May 26, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting

ALL RIGHT. I WILL NOW OPEN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL FOR MAY 26TH,

[1. Executive Session]

[00:00:06]

THE CITY COUNCIL IS RECESSING AT 12:02 P.M.. WE WILL BE BACK IN HERE AT 2:00.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL WILL NOW RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. SORRY. WE HAD A LITTLE BIT LONGER IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

WE THOUGHT. THANK YOU FOR BEING PATIENT WITH US.

WE'RE GOING TO TAKE UP OUR CEREMONIAL ITEMS FIRST, AND I'M GOING TO CALL ON HEATHER GARCIA WITH JAG MINISTRIES OR JAG.

[1. Invocation]

HEAVENLY FATHER, WE. FIRST AND FOREMOST, WE GIVE YOU ALL AUTHORITY AND DOMINION HERE.

HOLY SPIRIT, WE SAY, HAVE YOUR WAY WITH EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IN THIS ROOM.

LORD, WE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE FOR THE SATURATING RAIN THAT WE HAVE SO BADLY NEEDED.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE NEW GROWTH THAT IS BRINGING.

AND WE THANK YOU FOR THE RAIN TO COME. LORD, WE JUST.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE GRACE AND MERCY THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN US FOR THE.

THE FACT THAT IT IS NEW EVERY MORNING, LORD, THAT YOU ARE FORGIVING OF US AS WE WALK THROUGH THIS LIFE IN OUR IN OUR FALTERED STATE.

LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR THE PEOPLE ON THIS COUNCIL.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE CHRISTIANS THAT THEY ARE.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE CONVICTIONS THAT THEY HAVE AND WE THANK YOU FOR THE DESIRE TO DO WHAT'S RIGHT, NOT JUST FOR THEIR DISTRICTS, LORD, BUT ALSO FOR THE PEOPLE OF LUBBOCK.

WE THANK YOU THAT THEY HAVE GIVEN THIS TIME TO SERVE NOT JUST THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, BUT ALSO, LORD YOU THAT THEY. WE ASK THAT THAT YOU BE THE FOREFRONT OF EVERYTHING THAT THEY DO.

LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS TOWN. WE THANK YOU THAT YOU HAVE SHOWN YOUR LIGHT UPON US, LORD, AND WE ASK FOR YOU TO JUST CONTINUE TO GIVE US WISDOM AND KNOWLEDGE AS WE WALK FORWARD AS TO WHAT IS THE BEST WAY, NOT JUST TO TO GROW OUR CITY AND TO MAKE IT THRIVE, BUT ABOVE ALL ELSE, LORD, THAT IT BE A SHINING LIGHT UNTO YOU. IN JESUS MIGHTY NAME WE PRAY.

AMEN. AMEN.

[2. Pledges of Allegiance]

HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE TEXAS.

ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE.

ALL RIGHT. I'M JUST GOING TO TAKE A LITTLE MOMENT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE HERE, BECAUSE IT'S THE FIRST MEETING FOR OUR NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL PERSON, MR. DAVID BRUEGEL. WE WELCOME HIM TO THE SEAT FOR DISTRICT 3.

WELCOME, DAVID, TO OUR COUNCIL MEETING. AND WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS? I THINK YOU SHOULD GET A RED LIGHT. THERE YOU GO. THERE WE GO. FIRST STEP IS FIGURE OUT HOW THE MICROPHONE WORKS. WELL, THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR, FOR THE WELCOME. AND THANK YOU.

OTHER MEMBERS OF COUNCIL AND OUR STAFF. IT HAS BEEN REALLY ENCOURAGING TO SEE OVER THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS SINCE THE ELECTION HOW INCREDIBLY WELL ORGANIZED THINGS ARE HERE AT CITY HALL, AND HOW GREAT A JOB OF OUR LUBBOCK CITY STAFF DOES FOR US.

AND IT'S BEEN AMAZING TO GET TO MEET WITH EACH OF YOU COUNCIL MEMBERS, TO SEE THE BRIGHT MINDS THAT YOU ARE AND THE HEART FOR SERVICE YOU HAVE FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

SO THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING HERE. THANK YOU DAVID.

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER AND WE'LL TAKE UP CITIZEN COMMENTS.

[3. Citizen Comments - According to Lubbock City Council Rules, any citizen wishing to appear in-person before a regular meeting of the City Council, regarding any matter posted on the City Council Agenda below, shall complete the sign-up form provided at the meeting, no later than 2:00 p.m. on May 26, 2026. Citizen Comments provide an opportunity for citizens to make comments and express a position on agenda items. ]

IF THEY JUST GIVE US A LITTLE ADVANCE NOTICE, THEY CAN DO SO IN PERSON OR BY EMAIL.

AND TODAY, I HAPPEN TO HAVE TWO EMAILS ALONG WITH ONE PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK IN PERSON.

JUST TO REMIND YOU THAT WHEN YOU DO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS, YOU HAVE 3 MINUTES TO MAKE THEM AND YOU WILL HEAR A BELL RING WHEN YOU HAVE 30S LEFT, AND A SECOND BELL WILL RING WHEN YOU NEED TO WRAP UP YOUR COMMENTS.

AND WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT THIS IS NOT THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN ADDRESS THIS.

YOU CAN CALL US, YOU CAN EMAIL US, YOU CAN COME RIGHT UP HERE AND SIT IN OUR OFFICE AND TALK DIRECTLY TO US.

[00:05:03]

MISS WHITTON, ARE YOU HERE? AND IF YOU WILL COME FORWARD, STATE YOUR NAME AND LET US KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE SO THAT WE HAVE THAT.

