[1. Executive Session]
[00:00:06]
OKAY. I WILL NOW OPEN THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL FOR SEPTEMBER 22ND, 2026. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 551.071 TO CONSULT WITH AND SEEK THE ADVICE OF THE CITY'S LEGAL COUNSEL, SECTION 551.072 TO DISCUSS THE PURCHASE EXCHANGE OR VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY, AND SECTION 551.074 TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS, AND SECTION 551.0761 TO DISCUSS AND DELIBERATE ON MEASURES TO PROTECT A CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY. THE CITY COUNCIL IS RECESSING AT 12:31 P.M. ALL
[1. Invocation]
RIGHT, THE COUNCIL IS NOW RECONVENING IN OPEN SESSION, AND WE WILL BEGIN BY TAKING UP OUR CEREMONIAL ITEMS. SO TO BEGIN WITH, I'M GOING TO CALL ON REVEREND JUDITH SARKOZY BRANDT WITH FOREST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, AND SHE'S ALSO A CHAPLAIN AT COVENANT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, TO LEAD US IN OUR INVOCATION, AFTER WHICH OUR MAYOR PRO TEM WILL LEAD US IN OUR PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE. WILL YOU PLEASE STAND AS YOU ARE ABLE? THANK YOU. IT IS MY HONOR TO BE HERE AND LIFT MY VOICE IN PRAYER. PLEASE JOIN YOUR HEARTS WITH MINE AS I APPROACH OUR CREATOR. HOLY AND LOVING GOD, WE COME BEFORE YOU WITH HUMILITY AND THANKSGIVING, KNOWING THAT YOU HAVE PRECEDED US INTO THIS PLACE AND PREPARED US FOR THIS TIME. I ASK THAT IN THE PRESENCE OF ALL THESE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN GATHERED FROM DIFFERENT WALKS OF LIFE AND GIFTED BY YOU WITH DIFFERENT GIFTS AND THE SAME POWERFUL GRACE, THAT WE MAY TOGETHER WORK TO THE BENEFIT OF YOUR KINGDOM HERE ON EARTH. WE KNOW THAT WE ALL HAVE OUR JOBS TO DO. YOU HAVE CALLED US IN DIFFERENT WAYS, AND YET WE ARE VERY MINDFUL OF THE VERY FIRST COMMAND YOU GAVE TO THE ONES YOU BREATHE LIFE INTO, AND THAT IS TO PROTECT AND CARE FOR YOUR CREATION. SO HELP US BE FAITHFUL AND STRIDENT IN THAT. HELP US TO KNOW THAT EVERYTHING THAT WE DO MATTERS.IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE TO OTHERS, AND THEREFORE IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE TO YOU.
BLESS THE WORK AND THE TIME THAT IS BEING SPENT HERE. SEND YOUR HOLY SPIRIT TO GUIDE AND GUARD THE STEPS OF ALL WHO WILL BE MAKING DECISIONS, AND TOGETHER, LORD, MAY WE HONOR AND GLORIFY YOU. THIS WE ASK HUMBLY IN THE NAME OF THE ONE YOU SENT TO GIVE HIS LIFE FOR US, WHO TOGETHER WITH YOU AND THE HOLY SPIRIT ARE ONE GOD FOREVER AND EVER. AND ALL GOD'S PEOPLE SAID.
[2. Pledges of Allegiance]
NOW YOU'LL JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGES TO THE UNITED STATES AND TEXAS FLAG.I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE, TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE.
THANK YOU, REVEREND BRANDT, AND IT'S ALWAYS GOOD TO HEAR SO MANY VOICES RAISED IN A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I LOVE THAT. UM, LOVE
[3. Special Recognition of First Responders]
TO HEAR THAT. SO, UH, WE'RE GOING TO, UH, PROCEED RIGHT NOW WITH A SPECIAL, UH, RECOGNITION, UH, THAT I HAVE TODAY AND WAS BROUGHT FORWARD AND REQUESTED BY A GROUP OF, UH, OF FOLKS THAT CA- CALL THEMSELVES HIGH IMPACT AND LUBBOCK UNITY FOR ACTION. IF YOU'RE HERE WITH THAT GROUP, WOULD YOU STAND UP TODAY? WE THANK YOU, UH, FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD, AND, UH, WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO TODAY IS HONOR AND ESPECIALLY RECOGNIZE OUR FIRST RESPONDERS IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND WE HAVE A NUMBER OF THEM PRESENT WITH US TODAY REPRESENTING DIFFERENT, UH, GROUPS IN OUR CITY AND COUNTY THAT, UH, PROTECT US. I THINK WE HAVE MEMBERS OF OUR, AND AS I CALL ON YOU, IF YOU'D PLEASE STAND, OUR LUBBOCK POLICE FORCE, WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND? THANK YOU.UH, YOU MAY BE SEATED. UH, WE HAVE PEOPLE FROM OUR, UH, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LUBBOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
WOULD Y'ALL STAND, PLEASE? THANK YOU. AND WE HAVE MEMBERS OF UMC EMS HERE TODAY WITH US. WOULD Y'ALL STAND? AND HAVE I LEFT ANYBODY OUT? IS ANYBODY ELSE HERE REPRESENTING ANY OTHER GROUP OF OUR FIRST RESPONDERS? THIS PROBABLY DOESN'T ENCOMPASS
[00:05:01]
EVERYBODY THAT FALLS WITHIN THAT CATEGORY, BUT, UH, WE APPRECIATE YOU ALL FOR SHOWING UP SO THAT WE CAN SHOW YOU, UH, SPECIAL RECOGNITION, AND, UH, I'M GOING TO READ THE SPECIAL RECOGNITION NOW ON BEHALF OF US, UH, RECOGNIZING THIS AS FIRST RESPONDERS DAY. WHEREAS OUR FIRST RESPONDERS SERVE WITH COURAGE, COMPASSION, AND AN UNWAVERING COMMITMENT TO OTHERS, FROM PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY TO PROVIDING LIFE-SAVING CARE AND ASSISTANCE, THEIR WORK REACHES INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES THROUGHOUT LUBBOCK AND PROVIDES AN IMPORTANT SENSE OF SAFETY AND REASSURANCE TO OUR COMMUNITY. AND WHEREAS THE FIRST RESPONDERS DAY IS CELEBRATED IN OCTOBER, AND IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO STAND READY TO PROTECT, ASSIST, AND CARE FOR OUR COMMUNITY EACH AND EVERY DAY. OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, FIREFIGHTERS, EMERGENCY MEDICAL PERSONNEL, DISPATCHERS, AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, AND ALL OTHER EMERGENCY RESPONDERS ARE OFTEN AMONG THE FIRST TO ARRIVE WHEN OUR CITIZENS FACE AN EMERGENCY OR A MOMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN THEIR LIVES. AND WHEREAS THIS YEAR HOLDS SPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE AS OUR NATION MARKS THE 25TH SOMBER ANNIVERSARY OF SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001, AND WE REMEMBER TOGETHER THE EXTRAORDINARY BRAVERY SHOWN BY FIRST RESPONDERS DURING ONE OF THE DARKEST DAYS IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY. THEIR ACTIONS CONTINUE TO REMIND US OF THE SELFLESSNESS AND STRENGTH DEMONSTRATED BY THOSE WHO PUT THE WELL-BEING OF OTHERS BEFORE THEIR OWN.AND WHEREAS IT'S FITTING TO RECOGNIZE LUBBOCK'S FIRST RESPONDERS AND EXPRESS OUR APPRECIATION FOR THE MANY WAYS THEY CARE FOR OUR CITIZENS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, THEIR READINESS TO RESPOND, HELP OTHERS, AND REMAIN STEADY IN DIFFICULT CIRCUMSTANCES REFLECTS THE CHARACTER AND THE STRONG HEARTS OF THOSE WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITY SO VERY WELL. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE GREAT CITY OF LUBBOCK, DO HEREBY PROUDLY RECOGNIZE OCTOBER 28TH, 2026 AS FIRST RESPONDERS DAY IN LUBBOCK, AND ENCOURAGE ALL OUR CITIZENS TO JOIN US AS WE THANK OUR FIRST RESPONDERS FOR THEIR COURAGE, DEDICATION, AND CARE FOR OTHERS.
TO RECOGNIZE THEM FOR THEIR EXTREME BRAVERY AND HUMANITY, AND WE WANT TO DEMONSTRATE EVERY DAY, WHICH THEY DEMONSTRATE EVERY DAY, AND CONTINUE SUPPORTING OUR FIRST RESPONDERS. EVEN THOUGH THIS IS ONE DAY, WE HAVE A MONTH TO LET THEM KNOW HOW MUCH WE DO VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THEM, AND I CAN SAY WITHOUT QUESTION, WE HAVE THE FINEST GROUP OF FIRST RESPONDERS HERE IN, UH, THIS CITY, AND WE APPRECIATE EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO FOR US EVERY DAY. UH, LET'S GIVE THEM OUR THANKS. ALL RIGHT, I HAVE ONE OTHER THING I WANT TO JUST BRING TO PEOPLE'S ATTENTION. UH, IT'S SOMETHING WE'RE DOING HERE WE'VE NOT DONE IN A WHILE, BUT UH, HOPEFULLY IT WILL HAVE SOME INTEREST, UH, TO CITIZENS HERE IN OUR COMMUNITY. IF YOU CAN BRING UP THIS, UH, SLIDE, WE HAVE A MUNICIPAL COURT CASE RESOLUTION PROGRAM. SO, TO ANYONE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE OR ANYONE WATCHING ONLINE, IF YOU HAVE AN OUTSTANDING CASE IN OUR MUNICIPAL COURT, THAT'S ONLY GOOD FOR MUNICIPAL COURT, CAN'T DO ANYTHING FOR ANY OTHER COURT. UM, IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR ON YOUR SCHEDULED COURT DATE FOR A TRAFFIC VIOLATION, UH, OR YOU, UM, UH, YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR, WHICH IF THERE WAS AN ARREST WARRANT ISSUED FOR THAT, THAT WOULD BE WAIVED, AND YOU CAN CLEAR YOUR WARRANTS WITHOUT ANY DANGER OF ARREST.
ALL RIGHT? YOU NEED TO BRING YOUR ID WITH YOU AND YOUR JAIL CARD, IF APPLICABLE, AND THE DATES OF THIS OCTOBER 1ST THROUGH THE 16TH, AND YOU CAN FIND YOUR CASE BY VISITING MYLUBBOCK.US/COURT, AND WE JUST INVITE EVERYONE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS, UH, ONE TIME OFFER OF A REPRIEVE OR A WAIVER ON THAT SO WE CAN CLEAR THESE THINGS OUT. UH, IT, IT ASSISTS US, AND I'M PRETTY SURE IT WILL ASSIST THOSE WHO WANT TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT. SO I JUST WANT TO GET THE WORD OUT TO ANYBODY THAT MIGHT BE WATCHING, OR IF YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW SOMEBODY THAT THIS MIGHT, UH, APPLY TO, PLEASE LET THEM KNOW OF THIS OPPORTUNITY, THAT THEY CAN TAKE CARE OF IT AND WON'T HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND THE CITY WONDERING, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IF THEY GET STOPPED.
IT'S NOT AN INVITATION TO SPEED AGAIN, THOUGH, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO, UM, I WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THAT. ALL RIGHT. LET'S MOVE FORWARD, AND UH,
[3. Citizen Comments - According to Lubbock City Council Rules, any citizen wishing to appear in-person before a regular meeting of the City Council, regarding any matter posted on the City Council Agenda below, shall complete the sign-up form provided at the meeting, no later than 2:00 p.m. on September 22, 2026. Citizen Comments provide an opportunity for citizens to make comments and express a position on agenda items. ]
NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OUR, UM, TAKE UP OUR S- UH, CITY COMMENT- UH, CITIZEN COMMENTS AS I CALL THIS MEETING[00:10:01]
TO ORDER. UH, ACCORDING TO OUR RULES, ANY CITIZEN WISHING TO APPEAR BEFORE A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, UH, REGARDING ANY MATTER POSTED ON OUR AGENDA SHALL COMPLETE THE SIGN UP, UH, ON THE DATE, UH, BEFORE THE START OF THE MEETING, AND WE ASK THAT YOU GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS WHEN YOU COME FORWARD. YOU'LL HAVE 3 MINUTES TO SPEAK. THE TIMER IS HERE SO YOU CAN LOOK AT YOUR TIME. THERE'S ALSO LIGHTS ON THE, UH, PODIUM THERE, UM, GREEN LIGHT WHILE YOU'RE SPEAKING, UH, YELLOW LIGHT WHEN YOU'VE GOT 30 SECONDS LEFT, A RED LIGHT WHEN YOU NEED TO WRAP UP, UH, YOUR COMMENTS.SO, UH, WE HAVE, I BELIEVE, 2 PEOPLE TODAY WHO HAVE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. THE FIRST IS CATHAL ANDERSON. UH, MS. ANDERSON, IF YOU WILL COME FORWARD, AND UH, UH, I THINK YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON ITEM, UH, AGENDA ITEM 6.11.
GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS CATHAL ANDERSON. MY ADDRESS IS 2914 UTE AVENUE HERE IN LUBBOCK. I WILL ADDRESS, LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN OF THE BATTLE CENTER OF THE MORATORIUM THAT WE HAVE BEEN ASKED, WE HAVE BEEN ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE. IT, IT AMAZED ME TO SEE HOW THE CONVERSATION OF THE AI DATA CENTER HAS BEEN SPOKEN OF FOR SO LONG, OR DISCUSSED SO LONG. THE CITIZENS HAVE SPOKEN THAT THEY DO NOT WANT IT, WITH 2400 PLUS SIGNATURES. I HEARD A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL STATE THAT THE COUNCIL DOES IT FOR THE GOOD, WHAT THE COUNCIL DOES FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THE CITIZENS IN LUBBOCK. I ALSO HEARD, COULD BE A RUMOR, WHICH I DOUBT, THAT IF A DATA CENTER COME, IT WILL BE LOCATED IN EAST NORTH TO EAST LUBBOCK. OUR NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE BEEN CRUSHED BY INDUSTRY, SO THAT'S WHY I'M SPEAKING UP FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO SUFFER DIGITAL REDLINING IN THIS CITY. WE'VE ALREADY BEEN CRUSHED BY INDUSTRY REDLINING IN THIS CITY. IF YOU'RE GONNA DO THE GOOD FOR ALL CITIZENS IN LUBBOCK, START DOING THE GOOD FOR THOSE IN NORTH AND EAST LUBBOCK. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, MISS ANDERSON. UH, NEXT, UH, STEVEN SANDERS IS ASKED TO SPEAK. MR. SANDERS.
MY NAME IS STEVEN SANDERS. I LIVE AT 3404 75TH STREET. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. UM, I AM THE FOUNDER OF SAVE LUBBOCK. I AM HERE TODAY FIRST TO FOREMOST, UH, SAY THANK YOU. UH, I'VE BEEN PRETTY ROUGH AT TIMES IN IN THE PAST, UH, JUST BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THIS ISSUE. UH, BUT I WANT TO THANK EACH COUNCIL MEMBER WHO TOOK TIME TO MEET WITH ME, LISTEN TO CITIZENS, ASK DIFFICULT QUESTIONS, AND WORK TOWARDS A SOLUTION THAT IS BOTH LAWFUL AND MEANINGFUL. I WANT TO GIVE PARTICULAR THANKS TO MAYOR MARK MCBRAYER FOR SITTING DOWN WITH ME AND GOING THROUGH THIS RESOLUTION LINE BY LINE. MARK DRANK A LOT OF COFFEE WHILE WE DID THIS RESOLUTION, AND SO I DON'T, I WON'T BE ABLE TO REPLACE THE COFFEE THAT I MADE HIM DRINK, BUT UH, I'M GLAD HE DRANK IT.
UH, THAT KIND OF LEADERSHIP DOES MATTER TO ME. UM, IT SHOWED GENUINE WILLINGNESS TO SIMPLY, NOT TO SIMPLY HEAR THE CONCERNS OF THE PEOPLE, BUT TO HELP FIND A RESPONSIBLE PATH FORWARD. MY S- MANY CITIZENS CAME TOGETHER TO PETITION FOR AN 18-MONTH MORATORIUM.
THE PETITION WAS VALIDATED, AND WE ACHIEVED THE SIGNATURES REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL LENGTH COULD NOT MOVE FORWARD OR CANNOT MOVE FORWARD UNDER THE LAW, THE PEOPLE'S MESSAGE IS IS IS STILL VERY CLEAR. LUBBOCK WANTS TIME, SPACE TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE SAFEGUARDS IN PLACE BEFORE IRRESPONSIBLE OR IRREVERSIBLE DECISIONS ARE MADE. THE RESOLUTION REPRESENTS THE MAXIMUM PERIOD LEGALLY AVAILABLE TO US, AND I AM SINCERELY GRATEFUL FOR IT. IT IS NOT 18 MONTHS, BUT IT IS A MEANINGFUL STEP.
[00:15:01]
IT GIVES OUR CITY TIME TO ESTABLISH GUARDRAILS, PROTECT OUR RESOURCES, CONSIDER THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS ON OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, AND DEVELOP A CLEAR PLAN RATHER THAN RUSHING FORWARD WITHOUT ADEQUATE PREPARATION.THIS RESOLUTION ALSO REPRESENTS A COMMITMENT TO RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP OF TAX DOLLARS BECAUSE OF THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL, CITY, CITY STAFF, CONCERNED CITIZENS, CITIZENS OF LUBBOCK, THOSE WHO ARE STANDING BEHIND ME, OR SITTING BEHIND ME. YES, THANK YOU, MISS PHYLLIS.
WE HAVE A SOLUTION THAT CAN BE DECIDED HERE TODAY.
