Jun 23, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting

[3. Citizen Comments - According to Lubbock City Council Rules, any citizen wishing to appear in-person before a regular meeting of the City Council, regarding any matter posted on the City Council Agenda below, shall complete the sign-up form provided at the meeting, no later than 2:00 p.m. on June 23, 2026. Citizen Comments provide an opportunity for citizens to make comments and express a position on agenda items.]

CITIZEN COMMENTS ACCORDING TO OUR RULES.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN PERSON ON ANY ITEM POSTED ON OUR AGENDA MAY DO SO IF THEY SIGN UP BEFORE THE MEETING.

AND WHEN YOU COME FORWARD WE ASK THAT YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO MAKE YOUR COMMENTS. A BELL WILL RING BE RUNG BY OUR SECRETARY WHEN YOU HAVE 30 SECONDS LEFT AND THEN A FINAL BELL WHEN YOU NEED TO WRAP UP YOUR COMMENTS. SO WE HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNING UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT TODAY. FABIAN MATA.

MR. MATA IF YOU'LL COME FORWARD TO THE MICROPHONE HERE AT THE PODIUM FABIAN FABIAN MATA TO 11 NORTH AVENUE RIGHT NEXT TO THE CANYON. WELL MY CONCERNS ARE I SEND YOU ALL AN EMAIL YESTERDAY AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALREADY DID. IT DOESN'T MATTER. YOU KNOW I'M NOT HERE TO POINT OUT FRAUD OR MALFEASANCE OR CRONYISM. OK. I JUST WANT THIS STUFF FIXED. THE ORDINANCE 63 23 CHRISTIE GOT CITY STAFF TO SAY YEAH IT'S OK TO HAVE PERMIAN BASIN MATERIALS AND CONCRETE CRUSHING RECYCLING ONE OF THE WORST POLLUTERS IN THE WORLD RIGHT NEXT TO THE RIVERWALK BECAUSE OF PLANNING

[00:05:01]

IN THE 1940S AND 1950S. I SENT AN EMAIL TO CITY MANAGER OVER A WEEK AGO. HE DID NOT RESPOND.

IF YOU CAN POINT OUT IN THE ORDINANCE THE REVISED ONE THE ORIGINAL ONE THE MAP I CAN SHOW YOU THE MAP RIGHT HERE BETWEEN AVENUE Q THAT CLEARLY THOSE TWO BUSINESSES ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE AND THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. I JUST WENT OVER THERE BECAUSE IF THEY GET A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THEY HAVE TO HAVE BUILDING PERMITS ON AND ON AND ON. AND MAYBE THEY WILL BE FORCED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW. AND I COULD GO ON AND ON FURTHER AND FURTHER AND FURTHER. THE ONLY REASON I HAVE TO DO IS BECAUSE MANAGEMENT IS NOT HELPING. THEY'RE IGNORED.

THEY IGNORED THE COMPLAINT I HAD ABOUT STORMWATER THERE.

YEAH YOU CAN'T HAVE STORMWATER PILING ONTO THE CONCRETE STUFF FLOWING INTO THE WATER RIGHT NEXT TO IT. YOU CAN SEE IT GO NORTH UP THERE AS MOUNTAINS OF IT. AND I KNOW THOSE MOUNTAINS ARE THERE FOR THE DATA CENTERS. THE ONE THAT WAS GOING TO BE OVER HERE THANK GOD THAT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. AND THE ONE IN ABERNATHY. OH THEY'RE RIGHT NEXT TO THE INTERSTATE.

PERFECT PROFITEERING. WE'VE GOT TO PUT THEM NEAR THE WHERE THE PROFITS ARE GOING TO BE MADE. BUT IF THERE IS FRAUD MILL FEES AND CRONYISM WE CAN POINT IT OUT.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

THANK YOU. MR. MATA.

COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA MISTER MATA LET ME CORRECT YOU.

AND THAT'S TYPICAL.

I WASN'T HERE IN THE 1940'S. I WASN'T EVEN BORN.

AND THE CONCRETE COMPANIES CAME BEFORE I BEGAN MY SERVICE SO.

FOR THE FUTURE PUT OUT THE FACTS BECAUSE WE'VE GONE ABOVE AND BEYOND TO MAKE IT A POINT TO MEET YOUR NEEDS TO LISTEN TO YOU. MY STAFF HAS BEEN MISTREATED BY THIS INDIVIDUAL AND I JUST HAVE TO MAKE THAT CORRECTION FOR THE RECORD.

[4. Minutes]

WE'LL NOW TAKE A AGENDA ITEM 4.1 THE MINUTES FROM MAY 26 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 4.1.

THE MOTION TO SECOND.

OKAY MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA FOR THE SECOND BY MISTER COLLINS. ANY DISCUSSION ANY CHANGES TO THOSE MINUTES.

I SEE NONE ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE AYE ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY I HEAR NONE OKAY THAT MOTION IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

[5. Consent Agenda - Items considered to be routine are enacted by one motion without separate discussion. If the City Council desires to discuss an item, the item is removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.]

WE'LL NOT TAKE UP ITEM 5 ARKANSAS AGENDA. THERE'S NOT BEEN A REQUEST BY THE COUNCIL PERSON TO PULL ANY AGENDA ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. SO I WILL ENTERTAIN ONE MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA IN ITS ENTIRETY IS THERE SUCH A MOTION.

THE MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA AND A SECOND BY MISTER ROSE COUNCILWOMAN COUNCILMAN ROSE ALL RIGHT ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT.

I SEE NONE ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE AYE ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY I HEAR NONE THAT MOTION IS PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

[1. Ordinance Single Reading - Finance: Consider an ordinance of the City of Lubbock, Texas, authorizing the issuance and sale of City of Lubbock, Texas, Tax Notes, in one or more series; levying a tax in payment thereof; and enacting other provisions relating to the subject. The Tax Notes will be utilized to fund Radio System equipment and high dollar value vehicles/equipment approved in the FY 2025-26 Budget.]

WE'LL NOW TAKE UP A REGULAR AGENDA AND WE BEGIN WITH ITEM 6.1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LUBBOCK TEXAS AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE BY THE CITY OF TAX NOTES LIVING IN A TAX IN PAYMENT THEREOF TO BE UTILIZED TO FUND A RADIO SYSTEM.

EQUIPMENT AND HIGH DOLLAR VALUE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FOR OUR 2025 26 BUDGET AND JOE I MEAN AS YOU'RE GOING TO BRIEF US ON THIS MATTER.

GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 6.1 IS ORDINANCE TO ISSUE THE TAX NOTE AGAIN AS YOU RECALL THE TAX NOTES OR A FUNDING MECHANISM THAT WE USE TO PURCHASE LARGE VEHICLES OR LARGE EQUIPMENT FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK IT TYPICALLY HAVE A LIFE SPAN OF LONGER THAN 7 YEARS WHICH WE ISSUE THE TAX NOTES FOR 7 YEARS. I'M GOING TO GO TO KIND OF GO OVER THE PROJECT AGAIN THESE CAPITAL PRODUCT OR THESE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT WERE APPROVED IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 26 BUDGET BY CITY COUNCIL WHICH IS ISSUING THE TAX BILLS FOR THAT TO REIMBURSE FOR THE PURCHASE OF THAT WE HAVE WITH US TODAY, MISTER MATT BOTH FROM RBC AS WELL HE'S GOING TO KIND OF GET INTO THE NUMBERS AND GIVE YOU ALL THE RATE THAT WE ENDED UP INTEREST RATE FOR THE TAX BILL SO WITH THAT BEING SAID I JUST WANT TO GET A HIGH-LEVEL OVERVIEW AGAIN AS I MENTIONED THESE ARE LARGE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT THAT WE PURCHASE WITH THE TAX NOTE. WE HAVE A 3 FIRE PUMPERS ABOUT A MILLION DOLLARS A PIECE. WE HAVE ANOTHER BRUSH UP THE 400,000 AND ABOUT 8 ROLL OFF TRUCKS TO COME IN AND YOU KNOW ABOUT THE UPPER $300,000 AGAIN THESE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT ARE LONGER THAN 7 YEARS OF TAX NOTES FOR A 7 YEAR REPAYMENT PLAN ON THAT. WE HAVE SOME MOTORS AND GRADERS IN THE STREET MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT AND WE ALSO HAVE A GRINDER AND SOME GRADERS IN OUR SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT SO AGAIN THESE ARE HEAVY USE EQUIPMENT THAT WE USE THAT YOU KNOW YOU CAN LAST FOR YOU KNOW LONGER THAN 7 YEARS. IF YOU'LL SEE OFFSETTING THAT IS AN AMOUNT ABOUT $64,900 OF TAX NOTES THAT WE HAD PRIOR ISSUED. AGAIN WE CAME IN SOME