AND I BELIEVE YOU'RE SPEAKING TO ITEM 6.6 ON OUR AGENDA.

THAT'S CORRECT. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

BRENDA WHITTON 4908 109TH STREET. I HOPE THAT YOU ALL HAD A CHANCE TO READ MY EMAIL THAT I SENT YESTERDAY WITH OTHER CONCERNS.

YOUR THE COUNCIL'S OFFICE SAID THAT WAS THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO REACH OUT TO YOU TO EXPRESS ADDITIONAL CONCERNS.

AND OUR COMMENTS FOR MY HUSBAND AND I. WE ARE STILL CONCERNED REGARDING THIS ZONING CASE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED ON THE FIRST READING.

WE APPRECIATE THE 2 VOTES THAT WERE IN DENIAL AND CONSIDERATION OF ABIDING BY THE ALREADY ALREADY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES AND RULES THAT WERE SET BY THE COUNCIL, THROUGH THE UDC CODES, THROUGH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE OPERATIONAL HOURS OF THE SALON IN THAT AREA.

IT DOES NOT FIT AND IS NOT THE SAME AS THOSE EXISTING FOR ESTABLISHED BUSINESSES.

THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS GOING TO BE ABOUT 2000 SQUARE FOOT LARGER.

THE PARKING IS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT. THE FOOT TRAFFIC, WE BELIEVE, IS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT.

IT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS ALREADY THERE.

WE ARE HOPEFUL THAT WHAT WE WERE TOLD LAST 2 WEEKS AGO THAT THOSE OTHER OFFICE PLOTS ARE GOING TO BE OFFICE SOURCES THEMSELVES WITHIN THAT OFFICE CATEGORY. AND WE HOPE THAT'S THE CASE.

AS WE SAID BEFORE, WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PRECEDENTS OF DOING A SPOT ZONING IN AN OFFICE DEVELOPMENT.

AGAIN, WE APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'VE DONE. THE AMOUNT OF TIME I'VE SPENT THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS IS NOT COMPARED TO WHAT Y'ALL DO.

SO I ADMIRE YOU FOR THAT. I WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT THOSE HAVE BEEN VOTED IN FAVOR IN THE PRIOR MEETING, MIGHT RECONSIDER YOUR OPINION ON THIS MATTER AND GIVE SOME MORE CONSIDERATION TO WHAT THE NEIGHBORS HAVE EXPRESSED.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS WHITTON. I APPRECIATE IT.

NOW, WE HAD TWO COMMENTS SUBMITTED ONLINE TO THE SAME ISSUE.

ONE FROM TOM TENNER ABOUT THE ZONING CASE. 2911 E WHO ALSO WAS OPPOSED TO IT.

AND THEN ONE FROM ADA FAHIM ALSO OPPOSED TO THIS.

AND SO WE'LL TAKE NOTE OF THOSE THREE CITIZEN COMMENTS AND OPPOSITION WHEN WE COME UP IN TIME FOR THIS DISCUSSION LATER ON. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE NO ONE ELSE MAKING COMMENTS, SO THAT'LL CLOSE OUR CITIZEN COMMENT TIME.

WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ITEM AGENDA ITEM 4.1, THE MINUTES FROM OUR APRIL 28TH REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WHICH YOU HAD IN YOUR PACKETS.

[4. Minutes]

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. AYE. THANK YOU. THAT I THAT WAS AN AYE.

ALL RIGHT. YOUR VOICE CARRIES A LOT OF AUTHORITY HERE TODAY, DOCTOR WILSON.

IT SOUNDS LIKE GOD UP THERE. SO THE MOTION TO APPROVE IS CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

ALRIGHT, NOW WE'LL DEAL WITH OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

[5. Consent Agenda - Items considered to be routine are enacted by one motion without separate discussion. If the City Council desires to discuss an item, the item is removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.]

SO I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA IN ITS ENTIRETY.

IS THERE SUCH A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND HAVE A MOTION.

WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL RIGHT. ANY WELL ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. DOCTOR WILSON, WAS THERE AN AYE. OKAY, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IT DIDN'T SOUND LIKE THAT.

FIRST I THOUGH ALL ANY OPPOSED. I SEE AS I WAS TRYING TO NOT BE SO LOUD AND GOD LIKE CAN WE CAN WE TURN THAT DOWN JUST A LITTLE BIT? ALL RIGHT. SO THAT MOTION DID I SAY ALL OPPOSED? SAY NAY. THERE WAS NONE. ALL RIGHT. NONE. THAT MOTION IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

[00:10:01]

[1. Public Hearing - Planning (District 2): Consider a request for Zone Case 2565-I, a request of Hugo Reed & Associates for CRS Business Park, LLC, for a zone change from Heavy Commercial District (HC) and Industrial Park District (IP) to Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 101 66th Street, 103 66th Street, 107 66th Street, 6660 Ash Avenue, 6662 Ash Avenue, 7002 Ash Avenue, 7008 Ash Avenue, and 7010 Ash Avenue. Generally located south of 66th Street and west of Ash Avenue, Crossroads South Business Park Addition, Tracts A, D, E, F, G, I, J, and K, and consider an ordinance.]

[2. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3546, a request of McDougal Realtors for Premier Apex, LLC, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to General Industrial District (GI), at 7806 76th Street, located east of Alcove Avenue and north of Marsha Sharp Freeway, on 10.001 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, and consider an ordinance.]