BY ADOPTING THIS RESOLUTION, THE CITY CAN AVOID THE COST OF TAKING THE ORIGINAL PETITION LANGUAGE TO THE BALLOT IN MAY, S- SAVE LUBBOCK TAXPAYERS AN ESTIMATED 3,000. I ASK THAT YOU WOULD VOTE FOR THIS RESOLUTION TODAY, AS IT WILL GIVE US TIME TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE ALL THE GUARDRAILS IN PLACE AND THAT WE HAVE DONE OUR DUE DILIGENCE FOR THE CITIZENS WHO ARE LOOKING FOR US TO LEAD THEM IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, SANDERS. APPRECIATE THAT. OKAY, THAT'S ALL WE HAVE FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS TODAY.
[4. Minutes]
UH, WE'LL NOW TAKE UP AGENDA ITEMS, UH, 4.1 AND THE MINUTES FROM OUR REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, WHICH WERE INCLUDED IN OUR CITIZEN, OUR, UH, CITY COUNCIL PACKETS. UH, THIS IS, UH, MINUTES FOR AUGUST 25TH AND THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 1ST.SO THERE'S, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 4.1? SO MOVED.
ALL RIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
ANY DISCUSSION, ANY AMENDMENTS OR ADDITIONS? I SEE NONE. ALL RIGHT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. I HEAR NONE. THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT, WE'RE NOW GOING
[5. Consent Agenda - Items considered to be routine are enacted by one motion without separate discussion. If the City Council desires to discuss an item, the item is removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.]
TO TAKE UP OUR CONSENT AGENDA, UH, AND ITEMS TO BE CONS- CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE ARE ENACTED IN ONE MOTION WITHOUT SEPARATE DISCUSSION.HOWEVER, IF THERE'S A DESIRE ON THE CITY COUNCIL'S PART TO DISCUSS ANY PARTICULAR ITEM, IT'S REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGES- AGENDA AND CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. SO, UH, IN TAKING UP THE CONSENT AGENDA, THERE'S BEEN A REQUEST, UH, TO PULL AGENDA ITEMS 5.13, 1, 04, 1, 5, AND 2, 2. UH, AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AGENDA ITEMS 5.13, 5.14, 5.15, AND 5.22. IS THERE SUCH A MOTION? SO MOVED.
I HAVE A MOTION. I HAVE A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? UH, IF NOT, I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY. I HEAR NONE.
THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
SO WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ITEM 5.3 TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION
[13. Resolution - Engineering: Consider a resolution receiving the Semi-Annual Report from the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, regarding the progress and implementation of the Impact Fee Program.]
RECEIVING A SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGARDING THE PROGRESS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM. I'M GOING TO CALL ON BAILEY RATCLIFFE, OUR S- ASSISTANT ENGINEER, TO PROVIDE A STAFF BRIEFING ON THIS.GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRIEF YOU ON THIS ITEM. I'M GOING TO START WITH JUST A BRIEF, UH, BACKGROUND ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, OR CIAC. UH, THE CIAC WAS CREATED ON JUNE 11TH, 2019 BY RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL, AND IT WAS ORIGINALLY CREATED WITH 7 MEMBERS THAT AT LEAST 40% REPRESENTED REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT BUILDING INDUSTRIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
AND UH, THAT CIAC ADVISORY COMMITTEE RESEARCHED IMPACT FEES, EVENTUALLY BROUGHT AN ORDINANCE TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION, AND NOW THE CIAC OVERSEES THE IMPACT FEE PROGRAM, UH, AND PROVIDES OVERSIGHT ON CITY STAFF. UH, THE CIAC WAS EXPANDED TO 8 MEMBERS IN 2025 TO REFLECT AN UPDATE IN STATE LAW. AND THE CIAC IS ALSO REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODICAL UPDATES TO CITY COUNCIL. SO OUR CURRENT CIAC MEMBERS RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE CHRIS BERRY, OUR CHAIR, AND HE'S UNAVAILABLE TO BE HERE TODAY, BUT OUR VICE CHAIR, KEITH PATRICK, IS HERE TODAY. OH, HE'S RIGHT BEHIND ME. AND THEN WE HAVE VICTOR FLORES MOGUEL, CLARK LAMERT, NORMA JOHNSON, CLAY INGER, MONICA DELGADO, AND MATT VANCE. AND I ALSO JUST WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THOSE CITIZENS FOR DEDICATING THEIR TIME AND EXPERTISE TO THIS BOARD. SO THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF OUR IMPACT FEE BALANCES. WE HAVE ALL THE REVENUE RECEIVED, FEES DISTRIBUTED, AND REMAINING FUNDS FOR EACH SERVICE AREA. AND ALSO IN THE, UM, IN THIS REPORT, THERE ARE THREE OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL. UH, THE FIRST OBSERVATION IS THAT THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE PROGRAM IS BEING COLLECTED AND MAINTAINED AND DISTRIBUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW AND CITY ORDINANCE.
UH, THE CIAC ALSO RECOMMEND- RECOMMENDS FOR CITY COUNCIL TO USE IMPACT FEES AS YOU SEE FIT TO SUPPORT ANY BOND PROJECTS AS NEEDED, AND ALSO THE CIAC REQUESTS TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY COLLECTIONS AND EXPENDITURES
[00:20:02]
AT EACH SCHEDULED MEETING, SO I DO THAT WITH THE CIAC EVERY TIME THEY MEET. AND AT THIS TIME, I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, MY, MY ONE QUESTION IS THOSE, THOSE FUNDS, AND THIS WAS JUST TO CLEAR UP AN ITEM, EVEN THOUGH WE VOTED TO SET THE IMPACT FEE AT ZERO, THERE ARE STILL FUNDS IN THOSE, UH, D- UH, THAT ARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO DIFFERENT SECTIONS OF OUR CITY, AND THOSE FUNDS WOULD BE USED IN THOSE PARTICULAR SECTIONS OF THE CITY, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT, SIR.
ALL RIGHT, IT'S NOT LUMPED TOGETHER AND AND TO BE USED HOWEVER WE WANT.
THEY CAN AGAIN BE USED FOR BOND PROGRAMS THAT EXIST IN THOSE PARTS OF THE CITY WHERE THEY WERE COLLECTED.
YES, SIR, AS LONG AS THOSE PROJECTS WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE ORIGINAL IMPACT FEE STUDY, AND THEY ALL WERE.
ALL RIGHT, APPRECIATE IT. IF IT'S OKAY WITH EVERYONE, I'LL WAIT TILL THE END TO TAKE ONE VOTE ON ALL THESE ITEMS SO WE DON'T TAKE ON THEM INDIVIDUALLY. SO WE'LL
[14. Resolution - Public Health Services: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Agreement, and all related documents, by and between the City of Lubbock, on behalf of its Health Department, and the National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Inc., to assist the City of Lubbock with the launch of a regional Community Health Worker Hub.]
TAKE UP, UH, ITEM, UH, 5.14.THIS IS A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ME TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, INCORPORATED, TO ASSIST THE CITY OF LUBBOCK WITH THE LAUNCH OF A REGIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER HUB, AND I WILL CALL ON DR.
CATHERINE WELLS, DIRECTOR OF OUR PUBLIC HEALTH, TO PROVIDE A STAFF BRIEFING ON THAT.
WHICH ONE IS IT? OH, I DON'T HAVE SLIDES.
WELLS ON YOUR RECENT, UH, AWARD.
TELL US WHAT THAT AWARD WAS AGAIN, PLEASE.
I WAS RECOGNIZED BY THE TEXAS IMMUNIZATION PARTNERSHIP, WHICH IS A COLLABORATION OF MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH GROUPS, UH, FOR OUR RESPONSE TO THE MEASLES OUTBREAK AND OUR ADVOCACY AROUND, UM, MAKING SURE THAT OUR, UM, RESIDENTS HAVE ACCESS TO VACCINES.
WHICH WAS OUTSTANDING. THANK YOU.
YES, THANK YOU. IT WAS QUITE AN HONOR. YEAH. OH. WELL, GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
UM, TODAY WE HAVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERS- OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CDC FOUNDATION ON THE AGENDA. UM, THE CDC FOUNDATION IS AN INDEPENDENT NONPROFIT THAT WAS ACTUALLY CREATED BY CONGRESS, UM, TO ESTABLISH- ESTABLISH FIL- PHILANTHROPIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS TO IMPROVE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH AND SAFETY.
SO THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN CDC.
UM, THE FOUNDATION INVESTS IN INTERNATIONAL, FEDERAL, STATE, AND MORE RECENTLY STARTING TO INVEST IN LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS. AND THIS IS ACTUALLY THE FIRST TIME THAT THE CDC FOUNDATION HAS BEEN INTERESTED IN WEST TEXAS, AND I REALLY HOPE THAT THIS CAN BE A START OF A LONG-TERM COLLABORATION, UM, WITH THIS ORGANIZATION.
THEY HAVE ACCESS TO A LOT OF FUNDING AND EXPERTS THAT WE CAN BRING TO THIS AREA. UM, THIS AGREEMENT FUNDS ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER, UM, FOR 2 YEARS IN THE AMOUNT OF, UH, 122,586 DOLLARS, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? UH, YES, COUNCILWOMAN GARCIA.
AGAIN, CONGRATULATIONS, VERY WELL DESERVED. BUT JUST FOR THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT A COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER IS? UM, SURE. SO A COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER IS ACTUALLY, UM, OUR ON THE GROUND, UM, PUBLIC HEALTH WORKFORCE. UM, THEY'RE USUALLY... THE GOAL WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS IS TO FIND INDIVIDUALS IN A COMMUNITY THAT KNOW A COMMUNITY, UM, WHO REALLY WANT TO HELP SUPPORT IMPROVING, UM, THE HEALTH OF THEIR COMMUNITY. AND WHAT WE DO AT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS WE'LL BRING THEM IN. THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE. UM, WE BRING THEM IN, WE PROVIDE THEM TRAINING, TALK TO THEM ABOUT BOTH THE HEALTHCARE AND, UM, UH, SOCIAL SERVICE SYSTEM IN OUR COMMUNITY, UM, AND HAVE THEM WORKING WITH, UM, KIND OF PEOPLE THEY'RE FAMILIAR WITH, UM, TO HELP DO LINKAGE AND NAVIGATION. UM, SO REALLY- IS IT JUST GOING TO BE ONE PERSON, OR WILL THERE BE MORE THAN ONE? THIS, UM, INITIAL GRANT IS ONE PERSON.
UM, WHAT WE'RE EXPECTING TO HAVE HAPPEN IS WITH THE RURAL TRANSFORMATION MONEY THAT THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE RELEASED, AND THE OTHER RURAL MONEY THAT CAME FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WE'RE GOING TO START SEEING LOTS OF COMMUNITIES, UM, WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS.
UM, SO THIS WOULD BE ONE FOR LUBBOCK. WE'RE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THOSE, UM, THOSE FUNDS, UM, BUT WE DO EXPECT OTHER COMMUNITIES TO START HAVING THEM. SO EVENTUALLY WE'D LIKE TO HAVE LIKE A LITTLE NETWORK OF PEOPLE THAT ARE COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS THAT CAN WORK TOGETHER, UM, TO HELP NAVIGATE KIND OF COLLECTIVELY PEOPLE IN THE AREA.
BUT THIS PERSON WOULD BE FOCUSED ON LUBBOCK COUNTY.
[00:25:02]
THANK YOU.ALL RIGHT, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THIS POSITION IS FULLY PAID BY THE GRANT THAT WE WOULD GET FROM THE, UH, UH, CDCPI, I GUESS, RIGHT? YES, SO IT WILL COVER.
IT'S NOT, THERE'S NOT A MATCHING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT THAT WE GIVE.
NO, 100% FUNDED, UM, FOR 2 YEARS, AND THE PERSON WILL BE A FULL CITY EMPLOYEE WITH BENEFITS.
THAT'S ONE OF OUR GOALS WITH BRINGING IN COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS IS ALSO TO OFFER THEM THOSE BENEFITS, AND, YOU KNOW, MAYBE THAT WILL ALLOW THEM TO PROMOTE INTO ANOTHER POSITION WITHIN THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT THAT'S, ALL RIGHT.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, DR. WELLS. APPRECIATE IT. ALL
[15. Resolution - Community Development: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute, for and on behalf of the City of Lubbock, Amendment No. 1, to Contract 18503, the HOME Investment Partnerships Program - American Rescue Plan Funding Agreement for Non-Congregate Shelters, by and between the City of Lubbock, Community Development and Serve Lubbock. ]
RIGHT, ITEM 5.15 IS CONSIDERING A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE ME TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO CONTRACT 18503, THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, AS PART OF THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR NON-CONGREGATE SHELTERS WITH SERVE LUBBOCK. UH, KAREN MURPHY, THERE YOU ARE, UH, IS GOING TO, UH, UH, OUR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR IS GOING TO PROVIDE SOME STAFF BRIEFING ON THIS.OKAY. GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS GRANT IS A ONE-TIME GRANT.
IT'S FROM HUD, AND IT'S VERY CONFUSING BECAUSE IT SAYS AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN. UM, BUT THIS IS WHAT HUD, WE HAD COVID DOLLARS, AND NOW WE HAVE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN. THIS IS A ONE-TIME GRANT. THEY JUST PUT IT UNDER HOME BECAUSE THAT'S FOR HOUSING. UM, AND SO UNDER THAT GRANT, WE HAVE, UH, WE GOT IT IN 2021, AND THIS IS JUST AN AMENDMENT TO THE ALREADY GRANT, UM, AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE WITH SERVE LUBBOCK. THEY HAVE 10 AREA, OR I GUESS IT'S 5 VACANT LOTS AT THIS TIME, AND 5 HOUSES THAT WE ARE REHABBING. IT'S FOR QUALIFYING POPULATION, AND QUALIFYING POPULATION FOR THIS GRANT IS HOMELESS, HOMELESSNESS THAT ARE AT RISK OR, UH, CHRONICALLY HOMELESS, AND IT'S THROUGH A PROGRAM WHERE THEY'LL DO MOUS WITH OTHER AGENCIES THAT ARE WORKING WITH HOMELESS TO GET THEM HOUSED AND GET THEM ON TEMPORARY HOUSING, BUT IT COULD BE ALSO WHERE THEY COULD TRANSITION THEM INTO PERMANENT HOUSING.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? UH, MR. HARRIS.
YES, HOW MUCH IS IT BEING FUNDED? HOW MUCH IS BEING FUNDED? YES.
THE TOTAL GRANT'S 3.6 MILLION.
IT'S A, LIKE I SAID, IT'S A ONE-TIME GRANT. WE HAVE TILL 2030 TO EXPEND IT ALL.
UH, THE OTHER PARTNER AGENCY BESIDES SERVE LUBBOCK IS, UM, FAMILY PROMISE, AND THEY HAVE BUILT, OR NOT BUILT, THEY HAVE BOUGHT A BUILDING THAT THEY ARE REHABBING AT THIS TIME, UM, AND IT'S GOING TO SERVE OVER 36 PEOPLE FROM THE 8 PEOPLE THEY CAN SERVE WHERE THEY'RE AT CURRENTLY. SO WE'RE INCREASING THE NUMBER OF FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS THAT WE CAN HELP, UM, TRANSITION OUT OF HOMELESSNESS.
AND HOW DOES THE ANY PERSON, LIKE YOU SAY, HOMELESSNESS, BUT HOW DOES A PERSON HAVE TO QUALIFY TO GET THIS? THEY HAVE TO BE HOMELESS, UM, THEY HAVE TO BE, AND THEY'LL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE PROGRAM, SO THEY HAVE TO CONTACT WHOEVER, SO THAT WE HAVE OTHER AGENCIES TOO THAT, THAT SERVE HOMELESSNESS, AND SO THERE'LL BE REFERRALS TO, TO FAMILY PROMISE AND TO THE DIFFERENT ONES, BUT THEY DON'T APPLY LIKE A NORMAL APPLICATION.
THEY COME IN AND THEY ACTUALLY HAVE GO THROUGH COUNSELING, UM, IF THEY CAN SHOW THAT THEY NEED HOUSING, AND IT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM, UM, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, THOSE KIND OF THINGS.
BECAUSE EVERYONE HOMELESS IS NOT BASICALLY ON THE STREETS.
YOU HAVE PEOPLE THAT ARE LIVING ON PEOPLE'S COUCHES AND YES, SIR.
LIVING ROOMS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO, I MEAN, SO WHAT WOULD IT TAKE FOR THEM TO HAVE TO ACTUALLY QUALIFY FOR THAT? THEY JUST HAVE TO PROVE THAT THEY'RE HOMELESS. I MEAN, THAT'S THE, AND THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE THE CASEWORKERS WILL INTERVIEW AND, AND...
AND GATHER INFORMATION FROM THOSE PEOPLE.
OKAY, THANK YOU. UH, MR. GREEN.
HEY, UM, SO DID YOU SAY YOU'RE, YOU'VE GOT 5 HOMES BEING BUILT RIGHT NOW? NO, WE HAVE 5 HOMES THAT ARE BEING REHABBED.
WE HAVEN'T STARTED DOING THE NEW CONSTRUCTION YET.
UM, THIS IS IN SOUTH OVERTON, AND SO, UM, WE ARE TRYING TO GET, THEY'RE ALL ON ONE BLOCK. UH, WE WANTED TO GET THE HOUSES REHABBED FIRST BECAUSE SOME OF THE HOUSES HAVE BEEN THERE A LONG TIME EMPTY.
AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO DETERMINE IF WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH A PROCESS OF MAYBE DEMOING THE EXISTING ONES.
WE'VE GOT 3 COMPLETED NOW, WE'RE STILL LOOKING AT 2 MORE.
BUT ONCE WE GET THAT, THEN WE WANT TO DO THE WHOLE PLAN AND BE ABLE TO DO KIND OF A HOUSING BLITZ, UH, WHERE SERVE LUBBOCK CAN GO IN, HIRE A CONTRACTOR, AND GET THEM ALL BUILT AT THE SAME TIME.