[00:10:01]

OF THE VEHICLES CAME IN ON THE BUDGET SO WE REALLY UTILIZE THOSE TAX NOTES THAT WE HAVE WE USE THAT TO OFFSET THE BUDGET THAT YOU APPROVED IN 2526 SO WE ALSO HAVE ONE LARGE RADIO SHOP CIP IT'S A PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADE. IT'S A BIG INVESTMENT IN OUR RADIO SYSTEM WE'RE GETTING NEW RADIOS WE'RE BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR MORE RELIABILITY. AND SO THIS WILL BE FUNDED AGAIN WITH $6.1 MILLION OF TAX. SO THE TOTAL AMOUNT APPROXIMATELY ABOUT 14.9 MILLION AGAIN THIS WAS AUTHORIZED BY COUNCIL IN THE BUDGET AND SO NOW WE'RE JUST ISSUING THE TAX NOTES TO REPAY OURSELVES FOR THE PURCHASE OF THESE VEHICLES.

WITH THAT IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'LL TURN IT OVER TO MISTER BOWDEN HE'LL GIVE YOU ALL THE NUMBERS IN THIS TAX NOTES ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR JOE.

JOE WOULD YOU THE RADIO EQUIPMENT, PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADE COULD YOU JUST DESCRIBE THAT JUST A LITTLE BIT.

YEAH, I'LL TRY TO DO MY BEST, MAYOR I'M NOT A RADIO GUY, I KNOW IT'S NOT I KNOW IT'S NOT YOUR DEPARTMENT, BUT YEAH, SO IT'S AN UPGRADE TO OUR SYSTEM WE'RE BUILDING ANOTHER TOWER SO IT'S JUST FOR RELIABILITY, YOU KNOW BECAUSE LUBBOCK IS GROWING SO YOU KNOW THE SPAN OF YOUR RADIOS IN THE CITY.

AND AGAIN, IT'S JUST YOU KNOW SOFTWARE UPGRADES VERY COMMON I MEAN IT'S A VERY COMMON FOR SOFTWARE UPGRADES AND SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS THIS IS TO INVEST IN OUR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THAT THE UPGRADE OF THE RADIO SO AND AS YOU ALL KNOW I TEASE A VERY COSTLY EXPENSE SO BUT BUT IT'S GOOD AGAIN YOU GOT TO REMEMBER THAT OTHER ENTITIES USE OUR RADIO SYSTEM AS WELL SO THEY'LL BE PAYING THEIR PORTION OF THE COST FOR THIS CAPITAL PROJECT AS WELL. SO YOU HAVE EMS, YOU HAVE CITY BUS ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THAT THEY USE OUR RADIO SYSTEM AND SO THAT THEY'RE THEY'RE CARRYING ABOUT HALF OF THE COST ON THIS CAPITAL PROJECT WHICH IS ONLY FAIR THEY HAVE. SO WE WE BASED IT BASED ON THE NUMBER OF DEVICES WE HAVE AND SO THEY'RE ABOUT 50% OF UTILIZATION OF OUR OUR RADIO SYSTEM SO IT WON'T ALL BE ON THE CITY LEVEL GOING TO BE THE OTHER ENTITIES THAT ARE PAYING TO USE OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AS WELL.

I'M SEEING OTHER QUESTIONS.

OH, COULCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA AND IT'S NOT JUST PUBLIC SAFETY, IT'S ALL OF OUR DEPARTMENTS THAT USE THE RADIO CORRECT. YES, CORRECT AND THEN THE AMOUNT THAT LISTED 6 MILLION 100,000 IS THAT OUR HALF OR DO WE ONLY PAY HALF OF THAT? NO,NO,THAT'S THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE PROJECT SO IT IS THE PROJECT LIKE I SAID WE FUND THIS OUT FOR THE 7 YEARS ON THE THE TAX NOTE AND SO THOSE ENTITIES PAYING TO THAT PAY THE DEBT SERVICE ON THAT FOR THE 6.1 MILLION IN THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT.

THANK YOU FOR THE PUBLIC WHO MAY BE LISTENING IN AND SAY OKAY, WHAT IS A TAX NOTE? HOW IS THAT DIFFERENT FROM ANY OTHER KIND OF SO? THE TAX NOTE OF THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT FUNDING MECHANISM WHICH MEANS YOU KNOW IT'S NOT LIKE YOUR BOND, YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A YOU KNOW GO OUT FOR THE RATING AND ALL THAT WITH THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OF THE 7 YEAR SHORT TERM NOTE AND REALLY WHAT BENEFITS OF THE CALLABLE THE ONE WE ACCEPT THAT CALLABLE WITHIN 3 YEARS SO AGAIN IF YOU HAVE SAVINGS ON THIS RADIO SHOP PROGRAM YOU CAN PAY OFF THE DEBT SERVICE A LITTLE BIT OF THE USE THE BONDS ARE 10 YEARS CALLABLE. SO THIS IS GIVEN MORE FLEXIBILITY TO TO PAY THAT DEBT OFF SOONER WE NEEDED AND AGAIN YOUR INTEREST RATES ARE PRETTY COMPARABLE WITH YOUR BOND RATINGS AND IT'S A SHORT TERM NOTE VERSUS A LONG 1020 YEAR DEBT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MR. BOWLES.

THANK YOU MAYOR,COUNCIL. GOOD AFTERNOON, GOOD TO SEE YOU ALL.

MR. JIMENEZ DID A GREAT JOB OF INTRODUCING THE PROJECTS I JUST THOUGHT I'D GO THROUGH A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE MARKET AND THEN THE FINANCING ITSELF.

THE FINANCING IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU USED TO SEE AND TYPICALLY YOU ENTER THE PUBLIC MARKET AND AN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERED MODE. THIS IS MR. JIMENEZ SAID IS A PRIVATE PLACEMENT AND SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT IN THE WORK WE DO GOING UP TO THE ACTUAL SALE BUT WE DID TAKE BIDS YESTERDAY I THINK WE GOT A GOOD RESULT WILL GO THROUGH A HANDFUL OF WILL GO THROUGH ALL OF THOSE HERE IN A LITTLE BIT AND THEN TALK ABOUT THE ULTIMATE WINNER.

TO GET STARTED I JUST WANTED TO HIT THE MARKET REAL QUICK.

ONE THING ABOUT THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT COMPETITIVE BID OFFERED TO A GROUP OF BANKS IS THAT THEY TYPICALLY SEE THROUGH THE MARKET A LITTLE FURTHER.

THEY'RE NOT SO SENSITIVE AS TO WHAT'S GOING ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY AT THAT PARTICULAR MOMENT THEY SEE THROUGH THE MARKET AND AS HE SAID IN A SEVEN YEAR MODE THEY CAN DEFINE SUCH A SHORT TERM WINDOW THERE THAT THEY DON'T MOVE THEIR BIDS A WHOLE LOT. SO THEY PROBABLY HELD THESE BIDS FOR TWO OR THREE DAYS AND IT JUST IT'S A LITTLE BIT EASIER WHEN IT COMES TO THE MARKET.

