISTER, I HAVE A SISTER WHO LIVED THERE 27 YEARS.
HE WAS AN AGGIE, BUT ANYWAY, COLLEGE STATION ROLLED OUT THE RED CARPET TO ANY KIND OF PROGRESS FOR THEIR CITY AND TO THIS COMPANY, AND IT'S AN AMAZING ASSET TO COLLEGE STATION, AND BRYAN, TEXAS,
[04:00:07]
ALSO, I'M GOING TO GET OUT MY NOTES.I DO ANOTHER THING OF GOOD NEWS.
I DO NOT EXPECT TO MAKE A DOLLAR OFF THIS PROJECT.
I'VE BEEN A REAL ESTATE BROKER FOR 50 YEARS.
I WAS MARRIED TO A REAL ESTATE BROKER WHO WAS A BROKER 60 YEARS.
HIS NAME WAS THE LATE BOBBY DAY, AND I'M SURE A LOT OF YOU KNEW HIM AND I LOVED HIM VERY MUCH.
WE HAVE A BEAUTIFUL DAUGHTER WHO'S 35.
BOBBY AND I BOTH GRADUATED FROM TECH.
I'M VERY PROUD OF HIM AT [INAUDIBLE] LAW FIRM.
HE SAID, WELL, I DO, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY STAND ON ANYTHING.
WE APPRECIATE ALL YOUR SERVICE.
OKAY, NOW I'M GOING TO GET DOWN TO WHAT I WROTE.
NO, NO, I'VE ONLY DONE ONE MINUTE.
OKAY. LUBBOCK, TEXAS, IS VERY FORTUNATE TO BE THE HOME OF TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, WHICH IS CELEBRATING ITS CENTENNIAL YEAR, AND I'VE HEARD NO ONE MENTION THAT TODAY, 100 YEARS.
TEXAS TECH HAS BEEN IN LUBBOCK, AND THIS PROPERTY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS ABOUT 500FT FROM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY. OH, SURPRISE.
WELL, WE'VE KNOWN THAT FOR A HUNDRED YEARS, AND ANYWAY, AND I MY DAUGHTER AND SON IN LAW OWNED A A VERY VINTAGE APARTMENT COMPLEX IN OVERTON, AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF IT, AND WE LOVE THE OLD COMMUNITIES, BUT ANYWAY, TECH WELL, TECH HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GROWTH AND VITALITY OF OUR HUB CITY OF THE SOUTH PLAINS.
IT IS ALSO BEEN ONE OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT INDUSTRIES AND I DON'T THINK THIS HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY AND I'M NEARLY THROUGH THIS YEAR.
THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 21,000 EMPLOYEES BY TEXAS TECH, 40,500 STUDENTS, 378,000 ALUMNI, AND 278 MILLION IN RESEARCH INVESTMENTS WITH 1839 ACRES.
TECH HAS THE SECOND LARGEST CONTIGUOUS CAMPUS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IS THE ONLY SCHOOL IN TEXAS TO HOUSE AN UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION, A LAW SCHOOL AND A MEDICAL SCHOOL AT THE SAME LOCATION.
OKAY. MY BOBBY AND I BOTH ARE TECH GRADUATES, FOLLOWED BY OUR CHILDREN, OUR GRANDCHILDREN , AND I WANT THAT FAMILY TRADITION TO GO ON.
I'M PROUD OF TECH, THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS STATE OF THE ART STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT THAT IS PROPOSED TODAY AND AWAITING YOUR VOTE OF APPROVAL WILL HELP OUR BELOVED UNIVERSITY AND OUR CITY CONTINUE TO GROW AND PROSPER TOGETHER.
I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT OUR UNIVERSITY AND CITY'S PROGRESS GO HAND IN HAND.
THE END, AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU, EVERYONE.
WE HAVE SEVERAL MORE PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SPEAK, AND I WOULD BEG YOU FOR TWO MORE PEOPLE.
WE'VE HAD SOME YOUNG PEOPLE THAT ARE THAT HAVE ASKED TO DO THEIR CIVIC DUTY AND PARTICIPATE IN THIS, AND WE HAVEN'T HEARD FROM ANYBODY OF THAT AGE GROUP, AND WE HAVE A LARGE GROUP OVER HERE THAT WANT TO SPEAK AND WE'RE GOING TO TWO OF YOU PLEASE COME , AND THEN I THINK WE'RE GOING TO REST BECAUSE I THINK EVERYBODY'S TIRED.
THANK YOU GUYS FOR COMING TODAY.
MY NAME IS COLTON LEWIS, AND I LIVE AT 1819.
YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO HEAR FROM US YOUNG PEOPLE AS WELL.
THEY'VE TALKED ABOUT THE WALKABLE COMMUNITY.
[04:05:01]
I THINK THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT.I WILL AVOID A CAR AT ANY COST.
SO FOR ME, HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THAT, YOU KNOW, HIGH RISE AND THEN BE ABLE TO WALK TO CAMPUS, IT'S JUST IT'S ONE OF THE BEST THINGS YOU CAN OFFER A STUDENT WHO'S LOOKING FOR HOUSING.
I ALSO WANT TO TALK ABOUT TEXAS TECH THEMSELVES.