AND AS A REMINDER, THE PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. THE COUNCIL MAY ASK QUESTIONS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT NO DISCUSSION ON THE MERITS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE COUNCIL DURING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. I'M GOING TO NOW CALL ON, AS SHE'S ALREADY HERE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, KRISTEN SAGER, TO PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THESE 2 ZONING CASES SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. ITEM 6 1 IS ZONE CASE 2565 I.

THE PURPOSE IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

WE SENT OUT 24 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING 0 BACK.

THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF 66TH STREET, WEST OF ASH AVENUE.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

YOU SEE, THERE IS ADDITIONAL VACANT LAND TO THE WEST AND ADDITIONAL BUSINESSES AND INDUSTRIAL TO THE EAST AND TO THE NORTH.

CURRENT ZONING IS INDUSTRIAL PARK AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

IT IS BORDERED BY ADDITIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST AND SOUTH AND ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL ZONING TO THE EAST.

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.

AND HERE'S SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

HERE IS A GRAPHIC PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT OUTLINING THE TRACKS THEY ARE ASKING TO BE REZONED.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUESTED HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING.

THE ZONE CHANGE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY SPLIT ZONED HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARK AND THIS WILL DOWN ZONE THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LONG ASH AVENUE AND 66TH STREET.

66 IS LOCATED AS. IS DESIGNATED AS A COLLECTOR STREET AND ASH AVENUE IS DESIGNATED AS A LOCAL STREET IN THIS AREA ON THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE. ALL RIGHT. MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ONE.

ZONE CASE 3546. ITEM 6.2. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF 2 TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. WE SENT OUT 10 NOTIFICATIONS, AGAIN RECEIVING NO RESPONSE.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS LOCATED EAST OF ALCOVE AVENUE, NORTH OF MARSHA SHARP FREEWAY.

CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY, SINGLE FAMILY SF 2.

THERE IS ADDITIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONING TO THE EAST AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH.

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR A SPLIT BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.

HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

THERE IS AN EXISTING BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR COMMERCIAL AND LOW DENSITY, WHILE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WOULD BE A MINOR DEVIATION FROM THAT.

IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION GIVEN THE EXISTING USES AND ZONING NEARBY IT.

THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUITABLE FOR THIS PROPOSED LOCATION.

IT FRONTS 76TH STREET, WHICH IS DESIGNATED AS A LOCAL STREET.

STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS, MISS SAGER? I SEE NONE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ALL RIGHT. I'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 6.1 AND 6.2 ON CASES 25, 65-I AND 3546, RESPECTIVELY. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF EITHER OF THESE CASES? IF YOU WOULD COME FORWARD NOW? GOOD AFTERNOON COUNCIL. MY NAME IS MARK MCLENDON. I WORK AT 1500 BROADWAY, AND I'M SPEAKING ON BEHALF AND IN FAVOR OF 5.2, WHICH IS THE REZONING OUT NEXT TO THE TRASH TRANSFER STATION.

THIS IS IS SF-2 AS A RESULT OF DOING AWAY WITH TRANSITION.

IT IS CURRENTLY USED AS A SPORTS FACILITY. IT IS NOT A BY RIGHT USE IN ITS EXISTING ZONING.

IT WOULD BE IN THE REQUESTED ZONING. ULTIMATELY THIS IS SORT OF TRYING TO RIGHT SIZE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OUT THERE AS WE WORK THROUGH ALL OF THOSE T TO SF2S TO SOMETHING MORE APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AS AS NOTED IN THE PRESENTATION.

THIS IS IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE TRASH TRANSFER STATION.

THE USE IS PREDOMINANTLY IN THAT AREA ARE INDUSTRIAL USES AND WE'RE ASKING FOR

[00:15:05]

ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR? ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, PLEASE COME FORWARD. I SEE NONE.

ALL RIGHT. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR, IN OPPOSITION TO THE OTHER CASE.

ALL RIGHT. I SEE NONE, SO I WILL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 2:48.

AND IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.1 AND 6.2.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I HAVE A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? AYE SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? DOCTOR WILSON. IS THAT AN AYE? WAS THAT A OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OPPOSED. SAY NAY. HEARING NONE.

THAT MOTION PASSES. THOSE 2 OR THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ZONING CASE 3545, WHICH IS ENCOMPASSES AGENDA ITEM 6.3 AND 6.4.