ALL THAT TO SAY THAT IT'S BEEN A REALLY INTERESTING TIME SINCE WE ENGAGED IN THE MIDDLE EAST WARFARE

[00:15:01]

AND IT'S GOTTEN A LITTLE BIT BETTER IN TERMS OF VOLATILITY BUT NOT A TON BETTER. WE ARE STILL SEEING THE LINGERING EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND PRICE STABILITY AROUND COMMODITIES SPECIFICALLY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND THAT HAS STILL RIPPLED INTO INTO THE BOND MARKET. THE OTHER THING THAT WE'RE SEEING THAT'S BECOME SORT OF TOP LINE AT THIS POINT ARE THE NEW FED CHAIRS COMMENTS MADE LAST WEEK AT THE CLOSE OF THE FOMC MEETING. THEY WERE SHORT IN NATURE WHICH WAS A LITTLE BIT SURPRISING BUT EQUALLY AS SURPRISING IF NOT MORE WAS HIS DISCUSSION AROUND THE POSSIBILITY FOR RATE HIKES NOT EASING WHICH I THINK IS WHAT THE WORLD HAD HOPED TO SEE AS WE GO INTO THE BACK HALF OF THIS YEAR. RIGHT NOW AS WE SIT HERE THERE'S A 90 PERCENT PROBABILITY THAT THE FED FUNDS RATE WILL GO UP A QUARTER POINT OR MORE BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR AND THAT'S A REAL SURPRISE TO THE MARKET AND IT'S REFLECTED IN CPI DATA THAT WE'VE GOTTEN. ALL OF IT IS ELEVATED. AGAIN A LOT OF THAT SURROUNDING THE COMMODITIES MARKET AND SO AS WE GO INTO THE BACK HALF OF THIS YEAR WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BE VIGILANT ABOUT WHEN WE FIND ENTRY POINTS INTO THE MARKETPLACE.

BUT AGAIN THAT'S IN A PUBLIC OFFERED MODE AND WE'VE GOT ANOTHER PAGE HERE THAT REDEFINES OR DEFINES INFORMATION AROUND THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET AND IT'S NOT ALL THAT RELEVANT TO WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW BUT I KNOW YOU ALL ARE A FREQUENT ISSUER AND WE'LL PROBABLY BE IN THE MARKET EACH YEAR FOR A GOOD PERIOD OF TIME HERE JUST TO SELL YOUR VOTED AUTHORIZATION. AND YOU KNOW I DO THINK AS WE GET INTO 2026 THE BACK HALF OF 2026 WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT FINDING THE POINTS OF ENTRY THAT ARE MOST AGREEABLE.

BUT WE'LL BE HERE FOR THAT WHENEVER THAT COMES UP WITH YOU ALL. AND AS MR. JIMENEZ SAID YOU ALL YESTERDAY TOOK BIDS THROUGH A COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS ON THE PACKAGE THAT WAS PRESENTED EARLIER. THE CITY GOT A GREAT RECEPTION. I THINK SEVEN BIDS WERE RECEIVED. YOU CAN SEE THE RECAP OF THE BIDS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE AND THERE'S A LOT OF INFORMATION HERE BUT JUST TO DISTILL THIS DOWN WE LOOK AT INTEREST RATE FIRST AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THESE ARE ARRANGED IN ORDER OF RATE. SO WEBSTER BANK BID 3.92 PERCENT AND THEN WE GET SENSITIVE ABOUT MAKING SURE WE HAVE THE APPROPRIATE CALL FEATURES IN PLACE SO THAT IF YOU DO WANT TO REPAY OR PREPAY THE DEBT IN ADVANCE OF THE MATURITY YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THAT. AND YOU CAN SEE THERE'S OPTIONAL CALL DATA THERE THAT THEY'VE ATTACHED TO THEIR BID.

THIS IS NOT ATYPICAL SO THIS IS WHAT WE EXPECT TO SEE. I WILL MAKE A QUICK NOTE THAT IF YOU GO ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM THERE YOU'LL SEE THAT JP MORGAN DID IN FACT BID 3.84 PERCENT BUT THAT'S IN A NON CALLABLE MODE.

SO SEVEN YEARS NO OPTIONALITY NO ABILITY TO REPAY OR PREPAY THE DEBT. AND I THINK WE ALL AGREE THAT HAVING THAT OPTIONAL OPTIONALITY AT 3.92 PERCENT WAS THE RIGHT WAY TO GO. SO JUST A SOLID BID. I WILL MAKE NOTE THAT YOU HAVE DONE BUSINESS WITH THEM BEFORE SO EASE OF TRANSACTING AND RELATIONSHIPS ARE IN PLACE AND THAT ALWAYS MAKES THIS A BIT OF AN EASIER PROCESS. ON THIS PAGE THESE ARE THE NUMBERS THAT WE RAN THAT WILL ULTIMATELY BE SENT TO THE AG'S OFFICE. THE RATE THE AVERAGE COUPON IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PAGE 3.92 PERCENT. WE DO RUN AN ALL-IN TIC SO THINK OF THAT AS THE APR.

THAT INCLUDES ALL THE COSTS ALL THE COSTS OF ISSUANCE THAT YOU PAY TO GET THE TRANSACTION DONE. SO THAT'S JUST A SHADE OVER 4 PERCENT AT 4.0782 PERCENT. AND THEN THE AMORTIZATION ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE PAGE SHOWS YOU THE REPAYMENT TERMS. AND WE WENT AHEAD AND SPLIT THIS OUT ON THIS NEXT PAGE BETWEEN THE TWO PROJECTS. OBVIOUSLY THE VEHICLES ARE ALL LUMPED TOGETHER ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE. ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE IS THE RADIO TOWER PROJECT. AND SHOULD YOU DECIDE FOR WHATEVER REASON TO PREPAY EITHER OF THOSE WE CAN SELECT MATURITIES AND AMOUNTS WITHIN THOSE PRINCIPAL VALUES TO PINPOINT WITH ACCURACY VEHICLES OR A GROUP OF VEHICLES OR FOUR VEHICLES OR WHATEVER IT MAY BE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT.

AND THAT IS THE SUM TOTAL OF MY REMARKS TODAY. BUT I'M ALWAYS HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS OR GO INTO FURTHER DETAIL.

MR. BRODSKY YOU GO BACK TO SLIDE NUMBER THREE. ALL RIGHT.

EXPLAIN ON YOUR OPTIONAL CALL AT 101 PERCENT THROUGH 714 30 AT 100 PERCENT 715 2030. OK. SO THE SO THROUGH 2030 YOU HAVE

[00:20:02]

THE RIGHT TO PREPAY THE DEBT AT A PRICE OF 101 PERCENT. SO YOU MULTIPLY THE 101 PERCENT TIMES THE PRINCIPAL VALUE AND THAT'S A SHADE OF A PENALTY THERE.

SO IT'S NOT MUCH NOT MUCH.

BUT THEN AFTER THAT IT GOES TO JUST WHAT WE CALL PAR. SO 100 PERCENT OF THE VALUE AS IT'S STATED ON THE COVER. OK. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM SIX POINT ONE MOTION DR. WILSON SECOND FROM MR. COLLINS. ALL RIGHT.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. OPPOSED SAY NAY.

I HAVE A MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

[2. Public Hearing - Planning (District 4): Consider a request for Zone Case 3554, a request of The Garrett Group at Keller Williams, for Verlene Avant, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to Office District (OF), at 12202 Upton Avenue, located south of 122nd Street and west of Upton Avenue, on 5.1 acres of unplatted land out of Block E-2, Section 23, and consider an ordinance.]

ALL RIGHT. WELL I'LL TAKE UP ITEM 6.2 ZONE CASE 3-5-5-4. AND I'M GOING TO CALL ON KRISTEN SAGER TO COME FORWARD AND GIVE US A BRIEFING ON THIS ZONING CASE SUBJECT TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING.

GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND COUNCIL. ITEM 6.2 ZONE CASE THIRTY FIVE FIFTY FOUR. THE REQUEST IS A ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY SF TWO TO OFFICE. WE SENT OUT 60 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING THREE IN FAVOR FOUR IN OPPOSITION. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SECOND STREET WEST OF UPTON AVENUE. HERE'S THE MAP SHOWING THE RESPONSES WE RECEIVED.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH. ADDITIONAL RESIDENCES TO THE EAST AND WEST AND VACANT LAND TO THE SOUTH.

CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY SF TWO. IT IS SURROUNDED BY SF TWO ZONING BUT THERE IS ADDITIONAL OFFICE AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING TO THE WEST.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THESE PROPERTIES FOR RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USES.