THERE'S 10 OF THEM ON THAT LIST I SAW.
UH, 2100 BLOCK, I BELIEVE, I'M GONNA LIE TO YOU, BUT I THINK IT'S 14TH.
IT'S SEE- YEAH, IT'S ON 14TH STREET, YES SIR.
YEAH. UM, AND THEN THAT 3.6 MILLION, YOU'LL STILL HAVE FUNDS AFTER THAT.
NO, WE'VE ALREADY ALLOCATED ALL THAT OUT.
[00:30:02]
YOU- YOU- YOU'VE ALLOCATED EVERY BIT OF IT.SO WE'RE, WHAT WE'RE HAVING TO DO IS WE'RE HAVING TO EXTEND THIS CONTRACT. UH, IT, IT ACTUALLY IS UP SEPTEMBER 30TH OF THIS YEAR, AND SO WE'RE ADDING 2 MORE YEARS ON IT BECAUSE WE RAN INTO SOME PROBLEMS WITH, IT'S VERY EXPENSIVE TO REHAB RIGHT NOW, AND COST HAS GONE UP, AND AGAIN, RECENTLY WITH GASOLINE PRICES AND THINGS LIKE THAT, OUR COSTS HAVE GONE UP AGAIN.
SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE KIND OF REEVALUATING AND LOOKING AT HOW WE CAN BEST SPEND THE MONEY.
OKAY. APPRECIATE THE EFFORT AND THE PASSION IN THIS. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, KAREN. I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE AND BEING SO COMMITTED, BUT I ALSO WANT YOU TO, SOMETIMES PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE, BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT TRANSITIONING, WE HAVE A LOT OF FAMILIES THAT HAVE GONE FROM BEING IN A HOME TO BEING ON SOMEONE'S COUCH, COUCH SURFACES, GORDON OR COUNCILMAN HARRIS SAID, MM-HMM.
AND THEN LIVING IN CARS, BUT THEY'RE STILL WORKING. SO THEY'RE DOING EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO BE FUNCTIONAL, THRIVING CITIZENS, BUT THEY HAVE THE ROADBLOCKS THAT SOMETIMES HAPPEN BASED ON AN ECONOMY OR JUST LIFE SITUATIONS. SO, YEAH.
UM, I DO WANT TO THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT, BUT WE HAVE OTHER FACILITIES.
THIS ONE IS JUST A ONE-TIME OPPORTUNITY, AND I JUST WANTED TO REALLY THANK YOU FOR SEEKING OUT THIS OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE WE DO S- ARE SEEING A GROWING NUMBER OF FOLKS THAT ARE EXPERIENCING THIS. SO KEEP DOING WHAT YOU'RE DOING.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, KAREN. I APPRECIATE ALSO THE WORK THAT YOU GUYS HAVE DONE.
I'VE BEEN INVOLVED WITH, UH, A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT PROJECTS SINCE I'VE BEEN NAMED TO THE COUNCIL THAT'S ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS. I THINK YOU- WE WOULD BE SHOCKED TO LEARN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE QUALIFIED AS HOMELESS THAT ARE, AS THE COUNCILWOMAN SAID, NOT NECESSARILY IN THE STREETS. UM, AND I APPRECIATE THE EFFORT. WHAT I HEARD COUNCILMAN HARRIS ASK THAT I'M GONNA MAYBE ASK A LITTLE MORE SPECIFICALLY. IS THERE A CENTRAL CONTACT POINT OR A MULTITUDE OF CONTACT POINTS THAT PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY GO TO? THIS IS A COMPLICATED PROCESS, YES.
UH, AS I'VE LEARNED, AND AND THERE'S ALL KINDS OF ACRONYMS, AND I- I- IT'S IT'S DIFFICULT.
IS THERE A SPOT, AND AND WHAT IS THAT, THE FIRST STEP? WHAT IS THE FIRST PLACE SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO TO SEEK THIS ASSISTANCE? THE FIRST PLACE IS JUST ASK. I MEAN, IT'S THE FIRST PLACE IS REALLY HARD TO SAY FIRST PLACE, BUT WE HAVE A COORDINATED ENTRY, SO THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS UP SINCE YOU'RE ON THE BOARD.
UM, WE HAVE A, WE HAVE OUR OWN, UM, UM, COC, WHICH IS CONTINUUM OF CARE. WE HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED IN FEBRUARY OF, OF 25, UM, AND COUNCILMAN COLLINS SERVES ON THE ECHO BOARD. UM, AND SO WE HAVE THE ECHO STAFF ACTUALLY HAS, WE HAVE COORDINATED ENTRY AND CASE CONFERENCING, AND THAT'S WHERE THE COORDINATED ENTRY IS, IS WHERE YOU, WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO ASK FOR HELP, AND THIS COULD BE AT A HOSPITAL, THIS COULD BE COMING OUT OF JAIL, THIS COULD BE ANYWHERE. IF YOU GET INTO THE HOMELESS INFORMATION SYSTEM THAT WE HAVE, THAT ECHO IS OVERSEEING, AND IT'S A SYSTEM THAT WE CAN GO IN, THEY GO INTO THAT SYSTEM, AND THEN WE ALSO SIT DOWN AND WE HAVE OTHER COORDINATED ENTRIES WHERE WE CAN PUT THOSE PEOPLE IN, TRY TO, DON'T HAVE TO HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION, BUT WE CAN HAVE SOME INFORMATION, AND THEN WE CAN CONNECT THE DOTS WITH OUR, UH, CASE CONFERENCING. SO THAT'S WHERE OTHER AGENCIES, ALL AGENCIES, AND IT COULD BE ANYWHERE FROM HOUSING, IT COULD BE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES, IT COULD BE FOR MEDICAL, UH, HELP. WE'RE, WE'RE TRYING TO CO- THEY'RE TRYING TO COORDINATE IT ON ALL. WE'RE JUST THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT'S JUST A LITTLE BITTY COG IN THAT, I PROMISE YOU. IT'S THE WHOLE COMMUNITY IS INVOLVED IN THIS. I MEAN, SALVATION ARMY, YOU KNOW, GRACE CAMPUS, OPEN DOOR, THOSE ARE THE ONES WE KNOW ABOUT, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER SMALLER AGENCIES OUT THERE THAT ARE DOING THOSE OVERLAPPING SERVICES ALSO.
BUT IF, IF AN INDIVIDUAL NEEDS TO, IT CAN BEGIN WITH ECHO WEST TEXAS.
AND THAT ORGANIZATION SUPPORTS ALL OF THESE OTHER, UH, NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS THAT ACTUALLY PROVIDE SERVICES, BUT ECHO IS THE ENTRY POINT, THE COORDINATION EFFORT TO FIND THE APPROPRIATE NONPROFIT GROUP TO ASSIST. AND, AND THROUGH THAT, ECHO ALSO THEN BEGUN- BEGINS TO UNDERSTAND THE VARIOUS DIFFERENT NEEDS AROUND THE COMMUNITY AND HELPS TO, UM, HELP PEOPLE WITH THAT. AND SO, UM, I BRING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION AND TO EVERYONE WHO MIGHT BE WATCHING OR LISTENING. ECHO WEST TEXAS IS, IS A ORGANIZATION THAT IS SUPPORTED BY NONPROFIT GROUPS, IT'S SUPPORTED BY THE CITY STAFF, BY KAREN HERSELF, AND IS THE BEGINNING OF YOUR ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
[00:35:03]
THE PHONE NUMBER. I DON'T HAVE IT. I DON'T EITHER. I DON'T HAVE THE PHONE NUMBER, BUT I WISH I DID. WE'LL FIND IT.PLACE. THE WEBSITE'S THE BEST PLACE TO CHECK IT. AND, AND ALSO REMEMBER, IF YOU'RE AN AGENCY THAT'S NOT PART OF THE HMIS SYSTEM, IT'S REALLY HARD FOR US TO REFER TO THEM. SO YEAH.
IF, IF YOU WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS, YOU NEED TO BE A, BE ABLE TO GET ON THE HMIS SYSTEM.
SO ECHO WEST TEXAS HAS A WEBSITE. IT, UM, I KNOW THEY HAVE A PHONE NUMBER, BUT I ALSO KNOW THAT THERE IS, THAT IS THE ENTRY PROCESS, AND SO THAT'S THE POINT I WANT TO MAKE, IS THAT IS WHERE YOU CAN START WHEN YOU NEED HELP, UH, WITH, WITH HOMELESSNESS.
AND I, AND I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, IF I MIGHT, THIS IS BECAUSE IT'S BEING LOCATED IN SOUTH OVERTON. THESE ARE ACTUALLY HOMES THAT PEOPLE WILL LIVE, THE HOMELESS WILL LIVE IN.
THESE ARE NOT DAY, DAY HOMES WHERE PEOPLE COME DURING THE DAY. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN PROBLEMS AND ISSUES, YOU KNOW, IN SOUTH OVERTON, UH, WITH, WITH, WITH HOMELESS AND, UH, BUT THESE ARE NOT JUST PLACES WHERE THEY GO DURING THE DAY AND THEN CANNOT STAY AT NIGHT. THIS IS HOMES THIS WILL BE THEIR HOME.
AND IT'LL BE FOR A CERTAIN, IT DEPENDS ON WHICH PROGRAM THEY'RE IN.
SO IT COULD BE UP TO 6 MONTHS, A YEAR, IT JUST DEPENDS ON WHAT THEY'RE IN.
IT'S, IT'S DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS O- OPERATING RIGHT AT THE MOMENT IN SOME AREAS OF SOUTH OVERTON. UH, YES, SIR.
IT'S THAT, THAT'S JUST A DAY CENTER, WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, THIS WILL BE AN ACTUAL HOME, AND THEY'LL, SERVE LUBBOCK WILL HAVE AN MOU WITH ANY AGENCY, SO THERE COULD BE ANY AGENCY, NUMBER OF AGENCIES THAT COULD BE WORKING WITH THEM, UM, AND THEY WOULD BE, THEY WOULD BE THE ACTUALLY, THAT AGENCY WOULD CONTINUE WITH CASE MANAGEMENT, WITH WATCHING AND MAKING, MAKING SURE THAT THEY'RE NOT HITTING ANY ROADBLOCKS, THAT THEY'RE TAKING CARE OF THE HOME, THOSE KIND OF THINGS. AND IT'S A PARTNERSHIP THAT ACTUALLY TRANSITIONS THEM OUT OF THAT HEALTH.
NO OTHER QUESTIONS? UH, OH, UH, COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ GARCIA.
I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER TO ECHO WEST TEXAS.
BILL, DO YOU HAVE IT? YES, SIR.
BILL, YOU WANT TO GIVE US THAT PHONE NUMBER? I FEEL LIKE THE ANNOUNCER I HAVE IT.
IN A TV SHOW. BILL, GIVE US THAT PHONE NUMBER.
BUT ALSO YOU CAN CALL 211, AND THAT WILL ALSO HELP TO GET YOU TO ECHO WEST TEXAS.
AND THE WEBSITE IS ECHOWTX.ORG.
I WAS GONNA SAY YOU CAN CALL KAREN TOO.
AT 806-775-2296, AND WE'LL GET YOU TO THE RIGHT PLACE.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
[22. Resolution - Business Development: Consider a resolution approving an economic development grant and contract of Lubbock Economic Development Alliance, with Seals Commercial Holdings, LLC, for project development and road extension, pursuant to Section 501.073 of the Texas Local Government Code.]
YOU'RE WELCOME.ALL RIGHT, WE'LL NOW TAKE UP ITEM 5.22 TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT AND CONTRACT WITH LUBBOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE WITH SEALS COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC, FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ROAD EXTENSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 501.073 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. I'M GOING TO CALL ON JOHN OSBORNE, OUR PRESIDENT AND CEO OF LEDA, TO PROVIDE A BRIEFING ON THIS MATTER. MR. OSBORNE.
I HOPE I DON'T HAVE TO REMEMBER A PHONE NUMBER TOO.
UH, THANK YOU, UH, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, FOR, UH, TAKING UP THIS ITEM. UH, WE HAVE, UM, IT'S BEEN VERY WELL DOCUMENTED OVER THE LAST FEW DECADES HOW, UH, CHALLENGING IT IS FOR A COMPANY GROW, UH, FROM WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY, AS WELL AS TO HAVE NEW ONES LOCATE FROM THE OUTSIDE OF OUR COMMUNITY, UM, WHEN THEY NEED AN EXISTING BUILDING.
AND, UM, AND WE'VE DONE SOME ANALYSIS A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT TIMES AND HAD A COUPLE OF SPEC BUILDINGS BUILT BY BANDERA VENTURES BACK, UM, IN THE LATE 2010S AND IN THE EARLY 2020S, AND THE BOTH OF THOSE WERE IN THE BUSINESS PART.
BUT THANKFULLY, UH, AND AND HE THAT THAT COMPANY IS FROM OUT OF TOWN, BUT UH, THIS DEVELOPER IS ACTUALLY FROM WITHIN LUBBOCK, AND WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO BE WORKING WITH SEALS COMMERCIAL, UH, BECAUSE UM, THEY'VE SEEN UM THE NEED AS WELL THAT UM, THAT COMPANIES NEED TO BE UH, HAVE THE ABILITY TO GROW AND EXPAND. AND SO THEY HAVE SECURED ABOUT 60 ACRES ON SOUTH LOOP 289 AND, UH, IN BETWEEN, UH, SOUTH LOOP 289 AND HIGHWAY 84. UM, IT'S REAL CLOSE TO, UM, THE, UH, UH, FORMER POWER PLANT THAT'S DOWN THERE THAT LP&L OWNS, BUT IT'S, UH, IN BETWEEN THE TWO ROADS. THEY'VE HAD TO DO A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF DIRT WORK BECAUSE OF THE FLOODPLAIN THAT'S ON THERE, BUT THEY ARE, UH, UH, INVESTING ABOUT 40 MILLION DOLLARS TO BUILD A, UH, SPECULATIVE BUILDING, AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS A BUILDING THAT DOESN'T COME WITH A TENANT IN HAND. UM, THERE'S NO LEASE IN HAND. IT'S, IT'S JUST AVAILABLE FOR SOMEONE TO GROW INTO OR FOR A COMPANY TO MOVE, UH, FROM EXPAND FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE, UH, INTO IT. UM, THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD ABOUT A 350,000 SQUARE FOOT TILT WALL CROSS DOCK INDUSTRIAL FACILITY. AND WHAT
[00:40:01]
CROSS DOCK MEANS IS THAT, UM, WHEN YOU'RE DISTRIBUTING PRODUCTS, UM, YOU WANT A TRUCK TO BE ABLE TO BACK UP TO ONE SIDE, UNLOAD THROUGH A DOCK DOOR INTO THE BUILDING, IT GETS CHANGED AND PROCESSED AND REPACKAGED, AND THEN GOES OUT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING THROUGH ANOTHER, UH, UM, DOCK DOOR INTO ANOTHER TRUCK THAT THEN TAKES IT TO WHEREVER IT NEEDS TO GO.AND, UM, AND SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO BE PARTNERING WITH THEM.
THIS PARTICULAR SITE, UH, NEEDS, BECAUSE OF ALL THE DRAINAGE WORK THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO PUT, UM, UH, THESE BUILDINGS ON IT, UM, THEY, UH, WANTED SOME ADDITIONAL HELP WITH THE ROAD, AND SO, UH, LEDA HAS AGREED TO AN IN- UH, CAPITAL INVESTMENT INCENTIVE OF 500,000 DOLLARS THAT'S PAID FOR, UM, UH, ONCE THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING, UM, BECOMES, UH, IN PLACE, AND, UM, AND SO THEY'LL ACTUALLY HAVE TO PUT THE ROAD IN AND GET REIMBURSED FOR, UH, FOR THOSE, UH, FOR THAT COST.
THAT COST IS ABOUT HALF OF WHAT THE COST OF THE ROAD WILL END UP BEING.
SO IT, UH, FROM A RETURN ON INVESTMENT, IT'S FANTASTIC FOR THE CITY OF LUBBOCK. IT RETURNS AN INVE- UH, A RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF 0.7 YEARS.
ALL RIGHT, ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. OSBORNE? MR. HARRIS.
WHOSE DISTRICT IS THIS IN? THIS IS ACTUALLY, UH, YOU KNOW, I SHOULD HAVE LOOKED. I THINK IT'S IN DISTRICT 2.
OKAY, JUST WONDERING. THANK YOU.
IN DISTRICT 2. UH, YEAH, I WAS EXCITED WHEN I HEARD ABOUT THIS BECAUSE I THINK IT, IT REALLY DOES SPEAK TO A NEED THAT WE HAVE HERE IN LUBBOCK, UH, FOR, I GUESS, TRUCKING AND, AND, UH, MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION.
WE JUST HAD A, A LACK IN THAT AREA. WE HADN'T BUILT OUT TO THAT AREA. SO THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL. AND JUST TO ASSURE EVERYBODY, BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE BUILDING'S BEEN BUILT, IT'S BUILT FOR, UH, TRUCKS TO, UH, BRING PRODUCT INTO, TO TAKE PRODUCT OUT.
IT'S NOT BEING BUILT SPECULATIVELY FOR A DATA CENTER.
AT ALL. IT'S NOT FIT FOR A DATA CENTER AT ALL, AND, UH, AND IT'S SPECIFICALLY TO MEET THE NEEDS, UH, THIS PARTICULAR NEED, WHICH IS REALLY GOOD. I WAS IN A CONFERENCE IN DEL RIO AND CIUDAD ACUĆA A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, AND THEY REALLY TALKED A LOT ABOUT HAVING THESE KIND OF FACILITIES, HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS, UH, AND AND FOR LUBBOCK TO BECOME SORT OF A HUB FOR THINGS LIKE THIS. WE WE NEED THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT. SO APPRECIATE YOU, UH, LANDING THIS, AND I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE GOOD FOR LUBBOCK. MISS UH, COUNCILMAN GREEN.