[3. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 3545, a request for zone changes in City Council District 6 from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), Medium Density Residential District (MDR), High Density Residential District (HDR), Neighborhood Commercial District (NC), Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), Heavy Commercial District (HC), Industrial Park District (IP) and Light Industrial District (LI) to Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), Medium Density Residential District (MDR), High Density Residential District (HDR), Neighborhood Commercial District (NC), Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), Heavy Commercial District (HC), and Light Industrial District (LI), at 6007, 6015, and 6023 45th Street, Lots 3-A-1, 3-A-1-A, and 3-A-2, Santa Fe Park Addition, 6025 45th Street, 3.7 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 37, 6027 45th Street, Tract A, Isom Pearl Addition, 6029, 6033, 6039, 6107, 6109, and 6113 45th Street, Lots 9, 12, 13, 22, and 23, Santa Fe Park Addition, 309 North Slide Road, 5.66 acres out of Tract K-2, North Park Addition, 5006 Auburn Street, Tract C-1, North Park Addition, 4809, 4811, and 4815 Emory Street, Tracts F-1, F-2, and F-3, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 4810 North Loop 289, 6.1 acres out of Tract B, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 415 and 421 North Utica Avenue, Tracts D and E, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 4802 North Loop 289, 0.19 acres out of Tract C, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 418 and 424 North Utica Avenue, Tract DD-1-A and DD-1-B, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 410 North Utica Avenue, 0.6 acres out of Tract EE-1, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 4640, 4642, and 4650 North Loop 289, Tract A, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 430 North Utica Drive, Tract DD-1-C, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 4641 Erskine Street, Tract H, DD-1-B, Physicians Surgicenter Lubbock Addition, 5710 4th Street, 1.16 acres out of Tract E, West Wind Addition, 5212 4th Street, Tract C-1-A-2, Whisperwood Addition, 5402 4th Street, the northwest part of Tract F-1 and the northeast part of Tract G, Whisperwood Addition, 4710 and 4718 4th Street, Lots 1-A and 2-A-1, Whisperwood Office Park Addition, 304 Toledo Avenue, Lot 4-A, Holiday Park Addition, 4702 4th Street, 0.4 acres out of Lot 2-A, Holiday Park Addition, 4620 4th Street, Lots 4 and 5, Cursillo De Christ Addition, 1102 Slide Road, Lot 424, Alford Terrace Addition, 1150 Slide Road, Lot 423, Alford Terrace Addition, 6510 19th Street, Tract B-3, Mr. Postman Addition, 6526 19th Street, 0.12 acres out of Tract A, Mr. Postman Addition, 6604 and 6606 19th Street, Lot 7, Terra Estates Addition, 1802 Oakridge Avenue and 6702 19th Street, Lot 6, Terra Estates Addition, 6704, 6706, 6708, 6710, 6712 and 6714 19th Street, Lots 1-5, Terra Estates Addition, 6901 – 6924 18th Place, Lots 1-23, Gardens at Burgamy Park Addition, 6927 19th Street, 1.09 acres out of Block AK, Section 43, 6410 19th Street, 0.12 acres out of Tract A, Church’s Chicken Addition, 6419 19th Street, 0.40 acres out of Tract A-2-A, Milwaukee Place Addition, 7340 19th Street, Tract A, Black Hill Addition, 7342 19th Street, 0.96 acres of unplatted land out of Block D-6, Section 1, 7406 19th Street, Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Brown Crest Addition, 7402 19th Street, the south 107.5 feet of Lot 7, Block 2, Brown Crest Addition, 7440 19th Street, Lot 1, Block 2, Brown Crest Addition, 7341 19th Street, 4.87 acres of land out of Block AK, Section 42, 7501 19th Street, 2.35 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 42, 7741 and 7745 19th Street, Lot 1, Texas West Addition, 7905 19th Street, 0.77 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 41, 7907 19th Street, 0.83 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 41, 7911 19th Street, 0.72 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 41, 7915 19th Street, 0.91 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 41, 7750 19th Street, 0.06 acres of out Lot 11, Furgeson Addition, 3701 North Frankford Avenue, 2.29 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 3611 North Frankford Avenue, 2.01 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 3303 North Frankford Avenue, 5.02 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 3105 North Frankford Avenue, 4.36 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 2905 North Frankford Avenue, 5.02 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 2607 North Frankford Avenue, 5.02 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 2910 North Frankford Avenue, 6.15 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 11, 2902 North Frankford Avenue, 6 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 11, 2612 North Frankford Avenue, 1 acre of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 11, 2317 North Frankford Avenue, 5.01 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 2309 North Frankford Avenue, 2.58 acres of unplatted land out of Block JS, Section 12, 2703 North Quaker Avenue, Tract A, Stauffer Chemical Addition, 2715 North Quaker Avenue, 7.98 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, 4501 Bradley Street, the east 401.09 feet of Lot A, T C I Addition, 2213 North Quaker Avenue, 1.49 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, 4401 Clovis Road, 2.59 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, 4403 Clovis Road, Tract A, Rollins Addition, 4405 Clovis Road, Tract A, Saunders Addition, 4407 Clovis Road, 1.55 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, 4409 Clovis Road, 2 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, and 4413 Clovis Road, 2.60 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 14, and consider an ordinance.]

SO, MISS SAGER, WOULD YOU PLEASE PROVIDE US A BRIEFING ON THIS? THANK YOU MAYOR.

THE ITEM 6.3 IN CASE 3545. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF THE ZONE CHANGES WE HAVE BEEN BRINGING TO YOU AS A RESULT OF THE ZONING MAP ANALYSIS, WHICH WE COMPLETED AT THE END OF LAST YEAR. THIS REQUEST IS FROM THE CITY REQUESTING TO REZONE FROM SF-2,MDR,HDR,NC,AC,HC,IP AND LI TO SF-2,MDR,HDR,NC,AC,HC AND LI. THIS IS A MAP OF DISTRICT 6.

IT, OF COURSE, DOES NOT. WE ARE NOT REZONING EVERY PROPERTY WITHIN DISTRICT 6.

BUT THIS IS. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHERE WE ARE LOCATED.

WE SENT OUT 1195 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING 49 IN FAVOR, 12 IN OPPOSITION.

AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

SO WE HAVE PROPERTIES DOWN ON 45TH STREET ALL THE WAY TO NORTH FRANKFORD, SOME ON CLOVIS HIGHWAY.

SO WE'LL START HERE AT 45TH AND MARSHA SHARP FREEWAY.

WE HAVE A MIX OF INDUSTRIAL PARK AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING.

THESE BUSINESSES HAVE DEVELOPED AS HOTELS, FITNESS CLUB, OFFICE, WAREHOUSE TYPE SHOPS, SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING IN THIS LOCATION. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.

THIS IS ALONG 19TH STREET WEST OF MILWAUKEE BETWEEN MILWAUKEE AND ALCOVE.

YOU HAVE A MIX ALONG 19TH STREET OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL ZONING.