AND HERE'S SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY. THE OFFICE ZONING DISTRICT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THIS DESIGNATION BUT IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION GIVING ITS PROXIMITY TO OTHER OFFICE ZONING AS WELL AS BEING A LONGER COLLECTOR. THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THE SURROUNDING AREA. UPTON AND ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SECOND ARE BOTH DESIGNATED AS COLLECTORS.

STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH THE UNANIMOUS VOTE AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR SAGER.

I SEE NONE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I WILL NOW HAVE A OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND PURPOSES OF PUBLIC HEARING IS TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND THE COUNCIL MAY ASK QUESTIONS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING BUT NO DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE COUNCIL DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING SO NOW I'M GOING TO SEE IF ANYONE IS WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ZONE CASE IF YOU WOULD PLEASE COME FORWARD.

THANK YOU.

MY NAME IS GREG GARRET AND I RESIDE AT 3926 IN FIFTH PLACE HERE IN LUBBOCK.

WE RUN THE GARRET GROUP WITH KELLER-WILLIAMS. AND WE REPRESENT VERLEN AVANT SHE OWNS APPROXIMATELY FORTY SEVEN ACRES JUST OFF THE NEW ROUTE BETWEEN QUAKER AND SLIDE ROAD. THIS IS THE VERY NORTH 5.1 ACRES THAT WE WILL PROVIDE IN ONE ACRE TRACKS. IT WILL BE A VERY VERY NICE AREA MUCH LIKE WHAT'S WEST FROM THE VERY SAME STREET.

YOU KNOW WHAT WE HAD USED TO BE FOR KNOWING YOU KNOW YOU'LL KNOW WHO'S THERE BUT IT BE LIKE A CPA FIRM COULD BE A DOCTOR OFFICE, LAWYER OFFICE, SOMETHING OF THAT SORT. SO WE JUST THAT WE REQUEST YOU ALSO THOUGHT PROCESS OF APPROVING IT AND WE'RE EXCITED TO MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS? IS ANYONE HERE TODAY WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO IT.

I SEE NO ONE SO I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 2.25.

THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.2.

THANK YOU. MISTER BRUEGEL IS THERE A SECOND A SECOND MAYOR PRO TEM WILSON.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I SEE NONE ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE AYE OPPOSED SAY NAY. I KNOW THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[3. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3521-A, a request of Seventeen Services, LLC, for Milwaukee 104, LLC, for a zone change from Neighborhood Commercial District (NC) to Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), at 6602 104th Street, located west of Milwaukee Avenue and north of 104th Street, on 15.03 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 22, and consider an ordinance.]

ALL RIGHT WE TAKE UP ITEM 6.3 NOW IS ON CASE 3, 5, 2, 1, DASH A 5, 4, MISS SAGER.

THE CASE 3521 DASH A IS THE REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

WE'VE BEEN OUT 25 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING NO RESPONSE.

[00:25:01]

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF A 104 WEST OF MILWAUKEE.

HERE'S THE AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE ARE EXISTING RESIDENCES TO THE SOUTH, A FEW RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH AND THEY CAN LAND TO THE EAST AND WEST.

CURRENT ZONING IS NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. IT WAS A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL A YEAR AGO.

THERE IS A 50 LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING TO THE NORTH WEST AND EAST AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH.

THE FUTURE LAND TO THINK THE PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL DENSITY LAND USES.

AND HERE'S THE PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY THE PROPOSED AND CHANGE TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE DESIGNATION.

THE PROPOSED AND CHANGE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND NOT APPROPRIATE THE PROPOSED LOCATION.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY GOING TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, BUT IT DOES NOT HAVE AND IT DOES NOT FRONT ONTO AN AIR ARTERIAL ARTERIAL STREET, IT DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL STREET.

ALL THAT WOULD COME FROM A 104 THE ONLY A STREET THAT ARE CURRENTLY FRONT.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA.

KRISTEN, CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE A LITTLE BIT MORE UNDERSTANDING OF WHY STAFF RECOMMENDED DENIAL.

IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO A LARGE PORTION OF IT IS IT LACKS THAT FRONTAGE ON TO A MAJOR THERE ARE THERE OR AN ARTERIAL AND SO AS THE SITUATED TODAY, IT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM EXISTING RESIDENCES. SO ALL OF THE ACCESS THAT IS GOING TO BE COMING AND GOING FROM THAT 104 STREET RIGHT IN FRONT OF THOSE RESIDENCES THAT WOULD BE THE FRONT THERE WOULD BE NO TYPE OF SCREENING NO TYPE OF BUFFER YARD IN THAT LOCATION EITHER.

NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL WE WERE OK WITH LAST YEAR BECAUSE IT IS APPROPRIATE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL IT IS SMALLER SCALE RETAIL THAT TYPICALLY WHAT YOU SEE IN TECH CARE FOR YOU HAVE JAMIE COFFEE AND THAT SMALL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS APPROPRIATE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL GIVEN THAT THIS IS OFF OF THE THOROUGHFARE ACROSS THE STREET FROM RESIDENTIAL WE DID NOT FEEL HE WAS APPROPRIATE.

THANK YOU.

MAJOR MISS SAGER ISN'T THAT THE SAME PROPERTY, THE OWNERS JUST BOUGHT THE FRONTAGE ON MILWAUKEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUTTING ACCESS OFF OF MILWAUKEE FOR THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO BUILD HERE? I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE PURCHASED THAT SO IT WENT TO BID AND THEY ACTUALLY DID MOVE FORWARD WITH MOVE FORWARD WITH THE CONTRACT SO THEY ACTUALLY WILL HAVE ACCESS THAT IS NOT OFF OF A 100 FOR THAT WILL COME OFF MILWAUKEE WITH THAT CONCEPT OKAY, SO THAT WOULD THAT WOULD PROBABLY CHANGE THAT BECAUSE NOW THEY WILL HAVE ACCESS FROM BOTH IT WILL BENEFIT THEM AND IF THAT PROPERTY IS REALLY IS PLOTTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROPERTY IN MILWAUKEE WILL BECOME THEIR FRONT AND THEN BUFFERING AND SCREENING WILL BE REQUIRED ON A 104.

PERFECT, THANK YOU.

WE KNOW.

I SAY WE DON'T WANT THE CORNER.

I'M PRETTY CLOSE TO CORNER PROPERTY THERE IT IS A DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNER. IT IS NOT THE THING.

MISTER BRUEGEL.

SO.

SHOULD THE OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY.

OBTAIN THAT FRONTAGE WHICH I BELIEVE DEALS IN MOTION TO GET THAT DONE WOULD THEY HAVE TO ENTER A SECOND ZONING CASE TO REZONE THE FRONTAGE PIECE AS WELL.

IT DEPENDS. MORE THAN LIKELY IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO REZONE THAT FRONTAGE SINCE IT WILL BE DEVELOPED AS PART OF THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

IF IT IS LITERALLY JUST AN ACCESS EASEMENT THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES OR ANYTHING OF THAT SORT ON IT.

WE COULD POTENTIALLY ALLOW IT TO STAY AS THE FF DO.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 6.3 IS THERE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ZONE CASE.

PLEASE COME FORWARD.

GOOD AFTERNOON MY NAME IS TYLER GENTRY WITH 17 SERVICES AT FIFTEEN HUNDRED BROADWAY SUITE TWO OR THREE.

SO WE'RE THE APPLICANT I'M ALSO ONE OF THE PARTNERS IN THE PROJECT AND JUST TO BE CLEAR THE PURPOSE FOR THE REZONE ISN'T FOR USE IT'S FOR HEIGHT LIMITATION.

THERE'S THIRTY FIVE FOOT LIMIT IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL OR SEEKING TO GET UP TO THIRTY NINE FORTY FEET JUST ALLOWS US TO DO A BETTER JOB OF CLEARANCES AND SCREENING OF EQUIPMENT ETC.

SO THAT'S REALLY WHY WE'RE HERE.

THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT? ALL RIGHT.

ANY OF YOU WHO IS WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT.

[00:30:02]

YES PLEASE COME FORWARD.

STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS IF YOU WOULD COME FORWARD.

MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS DR. KEVIN KENNY AND I AM A RESIDENT OF THIS AREA.

OUR RESIDENCE IS DIRECTLY NORTH OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE AND I WOULD LIKE IF POSSIBLE THAT WE COULD REMAIN AS A NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT INSTEAD OF AN AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL FOR SEVERAL REASONS ONE MAINLY BECAUSE OF THE ACCESS TO OUR PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTIES BEHIND IT HAS A LOT OF THERE'S A RESIDENCE UP ON THE HILL THAT'S SAD ABOUT THE PROPERTY YOU KNOW THE CHANGE AND SO I WOULD LIKE IT TO REMAIN AS A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

LAST YEAR WE WENT THROUGH THIS I WOULD RATHER HAVE IT AS A RESIDENTIAL BUT PROGRESS AS IT IS.

AND SO THAT IT WOULD BE MORE IT WOULD BE MORE IN CONFORMITY TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THE PEOPLE WOULD BE HAPPIER WITH THAT WOULD BE FRIENDLIER AND SO FORTH AND ACTUALLY WE WOULD PROBABLY BE OURSELVES PROBABLY CUSTOMERS.

SO I WOULD ASK THE COMMISSION TO OF THE COUNCIL TO REMAIN AND KEEP IT AS A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

ALL RIGHT.

I SEE NONE SO I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 2.32 ALL RIGHT.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.3.

WHO IS DOWN HERE.

MISTER COLLINS MISTER COLLINS WAS MADE THE MOTION AND I SECOND THAT MOTION OR IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS.

OKAY. NOT A QUESTION BUT ISN'T THIS PROPERTY LIKE YOU REALLY CAN'T BUILD ANYTHING ON IT SO.

WE COULDN'T BUILD A NEIGHBORHOOD, RIGHT? I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

IS THAT THE CASE? I THINK THE PROPERTY THAT WE ARE ASKING THE REZONE IS CAN BE BUILT FOR NEIGHBORHOODS ANYWAYS.

YEAH, THE THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE REZONING DOES HAVE FLOOD ZONE ON IT.

IT'S A PRETTY DECENT AMOUNT BUT YOU CAN HAVE THE 30 MINUTE PERCENT RECLAMATION THAT STANDARD IN OUR DEVELOPMENT SO THAT MUCH OF IT CAN BE REMOVED.

PARKING LOTS AND SO FORTH THAT MAY BE AT THE EDGE OF A FLOOD ZONE OR NOT AN ISSUE IT'S FOR STRUCTURES SO THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION.

I'VE SEEN THE MAP SO I'M BACK ON TRACK. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I SEE NOT ALL RIGHT ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING AGENDA ITEM 6.3 LET ME KNOW BY SAYING AYE AYE ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY.

YOU'RE NOT THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[4. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3544, a request for zone changes in City Council District 5, from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), Heavy Commercial District (HC), Industrial Park District (IP), Light Industrial District (LI), and General Industrial District (GI) to Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), Heavy Commercial District (HC), Industrial Park District (IP), at 5701 130th Street, Tract A, Huffines Business Park Addition, 5701 130th Street Rear, 2.2 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 8, 5514, 5517, 5608, and 5619 132nd Street, Tracts H, K, P, and Q, Huffines Business Park Addition, 13306 and 13312 Chicago Avenue, Tracts U and V, Huffines Business Park Addition, 5215 and 5217 98th Street, 1.21 acres out of Tracts 6-A and 7-A, Southwest Lubbock Health Center Addition, 6601-6622 Xenia Avenue, 7501-7513 68th Street, and 6601-6622 Winfield Avenue, Tracts A-T, Camp HM Business Park Addition, 7018 82nd Street, 1 acre of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 30, 7006 82nd Street, 7.06 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 30, 7302 82nd Street, Tract A, Rancho Verde Estates Addition, 7304, 7314, and 7318 82nd Street, Lots 3-A, 4-A, 5-A, and 6-A, A&O Addition, 8101 and 8102 Viola Avenue, Lots 113-A and 116-A, Rancho Verde Estates Addition, 7412 and 7414 82nd Street, Lot 114-A, Rancho Verde Estates Addition, 7415, 7417, 7419, and 7421 81st Street, 7416, 7418, and 7422 82nd Street, and 8107 Wausau Avenue, Tract B, Rancho Verde Estates Addition, 6508 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.94 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 6602 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Tract A, Water Rampage Addition, 6102 Norwich Avenue, 0.3 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 6901 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 12.61 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 6909 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 2.5 acres of land out of Tract A, Killeen Addition, 6628 66th Street, 3.21 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 7005 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 3.33 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 7101, 7103, 7105, and 7107 Santa Fe Drive, Lots 62-65, Pine Grove Estates Addition, 7111 and 7113 Santa Fe Drive, Tracts B-1 and B-2, Pine Grove Estates Addition, 7102, 7104, 7106, and 7110 Santa Fe Drive, Lots 67-70, Pine Grove Estates Addition, 6409 Upland Avenue, the south 101.5 feet of the north 166.5 feet of the west 150 feet of Tract A, Pine Grove Estates Addition, 7311 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Tract B, Upland Point Addition, 7313 and 7315 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 2.67 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7002 Upland Avenue, 0.44 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7004 Upland Avenue, 0.34 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7008 Upland Avenue, 0.55 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7012 Upland Avenue, 0.68 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7302 Upland Avenue, 2.97 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7304 Upland Avenue, 2.28 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7306 Upland Avenue, 0.88 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7308 Upland Avenue, 0.39 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7310 Upland Avenue, 0.28 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7312 Upland Avenue, 0.41 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7314 Upland Avenue, 0.22 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7316 Upland Avenue, 1.27 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7411 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.28 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7413 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.20 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7415 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.133 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7417 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.27 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7419 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.20 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7421 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.49 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7423 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.17 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7433 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 0.53 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 4402 Upland Avenue, 1 acre of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 38, 6068 50th Street, 8.27 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 37, 4524 Milwaukee Avenue, 14.58 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 38, 4540 Milwaukee Avenue, Lot 7, Canyon West Addition, 5002 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract A, Braums Addition, 5008 Milwaukee Avenue, 1.55 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 35, 5010 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract E, Canyon West II Addition, 5012 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract A, Gill Holdings Addition, 5014 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract A, Starbucks Addition, 5016, 5018, and 5020 Milwaukee Avenue, Tracts B, C, and D, Canyon West II Addition, 5024 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract A, Toot N Totum No 3 Addition, 4501, 4505, and 4511, Milwaukee Avenue, Tracts A-1-A, A-2, and A-3, City View Campus Addition, 6401 46th Street, Tract A-4, City View Campus Addition, 4545 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract B, Esplanade Addition, 6060 50th Street, 1.7 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 37, 6435 50th Street, Lot 5-A, Canyon West Addition, 5005 Milwaukee Avenue, Lot 5-B, Canyon West Addition, 5009, 5013, 5015, 5017, 5029, and 5031 Milwaukee Avenue, Lots 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 1-D-1, and 1-D-2 Canyon West Addition, 6026, 6028, 6030, 6038, 6048, 6052, 6054, and 6064 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Lots 2, 3-C-1-A-1, 3-C-1-A-2, 3-C-1-A-3, 3-C-1-A-4, 3-C-1-B, 3-D-1, and 3-D-2, Canyon West Addition, 6055 50th Street, Lot 3-B, Canyon West Addition, 6018 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Lot 6, Canyon West Addition, 6016 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Lot 1, Block A, Sam’s Addition, 6016 Marsha Sharp Freeway 2, Lot 2, Block A, Sam’s Addition, 6014 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 6.45 acres of land out of Block AK, Section 37, 6012 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Tracts A and B, Twin Peaks Addition, 6010 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Lot 6, WT Hub West Addition, 5810 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 1.93 acres of land out of Block AK, Section 37, 6004 Marsha Sharp Freeway, Tract A, Home 2 Lubbock Addition, 5909, 5915, and 5919 50th Street, Tracts F-4, F-5, and F-6, Southwest Commercial Park Addition, 5815, 5821, 5821 Rear, 5823, 5827, 5833, 5839, 5847, 5901, and 5905 50th Street, Lots 1-4, 5-A, 7-A, 9-A, 11, 12, 13, 14-A, and 16-A, Southwest Commercial Park Addition, 5811, 5831, 5835, 5843, 5845, and 5853 49th Street, Tracts D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, D-6, D-7, D-8, D-9, D-10, and D-11, Southwest Commercial Park Addition, 5810, 5816, 5820, 5822, 5828, 5830, 5848, and 5850 50th Street, Tracts E-2, E-2-A, E-3, E-4, E-4-A, E-5, E-6, E-7, E-8, E-8-A, E-8-B, and E-8-C, Southwest Commercial Park Addition, 5004, 5026, and 5028 Frankford Avenue, Lots 2, 3-A, 4-A and 5, Frankford Business Park Addition, 5034 Frankford Avenue, Tract A, Luskey Addition, 5052 Frankford Avenue, Lot 6-A, Frankford Business Park Addition, 5602 Frankford Avenue, 0.73 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 36, 5610 Frankford Avenue, Lot 1, Frankford Business Park Addition, 5820 Spur 327, 4.01 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 36, 5802 Spur 327, Tracts A and B, Womble Addition, 5702 – 5828 Genoa Avenue, Lots 1-11, Heron Development Addition, 5911 57th Street, 6.88 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 36, 6000 Spur 327, Tracts A and B, Bob Mills Furniture Company Addition, 5423, 5425, and 5435 Frankford Avenue, Tracts 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C, C C Knott Addition, 5613 Frankford Avenue, Tract A, Carizma Motors Addition, 5617, 5621, and 5701 Frankford Avenue, Lots 8, 2-A, 2-B, 27, and 28, Westac Addition, 5310 Englewood Avenue, Lot 25, Westac Addition, 5320 Englewood Avenue, 1.39 acres of unplatted land out of Block E-2, Section 28, 5614 and 5618 Englewood Avenue, Lots 26-A and 26-B, Westac Addition, 5610, 5702, and 5712 58th Street, Lots 7, 10, 11-A, 17, and 23, Westac Addition, 5310, 5320, 5612, and 5620, West Loop 289, Lots 16, 20, 22, and 24, Westac Addition, 5801, 5805, and 5807 Frankford Avenue, Lots 1-A-1, 3-A, and 4-A-1, Westac Addition, 5702, 5706, 5708 and 5720 Spur 327, Lots 2-A, 3, 4, and 6, Village Center Addition, 5710 and 5716 Spur 327, Lots 6-A-1 and 6-A-2, Westac Addition, 5725 and 5727 58th Street, Lots 9-A-1 and 13-A-1, Westac Addition, 5721 58th Street, Lot 1-A, Village Center Addition, 5712 Spur 327, Lots 6-A-3-A and 6-A-3-B, Westac Addition, 5609 58th Street, Lot 14, Westac Addition, 5802 West Loop 289, Lot 15, Westac Addition, 5806 West Loop 289, 0.16 acres of unplatted land out of Block E-2, Section 28, 5810 West Loop 289, Lot 21, Westac Addition, 5902 West Loop 289, Lot 1-A, Cinema District Addition, and 5916 West Loop 289, Lot 5, Village Center Addition, and consider an ordinance.]