THANK YOU, JOHN, FOR BRINGING THIS TO US. UH, WHEN YOU SAY IT IS A 40 MILLION DOLLAR CAPITAL, UH, PROJECT, WHAT UH, WHAT ALL DOES THAT MEAN? SO THAT'S UM, IN ORDER TO BUILD THE BUILDING, THAT'S THEIR INVESTMENT THAT TAKES TO TO BUILD THE BUILDING AND TO PUT IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT.
AND, UM, SO THE ULTIMATELY THEY HAVE PLANS TO BUILD 3, 3 BUILDINGS ON THERE. THIS WILL BE THE BIGGEST AT 350,000 SQUARE FEET, AND, UM, THIS INVESTMENT IS ONLY, UH, RELATED TO THAT PARTICULAR, UH, BUILDING BEING BUILT. SO WHEN, UM, WHEN YOU BUILD A SPECULATIVE BUILDING OF THIS NATURE, IT ENDS UP, UH, BEING, UH, WHAT THEY CALL CONCRETE TILT WALL, AND SO THEY, THEY BUILD THEIR TILT WALLS, UH, LAYING DOWN ON THE GROUND. THEY FORM THEM UP, AND THEY POUR THEIR CONCRETE, LAY IT ALL OUT, AND THEN THEY TILT THE WALL UP INTO PLACE. AND SO, UM, IF YOU'VE DRIVEN OUT BY THE BUSINESS PARK WHERE AMAZON AND, UM, THE, THE BUDWEISER FACILITY AND O'REILLY'S HAS, UH, RIGHT THERE NEAR THE PARK, EVERY ONE OF THOSE BUILDINGS IS TILT WALL CONSTRUCTED. IT WAS CONSTRUCTED ON SITE, AND THEN THE WALLS WERE JUST TILTED UP.
SO IT'S, IT LOOKS VERY NICE, UM, UH, ATTRACTIVE, UH, BUILDING. IT'S NOT A METAL BUILDING, UH, AT ALL. AND, UM, AND SO THEN THAT INVESTMENT IS TO BUILD ALL OF THAT, AND THEN THEY BUILD A SHELL, UH, ON THAT, THEY THEY FORM THE PAD, AND THEY BUILD A SHELL ON THAT PAD. AND THEN DEPENDING ON WHAT COMPANY DECIDES TO GO IN THERE, THEY DO THE FINISH OUT ON THE INTERIOR BASED ON WHAT THE COMPANY NEEDS.
SO IT'LL BE 40 MILLION DOLLAR ON THE TAX ROLL? UH, YES, SIR.
AND THEN, UM... SO THAT EQUATES TO ABOUT 200,000 DOLLARS A YEAR FOR US, UH, AS FAR AS THE CITY REVENUE.
DOES, UH, DID- DID YOU, UH, DO YOU- DO YOU NEGOTIATE ANY TAX ABATEMENT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? NO, SIR. THERE'S NO TAX ABATEMENTS NO TAX ABATEMENTS.
NO, WE REALLY, UH, UH, TAX ABATEMENTS ARE, UM, UH, UH, REALLY SAVED FOR THOSE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT ARE, IT'S REALLY TRULY NECESSARY FOR, AND UM, THIS PROJECT, WE WERE ABLE TO DO THE INCENTIVE, UH, FOR THE PROJECT THROUGH LEDA.
UH, TAX ABATEMENTS ARE ONLY DONE AT THE CITY AND THE COUNTY.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, JOHN. I APPRECIATE THE EFFORTS THAT, UH, HAVE GONE INTO THIS PROJECT. I SEE A COUPLE GENTLEMEN IN THE BACK THAT MAY BE A PART OF THE, A PART OF THIS WORK AND WANT TO CONGRATULATE AND THANK THEM AS WELL. UM, CROSS DOCK BUILDINGS, WE HAVE 2 EXAMPLES, AT LEAST 2 EXAMPLES OF THOSE JUST WEST OF THE DPS SITE IN, IN OUR LUBBOCK BUSINESS PARK. AND SO AS YOU TALKED ABOUT THAT, I WANT TO, YOU KNOW, KIND OF REITERATE WHAT THE MAYOR SAID.
THERE ARE DOORS ON ALL SIDES, OR, OR AT LEAST ON BOTH SIDES, LARGE OVERHEAD DOORS
[00:45:02]
FOR TRUCKS AND ET CETERA, ET CETERA. THESE ARE THE KINDS OF DOORS THAT WOULD ALLOW AN AWFUL LOT OF DUST IN A BUILDING IN WEST TEXAS, SO THEY'RE NOT SUITABLE FOR, UH, DATA CENTERS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC, UM, USES LIKE THAT. AND SO, UM, JUST TO, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT QUESTION, UH, DOESN'T POP INTO SOMEONE'S HEAD ABOUT WHAT THE, WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THESE BUILDINGS ARE. YOU KNOW, AS, AS LUBBOCK HAS GROWN, THE PRIMARY PURPOSES THAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE BUSINESS PARK AND IN NORTH LUBBOCK HAVE BEEN S- SITUATED AROUND DISTRIBUTION.UH, WE HAVE BECOME IN OUR S- SLOWLY BECOMING BIGGER AND BIGGER, UH, COMPONENT IN AS A DISTRIBUTION HUB, AND THE HUB CITY IS, UH, YOU KNOW, IS VERY APPROPRIATE TO THAT. AND SO, UM, AGAIN, JUST WANT TO, UH, CONGRATULATE THE OWNERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO ARE WORKING ON THIS. I THINK THERE IS A GREAT NEED, AND IT, AND IT SHOULD BE A, A VERY, UH, A GOOD VENTURE FOR, FOR THOSE FOLKS, AND THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS TO US. WANT TO POINT OUT, AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS SAID BEFORE EITHER, 500,000 DOLLAR GRANT THAT WILL BUILD INFRASTRUCTURE PAYS BACK TO THE CITY HOW QUICKLY? IN 0.7 YEARS.
SO THAT ROUGHLY DO THE MATH, 8 MONTHS.
8 MONTHS. SO OUR RETURN ON THIS INVESTMENT WILL BE BACK TO US IN, IN AS LITTLE AS 8 MONTHS, AND, AND THIS IS THE KIND OF DEVELOPMENT THAT'S CRITICAL AS WE WORK THROUGH THE PROCESS OF OF PROPERTY TAX RATES. THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS BRING INCOME TO OUR COMMUNITY THROUGH THE PROPERTY TAX THAT COMES WITH VERY LITTLE COST. UM, THERE ARE VERY FEW POLICE CALLS. THIS BUILDING WON'T NEED A FIRE STATION, IT WON'T NEED A WATER TOWER.
THESE ARE THE KINDS OF DEVELOPMENTS THAT REALLY ASSIST US IN THE PROPERTY TAX CHALLENGE OF KEEPING OUR PROPERTY TAX RATES LOW. AND SO JUST WANT TO POINT THAT OUT. THANK YOU AGAIN. THIS IS, THIS IS GOOD FOR LUBBOCK. THANK YOU.
YES, SIR. ABSOLUTELY. AND, UH, IT'S RIGHT THERE ALONG, UH, THE STRETCH OF ROAD THAT, UM, ALREADY HAS A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT, UH, ALONG THERE, SO IT'S G- SHOULD FIT IN VERY NICELY WITH EVERYONE ELSE, UH, ALONG THERE. I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE A GREAT ADDITION, AND I, I CAN'T SAY ENOUGH, UH, POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT SEALS COMMERCIAL. THEY, THEY'VE JUST BEEN FANTASTIC TO WORK WITH.
THEY'VE SEEN THE NEED, UH, FOR BUSINESSES TO BE ABLE TO GROW IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND, UM, THEY'RE TRYING TO HELP, UH, SOLVE THAT NEED.
AND THEY'LL DESIGN A NICE BUILDING TOO, SO.
THAT'S RIGHT, VERY NICE BUILDING.
APPRECIATE IT. OH, ALL RIGHT, ONE MORE.
QUESTION. UM, YOU KNOW, I, I BELIEVE THE CHICK-FIL-A DISTRIBUTION CENTER IS MODELED LIKE THAT AS WELL.
YES, MA'AM. IT IS ALSO TILT WALL. IN FACT, THOSE WALLS JUST WENT UP. IF YOU'VE BEEN BY THERE LATELY, YOU CAN SEE IT BEING CONSTRUCTED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE LUBBOCK BUSINESS PARK BOULEVARD, RIGHT NEXT TO THE INTERSTATE ACROSS FROM O'REILLY'S.
I WANTED TO FOLLOW UP, AND THIS IS MORE OF A LEDA THING. AS YOU KNOW, I HAVE EXPRESSED THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE DISTRICT 1 AND DISTRICT 2, WHEN WE'RE DOING THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT WE ARE ALSO CONSIDERING A TIF, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF TIMES OUR NEIGHBORHOODS ARE NOT RECEIVING THOSE TYPES OF OPPORTUNITIES THAT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO OUR CITIZENS. SO WAS THAT, I KNOW THAT YOU'RE STILL EXPLORING THAT, BUT I JUST, I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT BECAUSE I THINK MOVING INTO THE FUTURE, IT IS NECESSARY AS OUR QUALITY OF LIFE IS IMPACTED ON A DAILY BASIS, OUR AIR QUALITY IS IMPACTED, AND SO ON AND SO ON, BUT JUST SOMETHING TO PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE YES, MA'AM.
IT IS IMPORTANT AND A PRIORITY FOR, FOR OUR CITIZENS AND ESPECIALLY DISTRICT 1 AND 2 CONSTITUENTS.
YES, MA'AM. WE WERE STARTING TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF ON THOSE. UH, WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO JUST WORK THROUGH ALL THE NUANCES TO MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTAND, UM, THE, UH, THE PROS AND ALSO THE CONS RELATED TO A TIF DISTRICT, BUT, UM, WE VERY MUCH SEE THAT THERE'S SOME GREAT OPPORTUNITIES THAT ARE MHM.
MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL FOR EVERYBODY INVOLVED.
ALL RIGHT, I WILL NOW ENTERTAIN A MOTION, UH, TO APPROVE ITEMS 5.13, 1.4, 1.5, AND 2.2. IS THERE SUCH A MOTION? SO MOVE.
I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.
I HAVE A SECOND. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY? I HEAR NOT ONE NAY, SO THAT THAT PASSES 6 TO 1. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW MOVE
[1. Public Hearing - Planning (District 1): Consider a request for Zone Case 0809-C, a request of AMD Engineering, LLC, for West Texas Land Guys, for a zone change from Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC) and High Density Residential District (HDR) to Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2), at 2820 North University Avenue, located east of University Avenue and north of Drake Street, on 8.43 acres of unplatted land out of Block A, Section 11, and consider an ordinance.]
[2. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3558, a request of Rasmussen Development, Inc. for Timothy Mandrell, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to High Density Residential District (HDR), at 6620 110th Street, located west of Milwaukee Avenue and north of 110th Street, on 1.85 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 22, and consider an ordinance.]
[3. Public Hearing - Planning (District 5): Consider a request for Zone Case 3559, a request of Hugo Reed and Associates, Inc. for Loop 88, LLC, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to General Industrial District (GI), at 7401 Alcove Avenue, located east of Alcove Avenue and north of 76th Street, on 33.3 acres of unplatted land out of Block AK, Section 31, and consider an ordinance.]
[4. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 2538-UU, a request of Seventeen Services, LLC, for JKC Ranch, LLC, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) and Heavy Commercial District (HC) to Neighborhood Commercial District (NC) and Heavy Commercial District (HC), at 8805 and 8825 34th Street, located south of 34th Street and west of Inler Avenue, on 25.87 acres of unplatted land out of Block D-6, Section 7, and consider an ordinance.]
[5. Public Hearing - Planning (District 6): Consider a request for Zone Case 2538-VV, a request of Max Dreasher, for a zone change from Low Density Single-Family District (SF-2) to Auto-Urban Commercial District (AC), at 7729 19th Street, located east of Alcove Avenue and south of 19th Street, Dreasher Addition, Lot 1, and consider an ordinance.]
ON TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA.WE'RE GOING TO TAKE UP ITEMS 6.1 TO 6.5, WHICH REPRESENT ZONING CASES, UH, AND WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE'LL CONDUCT A CONSOLIDATED PUBLIC HEARING FOR THESE ZONING CASES. UM, AS A REMINDER, THE PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. THE COUNCIL MAY
[00:50:01]
ASK QUESTIONS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT NO DISCUSSION WITH ABOUT THE MERITS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE COUNCIL DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO I'M GOING TO CALL ON KRISTEN SAGER, OUR DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, TO PROVIDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THESE ZONING CASES SUBJECT TO THIS PUBLIC HEARING.GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. ITEM 6.1, ZONE CASE 809-C, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 1.
THE APPLICANT IS AMD ENGINEERING LLC FOR WEST TEXAS LAND GUYS. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2. WE SENT OUT 6 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING 1 IN FAVOR. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST OF NORTH UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND NORTH OF DRAKE STREET. HERE'S THE MAP SHOWING THE ONE RESPONSE WE DID RECEIVE IN FAVOR. HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS MOSTLY SURROUNDED BY VACANT LAND, WITH THE, UH, STATE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY TO THE WEST. CURRENT ZONING IS AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THERE IS ADDITIONAL SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 TO THE EAST, WEST, AND SOUTH, WITH INDUSTRIAL TO THE NORTH.
FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. HERE'S SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA, AND A GRAPHIC PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING THEIR INTENT TO USE THIS PROPERTY AS PART OF THEIR PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. THE REQUEST FOR SF2 ZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THIS DESIGNATION. THE ZONE CHANGE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION.
IT IS BOUNDED BY OTHER SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 ZONING AND ALONG UNIVERSITY AVENUE, WHICH IS DESIGNATED AS AN ARTERIAL.
STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE AND ONE RECUSAL, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE. OKAY, PROCEED.
ITEM 6.2, ZONE CASE 3558, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 5. THE APPLICANT IS RASMUSSEN DEVELOPMENT FOR TIMOTHY MANDRELL. WE S- REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
WE SENT OUT 75 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING 68 IN FAVOR. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WEST OF MILWAUKEE AVENUE, NORTH OF 110TH STREET. HERE IS THE RESPONSE MAP SHOWING THOSE IN FAVOR. HERE'S AN AERIAL V- AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AMONGST A DEVELOPING RESIDENTIAL AREA. THERE IS ADDITIONAL VACANT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY SF2 TO THE NORTH, EAST, AND WEST, WITH AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL ZONING TO THE SOUTH. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.
THERE IS AN EXISTING HOME ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
HERE'S A GRAPHIC PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT SHOWING THEIR PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE PARK, SO IT WOULD HAVE GARDEN OFFICE AND PERSONAL SERVICE TYPE USES.
WITH THE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING, THOSE USES ARE LIMITED TO 03,500 SQUARE FEET EACH. AND HERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL GRAPHICS. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATES THIS AREA FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE, SO WHILE THIS IS A MINOR DEVIATION FROM THAT DESIGNATION, IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION AS A NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE PARK. THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION. IT FRONTS 110TH STREET, WHICH IS DESIGNATED AS A COLLECTOR.
STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ITEM 6.3, ZONE CASE 3559, ALSO IN DISTRICT 5. APPLICANT IS HUGO REED AND ASSOCIATES FOR LOOP 88 LLC. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL, GI. WE SENT OUT 118 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING ONE IN FAVOR. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST OF ALCOVE AVENUE, NORTH OF 76TH STREET. HERE'S THE RESPONSE MAP SHOWING THE ONE PARCEL IN FAVOR. HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT AND LOCATED JUST NORTH OF THE APEX CENTER. CITY OF WILFURTH IS TO THE WEST, ON THE WEST SIDE OF ALCOVE AVENUE, AND THERE IS A DEVELOPING BUSINESS PARK TO THE... CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2.
THERE IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING TO THE NORTH, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO THE SOUTH, THE APEX CENTER, AND INDUSTRIAL PARK
[00:55:01]
TO THE EAST. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION, AGAIN, IS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.SO WHILE THIS PROPOSAL IS A DEVIATION FROM THAT, UH, RECOMMENDATION, IT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS AREA ADJACENT TO OTHER EXISTING INDUSTRIAL ZONING AND USES. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION.
ALCOVE AVENUE IS AN ARTERIAL, AND 76TH IS A LOCAL STREET.
STAFF HAS NOTED THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ITEM 6.4, ZONE CASE 2538-UU, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6. THE APPLICANT IS 17 SERVICES LLC FOR JKC RANCH LLC. THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND HEAVY COMMERCIAL. WE SENT OUT 38 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING 1 IN FAVOR AND 6 IN OPPOSITION.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WEST OF INLER AVENUE, SOUTH OF 34TH STREET. HERE'S THE MAP SHOWING THE 1 IN FAVOR AND 6 IN OPPOSITION. HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THERE IS A DEVELOPED NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH. TO THE SOUTH IS OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS, AND THERE ARE EXISTING COMMERCIAL OFFICE WAREHOUSE, BUSINESS PARK TYPE USES.
CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2. THERE IS HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING TO THE EAST AND LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY TO THE NORTH AND WEST. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. AND HERE'S SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA. THE APPLICANT DOES INTEND TO SPLIT THE ZONING SO THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO 34TH STREET, ACROSS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
ON THIS GRAPHIC, THE LOTS IN PURPLE WOULD BE THE HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION IS FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. HOWEVER, THIS PROPERTY IS LONG, IS ALONG AN ARTERIAL AND ADJACENT TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING, SO THE REQUEST IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION. THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE SURROUNDING AREA.