YOU HAVE SEVERAL PROPERTIES WHERE YOU HAVE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES THAT STILL HAVE LEFTOVER RESIDENTIAL ZONING AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION.

AND YOU HAVE SOME PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL THAT HAS COMMERCIAL ZONING.

SO WE'RE LOOKING TO COME IN AND CLEAN UP THAT ZONING ALONG 19TH STREET.

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES PROPERTIES, COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY DEPENDING ON THEIR USE.

THIS IS ALONG NORTH LOOP AND EAST AND WEST OF NORTH SIDE ROAD.

YOU HAVE SOME HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH SIDE OF ERSKINE, JUST NORTH OF THE NORTH LOOP, AND YOU HAVE SOME MIX OF HIGH DENSITY, RESIDENTIAL, LOW DENSITY, SINGLE FAMILY SF 2 AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ALONG FOURTH STREET.

SO THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ERSKINE THAT WE'RE ASKING TO TAKE FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL, SOME OF THOSE PROPERTIES ARE ALREADY SPLIT ZONED WITH AUTO, URBAN COMMERCIAL.

IT'S MEDICAL OFFICES, A HOSPITAL, A CHURCH, A BANK.

SO WE'RE LOOKING TO CLEAN UP THAT ZONING, CLEAN UP THE ZONING FOR THE LA QUINTA.

WE HAVE SOME APARTMENTS THAT ARE OVER ON FOURTH AND FRANKFORD CURRENTLY HAVE COMMERCIAL ZONING.

TAKE THOSE BACK TO MDR AND THEN CORRECT THE ZONING FOR THE OFFICES, GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE.

FURTHER SOUTH ON FOURTH STREET, FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THESE PROPERTIES FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES AND THEN THE APARTMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL.

PROPERTY ALONG NORTH FRANKFORD AND CLOVIS HIGHWAY.

IF YOU'LL RECALL, NORTH FRANKFORD. THIS AREA WAS PART OF AN INVOLUNTARY ANNEXATION BACK IN 2018, SO A LOT OF THAT CURRENT SF-2 ZONING IS A RESULT OF THAT ANNEXATION.

YOU HAVE SEVERAL BUSINESSES THAT CURRENTLY HAVE THAT RESIDENTIAL ZONING, SO WE'D LIKE TO COME IN AND CLEAN THAT UP WITH HEAVY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMERCIAL OR AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL ZONING, AS WELL AS ON CLOVIS HIGHWAY DO THE SAME.

[00:20:07]

WE RECEIVED 2 RESPONSES IN FAVOR FOR THE PROPERTIES NEAR ERSKINE AND SLIDE ROAD.

WE RECEIVED SEVERAL IN FAVOR FOR THE PROPERTIES AT NORTH FRANKFORD.

THREE THAT WE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION ARE THOSE PROPERTIES YOU CAN SEE LOCATED OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS.

SEVERAL IN FAVOR ALONG 19TH STREET WITH THREE THAT ARE IN OPPOSITION.

AGAIN, SEVERAL IN FAVOR. THIS ONE. THIS IS 25 PROPERTIES THAT ARE IN FAVOR.

I TRIED TO ZOOM IN BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE THOSE ARE VERY NARROW TRACKS THAT EACH COUNT FOR AN INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE.

WE DID HAVE ONE IN OPPOSITION. IT IS NOT A PROPERTY BEING REZONED.

IT IS NORTH OF THESE PROPERTIES NEAR ERSKINE.

SO THIS OPPOSITION IS FROM A PROPERTY OWNER. THIS PROPERTY WILL BE ON THE NEXT ITEM YOU CONSIDER.

IT WILL REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE. THIS IS A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM THE PROPERTY SOUTH OF IT 661719.

IT IS ACTUALLY A DRAINAGE AND ACCESS EASEMENT.

IT'S REALLY TOO NARROW TO BE DEVELOPED. AND SO THE RECOMMENDATION WAS TO REZONE IT FROM SF-2 TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO MATCH WHAT'S ADJACENT TO IT.

HOWEVER, THE PROPERTY OWNER, WHO ALSO OWNS THE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK TO THE SOUTH, IS IN OPPOSITION 4521, HIGHWAY 84 AND 4501 OR 4509 CLOVIS ROAD. ONE OF THOSE PROPERTIES IS LOCATED OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS.

THEY WERE IN OPPOSITION. THE ONE INSIDE CITY LIMITS IS CURRENTLY ZONED TO LA.

WE ARE RECOMMENDING DOWNZONING IT TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

THAT PROPERTY OWNER WAS IN OPPOSITION AS WELL.

AND THEN 6102 45TH AND 6035 45TH, THE ONE AT 6035 CURRENTLY ALLEY WE ARE RECOMMENDING TO REZONE IT TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL THAT PROPERTY OWNER WAS IN OPPOSITION. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ITEMS THAT ARE IN 6.4.

HOWEVER, I DID RECEIVE WRITTEN OPPOSITION TODAY FROM THE PROPERTY ITS PROPERTY OWNER OF 7500 1/19, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND WAUSAU. SO THAT IS PART OF THIS ITEM 6.3 THAT WILL REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE.

NOW BECAUSE WE RECEIVED THE WRITTEN OPPOSITION.

SO IS THAT PART OF 6.3 OR 6.4? IT'S PART OF 6.3 BECAUSE WE DID NOT RECEIVE THE WRITTEN OPPOSITION UNTIL TODAY.

OKAY. HOW DO WE. WELL, IT DEPENDS ON THE MOTION.

YOU COULD MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 6.3. BUT FOR BUT FOR THAT THAT REQUIRES A SUPERMAJORITY.

THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. AND THEN AFTER THAT VOTES TAKEN, THEN YOU TAKE A SEPARATE VOTE FOR THAT PARTICULAR ADDRESS.

THE PUBLIC HEARING IS GOING TO BE FOR ALL OF THEM FOR ITEM 6.3.

BUT IF YOU IF YOU SPLIT UP THE MOTIONS, YOU CAN TAKE CARE OF IT THAT WAY.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? MR. COLLINS? FIRST OF ALL, MISS, WHAT WAS THE ADDRESS WHERE THERE WAS OPPOSITION? 70119 FRANKFORD CHANGES TO JUST MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR.

WHAT WERE WE PROPOSING FOR NORTH FRANKFORD? THIS THIS AREA OF NORTH FRANKFORD FROM.

FROM URSULINE TO KENT. SO WE'RE PROPOSING SOME NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING THERE AT THE AT THE NORTHERN END OF NORTH FRANKFORD. AN AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL ZONING AND THEN SOME ADDITIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

SO THESE ARE WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. YES. THIS IS THE RECOMMENDED HERE.

OKAY. AND THOSE FIT APPROPRIATELY WITH THE EXISTING USES THAT ARE GOING ON TODAY. YES. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT I REMEMBERED FROM OUR PRIOR MEETING.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WHAT WAS THE. DID THE FELLA WHO OWNED THE PROPERTY WITH THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, DID HE EXPLAIN WHY HE OPPOSED THAT? YES. SO HE OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH AS WELL.

AND HE WOULD PREFER TO KEEP THE SAME UNIFIED ZONING.

THE TWO. OKAY. IT'S A DRAINAGE, BUT NOTHING ELSE IS REALLY GOING THERE, RIGHT?

[00:25:05]

AND THIS. THIS ONE HERE IS PART OF ITEM 6.4. THAT IS 6.4.

YES. OKAY. SO WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT, RIGHT? NOPE. THE ONLY ONE DIFFERENT ON ITEM 6.3 IS THE 75011919.

ALL RIGHT. AND WHAT IF THE OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING ALONG 19TH STREET IN GENERAL, YOU GOT SOME OF THOSE.

BUT WHAT WAS THEIR OPPOSITION? THE ONES THAT WERE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTIES ALONG 19TH.

WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROPERTY OWNERS EXCEPT FOR THE ONE ALONG 19TH STREET.

WE HAD A FEW OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT WERE IN OPPOSITION.

MANY DIDN'T REALLY GIVE COMMENTS AS TO WHY. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MS. SAGER.. SEEING NONE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 6.3. IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ZONE CASE? PLEASE COME FORWARD. IS THERE ANYONE IN OPPOSITION? PLEASE COME FORWARD. I SEE NONE. I'LL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 2:59.

ALL RIGHT. SO GIVEN WHAT WE SAID A MINUTE AGO, IS THERE A MOTION TO SEPARATE OUT THE 7:50 1/19 OR TELL ME EXACTLY.

YEAH. YOU COULD, YOU COULD DO IT IN THE FORM OF MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 6.3.

BUT FOR BUT FOR 750119. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT.

SO MOVED. SECOND, HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? I SEE NONE. ALL RIGHT.

ALL IN FAVOR, LET IT BE KNOWN BY SAYING AY, AYE ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY.

THAT WAS AN AYE. OKAY. SOUNDS LIKE AN AYE. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD DEAL. ALRIGHT, SO NOW LET'S TAKE UP YEAH.

6.3 B OR WHATEVER WE WANT TO CALL IT 750 1/19 STREET.

AND THIS REQUIRES A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE. YEAH.

JUST NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND. AND IT'LL REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND JUST REMIND THE SUPERMAJORITY VOTE IS 6 VOTES ON THIS COUNCIL.

ALL RIGHT. SO IS THERE A MOTION ON 19TH STREET MOVED TO HAVE A SECOND, HAVE A MOTION? I HAVE A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT, MR. COLLINS? THANK YOU. MAYOR. WE'VE HAD A HISTORY OF THESE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS OF WHEN WHEN INDIVIDUALS ASKED FOR EXCEPTIONS TO BE MADE FOR THEIR PROPERTY.

WE'VE HONORED THOSE EXCEPTIONS. I DON'T KNOW THAT I UNDERSTAND THE REASONING BEHIND THIS OWNER NOT WANTING TO MAKE THIS CHANGE, PARTICULARLY FOR THIS TRACK THAT REALLY HAS NO NO COMMERCIAL FUTURE, I SUPPOSE.

BUT NONETHELESS, I WOULD REQUEST THAT WE HONOR HIS WISHES AND DENY THE MOTION THAT WAS JUST MADE.

ALL RIGHT. ANY FURTHER COMMENT OR DISCUSSION FROM THE COUNCIL? ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. IT'S A SUPERMAJORITY. YES.

IF YOU PUT IT UP FOR US TO SELECT OUR VOTING CHOICE.

OKAY. SO IF YOU'RE VOTING, IF YOU'RE VOTING FOR THE MOTION IS THE MOTION IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. OKAY. SO IF YOU IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE ZONING, YOU WILL VOTE FOR IT.

IF YOU WANT TO LEAVE IT AS IT IS PURSUANT TO THE MAN'S REQUEST, YOU WOULD VOTE NO.

AND I THINK YOU'LL HAVE TO HAVE COUNCILWOMAN DOCTOR WILSON'S VOTES BY VOICE VOTE.

WE'LL ASK FOR YOUR VOICE AFTER WE TABULATE THE REST OF THE VOTES.