ALL RIGHT, WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ITEM 6.4.

ZONE CASE 3, 5, 4, 4, THIS IS THE BIG ON THE BUS. YEAH, ZONING CHANGE ALL RIGHT.

THIS IS THE LAST AND WE SAY THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE PROPERTIES LISTED IN 6.5 AND 6.6 AND SAY THAT ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU MAYOR.

THIS IS THE LAST OF THE CHANGES ARE BRINGING TO YOU THE RESULT OF THE ZONING MAP ANALYSIS.

THIS IS DISTRICT 5.

WE'RE ASKING TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM AT THE 2 H THE IP ALLY AND GI TO SF TO A CHC AND I P WE'VE BEEN OUT 915 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING 10 IN FAVOR 14 IN OPPOSITION.

AGAIN THIS IS THE RESULT OF THE ZONING MAP ANALYSIS.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE AREAS WHERE WE'RE LOOKING TO REZONE PROPERTY.

LET'S START AT 98 INSIDE YOU HAVE AN EXISTING PARKING LOT FOR SHOPPING CENTER THAT IS STILL DONE AT THAT TO YOU AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION WE'RE ASKING THAT THE REASON TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REST OF THE PROPERTY.

FUTURE AND YOU PLAN HAS THAT DOESN'T NEED FOR COMMERCIAL.

CANYON WITH SHOPPING CENTER ALONG MARSHALL SHARP FREEWAY IN MILWAUKEE AND THEN LIGHT

[00:35:01]

INDUSTRIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARK AS WELL AS PROPERTY AT FRANK FERDINAND FOR 3.27. AND THEN YOU HAVE TEXAS WATER RAMPAGE THAT CURRENTLY ZONE FS2 AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION THESE AREAS HAVE NOT DEVELOPED AS INDUSTRIAL USES AND SO WE'RE ASKING THAT THEY BE TAKEN TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL OR HAVE THE COMMERCIAL FOR THAT AREA ON FRANKFORD WE HAVE CONTRACTORS OFFICE WAREHOUSE THAT TYPE OF USE.

FUTURE AND YOU PLAN TO MAKE THIS AREA FOR COMMERCIAL.

A PLAN IN 82ND WE HAVE SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES. ALL ALL UP AND DOWN 82ND AGAIN FS2 AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION ASKING TO TAKE THOSE TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL. WE LEFT OUT THE UTILITY SUBSTATION AND CHURCH THEY DON'T NECESSARILY NEED TO BE REZONED SO THEY CAN REMAIN FS2 FUTURE AND YOU PLAN HAS THIS AREA FOR COMMERCIAL.

CHICAGO AND A 130TH AGAIN AT THAT TO ZONING AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION THERE ARE EXISTING OFFICE WAREHOUSE AND STORAGE ASKING TO TAKE THOSE TO HAVE A COMMERCIAL.

FUTURE AND YOU PLAN TO THE NEED FOR COMMERCIAL.

MARSHALL SHARP FREEWAY AND UPLAND YOU HAVE AT THAT TO ZONING AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATION MIX OF COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES, CONTRACTORS. WE HAVE ANOTHER BUSINESS PARK ON WEST 66.

ASKING TO TAKE THE MAJORITY OF THAT ON MARSHALL SHARP TO HAVE THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PARK ON 56 TO INDUSTRIAL PARK.

THE FUTURE AND YOU MAP TO THE MAJORITY OF THE COMMERCIAL.

SEVERAL RESPONSES IN FAVOR FROM THE AREA AT A PLAN AND MARSHALL SHARP FREEWAY.

AN ADDITIONAL ONE AT THEM DOWN TO 6.68. FEW IN OPPOSITION AGAIN IN THE SAME AREA.

THE NEXT FEW ARE FROM PROPERTY OWNERS OPPOSITION, THE 7 PROPERTIES, I'M ABOUT TO GO THROUGH WILL BE AN ITEM 6.5.

THE 4525 MILWAUKEE 4517 MILWAUKEE CURRENT ZONING IS ALLY WE'RE RECOMMENDING AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

THE 5050TH A CURRENT ZONING IS ALLY. WE'RE RECOMMENDING AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

59.02, 3, 27 ALLY RECOMMENDING AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

AND THEN THE 72 OF 4 UPLAND THE NEW 72 OF 4 REAR UPLAND AND THE 72 OF 2 UPLAND FS2 AT TO AN INDUSTRIAL PARK. WE'RE RECOMMENDING HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

AGAIN THE 7 PROPERTIES YOU'RE NOT VOTING ON AT THIS TIME THE THE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY WILL FIT IN ITEM 6.4 BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WITH ONE REFUSAL AND I WILL BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ARE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER? OKAY NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING OR AGENDA ITEM 6.4 ZONE CASE 03, 5, 4, 4, EXCLUDING THE PROPERTIES LISTED IN. JIM OUT OF 6, 5, 6, 6, IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ZONE CASE.

DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONE CASE.