THEY ALSO DON'T HAVE A LOT OF HOUSING OPTIONS RIGHT NOW.
THEY'RE ACTUALLY GIVING THEM VOUCHERS AND SENDING THEM AWAY.
SO THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT, I THINK, FOR TEXAS TECH AS WELL, BECAUSE, I MEAN, IF WE DON'T HAVE HOUSING OPTIONS, WE'RE GOING TO BE SENDING STUDENTS AWAY AS WELL, AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A LOSS FOR THE TEXAS TECH COMMUNITY AS WELL.
A LOT OF THE PROPERTIES ARE MUCH OLDER.
THEY'VE BEEN SEEN VERY POOR TAKING CARE OF.
YOU DON'T GET A LOT OF INVESTMENT IN THESE PROPERTIES, AND SO THESE STUDENTS, ALL OF US, WE'RE FORCED TO LIVE IN PROPERTIES THAT AREN'T SUBPAR UNLESS WE WANT TO LIVE ACROSS TOWN LIKE I HAVE PERSONALLY CHOSEN TO DO, JUST BECAUSE I DID NOT FIND SOMETHING UP TO MY STANDARD CLOSE BY.
BUT YOU DON'T SEE THE HOUSING OPTIONS IF YOU TALK TO A LOT OF THE TECH PARENTS, ESPECIALLY AFTER LISTENING TO THIS PREVIOUS WEEKEND, WAS MOVING WEEKEND FOR A LOT OF THE PROPERTIES HERE IN TOWN.
IT'S THE CHOICES THEY WERE FORCED TO HAVE FOR THEIR KIDS.
A LOT OF US IN THIS GENERATION, WE DO WANT THE NICER STUFF PARENTS ARE WILLING TO PAY, YOU KNOW, FOR THEIR CHILDREN TO LIVE SOMEWHERE THAT'S A LOT MORE UP TO PAR WHAT THEY'RE USED TO THE WALKABILITY A LOT OF STUDENTS NOWADAYS, WE UBER, WE UBER EATS, WE DON'T WALK.
THANK YOU. SO WE'RE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
WE'RE GOING TO SIT DOWN AND WAIT FOR THAT.
THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AGENDA ITEM 7.4.
ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 7.14.
SO MOVED. THANK YOU, DR. WILSON.
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE THE PROPONENT AVAILABLE.
WE HAVE MR. HOGAN AND SEVERAL OTHER GROUPS AVAILABLE.
IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS THAT ANYONE HAS OF ANY OF THE PARTIES OR PROPONENTS AT THIS TIME? OKAY. MISS PATTERSON.
ARE YOU TALKING TO ME? MR. PIERCE? YES, SIR.
YOU'RE THE GENTLEMAN FROM PARALLEL, RIGHT? SOME PEOPLE THINK I'M A GENTLEMAN.
YES, MA'AM. [CHUCKLING] I THINK THAT THE MIC'S ARE A LITTLE LOW.
I'M HAVING A HARD TIME HEARING DOWN THERE.
YOU'RE HAVING A HARD TIME HEARING ME? [LAUGHTER] I WAS, NOW I'M NOT.
I'M NOT HAVING ANY TROUBLE. THERE WE GO.
ALL RIGHT. OKAY, NOW I GOT YOU.
I HAVE SEVERAL THINGS, BUT I'LL BE QUICK.
HOW LONG IS THIS PROJECT BEEN IN PLANNING, STAGE AND DEVELOPMENT AND ALL OF THAT? HOW LONG HAVE YOU GUYS BEEN CHATTING THIS OUT? SO AROUND FIVE YEARS AND SO IN THAT FIVE YEAR PERIOD, WAS THERE NOT A DESIRE TO VISIT WITH THE CITIZENS IN THAT AREA? WE WAITED UNTIL WE KNEW THAT WE HAD AN ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE DEVELOPMENT TO PUT IN FRONT OF THEM.
WE MET WITH THE CITY ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
WE TOOK SOME INPUT FROM CITY STAFF ON WHAT THEY FELT WAS APPROPRIATE, AND THEN WE CAME BACK AND WE KNEW THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE THERE WAS GOING TO BE OPPOSITION TO A REALLY DENSE BUILDING.
ULTIMATELY, WE CAME BACK WITH THE LIKE WE SAID, THE THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT WE COULD DO ON THIS PROPERTY, AND THEN WE BEGAN REACHING OUT SHORTLY AFTER THAT.
[04:10:04]
THAT NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY THAT WE DIDN'T MEET WITH EVERYONE.WE DID MEET WITH A FEW SELECTED PEOPLE AROUND US.
OTHERWISE, WE FELT LIKE WE WOULD, YOU KNOW, IT WAS NOT GOING TO BE A PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION UNTIL WE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WE NEEDED AND THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE PROJECT THAT WE NEEDED.
BECAUSE THE REASON I ASK THAT IS BECAUSE AFTER BRINGING YOUR INITIAL PLANS THAT I GUESS IT TOOK YOU FIVE YEARS TO GET AND YOU MEET WITH THE FOLKS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OVER A FEW WEEKS, I GATHER, AND YOU CHANGE YOUR WHOLE OUTLOOK OF YOUR PLAN.