DOCTOR WILSON. OKAY. SO. OKAY. AND DOCTOR WILSON.

OKAY. SO THAT MOTION FAILS, RIGHT? OKAY. GOTTA ALWAYS REMEMBER.

OKAY, SO THE THE ZONING WILL BE LEFT THE WAY IT IS.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ITEM 6.4. ZONING CASE 3545.

[4. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 3545, Part 2, a request for zone changes in City Council District 6 from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) and Light Industrial District (LI) to Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC) and Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 6035 45th Street, Lot 6, Santa Fe Park Addition, 6617 19th Street, the north 56 feet by 480 feet of Lot 2, Commanders Addition, 4509 Clovis Road, Lot 1, McCollum Addition, and consider an ordinance.]

[00:30:05]

ITEM 6.4 ARE THE THREE PROPERTIES WE RECEIVED.

OWNER OPPOSITION. THEY ARE 6617 19TH STREET, 4509 CLOVIS ROAD AND 6035 45TH P&Z. RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF REZONING THESE PROPERTIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND AGAIN, A SUPERMAJORITY IS REQUIRED. ALL RIGHT, I WILL NOW.

OH, DO YOU HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? MISS COLLINS? OKAY. YES.

SO, MISS, IF YOU WOULD GO BACK THROUGH THOSE PROPERTIES AGAIN AND TELL US SO THIS 19TH STREET PROPERTY IS SINGLE FAMILY CURRENTLY. CORRECT.

AND THE OWNER WISHES IT TO REMAIN THE SAME. CORRECT.

THOUGH THERE'S NO ROOM OR HOPE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY.

YES. THE NEXT 14509 CLOVIS ROAD CURRENTLY ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

RECOMMENDED ZONING IS AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL. CURRENT USE IS TRAILER SALES AND STORAGE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IS A HIGHER ZONING THAN IT'S CURRENTLY BEING USED AS.

CORRECT. MORE LENIENT ZONING. YES. OKAY. AND SO THIS OWNER IS ASKING NOT TO BE DOWN ZONED.

CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. AND THE NEXT ONE, PLEASE.

1635 45TH STREET. CURRENTLY ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, RECOMMENDING HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

IT IS AN HVAC CONTRACTOR AND SUPPLY. AND WHICH OF THOSE 2 ZONES ARE MORE APPROPRIATE.

THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL. THIS CONTRACTOR SHOP IS PERMITTED BY.

RIGHT IN A HEAVY COMMERCIAL. AND IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

THAT'S A THAT IS AGAIN, A HIGHER ZONING, MORE LENIENT.

AND SO THEY'RE ASKING NOT TO BE DOWN ZONED FOR WHATEVER PURPOSE.

OKAY. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. SAGER? I SEE NONE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

I'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 6.4.

ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE, PLEASE STEP FORWARD.

I SEE NONE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

PLEASE STEP FORWARD. SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 3:05 P.M..

ALL RIGHT. BECAUSE, AGAIN, THE PERCENTAGE OF OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONING CHANGE THAT WILL REQUIRE AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF 6 COUNCIL MEMBERS TO APPROVE THIS CHANGE.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.4? I HEAR NONE. THAT MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A MOTION OR IT FAILS FOR LACK OF EMOTION.

RIGHT? ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. SO LET'S MOVE ON

[5. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 3547, a request of Parkhill for St. John Neumann Catholic Diocese, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to Heavy Commercial District (HC), generally located east of West Loop 289 and north of 22nd Street, on 2.08 acres of land out of McGuire Addition, Lot 1, and consider an ordinance.]

CASE 3547 IS A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY SF-2 TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

WE SENT OUT 9 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING 1 IN FAVOR.

HERE'S THE RESPONSE MAP SHOWING THE ONE IN FAVOR.

HERE'S A VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT.

IT IS PART OF THE CHURCH PROPERTY THAT THEY WILL BE SELLING TO THE BUYER.

IT IS SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST, RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH, AND THEN THE CHURCH TO THE EAST.

CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY, SINGLE FAMILY'S F-2.

THERE'S HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO THE NORTH. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO THE WEST AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH.

FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.

AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

THIS IS A GRAPHIC SHOWING HOW THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY TO BE PART OF THE EXISTING DEALERSHIP.

FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS AREA FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.

THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THIS DESIGNATION.

IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.

IT IS LOCATED ALONG 22ND STREET, WHICH IS DESIGNATED AS A LOCAL STREET.

STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? SEEING NONE THANK YOU. AND I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 6.5.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS. PLEASE COME FORWARD.

[00:35:04]

WE'RE AT 4222 85TH STREET. AND BASICALLY THIS PIECE OF LAND IS BEING PURCHASED BY CAVENDAR AUTO DEALER, AND THEY ARE INTENDING TO DEVELOP IT FOR CONTINUED OR EXPANDED USE OF THE CURRENT OPERATIONS, WHICH IS RIGHT THERE AT THE ADJACENT TO THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY TO THE WEST.

AND SO THAT'S. ANY QUESTIONS? YES. MAYOR PRO TEM JUST A QUICK QUESTION.

WILL THERE BE A FENCE PLACED? OKAY. THAT'S ALL I NEED TO KNOW.

YES, MA'AM. ALL OF THE BUFFERING AND SCREENING WILL BE BUFFERING THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE ZONE.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION. I SEE NONE.

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 3:09 P.M..

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.5? IS THERE A SECOND? I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION? I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY I, I, I WE HEARD YOU THAT TIME.

ALRIGHT. ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY. I THINK THAT WAS EVERYBODY.

SO THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT.