34TH STREET IS DESIGNATED AS A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ZONE CASE 2538 VV, LOCATED IN DISTRICT 6. THE APPLICANT IS MAX DRESCHER. REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2 TO AUTO URBAN COMMERCIAL AC. WE SENT OUT 14 NOTIFICATIONS, RECEIVING 5 IN FAVOR. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED EAST OF ALCOVE AVENUE, SOUTH OF 19TH STREET. HERE'S THE MAP SHOWING THE 5 IN FAVOR. HERE'S AN AERIAL VIEW OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL UP AND DOWN 19TH STREET. THERE ARE 2 EXISTING COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY THAT WERE BUILT PRIOR TO ANNEXATION. CURRENT ZONING IS LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY SF2. THERE IS ADDITIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING IN THIS AREA ALONG 19TH STREET. FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. AND HERE ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA.
FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION, AGAIN, FOR LOW DENSITY. HEAVY COMMERCIAL IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS LOCATION ALONG 19TH STREET, WHICH IS AN ARTERIAL.
THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND APPROPRIATE IN THE AREA. 19TH STREET, AGAIN, A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH UNANIMOUS VOTE, AND I'D BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? I SEE NONE.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT.
I'LL NOW OPEN, UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR AGENDA ITEMS 6.1 TO 6.5.
IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ANY OF THESE ZONING CASES? IF SO, WOULD YOU COME FORWARD? IF YOU WOULD, IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND WHICH ONE YOU'RE SPEAKING TO.
UH, JALEN HOLLAND, UH, AMD ENGINEERING, 6515 68TH STREET, UH, SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF ITEM, AGENDA ITEM 6.1. UH, BASICALLY, JUST TO KEEP IT SIMPLE, WE'RE JUST LOOKING TO DOWN ZONE FROM AC TO, UM, AN HDR TO SF2,
[01:00:01]
AND I'LL BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU.THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I SEE NO QUESTIONS FOR YOU. SO ANYBODY ELSE? GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS BLAKE RASMUSSEN WITH AGENDA ITEM 6.2. UH, GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS BLAKE RASMUSSEN. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF RASMUSSEN DEVELOPMENT REGARDING THE ONE FORD ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE PARK. UM, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, UH, YOU MAY HAVE. UM, AND UH, OUR IDEA WAS TO CREATE A SMALL, THOUGHTFULLY DESIGNED NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE PARK THAT SERVES THE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN THE SURROUNDING HOMES AND THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA. UH, PROJECT CONSISTS OF SMALL SINGLE-FAMILY PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS RANGING FROM 505 SQUARE FEET TO 1250 SQUARE FEET. UM, WE ORIGINALLY BEGAN THIS PROCESS, WE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING BECAUSE OUR INTENTION FROM THE BEGINNING WAS TO BUILD AN OFFICE PARK.
THROUGH SEVERAL PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS WITH PLANNING STAFF, UM, THEY EXPRESSED CONCERNS THAT NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL WASN'T THE BEST ZONING TRANSITION FROM PROPERTY SURROUNDING, SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THEY INSTEAD RECOMMENDED THAT WE PURSUE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH LIMITED COMMERCIAL USE, THE 3500 SQUARE FOOT PER, PER LOT, UH, AND WE WORKED WITH STAFF TO REVISE THE APPLICATION ACCORDINGLY.
OF THE 133 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THE ONE FORD ROAD COMMUNITY, WE STILL OWN 131 OF THEM, SO NO ONE HAS A GREATER INTEREST IN MAKING SURE THAT WE GET THIS RIGHT THAN WE DO.
UH, WE WANT THIS OFFICE PARK TO BE AN EXTENSION OF THE ONE FORD ROAD COMMUNITY, NOT AN INTERRUPTION OF IT.
WE'VE ALSO MADE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AN IMPORTANT PART OF THIS PROCESS. WE'VE CONTACTED THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, ANSWERED QUESTIONS, TRIED TO BE VERY TRANSPARENT ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING.
APPROXIMATELY 80 NOTICES WERE SENT OUT FOR THE TWO PLANNING AND ZONING HEARINGS, AND THROUGHOUT THAT PROCESS, WE DID NOT RECEIVE A SINGLE LETTER OR HAVE A SINGLE SPEAKER APPEAR IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT.
OUR COMMITMENT TO THE PROJECT THAT YOU HAVE SEEN HERE HAS NOT WAVERED. WE'VE HIRED AN ARCHITECT AND AN ENGINEER AND HAVE ALREADY BEGUN THE DESIGN WORK FOR THE OFFICE PARK.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS NOW CONSIDERED THIS PROJECT TWICE. UH, FIRST TIME THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY UNANIMOUS 6-0 VOTE. UH, BECAUSE OF AN ISSUE WITH THE LEGAL NOTICE, THE CASE WAS HEARD AGAIN, AND THE COMMISSION AGAIN UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, THIS TIME AT A 9-0 VOTE. WE APPRECIATE PLANNING STAFF WORKING WITH US THROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS, AND WE APPRECIATE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION, AND WE APPRECIATE THE COUNCIL'S TIME TODAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
SEE, THANK YOU FOR, UH, BEING A MODEL APPLICANT THERE.
ALL RIGHT, ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE OTHER ITEMS? ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK? OKAY, COME ON FORWARD. YES.
MY NAME'S JOE SWAN. I'M A PRINCIPAL IN JKC RANCH LLC.
UH, WE'VE, WE'VE COME BEFORE THE, THE ZONING COMMISSION BEFORE TO GET THIS DONE, AND WE'VE KIND OF WORKED WITH THE COMMUNITY. UH, 34TH STREET WILL BE A MAIN ARTERY GOING THROUGH THERE. WE CHANGED IT, UH, TO THE COMMER- THE, THE HOME COMMERCIAL INSTEAD OF INDUSTRIAL, AND THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL BACK UP TO IT. WE'VE AGREED TO SOME OTHER CHANGES. WE'RE GOING TO BUILD A FENCE THERE AND, AND TRY TO COOPERATE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE'VE BEEN HERE A LONG TIME, AND WE WANT TO GET ALONG WITH EVERYBODY. AND IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL TRY TO ANSWER THEM FOR YOU.
I SEE NONE. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ANY OF THESE ITEMS, THESE ZONING CASES? ALL RIGHT, ANYONE HERE WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO ANY OF THESE ZONING ITEMS? I SEE NONE, SO I WILL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 3:26 P.M. SO IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEMS 6.1 TO 6.5? SO MOVED.
I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, LET ME KNOW BY SAYING AYE.
ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY. I HEAR NONE. THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT, UH, ITEM 6.6. THERE'S BEEN A REQUEST BY CITY STAFF TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 13TH. SO IS THERE A MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM UNTIL OCTOBER 13TH? SO MOVED.
OKAY. UH, ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY. THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE'LL TAKE UP ITEM, AGENDA ITEM 5- 6.7 NOW TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND
[7. Public Hearing - Business Development: Conduct a public hearing on the proposed 2026 Assessment Rate for the Northwest Passage Public Improvement District (PID), and consider an ordinance reviewing classifications for the methods of assessing special benefits for the services and improvements of property in the Northwest Passage PID; approving, adopting, and filing with the City Secretary the assessment roll; levying the 2026 assessments for the cost of certain services and improvements to be provided in the district during FY 2026-27; fixing charges and liens against the property in the district and the owners thereof; and providing for the collection of the assessments.]
RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AN ORDINANCE PROPOSING THE[01:05:01]
2026 ASSESSMENT RATE FOR THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND RELATED, UH, MATTERS. AND I'M GOING TO CALL ON MOLLY BALLESTEROS, OUR SPECIAL DISTRICTS MANAGER, TO PROVIDE THE STAFF BRIEFING ON THIS AGENDA ITEM, SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND SUBJECT TO THE MACHINERY WORKING.GOOD AFTERNOON, MAYOR MCBRAYER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS MOLLY BALLESTEROS, AND I AM HERE TODAY TO PRESENT THE CITY COUNCIL ITEM 6.7, WHICH IS THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL RENEWAL OF THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT ORDINANCE.
BEFORE YOU TODAY IS A MAP OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY. THIS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WAS CREATED ABOUT 5-YEARS AGO, AND IT IS LOCATED IN NORTH LUBBOCK OFF OF NORTH SLIDE ROAD. OVER THE PAST PREVIOUS FEW YEARS AND 2025, THE ASSESSMENT RATE WAS SET AND APPROVED AT 15 CENTS PER 100 DOLLAR VALUATION. THE PROPOSED 2026 ASSESSMENT RATE IS ALSO 15 CENTS PER 100 DOLLAR VALUATION. THE ASSESSMENT ON AN HOME WORTH 100,000 DOLLARS WOULD BE 150 DOLLARS PER YEAR. THE NORTHWEST PUBLIC IMPROV- NORTHWEST PASSAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WAS CREATED SEVERAL YEARS AGO TO IMPROVE A DRAINAGE AREA IN THE BOUNDARY, AND ALSO TO PROVIDE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS PARKS AND PUBLIC ART AT A FUTURE TIME. THE NEIGHBOR- THE DISTRICT IS NOW CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT AND CONTINUING TO GENERATE REVENUE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS AT A FUTURE TIME. OTHER THAN THAT, THAT IS ALL I HAVE TODAY FOR THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR MS. BALASEROS? I SEE NONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WHAT, YOU HAVE ONE? NO? NO, I WAS.
I GUESS MAYBE I'M, I'M OUT OF TURN, UM, BUT I DRIVE THAT ROAD, NORTH SLIDE ROAD, EVERY DAY, MULTIPLE TIMES A DAY. I SEE THE WORK THAT THIS GROUP IS DOING AND THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE BEING MADE, AND SO, UH, I WANT TO, YOU KNOW, SAY THESE ARE THE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT, THAT, UH, AND METHODS THAT WE CAN USE TO ENS- ENSURE THAT OUR AREAS ARE WELL MAINTAINED, UM, AND THAT'S WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE. AND SO I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE TIP BOARD AND THE WORK THAT THEY CONTINUE TO DO, BECAUSE THIS IS, UH, CONTINUES TO BE A GREAT IMPROVEMENT, UM, IN IN THAT AREA. SO THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, MR. COLLINS. THANK YOU, MS. BALASEROS. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT.
UH, I'LL NOW OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM 6.7. IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK, UH, REGARDING THIS AGENDA ITEM? IF SO, PLEASE STEP FORWARD. I SEE.
I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AT 3:30 PM THEN. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.7? SO MOVED.
A MOTION AND SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I SEE NONE.
AYE. ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY? HEARING NONE, THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
[8. Public Hearing - Business Development: Conduct a public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the City of Lubbock Commercial Tax Abatement Guidelines and Criteria. ]
[9. Public Hearing - Business Development: Conduct a public hearing and consider a resolution adopting the City of Lubbock Industrial Tax Abatement Guidelines and Criteria. ]
6.8 AND 6.9, ADOPTION OF COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA. UH, WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE WILL CONDUCT A CONSOLIDATED PUBLIC HEARING ON THESE TWO ITEMS, BUT I'M GOING TO CALL ON DANIELLE WILLIAMS, OUR NEW BUSINESS DEL- DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, TO PROVIDE THE STAFF BRIEFING ON THESE TWO AGENDA ITEMS, SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.YEAH. ALL RIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
UM, WANTED TO BRING TO Y'ALL A FAIRLY UPDATED INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES. UM, SO I'M GOING TO PROVIDE A REVIEW AND A LITTLE BIT ON WHAT, WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT, WHAT THEY ARE INTENDED FOR AND THE SLIGHT CHANGE THAT WAS MADE. SO BEFORE I GET STARTED, I WANTED TO GIVE A LITTLE HISTORICAL CONTEXT. THESE TWO TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES WERE APPROVED 2 YEARS AGO, UM, BY THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL, AND NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED IN MY REVIEW OF THESE, UH, GUIDELINES, BUT AS PER STATE STATUTE, WE ARE REQUIRED TO UPDATE, REVIEW THESE EVERY 2 YEARS AND BRING THEM BACK FOR APPROVAL FOR YOU GUYS TO LOOK AT, FOR COUNCIL TO LOOK AT. SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, YOU KNOW, WHAT IS A TAX ABATEMENT? AND AND KIND OF DIVE INTO THAT A LITTLE BIT. IT'S A TOOL ENCOURAGING QUALIFYING INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IT ALLOWS CITY TO TEMPORARILY REDUCE PROPERTY TAXES ON INCREASED TAXABLE VALUE RESULTING FROM QUALIFYING IMPROVEMENTS.
AND THERE'S TWO WORDS THAT ARE IMPORTANT THERE, TEMPORARILY REDUCE AND ONLY ON THE INCREASED TAXABLE VALUE.
[01:10:01]
OVER THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE IN DETAIL LATER. UM, THESE ARE USED TO ENCOURAGE NEW INVESTMENT, EXPANSION, REDEVELOPMENT, AND JOB CREATION. THEY'RE VERY MUCH A GUIDELINE, AND THEY HELP JUST PROMOTE THE AREA, THE AREAS WE WANT TO DEVELOP AND SEE DEVELOPMENT IN.UH, ABATEMENT IS DISCRETIONARY AND NEGOTIATED AS A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS, AND IT DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE PROPERTY'S EXISTING TAX OBLIGATION. TAX ABATEMENT ISN'T A, IS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AND NOT AN AUTOMATIC TAX EXEMPTION. SO WHY DO WE HAVE GUIDELINES? WELL, IT CREATES CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING REQUESTS. UM, THEY ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS. THEY HELP IDENTIFY PROJECTS THAT MAY PROVIDE MEANINGFUL ECONOMIC BENEFIT AND PROMOTE THE ONES THAT WE WANT TO SEE IN OUR, OUR COMMUNITY, UH, PROVIDE GREATER CONSISTENCY AND TRANSPARENCY. THEY ALIGN INCENTIVES WITH THE CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES. THEY PROTECT OUR CITY'S EXISTING TAX BASE, AND THEY ALSO PREFER- PRESERVE COUNCIL'S DISCRETION ON INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS. SO, AS FOR TODAY, YOU HAVE TWO TYPES OF GUIDELINES THAT ARE PRESENTED, ONE FOR COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY AND ONE FOR INDUSTRIAL TYPE, UM, PROJECTS. FOR COMMERCIAL, AND THIS IS VERY HIGH LEVEL REVIEW OF THE GUIDELINES, YOU'RE LOOKING AT PROJECTS THAT INVOLVE RETAIL SERVICE OR OFFICE SPACE. UM, THE GUIDELINES RECOMMEND A 5 MILLION DOLLAR MINIMUM CAPITAL INVESTMENT. THEY MUST PROVIDE 25 NEW PERMANENT JOBS. UH, THEY MUST BE WITHIN AN ENTERPRISE ZONE, AND I WILL SHOW A MAP OF WHAT THOSE ARE IN THIS COMMUNITY, AND THEY, IT CAN BE UP TO A TAX ABATEMENT UP TO 5-YEARS. SO THAT'S JUST FOR THE COMMERCIAL SIDE OF THESE PROJECTS. THE INDUSTRIAL SIDE IS DIFFERENT.
YOU'RE LOOKING AT MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS.
THERE'S A MINIMUM OF 10 MILLION DOLLAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT, UH, AGAIN, 25 NEW PERMANENT JOBS OR PRIMARY JOBS. UM, THEY MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN AN ENTERPRISE ZONE OR A REINVESTMENT ZONE, AND THE ABATEMENT IS UP TO 10 YEARS, AND THAT IS THE MAX FOR ANY STATE TAX ABATEMENT.
YOU CAN ONLY DO ABATEMENT FOR 10 YEARS. SO HERE IS A, UH, MAP OF THE CURRENT CALLED OUT ENTERPRISE ZONES FOR THE COMMERCIAL TAX ABATEMENT. UH, THESE HIGHLIGHTED IN SORT OF LIKE A LIGHT BLUE COLOR ARE THE ONES THAT WERE DETERMINED 2 YEARS AGO IN THE PRIOR ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL, UM, PROJECTS.
AND SO, UM, IF ANYBODY WERE TO COME TO US AND WANT TO DO A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, WE WOULD SAY IT MUST WAS BE WITHIN THESE HIGHLIGHTED AREAS TO BE ELIGIBLE. INDUSTRIAL TAX ABATEMENTS CAN BE IN ANY OF THE ENTERPRISE ZONES THAT WE HAVE ACROSS THE CITY, UM, AND YOU HAVE TO ESTABLISH THAT REINVESTMENT ZONE PRIOR TO ACTUALLY APPLYING FOR THAT TAX ABATEMENT. SO AGAIN, UM, COMMERCIAL ELIGIBILITY, 5 MILLION DOLLARS, 25 NEW JOBS, AT LEAST 30% OF THE NEW EMPLOYEES IN THE ZONE ARE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY, WHICH IS IMPORTANT. PROTECT THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE A MEANINGFUL ECONOMIC BENEFIT, AND THE COUNCIL MAY VARY REQUIREMENTS BY A THREE-FOURTHS AFFIRMATIVE VOTE WHEN IN THE CITY'S BEST INTEREST.
AND THOSE ARE ALL STIPULATIONS THAT ARE LINED OUT IN THE GUIDELINES. INDUSTRIAL ELIGIBILITY IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT, AND THIS IS WHERE I MADE, UH, ONE SLIGHT CHANGE AS, UM, PRESENTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. WE HAVE THE 10 MILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT, 25 NEW JOBS. BUSINESS GENERALLY SERVES MARKET OUTSIDE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY, SO WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MANUFACTURING JOBS, IT'S PRODUCING PRODUCTS HERE AND SHIPPING THEM OUT. UM, AND THEY FOCUS ON TARGET INDUSTRIES SUCH AS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING, VALUE ADDED AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, MEDICAL SERVICES, WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION, AND REGIONAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS.