BECAUSE I'M WONDERING NOW KIND OF HOW YOU CAME UP WITH THE FIRST DESIGN THAT YOU DID THAT YOU INITIALLY HOW DID YOU COME UP WITH THAT? IT WAS IT WAS BASED ON ON OUR CRITERIA AND WHAT WE FELT WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA, AND THEN WE LISTENED TO COMMENTARY AND WE MADE SOME CHANGES.
DID I HEAR THAT WRONG? WE HAVE A SUBBASEMENT.
SO THE PARKING GARAGE GOES UP AND THEN THERE'S A SUBBASEMENT THAT GOES DOWN.
YES. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT IT WAS.
I WASN'T CLEAR AS TO WHAT IT WAS.
I UNDERSTAND, AND ONLY TECH STUDENTS CAN LIVE IN THIS PARTICULAR--ANYONE CAN LIVE THERE.
ANYONE CAN LIVE THERE? ANYONE CAN LIVE THERE.
WE'LL HAVE OTHER PEOPLE. WE'LL HAVE WE'VE HAD FAMILIES LIVE IN OUR PROPERTIES.
I JUST COULDN'T GATHER THAT BY THE INFORMATION THAT WAS BEING CONVEYED.
ANYONE CAN LIVE IN THIS PROPERTY.
LET ME SEE. LET ME GO DOWN MY STUFF.
OKAY. I THINK THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR RIGHT NOW.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU, MS. MARTINEZ-GARCIA.
DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. PIERCE? NOPE. ALL RIGHT.
YOU MIGHT STAY CLOSE, MR. PIERCE. I WILL. NOW YOU CAN SIT DOWN.
CAN I SIT DOWN? OKAY. SIT DOWN.
YOU MIGHT JUST STAY RIGHT THERE.
I CAN HOBBLE BACK UP HERE WHENEVER.
IT'S MORE OF A COMMENT, AND WHEN MISS REYNA CAME, YOU KNOW, I HEARD EVERYONE, YOU KNOW, SAW AN ANGRY WOMAN, AND IT WASN'T THAT SHE WAS ANGRY.
IT'S THAT SHE FELT HOPELESS, AND ULTIMATELY, YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE TYPE OF PERSON THAT I THINK I'M SUPPOSED TO BE SPEAKING ON BEHALF.
I HAVE DONE MY DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE SURE THAT I HAVE FACILITATED MEETINGS.
I'VE DONE EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO TRY TO FIND A COMMON GROUND, BUT ULTIMATELY, IT'S PEOPLE LIKE MISS REYNA WHO FEEL HOPELESS. THEY FEEL HOPELESS.
YOU HEARD THAT ANGER, BUT ALSO THAT HURT.
I'VE BEEN THAT HOPELESS PERSON, BUT NOW I'M IN A POSITION WHERE I CAN BE HOPEFUL, AND MR. ABRAHAM DID COME TO VISIT ME, AND, YOU KNOW, I GOT TO KNOW HIM, AND SOMETHING THAT HE SAID TO ME WAS, I MEAN, THIS HAS BEEN HE SHOWED ME A LETTER.
I REMEMBER REVIEWING THAT LETTER AND I THOUGHT, WOW, THAT WAS 12 YEARS AGO.
IN 12 YEARS, I THINK A LOT COULD HAVE BEEN ACHIEVED, A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY.
THERE WAS NO NEIGHBORLY OPPORTUNITIES, AND DAVID, I APPRECIATE THAT.
YOU SAID YOU SPOKE WITH A FEW PEOPLE WITHIN FIVE YEARS, BUT IN 12 YEARS THERE WAS SO MANY OPPORTUNITIES AND THEY DIDN'T HAPPEN, AND IN LOOKING AT SOME OF THE ILLUSTRATIONS, I KNOW, MARY, YOU SHOWED YOUR BLACK AND WHITE LITTLE DESIGN AND IT REALLY HIT
[04:15:03]
ME. IT'S LIKE, WOW, THERE REALLY IS NO SPACE.YOU GO FROM A VERY HIGH RISE TO RESIDENTIAL AND THEN LOOKING AT THE BANK OF AMERICA BUILDING, SAME THING, EXCEPT THEY HAVE A HUGE SPACE PARKING BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE RESTAURANT.
WE NEED TO BE MORE MINDFUL OF THE NEEDS OF THIS COMMUNITY, AND THAT BEING SAID, I ALSO DROVE THROUGH THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MULTIPLE TIMES , AND YOU KNOW WHAT? IT WASN'T THAT DAVID DIDN'T DO HIS PART TO TRY TO DO SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE A HAPPY MEDIUM FOR THESE FOLKS.
IT WAS THE FACT THAT AS A CITY, WE HAVE BEEN NEGLECTFUL OF SOUTH OVERTON, AND I KNOW NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR THAT, BUT WE HAVEN'T DONE WHAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING FOR THESE RESIDENTS, FOR LOTS OF NEIGHBORHOODS.
AGAIN, WHY I RAN FOR OFFICE BECAUSE OF AGING NEIGHBORHOODS.
I MEAN, I HAD NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HADN'T HAD NEW STREETS IN 40 TO 50 YEARS, 40 TO 50 YEARS.
I MEAN, IF WE'RE ALL PAYING TAXES, WHY AREN'T WE DISTRIBUTING THOSE DOLLARS INTO EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD, ESPECIALLY NEIGHBORHOODS? AND, YOU KNOW, SOME MAY NOT FIND THIS MY COMMENTS POPULAR.
IT'S TIME FOR US TO INVEST IN PEOPLE, AND I'VE ALREADY SEEN THE PEOPLE INVESTING IN THEMSELVES, AND THAT'S WHY YOU SEE SOME HOUSES THAT HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED BY THEIR OWN REGARDS.
THEY PUT THEIR LIFE SAVINGS INTO THIS.
THEY'VE PUT THEIR TIME INTO THIS BECAUSE THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR COMMUNITY, AND I APPRECIATE THAT, AND, YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND THAT WE WANT TO ERECT MONUMENTS TO HONOR OUR LEGACY, BUT IF YOU REALLY WANT TO MAKE AN IMPACT AND REALLY BUILD A LEGACY, THEN INVEST IN THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS, INVEST IN THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS.
YOU KNOW, I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT DAVID AND HIS GROUP HAVE DONE.
I APPRECIATE ALL THE OPPORTUNITIES, BUT, YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT PARALLEL WITH THE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, AND AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, BUT I WILL BE VOTING AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.
THANK YOU, MISS MARTINEZ-GARCIA.
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR DAVID, IF HE'LL STEP BACK UP HERE, BUT I ACTUALLY GREW UP ON 16TH STREET AND ABOUT AVENUE W, THAT WAS THE FIRST HOME I LIVED IN HERE IN LUBBOCK AND I ALWAYS LOVED THAT VIEW DOWN 16TH STREET.
SO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD IS IMPORTANT TO ME.
NO DECISION WE MAKE IS MADE IN A VACUUM.
I MEAN, THERE'S ALWAYS COMPETING INTERESTS.
WE'VE TALKED ABOUT DEVELOPMENT.
I THINK YOU HAVE SHOWN YOURSELF TO BE AN OUTSTANDING DEVELOPER.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE'S A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT FEELS VERY STRONGLY ABOUT WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT IS APPROPRIATE NEXT TO THEM, AND THESE PEOPLE LIVE THERE, THEY HAVE THEIR HOMES THERE, THEY MAKE THEIR INCOME OFF OF PROPERTY THAT THEY OWN THERE, AND THEIR CONCERNS ARE VALID TOO, AND THAT'S WHAT MAKES THIS REALLY TOUGH.
WE DON'T MAKE THESE DECISIONS IN A VACUUM.
IT'S NOT OUR GOAL HERE TO MAKE, YOU KNOW, MR. ABRAHAM'S DREAM COME TRUE.
NOR IS IT OUR JOB UP HERE TO RESIST EVERY KIND OF DEVELOPMENT THAT MIGHT COME ALONG THERE IS GOING TO BE DEVELOPMENT.
I MEAN, THANK GOD TEXAS TECH IS HERE IN LUBBOCK.
IT'S A BLESSING AND A BENEFIT TO THIS CITY, BUT THERE ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT DENSITY AND ABOUT SAFETY.
SO THAT'S WHAT MAKES THIS DECISION REALLY HARD FOR ME TODAY.
[04:20:04]
TRYING TO WEIGH THESE TWO CONSIDERATIONS.LET ME JUST ASK YOU THIS QUESTION, AND I APPRECIATE THE CHANGES THAT YOU HAVE MADE AND I APPRECIATE YOUR OPENNESS TO MAKING THOSE CHANGES, BUT THE CONCERN ABOUT THE SCOPE AND THE DENSITY OF THIS PROJECT, AND I THINK I'VE HEARD YOU ANSWER THIS QUESTION, BUT I JUST WANT TO PUT IT TO YOU. HAVE YOU MADE ALL THE CONCESSIONS ON THOSE TWO MATTERS THAT YOU BELIEVE YOU CAN MAKE AS A DEVELOPER? YES, SIR. I THINK WE HAVE, AND IF I CAN FURTHER ANSWER IN TERMS OF DENSITY AND SAFETY, DENSITY ACTUALLY CONTRIBUTES TO SAFETY.
RIGHT NOW, THERE'S A LOT OF EMPTY PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THERE, WHICH IS NICE FOR LACK OF LACK OF DENSITY, BUT IT ALSO CREATES A VOID, AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE DEVELOPMENT OF OTHER UNIVERSITY TOWNS WHERE THEY'VE ALLOWED DENSITY BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE UNIVERSITY, IT ACTUALLY INCREASES WALKABILITY, EYES ON THE STREET AND PEDESTRIAN WALKABILITY, AND ULTIMATELY THAT CONTRIBUTES TO SAFETY ALONG WITH THE LIGHTING AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WE WOULD BE DOING THERE.
SO WE ARGUE THAT IT ACTUALLY IS GOING TO MAKE THINGS MORE SAFE, BUT IN TERMS OF THE DENSITY WE HAVE ASKED FOR AND AGAIN, I'VE REPEATED THIS AND IF WE COULD MAKE THIS FIVE STORIES, WE CERTAINLY WOULD, BUT THIS IS THE THIS IS THE THE MINIMUM.
ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE, AND IT'S NOT JUST THE ECONOMY.
NOW, I HEARD THAT. I HEARD THAT EARLIER.
IF YOU GUYS DON'T FIND A WAY TO FIND A WAY TO BUILD 700 BED DEVELOPMENTS, THOSE KIDS DON'T HAVE A PLACE TO GO AND THEY'RE GOING TO SPREAD OUT ALL OVER THE CITY AND IF THAT'S YOUR PREFERENCE, I MEAN, THAT MAY BE THE PREFERENCE.
MOST PLACES WE GO, THEY PREFER TO KEEP THOSE KIDS IN SAFETY, WALKABLE DISTANCES TO CAMPUS , AND I THINK ULTIMATELY THAT'S PROBABLY BEST IN LUBBOCK AS WELL, WHICH IS WHY WE'VE MADE THIS PROPOSAL. OKAY.
THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTION. YOU'RE WELCOME.
DR. WILSON. MR. PIERCE, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY.
SO I HAD A CITIZEN REACH OUT TO ME WHO WENT AND DID HER OWN RESEARCH ON THE AREA AND TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW SHE WAS GOING TO SUPPORT THIS, AND SHE PROVIDED ME WITH NUMBERS. SO ONE OF THE BIG CONCERNS I'VE HEARD REPEATED OVER AND OVER IS PARKING.
THAT WAS AN ISSUE ALSO WITH THE 19TH STREET PROJECT, AND SO SHE WENT TO THE NEAREST BIG STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT, WHICH IS U LOFTS THAT IS RIGHT NEAR WHERE THIS BUILDING IS BEING PROPOSED. CURRENTLY, U LOFTS HAS 299 BEDS WITH 250 PARKING SPOTS AVAILABLE, AND OUT OF THE 250, LESS THAN 100 CURRENTLY ARE LEASED OUT AT THAT BUILDING.
SO 40%, WHICH IS EVEN LESS THAN THE PROPOSED 75% THAT YOU HAVE SHOWN.
SO I THINK THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES TO PARKING CONCERNS WITH THIS BUILDING IS THAT A NEARBY FACILITY IS ALREADY NOT HAVING ISSUES WITH THIS BUILDING AND HAS AMPLE FOR BOTH RESIDENTS AND GUESTS TO COME TO THAT BUILDING.
YES, MA'AM. THE OTHER THING THAT YOU COULDN'T HAVE SAID IT MORE PERFECTLY THAN I WAS GOING TO.
THAT'S WHY I HAD PUT MY FLAG UP OVER HERE ABOUT SAFETY.
DENSITY CREATES SAFETY, AND I HAVE HEARD FROM YOU AND FROM OTHER PEOPLE THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU WERE WILLING TO PROVIDE CAMERAS TO OVERLOOK THE PROPERTIES THAT SURROUND THIS BUILDING, WHICH I APPRECIATE.
WE'VE TALKED ABOUT GREEN SPACE.
YOU KNOW, YOU'VE TOLD US ABOUT A POTENTIAL DOG PARK IN THAT AREA.
I APPRECIATE ALL OF THOSE EFFORTS.
I THINK THAT DEVELOPERS CAN COME IN AND I APPRECIATE YOUR HISTORY WITH TECH.
YOU KNOW, PEOPLE TRY TO COME IN AND WE WANT DEVELOPERS TO COME TO OUR CITY.
WE WANT DEVELOPERS TO COME TO OUR CITY.
YOU TURN THEM AWAY, NOBODY WILL COME HERE, AND JUST LIKE SOMEONE ELSE HAS SAID, IF YOU'RE NOT GROWING, YOU'RE DYING AND WE DO NOT WANT TO SEE THAT AROUND ONE OF THE BEST UNIVERSITIES IN TEXAS.
SO, YOU KNOW, I LIKE THE SAFETY OF THIS.
I LIKE THE WAY YOU CAME IN AND COMPROMISE.
I THINK THIS IS A GREAT PROJECT.
[04:25:01]
I DON'T EVER WANT TO SEE THE CITY DIE, AND I THINK IT'S TIME TO BRING DEVELOPMENT LIKE THIS TO LUBBOCK, TEXAS.I CAN JUST I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THAT.
THANK YOU, MAYOR DAVID, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU, SO YOU CAN REST.
I'LL STAND HERE AS LONG AS I NEED TO.
I JUST WANT TO SAY THANKS TO EVERYONE THAT'S HUNG IN HERE TONIGHT.
THESE ARE SERIOUS DECISIONS TO BE MADE IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND REGARDLESS OF WHAT SIDE YOU'RE ON THIS; THIS IS FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE STARS IN YOUR EYES AND YOU THINK, OH MY GOSH, I WANT TO SERVE ON THE CITY COUNCIL.
THE MAYOR MAKES THREE TIMES WHAT WE MAKE.
THAT'S WHY WE BORROW MONEY FROM HIM FOR LUNCH, AND BUT, YOU KNOW, AT THE SAME TIME, WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A DECISION TONIGHT, AND WE HAVE FRIENDS ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS. OKAY, AND SO THESE ARE [INAUDIBLE] DEALS WHEN WE HAVE TO MAKE DECISIONS LIKE THIS, YOU KNOW, OUR BURDEN, OUR LEGAL BURDEN ON THIS IS TO DETERMINE COMPATIBILITY, AND COMPATIBILITY IS NOT PERFECT.
THE DEFINITION IS THE ABILITY TO EXIST OR OCCUR WITHOUT CONFLICT.
IT'S CAN YOU MAKE IT WORK? I THINK THIS IS A PROPERTY RIGHTS.
I'M A PROPERTY RIGHTS GUY, BUT YOU KNOW, THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE PROPERTY AND MR. ABRAHAM HAS PROPERTY, HE HAS RIGHTS TOO.
QUITE FRANKLY, YOU COULD GO BACK.
IT'S THE FOUNDATION OF THIS COUNTRY THAT'S IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE TO DO AND INVEST IN YOUR PROPERTY.
I'M TOOK A LEDGER AS PEOPLE SPOKE OPPOSED TO THIS TODAY, AND I WAS DISAPPOINTED, QUITE FRANKLY, THAT I DIDN'T HEAR FROM MORE PEOPLE THAT LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
I MARKED TWO. NO, THAT'S WRONG.
I DON'T THINK SO. WELL, I REALIZE THAT MY TIME TO SPEAK RIGHT NOW, I THINK THE PROS OUTWEIGH THE CONS ON THIS.
I HAD MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE PARKING.
I THINK THEY'VE SATISFIED THAT.
OUR VOTE IS FOR THE REQUEST [INAUDIBLE].
MISS JOY. MR. HOGAN? YES, MA'AM.
DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? I'M ON IT. I'M SORRY.
I HAVE A COMMENT. THAT'S ACCEPTABLE.
OKAY. YOU'LL HAVE TO COME UP HERE IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT SO WE CAN RECORD YOU.
I THINK YOU'VE PROBABLY HAD ENOUGH AND SOMEBODY ELSE CAN SEE YOU.
THANK YOU. I'VE CHANGED MY THINKING.
WELL, NO MORE THAN MR. PIERCE CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS.
IF WE WANT TO ASK QUESTIONS AND HE CAN MAKE A STATEMENT, AND I PROMISE TO KEEP IT SHORT.
IN SITTING HERE, I'VE BEEN IMPRESSED BY THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION, AND I DO NOT DOUBT THEIR SINCERITY OR THEIR PROFESSIONALISM AT ALL.
I THINK THEY ARE CAPABLE OF DEVELOPING A VERY GOOD DEVELOPMENT, JUST NOT IN THIS PLACE.
IT GOES BACK TO PUTTING THE RIGHT PROJECTS IN THE RIGHT PLACES.
THE SPEAKERS ARE CORRECT. WE CAN CAPTURE THESE TAX DOLLARS.
MR. PIERCE HAS FIVE YEARS INVESTED IN THIS PROJECT.
[04:30:01]
THIS COMMUNITY.WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP OUR COMMUNITY IN A WAY THAT WORKS FOR US, PUTTING THE PROPER USES IN THE PROPER PLACES AND ALLOWING PRIVATE DEVELOPERS TO REALIZE A WORKABLE PROFIT.
ONE MORE POINT AND I'LL SHUT UP.
THEY GO INTO THE DORMS YEAR ONE.
TYPICALLY IN YEAR TWO, THEY GO INTO DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS THIS.
BY THE TIME THEY BECOME UPPERCLASSMEN OR GRADUATE STUDENTS, OUR EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN THAT TYPICALLY THEY GO TO LOWER DENSITY BECAUSE THEY WANT TO GET OUT OF DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS, AND SO AS PROPER PLANNERS, WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL THAT WE DON'T HAVE A GLUT OF DEVELOPMENT.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, I THINK THIS IS A VERY APPROPRIATE PLACE IN THE DEVELOPMENT, IN THE RIGHT PLACE, AND WE WOULD I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION WITH HIM, NOT TO SELL HIM A PIECE OF LAND, BUT TO FIND A PLACE THAT THIS WORKS IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS, TO CAPTURE THOSE TAX DOLLARS AND TO CAPTURE THOSE JOBS AND TO CAPTURE EVERY BENEFIT THAT THEY CAN OFFER OUR COMMUNITY.
THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY.
I'LL GET OUT OF THE WAY. MISS MARTINEZ GARCIA.
VERY, VERY BRIEFLY, COULD WE FIND A DIFFERENT LOCATION? YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT APPROPRIATE.
OKAY. SO I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF A CONCERN ABOUT THE OPPOSITION BEING ALLOWED TO RE-OPPOSE AGAIN, JUST AS A POINT OF ORDER. I DON'T THINK THAT WAS APPROPRIATE.
SO I'D JUST LIKE TO REGISTER MY CONCERN ABOUT THAT.
SO MY PARTNER HAS A COUPLE OF THINGS TO ADDRESS OF COMMENTS THAT CAME UP AS WELL.
IF MISS JOY HAS A QUESTION, WE WILL ASK THE QUESTION.
OKAY, I ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR POINT OF ORDER, BUT WE ALLOWED IT.
OKAY, MISS JOY, THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
WELL, SOMEONE REFERENCED WE'VE GOT LAWYERS UP HERE.
WE'VE GOT THREE. WE'RE ALL SITTING NEXT TO EACH OTHER, AND I COULD GO DOWN THROUGH MY NOTES.
I DID IT JUST LIKE I WOULD IF I WAS TRYING A CASE, AND I COULD POINT BY POINT THROUGH THIS.
I DON'T KNOW HOW HELPFUL THAT IS.
IT'S MORE OF MY IDEA ABOUT WHAT MAY BE TRUE AS OPPOSED TO YOUR IDEA.
YES, MA'AM. I DON'T THINK THAT'LL GET US WHERE WE NEED TO BE.
A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT CONCERN ME IS THE DISCUSSION ABOUT RETAIL.
YOU KNOW, IT'S STRANGE TO ME THAT NORTH OVERTON HAS MORE STUDENTS IN IT THAN IT EVER HAD BEFORE.
IT WAS DEMOLISHED, AND WE CAN'T KEEP BUSINESSES IN THOSE FRONT RETAIL THERE ON UNIVERSITY.
THEY'VE CLOSED. THEY'VE OPENED.
THEY'VE CLOSED. THE ONLY THING THAT'S KIND OF MADE IT IS A T-SHIRT, ATHLETIC KIND OF PLACE, AND THEN WHEN I MOVE CLOSER TO WHERE MR. ABRAHAM'S BUSINESS IS, AND I CAN TELL YOU I HAVE TWO DEGREES FROM TEXAS TECH AND WE HAD CARS, MOST OF US, BECAUSE WE HAD TO, TO GET TO SCHOOL, BUT WE SHOPPED.
THOSE WERE VIBRANT BUSINESSES.
I DON'T THINK DENSITY HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT.
YES, MA'AM? MAY I ANSWER SOME OF THOSE OR.
OKAY. THEY TALKED ABOUT TAXES.
IT'S NOT BASED ON THE VALUE OF YOUR LAND YOUR IMPROVEMENTS.
IT'S BASED ON SOMETHING DONE BY STATE STATUTE, WHICH TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION YOUR OCCUPANCY, YOUR INVENTORY, SOME OF THE OTHER FACTORS, AND THAT'S WHY WHEN NORTH OVERTON WAS DEVELOPED, WE HAD A LOT OF APPEALS ON THE TAXES, AND I GET THAT THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, BUT NEITHER YOU NOR I OR ANYBODY ELSE IN THIS ROOM CAN PREDICT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN 20 YEARS.
[04:35:03]
JUST ASK [INAUDIBLE] WHEN HE BOUGHT ALL THESE PROPERTIES IN NORTH OVERTON BUT HERE'S THE BOTTOM LINE FOR ME.IT IS A PLANNING CASE, AND IT IS GOVERNED BY PLANNING PRINCIPLES, AND I'VE SAT UP HERE LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT THEY AREN'T.
WHEN YOU WERE REFERENCED ABOUT YOUR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, YOU COULDN'T DO A THREE BECAUSE IT WOULDN'T ALLOW YOU TO DO THE THINGS THAT YOU WANT TO DO.
SO YOU WENT TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS IN OUR CODE THAT YOU CAN'T DO THAT.
YOU CAN'T DO IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHAT YOU COULD NOT DO IN A-3.
LET'S STICK WITH OUR PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND OUR CODE, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ABOUT , AND THE CODE TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION DENSITY. YOU KNOW, WHETHER THIS IS GOING TO BE A GOOD PROJECT AND NOT BE A GOOD PROJECT.
WE HAVE HOPES, WE HAVE DREAMS, BUT I DO KNOW THAT FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, MR. ABRAHAM WENT AROUND AND COLLECTED ALL THESE PROPERTIES.
SOMEBODY SAID, WHAT, 30 YEARS? BUT HE WAS BUYING UP PROPERTIES, BUT NOTHING WAS HAPPENING WITH THEM, AND SO WE ENDED UP WITH A NEIGHBORHOOD AT THIS POINT, WHO HAS EXISTED? HAVE ALL THE PROPERTIES BEEN TAKEN CARE OF? DON'T KNOW, BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER.
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU'RE AN OWNER OR IF YOU'RE A RENTER.
PEOPLE LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND IT DOESN'T MATTER TO ME HOW MANY OF THESE PEOPLE SHOWED UP TODAY WHO LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER AT ALL BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE DECIDING FACTOR.
THE DECIDING FACTOR IS, DOES IT FOLLOW OUR CODE AND OUR PLANNING PRINCIPLES? AND IN MY OPINION, IT DOES NOT ADHERE TO THOSE.
THANK YOU. I MAY HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU, MR. PIERCE. [INAUDIBLE] LET ME MAKE MY STATEMENT FIRST.
YES, SIR, AND THEN WE MAY BE DONE.
IT DOES MATTER BECAUSE WE MAKE DECISIONS EVERY OTHER WEEK HERE TO MAKE VARIANCES AND CHANGE THE CODES AND MOVE THINGS FORWARD THAT ARE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF LUBBOCK, AND THERE'S A DISTINCTION DRAWN.
A LOT OF PEOPLE CAME OUT IN THE TECH TERRORIST SITUATION, AND I THINK THAT'S APPLES AND ORANGES TO THIS PERSONALLY, BECAUSE I THINK THAT ACTUALLY WAS A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WAS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION, AND I DON'T THINK THAT WAS APPROPRIATE AT THE TIME.
THIS IS A PROJECT THAT IS RIGHT NEXT TO UNIVERSITY.
I DON'T WANT TO HAVE MISS SAGER BRING IT BACK UP, BUT I WAS VERY CURIOUS ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE PEOPLE, WHEN IT LOOKS LIKE 95 PLUS PERCENT OF THE THE HOUSES WITHIN A 200 YARD RADIUS OR AT LEAST TOWARDS THE EAST ARE ALL RENTAL PROPERTIES.
ISN'T THAT THE SAME THING? IF WE'RE JUST GOING TO CONTINUE TO PROTECT THE LANDLORDS IN THAT AREA, OR IS THIS COMPETITION THAT WE'RE PROTECTING COMPETITION OR I SAW MANY EMAILS THAT OBJECTED BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO MESS WITH MY BUSINESS AND MY BUSINESS IS BEING A LANDLORD, BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS I BELIEVE THIS IS GOOD FOR LUBBOCK AND THERE MAY BE SOME PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE AREA THAT MAY NOT LIKE IT AT FIRST, BUT I THINK THIS IS THE GREATER GOOD.
I THINK THIS IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE IN EVERY DISTRICT.
WE TALKED ABOUT SOMEONE THAT SEEMED HOPELESS.
THEY LIVE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MARSHA SHARP.
IS THAT WHERE WE ARE NOW THAT WE HAVE TO NOTIFY PEOPLE WITHIN FIVE, SIX, 700 YARDS, A MILE OR TWO MILES, WHAT AT SOME POINT THERE'S A THERE'S A STOPPING POINT WHERE WE SAY, LET'S FOCUS ON WHAT'S GOOD FOR THIS AREA AND LET'S FOCUS ON WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK AND PUTTING MONEY INTO THE LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, WHICH DESPERATELY NEEDS IT AND NEEDS NEW TAX BASE.
IT NEEDS PROJECTS LIKE THIS THAT WILL FUEL MONEY INTO THAT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND HELP THEM GROW.
IF NOT, AS MR. HENTHORN SAID EARLIER, IF YOU'RE NOT YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE NOT GROWING, YOU'RE DYING, AND I THINK THAT THIS PROJECT IS COMPLETELY ACCEPTABLE, AND I THINK THIS IS ACCEPTABLE FOR WHERE
[04:40:08]
WE ARE TODAY.I ALSO KIND OF LOOK AT WHAT MR. MASSENGALE SAID, AND I'LL BACK HIM UP THAT, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THAT AREA THAT DIDN'T GET UP AND SPEAK, BUT I DID MARK DOWN TWO PEOPLE THAT SPOKE.
I WOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT JUST SPOKE THAT ACTUALLY LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE REST WERE PEOPLE THAT, YOU KNOW, LIVE IN OTHER LOCATIONS OR I HAD EMAILS SENT FROM PEOPLE THAT SAID, YOU KNOW, BACK IN 1978, THEY WOULDN'T LET ME CHANGE THIS. WELL, THAT WAS 50 YEARS AGO AND WE ARE DIFFERENT, AND WE NEED TO BE LOOKING AT LOW DENSITY AREAS FOR PEOPLE TO LIVE AND WALK.
MILLENNIALS AND THE GENERATION X ARE CHANGING THE GAME.
THEY DON'T WANT TO DRIVE AROUND ANYMORE.
I THINK THE INVESTMENT IN OUR SEWAGE SYSTEM AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WILL HAPPEN IS GOOD FOR LUBBOCK AND GOOD FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND I WOULD ASK THAT PEOPLE CONSIDER THOSE THINGS. THANK YOU.
LET'S GO AHEAD AND PULL THIS UP FOR VOTING.
JIMMY, YOU CAN DO THE VISUAL SO WE CAN MAKE SURE I DON'T MESS UP THE NAYS.
MR. MCBRAYER, THERE ANYWAY TO GIVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND THIS DEVELOPER TO SEE IF THEY CAN MAKE THIS WORK IN SOME WAY THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD BECAUSE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS A LOT OF NEGATIVES AND OPPOSITION TO IT, BUT WHAT'S NOT BEEN SPOKEN IS, IS THERE SOME WAY THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT CAN BENEFIT THAT NEIGHBORHOOD? AND I DON'T THINK THAT HAS BEEN FULLY VETTED AND EXAMINED YET.
SO MY MOTION IS TO TABLE THE QUESTION HERE TO A DATE CERTAIN OF A MONTH FROM TODAY TO GET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR THE DEVELOPER AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO SPEAK TO SEE IF THEY CAN FIND SOME COMPROMISE ON THIS.
ALL RIGHT, MR. MCBRAYER HAS A MOTION TO POSTPONE THE VOTE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 26TH.
IS THERE A SECOND? MOTION FAILS.
WE WILL PROCEED WITH THE VOTE ON 7.14.
CAN YOU POP THAT UP FOR ME, JIMMY ? ALL RIGHT, MOTION FAILS 3-4.
ALL RIGHT, IT IS 6:55 ON WHAT IS IT? STILL THE AUGUST THE 22ND AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.