LET'S MOVE ON TO 6.6 ZONING CASE 2911 E ON SECOND READING.

[6. Ordinance 2nd Reading - Planning (District 4): Consider Ordinance No. 2026-O0061, for Zone Case 2911-E, a request of Seventeen Services, LLC, for Lequity, LLC, for a zone change from Office District (OF) to Neighborhood Commercial District (NC), at 10909 Wayne Avenue, located east of Slide Road and north of 110th Street, Epic North Addition, Tract Q.]

REMIND US OF THIS. THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ONE, BECAUSE THE SECOND READING.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM 6 1 IN CASE 2911 E. THIS IS A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM OFFICE TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

WE SENT OUT 59 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING 3 IN FAVOR, 2 IN OPPOSITION.

HERE'S THE RESPONSE MAP. HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THERE IS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST AS WELL AS FURTHER TO THE NORTH.

YOU CAN SEE IT IS SURROUNDED BY OFFICE TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH, LOW DENSITY SF-2 TO THE EAST AND THEN HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE WEST.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL LAND USES.

I MEAN, I'M SORRY FOR OFFICE LAND USES. AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

HERE'S A SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING THE PROPOSED LAYOUT.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR OFFICE.

SO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IS NOT FULLY CONSISTENT WITH THAT DESIGNATION, BUT IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION.

IT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA.

STAFF HAD NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST. HOWEVER, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND COUNCIL APPROVED THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE BY A VOTE OF 5 TO 2.

AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? MR.. DO YOU HAVE ANY. YOU WEREN'T HERE FOR THAT, OR YOU MIGHT HAVE WATCHED THAT.

I THINK YOU WERE HERE. YOU DID WATCH IT. OKAY, SO YOU'RE PRETTY MUCH UP TO DATE ON IT. ALL RIGHT. GOOD DEAL. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. I WILL ENTERTAIN NOW A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 6.5.

SO I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT.

LET'S CALL. SINCE THERE WAS A SPLIT VOTE ON THIS LAST TIME, JUST TO MAKE SURE HOW EVERYONE VOTES, IF WE WILL BRING THIS UP. IF YOU'RE VOTING FOR IT, PLEASE CHECK.

YES. AND IF YOU'RE VOTING AGAINST, PLEASE SAY NO.

FOR AN ANSWER. MR. HARRIS.

DOCTOR WILSON, I KNOW YOU CAN'T PUNCH A BUTTON.

OKAY? AYE. CAN YOU MARK HER? YOU MARK HER. SO THAT WOULD.

WELL, ASSUMING SHE IS. I'M NOT ASSUMING SHE IS AN AYE.

SO THAT WOULD BE A 4 TO 3 FOR 3 TO 4 VOTE FOR AGAINST.

ALL RIGHT. SO THAT MOTION FAILS.

ALL RIGHT. LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM 6.6. EXCUSE ME, 6.7.

[7. Resolution - City Secretary: Take nominations and consider a resolution electing a Mayor Pro Tem, pursuant to Chapter 1, Article IX, Section 12 of the City Charter.]

[00:40:02]

AND THIS ITEM SHOULD BE TAKEN AT YOUR FIRST REGULAR MEETING, WHICH YOU ALL ARE DOING TODAY.

IT DOES ALSO STATE IN THE CHARTER THAT MAYOR PRO TEM SHALL BE OCCUPIED BY THE COUNCIL MEMBER HAVING THE MOST SENIORITY IN SERVICE ON THE CITY COUNCIL.

SO JUST PUTTING THAT OUT THERE FOR YOU ALL. THAT'S ALL THE COMMENTS I HAVE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'LL BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS PAZ.

MR. HARRIS. CURRENTLY THAT WOULD BE DOCTOR WILSON AND OUR CURRENT MAYOR PRO TEM.

ELECT A MAYOR PRO TEM. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE HAVE JENNIFER WILSON, DISTRICT 6 TO SERVE IN THE CAPACITY OF MAYOR PRO TEM.

SHE DOES HAVE SENIORITY. AND SHE IS ALSO SOMEONE THAT HAS BEEN VERY SHE'S DONE A LOT FOR OUR COUNCIL AND HAS PROVIDED A LOT OF REALLY GOOD PERSPECTIVE.

SO THAT IS MY MOTION. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY. AYE. ARE YOU VOTING FOR YOURSELF? YEAH.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I HEAR NO OPPOSITION. SO THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

SO WELCOME TO THE JOB OF MAYOR PRO TEM. EVEN THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU'RE NOT PRESENT FOR A MEETING.

YOU GET SELECTED FOR OFFICE, YOU KNOW? SO THAT'S SHOW UP.

SHOW UP IF YOU DON'T WANT TO GET THE JOB. SO WE'LL LOOK FORWARD TO SERVING FOR HER SERVING FOR THE NEXT 2 YEARS.

AND I WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO THANK OUR CURRENT OR OUTGOING MAYOR PRO TEM FOR HER SERVICE FOR THE PAST 2 YEARS.

SHE'S DONE AN AMAZING JOB. I ALWAYS TALK ABOUT CHRISTY MARTINEZ GARCIA IS THE HARDEST WOMAN WORKING WOMAN IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS, AND SHE'S REALLY WORKED HARD AND FULFILLED HER JOB WELL, BEEN EVERYWHERE THAT SHE NEEDED TO BE.

AND SO WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR SERVICE HERE.

ALL RIGHT. WELL, WITH THAT, WE HAVE NO OTHER ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA.

SO THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED. AND PLEASE, WE REMIND YOU ALL TO TURN OFF YOUR MICROPHONES.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.