AND IN THE ORIGINAL LIST, THERE WAS DATA CENTERS. SO I WENT AHEAD AND REMOVED THAT AS ONE OF THE, UM, PRIORITIES AS NOT BEING AN ELIGIBLE, UM, PROJECT FOR INDUSTRIAL. SO THERE, IT WAS MENTIONED TWICE IN THE DOCUMENT. THERE WAS A DEFINITION OF THE DATA CENTER THAT WAS REMOVED, AND THEN ALSO JUST THE LISTED ITEM AS AN EL- ELIGIBLE PROJECT. SO THAT WAS TAKEN OUT OF THERE. UM, OTHER PROJECTS MAY BE CONSIDERED WHEN THEY CREATE SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. SO WE'RE NOT LIMITED TO JUST THIS LIST. IF THERE'S ANYBODY THAT ACTUALLY COMES AND APPLIES FOR A TAX ABATEMENT AND WE FEEL LIKE IT MEETS ALL THE CRITERIA, WE CAN STILL BRING IT TO Y'ALL IF IT'S NOT TECHNICALLY LISTED AS ONE OF THESE ITEMS IN THE INDUSTRY LIST. SO TOUCHING BACK ON HOW DOES THE TAX ABATEMENT WORK, THIS IS A, A COMMON MISCONCEPTION SOMETIMES WITH TAX ABATEMENTS. TAX ABATEMENT ONLY APPLIES TO THE NEW VALUE CREATED BY THE PROJECT, NOT THE EXISTING TAX BASE. SO YOU HAVE EXISTING PROPERTY, WHICH ESTABLISHES YOUR BASE, BASE YEAR,
[01:15:01]
AND THEN IT CONTINUES TO BE TAXED AT THAT BASE YEAR ONCE ALL PARTIES AGREE THAT WE WANT TO DO THIS TAX ABATEMENT. AND THEN THE TAX ABATED IS ON THE NEW INVESTMENT OR INCREASED VALUE. SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LARGE SCALE IN EXPANSIONS OF, UM, MANUFACTURING FACILITIES, OR YOU HAVE A VACANT PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN, MIGHT HAVE BEEN AGRICULTURE.NOW WE'RE GOING TO PUT IN A STRIP CENTER. SO THAT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. AND THEN, UM, OF COURSE, THAT EQUALLY POTENTIALLY ELIGIBLE FOR ABATEMENT. SO WHAT DOES COUNCIL CONTROL? COUNCIL RETAINS DISCRETION OVER EVERY ABATEMENT AGREEMENT.
COUNCIL DETERMINES WHETHER TO GRANT AN ABATEMENT, HOW MUCH TO ABATE, HOW LONG THE ABATEMENT WILL LAST, WHETHER A PROJECT PROVIDES SUFFICIENT ECONOMIC BENEFIT, WHETHER MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE VARIED WHEN PERMITTED, AND WHETHER AN AGREEMENT SHOULD BE MODIFIED, CANCELLED, OR TERMINATED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE. SO ULTIMATELY, AS YOU KNOW, UM, ALL ABATEMENTS HAVE TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. COUNTY ALSO HAS THE SAME RESPONSIBILITY WITH THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT IF THEY FILE FOR A TAX PAYMENT WITH THE COUNTY.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND PROTECTION.
ABATEMENT IS PERFORMANCE BASED.
SO WITH ANY, UM, INCENTIVE, THEY MUST PERFORM AND MEET THE BENCHMARKS BEFORE WE GIVE THEM ANY TYPE OF INCENTIVE OR REIMBURSEMENT.
SO INVESTMENT AND TAXABLE VALUE ARE VERIFIED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT PROCESS BEING DEVELOPED. EMPLOYMENT COMMITMENTS ARE MONITORED.
UM, AGAIN, THEY HAVE TO SHOW THAT THEY HAVE HIRED THOSE 25 NEW QUALIFYING JOBS. COMPANIES MUST COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THEIR AGREEMENT.
NON-COMPLIANCE CAN RESULT IN CANCELLATION OR RECAPTURE OF ABATED TAXES, AND AGREEMENTS INCLUDE PROVISIONS TO PROTECT, PROTECT THE CITY'S INTERESTS.
SO, WITH WHAT WE HAVE PRESENTED TODAY WITH THE TWO, UM, TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES, THE GUIDELINES WILL ESTABLISH A CLEAR AND CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK, TARGET MEANINGFUL INVESTMENT AND JOB CREATION, SUPPORT STRATEGIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PROTECT THE EXISTING TAX BASE, AND PRESERVE COUNCIL'S DISCRETION. AND, UM, THIS IS, EVEN THOUGH IT IS A SORT OF HOUSEKEEPING ITEM BECAUSE WE'RE REQUIRED TO DO THIS EVERY TWO YEARS, I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION THAT, UM, TAX ABATEMENTS ACROSS THE STATE, AS FAR AS REQUESTS, HA- ARE TRENDING DOWN, UM, AND S- BUT IN ORDER TO KEEP THIS RELEVANT AND UP TO SPEED WITH EVERYTHING, WE HAVE NEW ABATEMENT GUIDELINES FOR Y'ALL TO CONSIDER. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, I DON'T SEE ANY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, AARON.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, UM, IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK? SO I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW ON AGENDA ITEM 68 AND 69. UH, IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK REGARDING EITHER OF THESE TWO AGENDA ITEMS? I SEE NONE, SO I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THESE AGENDA ITEMS AT 3:40 PM. UH, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.8, 6.9? SO MOVED.
I HAVE A MOTION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
AYE. ANY OPPOSED SAY NAY? I HEAR NONE. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE'LL NOW TAKE UP
[10. Resolution - City Council: Consider a resolution directing the City Manager to initiate the procedure outlined in Tex. Loc. Gov't Code Chapter 212, Subchapter E, to adopt a 90-Day moratorium on the acceptance, processing, and/or approval of any application for rezoning, building permits, or any request for annexation related to the development of large-scale data centers. ]
ITEM 6.10 TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO INITIATE THE PROCEDURE OUTLINED IN TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 212 SUBCHAPTER E TO ADOPT A 90-DAY MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE, PROCESSING, AND/OR APPROVAL OF ANY APPLICATION FOR REZONING BUILDING PERMITS OR ANY REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE-SCALE, UH, DATA CENTERS. AND I'M GONNA CALL ON OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO GIVE US A BRIEF OUTLINE OF THIS RESOLUTION AS, UH, IT WAS WORKED OUT, UH, BETWEEN MYSELF AND, UH, COUNCILMEMBERS HARRIS AND MARTINEZ GARCIA AND MR. SANDERS.BE- BE GLAD TO, MAYOR. AS YOU MENTIONED, THIS IS A RESOLUTION THAT'S SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEMBERS, UH, MARTINEZ GARCIA AND COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS. IT IS A, UM, IT STARTS THE PROCESS FOR CALLING A MORATORIUM UNDER CHAPTER 212 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF DATA CENTERS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF LUBBOCK, LARGE SCALE DATA CENTERS. THE RESOLUTION, UM, WILL REQUIRE THE CITY MANAGER TO DIRECT STAFF TO BEGIN THAT PROCESS, WHICH WOULD BE TO GO AHEAD AND PUT NOTICE IN THE NEWSPAPER FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH HAS TO BE 30 DAYS, UM, OUT. THERE HAS TO BE 30 DAYS NOTICE FOR THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING, THEN THERE'LL BE A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AFTER THAT, AND THEN THERE'LL BE A READING OF THE, UM, OF THE ACTUAL ORDINANCE THAT WOULD CALL FOR THE MORATORIUM ON, ON LARGE-SCALE DATA CENTERS.
THE RESOLUTION, UM, OTHER THAN STARTING THAT PROCESS, DEFINES LARGE-SCALE DATA CENTERS AS THOSE DATA CENTERS THAT ARE 75 MEGAWATTS
[01:20:02]
OR GREATER AS FAR AS CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICITY AND/OR CONSUMING 100,000 GALLONS OF WATER AT A PARTICULAR SITE, AND ALSO IS USED FOR, UM, DATA SERVERS, ET CETERA, THAT TYPE OF BUSINESS. UM, THE RESOLUTION ALSO REQUESTS A STAFF TO LOOK AT OUR ZONING, UM, CODE AND OUR UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE AND LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF AMENDING THE UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE ZONING CODE IF FOR DATA CENTERS, AND TO LOOK AT THINGS SUCH AS THE USE OF ELECTRICITY, THE USE OF WATER RESOURCES, WHAT TYPE OF BUILDING SETBACKS NEED TO BE THERE, SCREENING REQUIREMENTS, LANDSCAPING, NOISE IMPACT AND RESTRICTIONS, OUTDOOR LIGHTING, AIR QUALITY, AND DECOMMISSIONING, UM, DATA CENTERS. UM, IT ALSO DIRECTS THE CITY MANAGER TO RESEARCH AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING ANY OTHER TYPES OF ADDITIONAL ORDINANCE CHANGES THAT MIGHT BE NEEDED BASED ON THE IMPACT THAT DATA CENTERS MIGHT HAVE ON PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE OR OUR PUBLIC SERVICES. UM, HE WILL BE DIRECTED TO SCHEDULE A WORK SESSION, UM, WITHIN 90 DAYS OF, IF THE RESOLUTION IS PASSED WITHIN 90 DAYS, TO HAVE A WORK SESSION THAT WILL ALLOW FOR THE PRESENTATION OF RESEARCH FROM INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED EXPERTS REGARDING THE IM- THE IMPACT THAT DEVELOPMENT OF LOGICAL DATA CENTERS WILL HAVE ON HOUSING COSTS AND AVAILABILITY, PUBLIC ROADWAYS, PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY, AND POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION, UM, AND OF COURSE THE IMPACT ON WATER AND ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE. UM, AND THEN THE CITY MANAGER WILL INCLUDE IN THE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FOR THE 90TH TEXAS LEGISLATIVE SESSION AN ITEM FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES WITH THE LOCAL DELEGATION OF STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS, UM, REGARDING THE IMPACT LARGE SCALE DATA CENTERS COULD HAVE ON A MUNICIPALITY'S PUBLIC UTILITY RESOURCES AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THAT IS THE RESOLUTION. AS YOU MENTIONED, IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH MR. STEVEN SANDERS AS WELL, AND I BELIEVE HE WAS GIVEN A COPY OF IT WHO TO LOOK OVER, UM, AND THIS IS THE ONE THAT IS BEING SPONSORED BY, AS MENTIONED, BY COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ GARCIA AND COUNCILMEMBER HARRIS. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR CITY ATTORNEY? I DON'T SEE ANY. ALL RIGHT. WAIT, OKAY, MR. UH, COUNCILMAN COLLINS.
MR. WADE, COULD YOU, AND I THINK IT'S IN HERE, BUT LET ME CLARIFY THAT WE GO THROUGH, IF IF THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED TODAY, IT'S GOING TO TAKE ABOUT 90 DAYS, UH, TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS BEFORE THE COUNCIL COULD ACTUALLY DECLARE A 90-DAY MORATORIUM. IS THAT? THAT'S CORRECT. TH- THOSE, AND THAT PROCEDURE IS OUTLINED IN STATE STATUTE. YES, YOU ARE.
AND, AND UPON THE CONCLUSION OF THE 90 DAYS, THE COUNCIL AT ITS PREROGATIVE CAN EXTEND FOR ANOTHER 90 DAYS.
THAT THERE'S SOME PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AS WELL, BUT YES, YOU CAN EXTEND IT FOR ANOTHER 90 DAYS.
DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY FURTHER PUBLIC HEARINGS. IT DOESN'T, I MEAN, IT COULD BE CONSECUTIVE DAY.
START DAY CAN BE THE SAME DATE.
AND SO ESSENTIALLY THE OPTION OF 180 DAYS OF MORATORIUM IS, IS THE LIMIT OF OUR, UM, CAPACITY.
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? YOUR LIGHT NOT GO OUT? I PUSHED IT AGAIN, IT'S THERE YOU GO. A SLOW, A SLOW LIGHT. ALL RIGHT, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.1? SO MOVED.
OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. HARRIS, A SECOND FROM COUNCILWOMAN, UH, CHRISTY MARTINEZ-GARCIA. IS THERE DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? UH.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. UM, I HOPE THAT AS WE'VE GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS OVER THE LAST, UM, 30 DAYS, UH, HERE WITH THE COUNCIL, WE HAVE AND I HAVE CONVEYED TO THE PUBLIC, UM, A GREAT DESIRE TO PROTECT OUR COMMUNITY, TO PROTECT OUR RESOURCES FROM BEING OVERUSED, FROM BEING TAKEN AWAY FROM US, BEING USED IN A MANNER THAT WE WOULD NOT APPROVE OF, WHEN I TALK ABOUT WATER AND POWER. AND SO, AGAIN, I HOPE THAT WE'VE COMMUNICATED THAT, THAT I'VE COMMUNICATED THAT I AM ON THE SIDE OF PROTECTING OUR COMMUNITY.
WHEN I LOOK AT THIS ITEM IN SPECIFIC, UM, CONTEXT, I BECOME CONCERNED BECAUSE OF THE TIMELINE THAT MR. WADE JUST LAID OUT. WE HAVE 90 DAYS TO INITIATE A MORATORIUM. THAT PUTS US AT JANUARY 1. THE
[01:25:03]
MORATORIUM LASTS, OR ABOUT JANUARY 1, THAT MORATORIUM LASTS FOR 6 MONTHS AT ITS LIMIT, AND IT PUTS US AT THE END OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION.THE GOVERNOR HAS SAID THAT WE WANT TO STOP. HE HAS ORDERED A PAUSE TO DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT.
HE'S ORDERED ERCOT TO STUDY THE POWER NEEDS OF THE ENTIRE STATE, AND CAN WE, CAN THEY, UM, HANDLE ANY MORE OF THESE GREAT POWER, UH, NEEDS THAT THAT ARE COMING FROM DATA CENTERS, CORRECT? I FEEL LIKE OVER THE COURSE OF NOW TO THE END OF MAY, THE END OF THE SESSION, WE ARE GOING TO RECEIVE A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION. A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION ABOUT POWER REQUIREMENTS, A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION ABOUT WATER NEEDS, A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT THE STATE IS GOING TO REQUIRE DATA CENTERS TO DO.
BUT WE HAVE ONE TOOL. WE HAVE ONLY ONE TOOL, AND THAT'S THIS MORATORIUM.
AND IF WE EXERCISE THAT TOOL TODAY, COME JUNE, WE'RE OUT.
WE'RE OUT OF THE GAME. OUR COMMUNITY CAN NO LONGER SAY, WE WANT TO ADD A MORE MORATORIUM. WE DON'T HAVE THE INFORMATION TODAY THAT I THINK WE HAVE IN JUNE. I DON'T WANT YOU TO THINK THAT I'M NOT SUPPORTIVE OF A MOR- OF A MORATORIUM. I THINK IT'S A VALUABLE, VALUABLE TOOL THAT WE COULD USE IF THE INFORMATION THAT COMES OUT OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION IS NOT WHAT WE WANT. IF WE SEE SOMETHING COME OUT OF AUSTIN THAT WE DON'T LIKE, NOW WE HAVE A TOOL. WE CAN HAVE A POSTPONEMENT, BUT IF WE INITIATE IT TODAY, WHAT COMES OUT OF AUSTIN IN JUNE, WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER.
WE HAVE NO ABILITY TO CREATE A PAUSE. AND SO THAT'S MY CONCERN. IF WE UTILIZE THIS TOOL TODAY, WE END THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION, WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION THAT THE STATE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO APPLY AND GIVE TO US IN, IN DIRECTION OF DATA CENTERS, WHETHER THEY LIMIT OR EXPAND, WE DON'T KNOW, BUT WE HAVE USED OUR TOOL.
WE'VE USED THE ONE TOOL THAT WE MIGHT HAVE TO GIVE OURSELVES A PAUSE. AND SO MY VOTE, SO YOU UNDERSTAND IT, WHEN I SAY NO, IT'S NOT A NO TO DATA CENTERS. IT'S, I MEAN, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S NOT A NO TO A MORATORIUM. IT IS A NO.
LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS OUT OF THE LEGISLATION. IT'S NOT A NO TO A MORATORIUM. IT IS LEAVE THIS TOOL IN THE BOX UNTIL WE HAVE THE INFORMATION THAT WE NEED AND WHETHER WE SHOULD AND CAN BRING IT BACK TO USE. SO, I, I DON'T KNOW IF I EXPLAINED MYSELF WELL ENOUGH. I'VE TRIED TO CONVEY, YOU KNOW, AND I'M A PRACTICAL PERSON.
WHAT ARE, WHAT ARE THE TOOLS THAT I HAVE TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED RESULT? I THINK OUR DESIRED RESULT IS TO PROTECT OUR COMMUNITY. THIS IS A WONDERFUL, WONDERFUL TOOL, AND IF WE EXPEND IT TODAY, WE NO LONGER HAVE IT. AND SO PLEASE UNDERSTAND, THIS IS NOT A NO TO A MORATORIUM. THIS IS A LET'S LEAVE IT IN A BOX UNTIL WE CAN USE IT TO THE MOST EFFECTIVE NATURE, UH, THAT THAT WE HAVE. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO I HAD THE THE CHANCE TO SPEAK TO MR. SANDERS THIS MORNING, AND I WAS VERY GRATEFUL THAT WE HAD PLAYED PHONE TAG FOR A LITTLE WHILE, SO I WAS GRATEFUL TO GET TO ACTUALLY SPEAK TO HIM, AND AND I MADE MY KIND OF POSITION ON THIS CLEAR TO HIM AS WELL BEFORE SPEAKING TODAY, AND I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR ABOUT MY VOTE TODAY. YOU KNOW, I'M NOT ANTI-DATA CENTER, AND I'M NOT, THE VOTE THAT I WILL MAKE TODAY IS NOT ANTI-GROWTH. I AM PRO-LUBBOCK, AND I AM PRO-LUBBOCK'S RESOURCES, YOU KNOW, AND I BELIEVE THAT DATA CENTERS COULD BRING SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT AND OPPORTUNITY TO LUBBOCK IN THE FUTURE, BUT PROJECTS OF THIS SIZE CAN ALSO HAVE PRETTY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON OUR CITIZENS, UM, OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER RESOURCES, AND ESPECIALLY, I THINK MY BIGGEST CONCERN, OUR ELECTRICAL GRID AND THE STABILITY OF THAT GRID IN TEXAS. YOU KNOW, SO I BELIEVE A 90-DAY MORATORIUM KIND OF GIVES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT DUE DILIGENCE, TO ESTABLISH THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE, YOU KNOW, HAVE NOW PROVIDED TO PLANNING AND ZONING, AND THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO IMPLEMENT HERE IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK. AND THAT WAY, IN THE FUTURE, AFTER WE SEE WHAT OUR STATE LEGISLATURE DOES, AND POTENTIALLY A PROJECT MIGHT COME TO LUBBOCK, WE CAN EVALUATE TO SEE IF IT IS THE RIGHT PROJECT FOR LUBBOCK AND
[01:30:01]
OUR CITIZENS HERE. I DO WANT LUBBOCK TO BE OPEN TO BUSINESS, BUT NOT AT ANY COST. SO I WANT IT TO BE THE RIGHT PROJECT, IN THE RIGHT LOCATION, AND UNDER THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES THAT IT BENEFITS US HERE IN WEST TEXAS. SO FOR THAT, TODAY, I AM HAPPY TO SUPPORT THE 90-DAY MORATORIUM.YES, I ALSO WANT TO THANK YOU, MR. SANDERS AND SAVE LUBBOCK, FOR USING DEMOCRACY TO TRY TO GET THINGS DONE SO THE CITIZENS HAD SPOKEN BEFORE ONCE WE WAS AT THE CIVIC CENTER, WHERE OVER 600 PEOPLE CAME AND VOICED THEIR OPINIONS. YOU KNOW, LIKE 87 PEOPLE OR SOMETHING GOT UP AND SPOKE, AND THERE WAS ONLY ONE FOR IT. SO... I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU PERSONALLY FOR STEPPING OUT AND GETTING THIS DONE FOR THE PEOPLE, SO THE PEOPLE DO HAVE THE AN OPINION, OR AT LEAST THEY DO HAVE AN OPTION. AT LEAST THEY KNOW THAT EVEN US AS A COUNCIL ARE GOING BY THE LAW TO GET THIS DONE OR UNDONE, HOWEVER IT MAY GO, BUT HOPEFULLY IT'LL GO IN THE WAY THAT THE CITIZENS WANT IT TO GO. AND HOPEFULLY, I KNOW YOU ASKED FOR INDEPENDENT TO DO A STUDY, WHICH IS NEEDED, YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY IN THIS DAY AND TIME, YOU KNOW, ONE COULD SAY ONE THING, ONE COULD SAY SOMETHING ELSE.
SO, BUT I JUST WANT TO SAY I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE DOING, AND KEEP DOING IT, AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN SEE IT THROUGH, AND AND HOPEFULLY THE PUBLIC WILL BE PLEASED WITH WHAT WE DO DECIDE. THANK YOU.
COUNCILMAN. COUNCILMAN BRUEGEL.
I AM VERY EXCITED TO SEE NEW OPPORTUNITIES COME TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK TO DEVELOP OUR ECONOMY AND CONTINUE TO BRING IN REVENUE FOR ALL OF US IN THIS COMMUNITY.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE NEED TO DO THESE THINGS IN A METHODICAL AND THOUGHTFUL APPROACH, WHICH I THINK OUR COUNCIL HAS DONE A GOOD JOB OF DOING. I THINK THAT CONTINUES THIS PROCESS BY ADOPTING THIS 90-DAY MORATORIUM, WHICH WILL GIVE US ADDITIONAL TIME TO RECEIVE THAT FEEDBACK FROM THE STATE LEGISLATURE REGARDING THE PROPER APPROACH TO PERMITTING AND REGULATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE DATA CENTERS.
SO WITH THAT SAID, I WILL BE SUPPORTING THE 90-DAY MORATORIUM AS WELL.
ANYONE ELSE? UH, COUNCILMAN GREEN.
THANK YOU, AND UM, I WAS GONNA TELL EVERYBODY I APPRECIATE THEIR PERSPECTIVE, AND THAT'S, YOU KNOW, THAT'S A NICE THING THAT WE HAVE 7 DIFFERENT OPINIONS AND 7 DIFFERENT, UH, WAYS OF THINKING, AND THERE'S A COUPLE OF THINGS SAID THAT I HAVEN'T, UH, THOUGHT ABOUT, WHICH, UH, BUT DOESN'T CHANGE MY MIND.
I'M, UM, I'M NOT GONNA, I'M GONNA, UH, I WILL NOT BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF A MOR- MORATORIUM. UM, I WANT TO BE CLEAR TOO ABOUT WHY. OUR JOB AS CITY COUNCIL IS TO MANAGE THE RES- UH, MANAGE GROWTH RESPONSIBILITY RE- UH, RESPONSIBLY AND PROTECT OUR CITIZENS AND MAKE SURE THAT GROWTH, UH, BENEFITS THE TAXPAYERS OF LUBBOCK. SO OUR CITY, UH, STAFF RIGHT NOW IS ALREADY WORKING ON, UM, DEVELOPING STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USE FOR D- DATA CENTERS. UM, AND, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT DATA CENTERS. THEY USE A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY, AND THEN, UM, SOME THEY USED TO USE, UH, TECHNOLOGIES, COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, USE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF WATER.
BUT THE TECHNOLOGY HAS CHANGED.
MODERN DATA CENTERS HAVE MULTIPLE COOLING OPTIONS, INCLUDING CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS AND DRY COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, AND DRAMATICALLY REDUCE DIRECT WATER CONSUMPTION. SO IF IT THREATENS LUBBOCK'S WATER SUPPLY, WE SHOULDN'T APPROVE IT, AND WE WON'T APPROVE IT.
BUT IF A COMPANY CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT IT CAN OPERATE RESPONSIBLY, THEN LET'S LOOK AT IT. THE SAME THINGS APPLIES TO ELECTRICITY. THE LEGISLATURE HAS ALREADY ADDRESSED THE ENORMOUS ELECTRICITY DEMAND, UH, CREATED BY THESE FACILITIES THROUGH SENATE BILL 6. SO I DON'T, UH, BELIEVE THE ANSWER IS SIMPLY TO SHUT THE DOOR ON DATA CENTERS FOR BASICALLY 270 DAYS, WHEN YOU DO THE MATH. UM, WE NEED TO SET THE STANDARD, PROTECT THE GRID, PROTECT OUR WATER, AND PROTECT THE TAXPAYER, AND THEN LET THE PLA- PRIVATE SECTOR DETERMINE WHETHER IT CAN MEET THOSE STANDARDS. SO, THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS THAT NO ONE'S REALLY TALKING ABOUT, THAT DR.
[01:35:03]
WILSON, UH, TALKED ABOUT JUST A LITTLE BIT, IS WHY EVEN DO- WHY EVEN CONSIDER THE A DATA CENTER? BECAUSE OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE, UH, MULT- IF A MULTI-MILLION OR MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR DATA CENTER REPRESENTS POTENTIALLY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF NEW TAXABLE INVESTMENT COMING IN COMMU- IN THIS COMMUNITY, THAT'S A TRANSFORMATIONAL OPPORTUNITY.WE COULD REDO- WE COULD REDUCE ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES, EVERY ONE OF THEM. AND, AND, UH, IN DOING THAT, UH, WE COULD BUILD A DATA CENTER, WE COULD BUILD LAKE 7 WITH ALL OF OUR DRINKING WATER. WE CAN INVEST AND PAY, UH, POLICE, FIRE, STREETS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE. USING ECONOMIC GROWTH TO REDUCE THE P- THE PRESSURE ON OUR EXISTING TAXPAYERS, AND THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO DO. I WANT TO REDUCE THE PRE- THE BURDEN OFF OF THE TAXPAYERS. THE TAXPAYERS DESERVE TO HAVE, UH, NEW REVENUE COME IN THE CITY. I WANT OUR ECONOMY TO GROW, AND AND SO WE DON'T HAVE TO RAISE THE TAXES. I DON'T WANT TO S- SAY NEXT YEAR, LIKE WE DID THIS YEAR, WE'VE GOT TO RAISE YOUR TAXES BECAUSE WE DIDN'T GROW. THAT'S WHAT WE HAD TO DO THIS YEAR.
UM, SO I'M TELLING THE DATA CENTER INDUSTRY, BRING US A PROJECT, SO SHOW US THE TECHNOLOGY, SHOW US A WATER PLAN, SHOW US A POWER PLAN, SHOW US THE INVESTMENT, SHOW US WHAT IT DOES FOR THE TAXPAYERS OF LUBBOCK, THEN WE CAN MAKE THE DECISION.
THAT'S WHY I'M VOTING NO ON THE MORATORIUM.
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS? MAYOR, I CALL FOR THE VOTE.
WELL, I- I- I'VE GOT MY COMMENTS I WISH TO MAKE.
RESERVE MY COMMENTS FOR THE LAST, USUALLY. UH, FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO, UH, SAY A COUPLE OF THINGS. UM, LUBBOCK IS KIND OF UNIQUE IN MANY WAYS, UH, WHEN WE SEE HOW THINGS PLAY OUT AROUND THE COUNTRY, UH, AND PEOPLE, UH, TALK AT EACH OTHER BUT DON'T LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER. UM, THAT'S LED TO UNFORTUNATE RESULTS AND ACTUALLY PEOPLE NOT LISTENING TO ONE ANOTHER. AND I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT I LIVE IN A CITY AND A MAYOR OF A CITY WHERE WE DON'T DISCOUNT THE VOICES OF OTHER PEOPLE. UH, I COMMEND THIS GROUP FOR DOING THE WORK OF, UH, GETTING SIGNATURES ON A PETITION. THAT'S HARD TO DO, TO BRING THAT, UH, ISSUE FORWARD. UH, OF COURSE, I BELIEVE WE WERE ACTUALLY FOCUSING ON A LOT OF THOSE ISSUES IN OUR OWN WAY DURING THAT SAME TIME PERIOD.
UH, BUT LUBBOCK IS, UH, KIND OF UNIQUE, AND, UH, THE ABILITY TO SIT DOWN AND TALK WITH ONE ANOTHER AND LISTEN TO ONE ANOTHER AND TO TRY TO REACH AN AGREEMENT LIKE THIS, I THINK SHOWS HOW THE PROPER WAY, UH, FORWARD IN DEALING WITH ISSUES LIKE THIS THAT CAN OFTENTIMES BE CONTENTIOUS WITHOUT ANY, UH, GOOD RESOLUTION AT ALL. UM, YOU KNOW, NOTHING IN WHICH WE ARE DOING TODAY, I DON'T BELIEVE, IN PASSING THIS, UH, MORATORIUM IS GOING TO PREVENT ANY GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES FOR LUBBOCK. UH, LUBBOCK IS NOT ALONE IN FACING THIS ISSUE AND ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT GO WITH IT. EVERY CITY IS FACING IT. THE DATA CENTER INDUSTRY KNOWS WHAT THESE ISSUES ARE.
THEY KNOW THEY HAVE, UH, QUESTIONS THAT HAVE TO BE ANSWERED, AND THEY DO HAVE TO ANSWER THEM. UH, AS THIS PROCESS GOES FORWARD, UH, THE CITY WILL BE TAKING TIME FOR US TO DEVELOP OUR ORDINANCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT WE BELIEVE ARE PROPER LIMITS ON ANY FUTURE DATA CENTER.
BUT GIVEN THE NATURE OF BATCH ZERO AND ERCOT, NO ONE'S COMING TO LUBBOCK IN THE NEXT YEAR ANYWAY WITH A DATA CENTER. UH, YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BEEN APPROVED ALREADY, UH, IN THAT BATCH TO GET INTO LUBBOCK. SO WE'RE NOT SAYING NO TO ANY DATA CENTER, UH, REALLY, UH, THAT'S THAT I KNOW OF THAT WOULD BE OUT THERE WANTING TO COME TO LUBBOCK. UH, BUT WE ARE STAKING A POSITION THAT WE WANT TO WAIT FOR OUR LEGISLATORS AT THE STATE LEVEL TO GIVE SOME DIRECTION, TO GIVE SOME FURTHER GUIDANCE IN AREAS THAT ONLY THEY CAN GIVE GUIDANCE. WE CANNOT CONTROL THE ELECTRICAL PART OF THE COM- COMPONENT OF, UH, THIS. SO WE HAVE TO DEPEND ON THEM TO WORK SOME OF THESE ISSUES OUT. THEY WILL BE DOING SOME OF THE SAME THING, UH, THAT WE HAVE DONE. OUR, OUR GOVERNOR HAS CAUSED FOR A PAUSE. I DON'T THINK WE'RE SAYING NO TO GROWTH. I DON'T THINK, THINK WE'RE SAYING NO TO DEVELOPMENT. I DON'T THINK WE'RE SAYING NO TO TAX, UM, UH, BENEFITS. BUT THIS, LIKE ANYTHING, COMES WITH BENEFITS AND COSTS, AND IT GIVES US AN OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH BOTH OF THOSE IN. AND PART OF THE REASON, AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S, UH, MR. SANDERS AND I HAD TO WORK OUT, UM, IS HOW WE LISTEN TO EXPERTS THAT MIGHT BE ABLE TO ADDRESS US ON THE IMPACT
[01:40:03]
DATA CENTERS WILL HAVE. THAT'S BEEN A REAL ISSUE, I THINK, WITH THIS GROUP. UH, AND MY ISSUE WAS, WELL, WHO, WHO DO WE LISTEN TO? WHO ARE THE EXPERTS? AND OF COURSE, THERE WAS A LITTLE DISTRUST ON US APPOINTING THE EXPERTS.UH, AND SO I THINK WHAT WE WORKED OUT IS, AND I, THIS IS WHY I'M SAYING THIS TODAY, IF YOU'RE OUT THERE AND YOU'RE A QUALIFIED EXPERT TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THESE ASPECTS OF IMPACTS, UM, UH, THEN WE INVITE YOU, AND WE WILL BE PUBLISHING THE TIMELINE FOR THAT PRETTY SOON, BUT LOOK, UH, FOR THAT OPPORTUNITY TO COME AND ADDRESS US AS A WORKSHOP ON ANY OF THE IMPACTS. IT CAN BE THE IMPACTS IN GENERAL OR ANY SPECIFIC THING LIKE TRAFFIC, CONSTRUCTION, UH, ELECTRICITY, WATER, ANY OF THOSE, IF YOU ARE A QUALIFIED EXPERT, SIMPLY MEANS WE WISH YOU TO PROVIDE A CV WITH YOUR ANALYSIS, AND WE WILL HAVE AN OPEN HEARING WHERE WE CAN LISTEN, UH, TO YOU. WE'RE NOT DECIDING WHO COMES TO US TO SPEAK. WE'RE NOT PICKING THE PERSON. WE'RE OPENING IT UP TO THE PUBLIC TO COME TO US AND SPEAK AND ADDRESS THESE ISSUES SO WE CAN HAVE, UH, UH, SOME OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR THAT AS WELL. SO, UM, UH, AND AND OUR PLANNING AND ZONING IS WORKING METHODICALLY THROUGH THIS. THEY HAD A MEETING, THEY ASKED SOME GREAT QUESTIONS. UH, THEY'RE THEY'RE THINKING HARD ABOUT THIS A- AS WELL.
BUT I THINK THIS IS THE BEST WAY TO DO THIS THAT RESOLVES, I THINK, THE CONCERNS OF A LARGE PART OF OUR COMMUNITY AS THEY HAVE SPOKEN, UH, TO THEM. UH, TO SPEAKING TO MR. COLLINS, UH, O- OBJECTIONS HERE, THIS IS JUST A FINITE TOOL.
IT'S, IT'S NOT A LIMITLESS TOOL. AND, UH, WE, DURING THE TIME IN WHICH OUR LEGISLATORS ARE WORKING THROUGH THIS, WE WILL BE PUTTING A PAUSE AS WELL.
BUT HOPEFULLY BY THE TIME OUR LEGISLATURES IS THROUGH DEALING WITH THIS ISSUE AND RESEARCHING IT AT A MUCH HIGHER LEVEL THAN WE CAN, WE CAN BE READY AT THAT POINT TO MOVE PROPERLY, UH, FORWARD.
I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE WE WILL BE ABLE TO ADD TO THE SITUATION WITH 90 DAYS OR 180 DAYS AT THE END OF THIS THAT HASN'T ALREADY BEEN WORKED THROUGH, UH, IN THE NEXT, UM, 8, 9 MONTHS.
UH, SO THAT'S WHY I DON'T THINK THAT IS A, UM, I- I DON'T AGREE WITH HIM ON- ON HOW THIS WOULD, UH, WORK OUT. SO, UM, UH, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? OKAY, UH, COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ GARCIA.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. AS YOU ALL KNOW, I'VE SPOKEN ON THIS SUBJECT EVERY TIME, BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO OUR CITIZENS, AND I THINK THAT THE DECISION MADE WITH THIS VOTE WILL LET PEOPLE KNOW WHERE WE STAND, AND UM, I'M NOT GONNA GET LONG-WINDED ABOUT IT. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT WE ARE LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE AND THAT WE HAVE REALIZED THAT, YES, WE ALL WANT TO PROFIT, BUT THERE'S NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION ABOUT THIS YET, AND THIS TIME WE PUT PEOPLE OVER THAT PROFIT. I'VE SAID IT TIME AND TIME AGAIN, AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO THE NECESSARY WORK.
WE'VE GOT PLANNING AND ZONING, ZONING DOING THEIR PART. THANK YOU TO THAT COMMITTEE. THANK YOU TO OUR STAFF THAT HAVE WORKED DILIGENTLY TO TRY TO FIND OUT EVERYTHING THAT WE CAN. I KNOW I PERSONALLY HAVE DONE SOME INTERVIEWS WITH OTHER CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS IN OTHER CITIES. IT IS NOT A EASY TOPIC, AND I HOPE THAT OUR COUNCIL CAN COME TOGETHER IN THE FUTURE AND CONTINUE TO BE ADVOCATES OF OF OUR CITIZENS. AND WITH THAT, I CALL FOR THE VOTE.
ALL RIGHT, QUESTION BEEN CALLED. UM, NO FURTHER DISCUSSION THEN. ALL IN FAVOR OF AGENDA ITEM 6.1.
UH, CAN WE BRING THIS UP SO WE CAN SEE THE VOTE? 6.10.
6.10. ALL RIGHT. OKAY, IF YOU, UH, VOTE ON THE 90, YOU'RE VOTING FOR THE 90-DAY, UH, MORATORIUM OR AGAINST IT. ALL RIGHT, THAT PASSES, UH, 5 TO 2. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL NOW TAKE UP
[11. Ordinance 1st Reading - City Secretary: Consider and take action on the petition-initiated ordinance, in accordance with Chapter 1, Article IV, Section 1 of the City of Lubbock Charter, establishing an "18-month moratorium on high-water-use and high-energy-use data centers in the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas."]
ITEM, UH, 6.11 TO CONSIDER AND TAKE ACTION ON A PETITION-INITIATED ORDINANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 1 OF THE LUBBOCK CITY COUNCIL CITY CHARTER ESTABLISHING 18-MONTH MORATORIUM ON HIGH WATER USE AND HIGH ENERGY USE DATA CENTERS IN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, LUBBOCK COUNTY, TEXAS. AND IS THERE ANY BRIEFING WE NEED TO RECEIVE ON THIS, MISS PAZ? NOT PARTICULARLY. THIS IS JUST THE NEXT STEP, UM, FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING YOU ALL HELD AT YOUR SEPTEMBER 8TH MEETING.AND EVEN THOUGH WE HAD THIS FOR THE DISCUSSION BEFOREHAND AND PASSED THAT 90 DAY, WE STILL HAVE TO HAVE YES, SIR.
YOU STILL HAVE TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS ITEM, UM, AS PART OF THE PROCESS.
BY LAW, IT HAS TO BE BROUGHT ON OUR AGENDA. SO I'LL NOW ASK IF THERE IS A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.11.
WE HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? THERE IS NO SECOND,
[01:45:05]
SO THAT MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF A SECOND. AND WITH THAT, WE ARE, I HAVE NOTHING F- WAIT, WAIT. EXCUSE ME, GOT ONE MORE ITEM HERE. FORGOT ABOUT THIS ONE. DONE. ALL[12. Resolution - City Manager: Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lubbock and the Canadian River Municipal Water Authority, defining expectations for development of the CRMWA II Project. ]
RIGHT. UH, ITEM 6.12. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ME TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK AND THE CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY, DEFINING EXPECTATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CRIMWA CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY 2 PROJECT. UH, MR. RAHINO.ALL RIGHT, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, GOOD TO BE WITH YOU. THIS LAST ITEM, UH, I'LL TRY TO GO THROUGH IT BRIEFLY. UM, THIS IS NOT A NEW ITEM TO THE COUNCIL, BUT UH, NONETHELESS, I WANTED TO BRING IT TO YOU, UH, FOR ACTION TODAY. UM, THIS IS ITEM NUMBER 6.12, AND IS ACTUALLY A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, THE MEMBER CITIES OF CRIMWA, AND THE CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY, UH, RELATED TO CRIMWA 2. SO I'M GONNA START OUT BY GIVING A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON CRIMWA IN GENERAL, UH, THEN WE'LL GET INTO, UH, KIND OF WATER SUPPLY TODAY, THEN GET INTO THE ACTUAL CRIMWA 2 PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE MOU. UH, SO JUST BRIEFLY, WHAT, WHAT IS CRIMWA? UH, CRIMWA IS THE CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHORITY, UH, CREATED BY THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE IN 1953 TO PROVIDE A DEPENDABLE LONG-TERM WATER SOURCE FOR WEST TEXAS CITIES AS WELL AS PANHANDLE CITIES. UM, CRIMWA IS GOVERNED BY A 17-MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS, UH, APPOINTED BY THE MEMBER CITIES. UH, THERE'S 11 MEMBER CITIES.
UH, IT'S ACTUALLY A, A MR. JIM COLLINS AND MR. JAY HOUSE THAT REPRESENT US ON THAT AND HAVE FOR SOME TIME. THEY HAVE QUITE A BIT OF SENIORITY ON THAT BOARD. UH, THERE'S A TOTAL OF 11 MEMBER CITIES, AND OF THAT, UH, SHARE OF WATER, LUBBOCK HAS 37.67% OF THE WATER SUPPLY, AND IT ACTUALLY MAKES UP 2 OF OUR 4 WATER SUPPLIES WITH THE JOHN C. WILLIAMS WELLFIELD AND LAKE MEREDITH.
AND AGAIN, THAT GENERATES ABOUT 33.9 MILLION GALLONS A DAY OF OUR AVAILABLE 71.35 MILLION GALLONS A DAY. THIS IS JUST A MAP KIND OF OVERLAYING THE, THE 11 MEMBER CITIES. OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, THE WATER SUPPLY IS NORTH OF AMARILLO IN THE ROBERTS COUNTY WELLFIELD, LAKE MEREDITH WEST OF BORGER, AND THERE'S THE PIPELINE IN BLUE, AS WELL AS THE VARIOUS MEMBER CITIES. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE WATER THAT COMES TO LUBBOCK, WE ACTUALLY TREAT FOR THE SURROUNDING CITIES, INCLUDING LEVELLAND, BROWNFIELD, SLATON, TOHOKA, O'DONNELL, AND LAMESA. WE BILL THEM FOR THAT. OBVIOUSLY, THEY ALSO PAY A CAPITAL COST FOR THE NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELATED TO THEIR TREATMENT. A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON CRIMWA 2. TH- THIS IS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN IN THE WORKS FOR A WHILE. UM, I THINK ONE, UH, PARTICULAR EVENT THAT OCCURRED BACK IN 2012 REALLY BEGAN ACTIVE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT CRIMWA 2, AND THAT'S WHEN ACTUALLY CRIM- CRIMWA STARTED WORKING ON THE PROJECT TO DO ACQUISITION. UH, BUT CRIMWA 2 IS BASICALLY, UM, IT'S A 70 MILE PIPELINE, UH, BE A SECOND, UH, WELL FIELD IN ROBERTS COUNTY, AND REALLY WHAT GENERATED THAT DISCUSSION BACK IN 2012 WHEN DISCUSSIONS BEGAN WAS THE DROUGHT OF RECORD THAT WE HAVE FOR ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF BETWEEN 2012 AND 2013. UH, OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, LAKE MEREDITH BECAME TO A POINT WHERE WE, IT, IT GOT DEPLETED PRETTY SIGNIFICANTLY.
FORTUNATELY, IT'S BACK, AND IT MAKES UP ABOUT 25% OF CRIMWA TODAY, UH, BUT NONETHELESS, IT, UH, IT REALLY CAUSED ALL THE CITIES TO TAKE A SECOND LOOK AND REALLY BEGIN MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT. UM, DISCUSSIONS BEGAN, PICKED UP PRETTY HEAVILY AT THE END OF LAST YEAR, AS YOU ALL KNOW, UH, WITH CRIMWA AND THE MEMBER CITIES TO REALLY DETERMINE A TIME FRAME FOR CRIMWA 2. UH, SO THERE WAS A SERIES OF MEETINGS EARLIER THIS YEAR THAT OCCURRED, THE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE MEMBER CITIES, CRIMWA, TO REALLY TRY TO COME UP WITH A TIMELINE OF, NUMBER ONE, WHAT, WHAT ARE THE NEEDS OUT THERE? UH, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, MANY CITIES HAVE OTHER WATER SOURCES OUTSIDE OF JUST CRIMWA, AND IT WAS A REALLY GOOD PLANNING SESSION, SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS, UM, AND ULTIMATELY WE LANDED ON, ON, ON THE MOU THAT I'M ABOUT TO GO OVER. BUT CRIMWA 2 WOULD BASICALLY TAKE OUR CAPACITY FROM 65 MILLION A DAY FROM THE WELL FIELD TO 112 MILLION GALLONS A DAY TOTAL FOR ALL THE MEMBER CITIES.
UH, THE PIPELINE THERE IN RED IS WHAT CRIMWA 2 WOULD BE. IT'D BE AN ADDITIONAL PIPELINE FROM THE NEW WELL FIELD IN ROBERTS COUNTY GOING TO THE AMARILLO AQUEDUCT, AND THEN THAT WOULD THEN COME DOWN TO THE CITY OF LUBBOCK AND THE OTHER CITIES IN THIS AREA AS WELL. UM, AS FAR AS WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, YOU HAVE AN MOU, UH, THAT THE CRIMWA BOARD VOTED ON THAT'S GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS OF GETTING APPROVED BY ALL THE MEMBER CITIES. UH, BUT I'M JUST GONNA HI- I'M GONNA HIT SOME HIGHLIGHTS.
YOU'VE GOT THE ENTIRETY OF THE MOU IN YOUR PACKET. I'M JUST GONNA HIT A FEW OF THE HIGHLIGHTS HERE.
[01:50:02]
THAT IT'S BENEFICIAL FOR CRIMWA AND THE MEMBER CITIES TO AGREE TO A DATE, UM, OF WHEN CRIMWA 2 IS EXPECTED TO COME ONLINE, HELP CITIES PLAN THEIR CURRENT WATER SUPPLIES, AS WELL AS PLAN FINANCIALLY, BECAUSE IT IT WILL BE A PRETTY BIG UNDERTAKING WHEN THAT TIME COMES. UH, FURTHER, IT AGREE, YOU KNOW, THE MEMBER CITIES AGREE THAT IT'S BENEFICIAL FOR CRIMWA AND THE IMPACT OF MEMBER CITIES TO PRIORITIZE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, UH, AHEAD OF CRIMWA 2. THIS IS ONE THAT THE CITY OF LUBBOCK TOOK A PRETTY STRONG STANCE ON IN THOSE DISCUSSIONS, AND THAT PRIOR TO BRINGING ON THAT SECOND SUPPLY, YOU REALLY NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE, A LOT OF WHICH WAS BUILT IN THE 1960S, IS GOOD, CAN HANDLE THAT ADDITIONAL SUPPLY.DOES US NO GOOD TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, 24 TO 32 MILLION GALLONS COMING TO LUBBOCK WITH THAT PIPELINE, UH, NOT BEING IN GOOD SHAPE. SO WE'RE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE'RE, THEY'RE LOOKING AT THAT. UH, THINGS ARE STILL GOOD. THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE PIPELINES ARE SECURE. SO THERE'S A LOT OF THAT, UH, THAT WILL BE BUILT INTO THEIR CAPITAL COST BEGINNING THIS YEAR INTO THE COMING YEARS AHEAD OF, UH, THE CRIMWA 2 PROJECT. UH, THE BIG TAKEAWAY TODAY WAS THE MEMBER CITIES AGREED THAT, UH, 2038 IS REALLY THE IDEAL TIME FOR THAT TIME THAT, UH, CRIMWA 2 SUPPLY TO COME ONLINE, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT WE WOULD, YOU KNOW, START ISSUING SIGNIFICANT DEBT.
CRIMWA WOULD START ISSUING SIGNIFICANT DEBT IN 2034 TO PAY FOR THAT, AND IT'D BE ABOUT A 5-YEAR PROJECT. SO TOWARDS THE END OF 2038 IS WHERE WE LANDED AFTER SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS, AND THAT'S WHAT'S BUILT INTO YOUR MOU. UM, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALSO UNDERSTOOD THIS IS A NON-BINDING MOU. UH, DROUGHT CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE, NEEDS CAN CHANGE. UH, I THINK THIS IS JUST MORE OF A STARTING POINT AS YOU HAVE TRANSITIONS IN BOARD MEMBERS, AS YOU HAVE TRANSITIONS IN COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR VARIOUS CITIES, UH, AS WELL AS STAFF. UH, THIS IS REALLY JUST KIND OF JUST CODIFIES WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
IT CAN CHANGE. UM, IT'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, IT'S GOING TO BE A TOPIC THAT WE, WE ALL AGREED WOULD NEED TO REMAIN IN THE FOREFRONT OF THE CRIM LAW BOARD AND THE MEMBER CITIES, SO SOMETHING WE WANT TO DISCUSS FORMALLY AT OUR, THAT THEY MEET QUARTERLY, BUT SOMETHING WE AGREED THAT WOULD BE DISCUSSED AT THE APRIL BOARD, AT EACH APRIL BOARD MEETING EACH YEAR TO CONTINUE DISCUSSIONS ACTIVE.
AND THAT LAST POINT I JUST MENTIONED, IT'S A NON-BINDING MOU, UM, AND AGAIN, THINGS CAN CHANGE, BUT RIGHT NOW THE, THE, THE COMMITMENT IS THAT WE WILL TARGET 2038. WE WILL TARGET DOING CAPITAL PROJECTS NOW AHEAD OF LAKES, AHEAD OF LAKE 07, CRIMAW 2, UM, AND THAT'S WHERE WE ARE. SO, ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, COMMENTS AS IT RELATES TO THE MOU? COUNCILMAN BRUEGEL.
THANK YOU, UH, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, SIR.
THANK YOU, ERIC. I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THIS TO US. UM, CAN YOU BREAK DOWN A LITTLE BIT OF THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE KERMAW 2 PROJECT? I KNOW THAT'S A BIG QUESTION, BUT JUST IN SIMPLE TERMS. YEAH, SURE. UH, SO IT'S A BIG PROJECT. UH, ONE THING THAT I'M GONNA GO BACK TO THE TIMELINE, 2038, UH, IT WOULD BE ONLINE, 2034, THAT'S WHEN THEY WOULD BE GOING TO THE MEMBER CITIES, THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, FOR THE SIGNIFICANT DEBT ISSUANCE. 2032 IS WHEN WE'RE PLANNING TO HAVE LAKE 7 ONLINE, AND WE'LL BE, YOU KNOW, PRETTY MUCH WELL UNDERWAY WITH THAT AND COMPLETED WITH THAT PROJECT. UH, THE IMPACT AS FAR AS TOTALITY FOR THE PROJECT, PREMOIS 2, IS 1.11 BILLION DOLLARS.
LUBBOCK'S SHARE OF THAT WOULD BE ABOUT 414 MILLION DOLLARS. YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE LAKE ALLEN HENRY DEBT FALLING OFF IN 28, 29.
YOU DO HAVE CRIMWA, I'M SORRY, YOU DO HAVE LAKE 7 DEBT COMING ONLINE, BUT THIS WOULD, THIS DEBT WOULD NOT BEGIN COMING ONLINE UNTIL LAKE 7 IS FULLY BUILT INTO THE RATES.
AND WE DON'T HAVE TO ISSUE THE BONDING FOR ALL THAT 1.1 BILLION DOLLARS ALL AT ONCE, DO WE? CORRECT, IT WON'T BE NEEDED ALL AT ONCE.
THEY WOULD WANT A COMMITMENT, OBVIOUSLY, FROM THE CITIES AT THAT TIME, BUT IT WOULD BE ISSUED AS NEEDED.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IT JUST GOES TO SHOW YOU WE ALL KNOW HOW IMPORTANT WATER IS, SO, YOU KNOW, APPRECIATE IT. UH, COUNCILWOMAN MARTINEZ GARCIA.
THANK YOU, ERIC, FOR REPORTING.
I JUST WANT TO EMPHASIZE TO OUR CITIZENS THAT LUBBOCK HAS BEEN VERY PROACTIVE. WE HAVE IN, UH, MR. HOUSE AND MR. COLLINS, TWO AMAZING REPRESENTATIVES. I'VE GOT TO WATCH THEM IN ACTION AND VERY, UM, ON POINT FOR OUR CITY, BUT EVEN MORE SO OUR CITY MANAGER, UM, WHO'S NOT HERE BECAUSE HE IS, UM, HAVING SOME PROCEDURES DONE, BUT HE HAS REALLY BEEN ON TOP OF THIS, AND WE'VE BEEN, THIS CITY OF LUBBOCK HAS BEEN VERY PROACTIVE, AND I THINK KNOWING, I THINK FOR THE, THE CITIZENS, WE SHOULD FEEL VERY GOOD ABOUT THE DIRECTION THAT WE'RE GOING.
SO A LOT OF POSITIVE THINGS, AND I JUST WANTED TO EMPHASIZE THAT, AND ALSO THANK YOU TO YOU AND, AND THE REST OF THE STAFF FOR REALLY PUTTING THIS, UM, AS A PRIORITY FOR OUR CITIZENS. THANK YOU FOR THAT.
ALL RIGHT, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. RAHINO? ALL RIGHT, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 6.12? SO MOVED. HAVE A MOTION? HAVE A SECOND? ALL RIGHT, ANY FURTHER
[01:55:01]
DISCUSSION? I SEE NONE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED, SAY NAY. I HEAR NONE.WITH THAT, WE'VE EXHAUSTED ALL ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA. THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.