I SEE NONE I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 2.39.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.4.

THE MOTION FROM COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA SECOND FROM COUNCILMAN ROSE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE AYE AYE, THOSE OPPOSED SAY NAY. THEN THAT MEANT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[5. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3544, Part 2, a request for zone changes in City Council District 5, from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), Industrial Park District (IP), and Light Industrial District (LI to Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), and Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 4517 Milwaukee Avenue, 1.06 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 37, 4525 Milwaukee Avenue, Tract A, Esplanade Addition, 5902 Spur 327, Heron Development Addition, Lot 12, 7204 Upland Avenue, 1.94 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7204 Upland Avenue R, 2.99 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, 7202 Upland Avenue, 1.35 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, and 6050 50th Street, 2.97 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 37, and consider an ordinance.]

NOW WE'LL PICK UP 6.5. SO IN CASE 3, 5, 4, 4, PART 2, WHICH REQUEST FOR SEVERAL ZONE CHANGES IN DISTRICT. COUNCIL DISTRICT 05, NOT INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS AGENDA ITEM 6, 4, 6, 6, MISS SAGER WILL YOU PROVIDE A SUMMARY ON THIS FOR US.

SO THESE ARE THE 7 PROPERTY WHERE WE RECEIVED PROPERTY OWNER WRITTEN OPPOSITION. THE MAJORITY VOTE OF CITY COUNCIL WILL BE REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR THE CHANGES TO BE APPROVED.

SO AGAIN WE HAVE 4525 AND 4517 MILWAUKEE.

ONE OF THOSE PROPERTIES IS VACANT THE OTHER IS DEVELOPED WITH RETAIL RESTAURANT PERSONAL SERVICES. CURRENTLY DONE BY INDUSTRIAL YOU'RE ASKING FOR URBAN COMMERCIAL.

THE 5050TH IS CURRENTLY THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ACTING FOR AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL. THE PROPERTY IS VACANT, BUT THE PROPERTY OWNER IS IN THE PROCESS OF LOOKING TO DEVELOP IT FOR A BAR AND AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL A BAR WOULD BE A LIMITED YOU THEY WOULD SHOULD THEY SHARE PROPERTY LINE WITH RESIDENCES THEY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO OPEN IS A PERMITTED YOU IN MY INDUSTRIAL THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT SEPARATION REQUIREMENT FROM RESIDENTIAL USE.

59-OH-2 FOR 3.27.

[00:40:03]

CURRENTLY DONE BY INDUSTRIAL YOU'RE ASKING FOR AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL. IT IS CURRENTLY AN AUTO BODY SHOP WHICH IS THE PERMITTED YOU AND THAT YOU SEE DISTRICT.

AND THEN 72-O-4 TO A 72 TO A 4 REAR AND THE 72-O-4 TO UPLAND CURRENTLY A LANDSCAPING COMPANY, THEY CAN LAND AGRICULTURAL USE.

AND AT THE FS2 AND I P WE'RE RECOMMENDING HEAVY COMMERCIAL FOR THE 2.

AGAIN STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WITH ONE RECUSAL AND IT WILL REQUIRE 6 OUT OF 7 VOTES FROM THE COUNCIL IN ORDER TO BE APPROVED AND I WILL BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS. COULCILWOMAN MARTINEZ-GARCIA. JUST FOR THE PUBLIC, WHAT WERE SOME OF THE REASONS THAT THE P&C COMMISSION DENIED IT.

AND THAT HAS KIND OF BEEN A PRECEDENT FOR THAT COMMISSION AS WE'VE GONE THROUGH EACH OF THESE DISTRICT, IT'S A PROPERTY OWNER DID NOT WANT THE ZONING THAT THE CITY HAD REQUESTED IT WAS NOT AT THEIR REQUEST AND THEY FELT IT WAS APPROPRIATE TO NOT REQUIRE THAT REASON.

MISTER COLLINS.

THROUGH THAT PROCESS DID I HEAR YOU SAY THAT EVERY BUSINESS THAT IS THERE OR THERE WAS ONLY ONE THAT WAS VACANT. BUT THE BUSINESS USE THAT WAS OCCURRING ON THOSE PROPERTIES WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THE ZONING THAT THEY HAD IT COULD BE DOWNGRADED BUT IT WAS APPROPRIATE.

SO, FOR EXAMPLE, THE THESE PROPERTIES HERE ON A PLAN.

THE AGRICULTURAL USE WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT.

BUT THEY WERE EXISTING BUSINESSES.

THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT GET THEIR NONCONFORMING. OKAY.

AND THE OWNERS AND EACH OF THESE CHANGES THAT YOU'RE HAD PROPOSED IS A DOWNGRADE TO THEIR ZONING.

IN SOME CASES, YES, BUT AGAIN HERE YOU HAVE TO WE'RE ASKING TO GO UP TO HAVE THE COMMERCIAL.

THEY ARE NOT ONLY DOWN.

BUT THE OWNER ASKED NOT TO GO.

THAT'S CORRECT. MAYBE COMMERCIAL.

THEY WANT TO KEEP THEIR CURRENT ZONING.

THANK YOU.

BUT WITH THE IN EACH CASE WOULD THEY BE APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE ZONING THAT WHAT YOU ARE PROPOSING. YES. OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.

FOR MISS SAGER ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT.

I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

FOR AGENDA ITEM 6.5.

IS ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ZONE CASE I SEE NONE ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONE CASE.

OKAY, PLEASE COME FORWARD GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS.

GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MY NAME IS CHRIS NICHOLS.

I'M A PARTNER OF THE LAW FIRM BRADY AND HAMILTON LOCATED AT 16 TO 13TH STREET.

I REPRESENT THE BUYER PROPOSED DEVELOPER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6050 50TH STREET.

THAT PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE WHAT IS A CONCEPT CALLED FAIR TO MIDLAND.

THE CONCEPT THAT IS ORIGINATED IN MIDLAND TEXAS AND THE DEVELOPERS ARE UNDER CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THAT PROPERTY FOR A FAIR TO MIDLAND PROJECT HERE IN LUBBOCK.

THEY'VE BEEN UNDER CONTRACT SINCE AUGUST OF 25.

WE HAVE A PLOT THAT IS UNDER REVIEW CURRENTLY.

WE ARE CONDUCTING OUR DUE DILIGENCE TO IDENTIFY THE NEIGHBORING LANDOWNER AND TO SECURE AN EASEMENT FROM THAT LANDOWNER FOR DRAINAGE ALONG WITH THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT THAT WE'LL BE DEDICATING TO THE CITY.

IT IS A RESTAURANT BAR AND OUTDOOR EXPERIENCE SPACE SO WE DO RECEIVE YOU KNOW MORE REVENUE FROM ALCOHOL SALES THAN WE DO FOOD JUST BECAUSE ALCOHOL IS MORE EXPENSIVE.

WE DO OFFER A FULL MENU AND WE WOULD LIKE TO THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONTINUE TO DEVELOP THAT PROJECT WITH ME TODAY IS MR. CAMPBELL FOSTER.

HE REPRESENTS THE DEVELOPER AND IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER THOSE OR MISTER FOSTER WOULD BE PLEASED TO COME UP AS WELL.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS.

TO MR. COLLINS.

THE CURRENT ZONING ON THAT PROPERTY APPROPRIATE FOR THE FAIR TO MIDLAND PLAN. YES, WE WOULD BE ENTITLED AS A MATTER OF RIGHT. OK, THANK YOU.

IS THAT BECAUSE IT'S WELL AS A MATTER RIGHT BECAUSE.

THE ZONING THE CURRENT ZONING PERMITS OUR ABILITY TO USE THE PROPERTY AS WE INTEND.

OK.

ALL RIGHT.

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.

[00:45:07]

ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

GOOD AFTERNOON JEREMY STEVE FROM ONE OH 210 QUAKER AVENUE.

I REPRESENT THE OWNER OF TWO TRACKS FORTY FIVE TWENTY FIVE MILWAUKEE AND FORTY FIVE SEVENTEEN MILWAUKEE.

BOTH OF THESE TRACKS WERE PREVIOUSLY ZONED IN ONE AND THEN THE NEW UDC ZONE THEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND THE PROPOSED ZONE IS NOW THE URBAN COMMERCIAL.

THE CONCERN HERE IS THE SHOPPING CENTER FORTY FIVE TWENTY FIVE.

MOST OF YOU GUYS WILL RECOGNIZE AS THE TRAMPOLINE PARK.

WE ACTUALLY HAVE TWO RESTAURANTS IN THERE THAT BOTH SERVE ALCOHOL.

ONE OF THEM IS MULLIGAN'S WHICH IS A GOLF SIMULATOR AND THE OTHER ONE JUST OPENED THIS WEEK OUTLAW GRILL AND THE CONCERN WITH THIS IS THE POTENTIAL DOWN ZONE COULD MAKE THOSE NONCONFORMING IF THE LIQUOR LICENSE WERE TO CHANGE.

SO SOME OF THEIR USE THIS COULD RESTRICT THAT FUTURE USE AND HARM THE CENTER.

IT'S BEEN VERY DIFFICULT TO LEASE THAT CENTER UP AND YOU KNOW DON'T NEED ANY HELP TRYING TO MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT IN THE FUTURE.

THIS DIDN'T LEAVE AND WE GET SOMEBODY ELSE IN THERE WITH A DIFFERENT LICENSE.

AND THEN THE SECOND ONE IS FORTY FIVE SEVENTEEN WHICH IS THE VACANT LAND THAT WAS ALSO UNDER CONTRACT TO BE PURCHASED BY A DEVELOPER OUT OF FLORIDA AND ITS CURRENT USE IS RESTAURANT WHICH WOULD BE CONFORMING BUT IT COULD AFFECT THE FUTURE USE IF THEY DID HAVE SOME SORT OF ALCOHOL SO WE JUST RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU KEEP THE ZONING THE WAY IT IS.

THANK YOU FOR SAYING WE SHOULD.

ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

I SEE NONE SO I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 2.42 P.M.

ALL RIGHT.

BECAUSE THE PERCENTAGE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ZONING CASE WILL REQUIRE AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF SIX COUNCIL MEMBERS TO APPROVE THIS CHANGE.

SO IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM SIX POINT FIVE.

I HEAR NO MOTION SO THAT FAILS FOR LACK OF A MOTION.

ALL RIGHT?

[6. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3544, Part 3, a request for zone changes in City Council District 5, from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 7009 Marsha Sharp Freeway, 7.02 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 30, and consider an ordinance.]

ALL RIGHT.

LET'S MOVE ON TO TAKE UP ITEM AGENDA ITEM SIX POINT SIX ZONE CASE THREE FIVE FOUR FOUR PART THREE.

THANK YOU MAYOR.

THIS IS A CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY AT THE FS2 TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

THIS IS THE PROPERTY THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CHOSE TO VOTE ON SEPARATELY FROM THE OTHER CASES WE HAVE HEARD.

IT IS LOCATED AT SEVEN THOUSAND NINE MARSHALL SHARP FREEWAY.

CURRENT ZONING IS SF2 TO REMAKE RECOMMENDED ZONING WITH HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

IT IS OWNED BY TOM'S TREE PLANE.

YOU CAN SEE THE SMALL RED SQUARE ON THE ZONING MAP TO THE RIGHT.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OF PROPERTY OWNER OPPOSITION TO THIS REZONING THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY.

ONE OF THOSE OWNERS SPOKE IN OPPOSITION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

YOU HAVE THEIR OPPOSITION LETTER IN YOUR PACKET.

THEY LATER SPOKE WITH THE OWNER OF TOM'S TREE PLACE.

THEY CAME TO AN AGREEMENT THAT THEY WOULD BOTH BE IN SUPPORT OF AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL IN LIEU OF HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

SO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF THE REQUEST FOR HEAVY COMMERCIAL BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WITH ONE RECUSAL.

BUT BOTH PROPERTY OWNERS ARE IN SUPPORT OF AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL IF COUNCIL FEELS THAT IS APPROPRIATE.

THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY VOTE BECAUSE WE DID NOT HAVE WRITTEN OPPOSITION FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OWNER.

AND ILL BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS SAGER.

SO CURRENTLY WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA IS STILL HEAVY COMMERCIAL CORRECT, CORRECT, OKAY, SO COULD WE POTENTIALLY CHANGE THE AGENDA ITEM TO AUTO CAR DOES THAT HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE PROCESS.

NOW YOU CAN YOU CAN DO THAT BECAUSE OUR OWN COMMERCIAL MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN HEAVY COMMERCIAL SO YOU CAN ACTUALLY MAKE THAT A PART OF THE MOTION THAT YOU HAVE WHEN WE WILL GET TO THAT POINT OKAY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AND NOW THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 6.6 ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS CASE PLEASE COME FORWARD.

GOOD AFTERNOON MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I'M ALEX SCARBOROUGH 03,009 MESA AND I'M HERE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR AND ALSO COMPLIMENT.

KRISTEN AND HER STAFF.

WORKING WITH US THROUGH THIS AND WE REALLY APPRECIATE NOT HAVE TO TAKE IT THROUGH ANOTHER ZONE CASE SO THIS WOULD BE VERY GOOD FOR US AND WE COMPLETELY AGREE WITH WHAT THE OPPOSITION WAS WE'RE WE'RE GREAT WITH THE ZONING AS RECOMMENDED.THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. SCARBOROUGH ANYONE ELSE.

WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR.

[00:50:02]

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION.

I SEE THAT'S WHAT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 2.51.

ALL RIGHT NOW IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.6.

MISTER WAY TO SEE YOUR YOU OKAY, YOU'RE YOU'RE GOOD.

OKAY, MAYBE HIM.

I WAS GOING TO ASK THE RIGHT TO DO IT CAN I DO IT AS A MOTION CAN I DO IT AS A MOTION JUST WITH AN AMENDMENT ALREADY OR DO WE NEED TO MOVE TO APPROVE AND THEN A MINUTE AFTER YOU YOU CAN GO AHEAD MAKE THE MOTION TO CHANGE THE ZONING TO WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CHANGE TO PERFECT ALL RIGHT, I'M GOING TO MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM 6.6 BUT AMEND THAT IT WILL GO FROM SF 2 TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO SF TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO AUTO.

COMMERCIAL THAT IT BE GOING A MOTION TO MOVE FROM SF TO THE AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL. THANK YOU.

AND WE HAVE A SECOND ON THAT ALL RIGHT.

ANY DISCUSSION.

I SEE NONE.

ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING AND SO WE'RE JUST APPROVING AN AMENDED MOTION AT THIS POINT THERE WILL NOT BE A SECOND VOTE AND IT'S NOT EVEN AN AMENDED MOTION YEARS. IT IS IT'S A SUBSTITUTED MOTION TO TRY TO OKAY ALL RIGHT SO ALL IN FAVOR LET ME KNOW WE'RE SAYING AYE AYE ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY. I HEAR NONE ALL RIGHT THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[7. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 2538-QQ, a request of Lubbock Telcom, Inc., for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 8110 19th Street, located north of 19th Street and west of Alcove Avenue, on 1.4 acres of unplatted land out of Block D-6, Section 2, and consider an ordinance.]

ALL RIGHT MOVING ON TO 6.7 ZONE CASE 2, 5, 3, 8, DASH Q Q.

IT'S A GOOD THING HERE AND 6.7 IS A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOADING THE SINGLE-FAMILY SF 2 TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL.

WE SENT OUT 12 NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVING ONE IN FAVOR.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF 19 WEST OF ALCOA.

THE ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS AN EXISTING BUSINESS ON THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH OTHER BUSINESSES ON 19TH STREET.

CURRENT ZONING IS LOOKING TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY SF 2.

THERE IS ADDITIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF 19 STREET.

FUTURE LAND YOU PLAN TO MAKE THE PROPERTY FOR LOADED THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.

HERE'S A PHOTO OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.

THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR LOADED CITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.

ALTHOUGH THE REQUEST FOR HEAVY COMMERCIAL IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DEFINITION IS APPROPRIATE ALONG WITH FULL ARTERIAL AND ADJACENT TO OTHER HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING.